PDA

View Full Version : Citizenship for sale: Foreign investors flock to U.S.



coyotes_geek
06-11-2012, 08:11 AM
CG: Saw this and found it interesting. Kind of a stark contrast when you take into account that we're deporting people at record rates these days.

**********************

Citizenship for sale: Foreign investors flock to U.S. (http://money.cnn.com/2012/06/11/news/economy/citizenship-foreign-investment/index.htm?iid=HP_LN)

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Good riddance, Eduardo.

Facebook co-founder Eduardo Saverin drew public ire last month following the revelation that he had renounced his U.S. citizenship, a move widely seen as a tax dodge. But thousands of wealthy foreigners are lining up to replace him, making investments here and putting themselves on a path to citizenship in the process.

The State Department expects to issue over 6,000 "investor visas" in the current fiscal year, which would be an all-time record. Other countries, meanwhile, are following the U.S.'s lead, keen to spur growth in lean economic times.

"Our goal is certainly job creation, and that's what this program is all about," said Bill Wright, a spokesman for U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. "At the same time, it's allowing somebody from a foreign country to come and invest in our nation."

Under the government's EB-5 Immigrant Investor program, foreign investors can get conditional visas that allow them and their families to live, work and attend school in the U.S. To qualify for the visa, they must invest at least $1 million in a new or recently created business, or $500,000 for businesses in rural or high-unemployment areas.

The investment must be demonstrated to have created or preserved at least 10 full-time jobs for U.S. workers within two years. Assuming this condition is met, investors and their families graduate to permanent resident status, and can apply for full citizenship three years later.

While the EB-5 program has been around since 1990, demand has been surging as of late, fueled in large part by China's growing elite, who accounted for 70% of the roughly 3,500 investor visas issued last year. State Department officials expect the program's quota of 10,000 visas per year, which includes visas given to the spouses and children of investors, to be filled for the first time ever within the next year or two.

Some critics of the U.S. program question the fairness of letting wealthy immigrants pay for special treatment, while others say investments and job creation claims need stricter vetting. Immigrants who arrive via the program have no guarantee of recovering their investments, and may face deportation if they don't produce the required number of jobs.

Of the roughly 12,000 immigrants who've arrived on the EB-5 investor visa, just 39% have earned permanent residency, according to USCIS data.

There's also the lengthy application and approval process -- a 2005 study by the Government Accountability Office said the program's reputation for red tape had dampened interest among foreigners in the preceding years.

USCIS press secretary Christopher Bentley said in an email that the agency "continues to take steps to enhance [the EB-5 program's] efficiency and integrity." USCIS recently expanded the team of analysts responsible for evaluating EB-5 projects and proposals, he said.

Whatever the program's problems, interest has been growing in recent years, and meanwhile, the U.S. has faced increasing competition from other countries trying to woo well-heeled foreigners with the promise of residency or citizenship.

In January, Ireland announced a new residency program for immigrant investors, and Australia unveiled a similar program last month.

"Governments are reinvigorating their policy and their resources around this," said Eric Major, the CEO of Henley & Partners Ltd, an international consulting firm based on the European island of Jersey that specializes in immigration assistance for the wealthy.

Around 20 countries currently offer residency or citizenship by investment, Major said, a figure that may soon grow with economies struggling in much of the developed world. Major said he had met with five governments in the past eight months to discuss such programs.

Demand shows no sign of slowing down, either. International travel, banking and communication have become increasingly easy, while Asia, in particular, is minting new millionaires at a rapid pace.

"At no time in human history have we ever been so mobile and has there been so great a wealth effect from China and India," Major said.

In the U.S., the immigrant investor program has been responsible for at least 46,810 jobs and more than $2.3 billion in investments since its inception in 1990, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

That's a small fraction of overall foreign investment in the U.S., but it comes at no cost to the government. Were the EB-5 program to meet its 10,000-visa quota, it would contribute more than $4.4 billion to GDP and create or preserve nearly 75,000 jobs annually, according to a 2010 report prepared for the government by consulting firm ICF International.

The EB-5 program is up for renewal in the fall, and while USCIS says it has "no indication" that the initiative will be allowed to expire, some supporters are more wary.

"We can't let our guard down," said David Andersson, an immigration attorney and president of the Association to Invest In the USA. "The deadline approaches and Congress just demonstrates a reluctance to get things done."

For foreign investors, Andersson said, the main appeal of immigration to the U.S. is access to good schools for their children or other family-related concerns.

That was the case for Jordan Gagner, a Canadian investment manager who came with with his wife and three children to Arizona in 2009. His wife had come down with a serious case of rheumatoid arthritis, a condition exacerbated by Vancouver's cold, wet weather.

"We just thought, we've got to get down to a climate that's more conducive to this disease," Gagner said.

Gagner invested in an assisted-living complex being constructed in Washington. He and his family now have green cards giving them permanent resident status, and plan on applying for citizenship as soon as they're able.

"We're fiercely proud about Canada, but there's things we love about the U.S. that Canada just doesn't provide," Gagner said.

boutons_deux
06-11-2012, 08:23 AM
Woman allegedly helped wealthy foreigners commit visa fraud


Federal authorities charged a Laredo woman in San Antonio with using fraud to help Mexican entrepreneurs get visas that let them live in the United States.

A federal indictment unsealed Wednesday charges Emilia Diaz, 41, who runs a financial and immigration services business in Laredo, with conspiracy to commit visa fraud and two counts of visa fraud. It states she provided fraudulent paperwork to the State Department in an effort to get “E” series visas for at least 14 clients between November 2006 and February of this year.

Prosecutors also seek a judgment against Diaz of $250,000.

E-1 and E-2 visas give residency leading to citizenship to Mexicans who are involved in trade or “substantially” invest in certain types of U.S. businesses, renewable every three to five years.

The indictment states Diaz included fraudulent tax forms and false information on businesses and employees on visa applications. It was not clear how many of the clients, identified only by initials, entered the country before the State Department caught on.

Diaz pleaded not guilty and was released on $3,000 bail.

On one application, she claimed the applicant would be starting a business and staying at an address that turned out to be the location of her own business, EG Professional Services in Laredo, the indictment said.

http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/local_news/article/Woman-allegedly-helped-wealthy-foreigners-commit-3371897.php

ElNono
06-11-2012, 05:56 PM
So, US citizenship costs $2 millions for the 4 years "fasttrak" version...

Th'Pusher
06-11-2012, 06:21 PM
Related, but with a slightly different spin

http://www.economist.com/node/21556579

Visas for entrepreneurs
Let the job-creators in
America’s government should give more visas to people with ideas
Jun 9th 2012 | from the print edition


BOTH political parties in America claim to love entrepreneurs. Barack Obama waxes lyrical about “a society that empowers the inventor and the innovator; where men and women can take a chance on a dream.” Mitt Romney, who once started a company himself, says much the same. Yet America’s immigration system is strangely unwelcoming to foreign entrepreneurs, even as other nations roll out the red carpet.

For plenty of historical and cultural reasons, the home of Hollywood and Silicon Valley is frequently still the first choice for people who want to start a business. But not at any price. The tale of Claudio Carnino, a young Italian who wanted to create games for mobile phones that other firms could then use to advertise their products, is fairly typical. Investors in Rhode Island were willing to back him, but only if he could stay in the country. Mr Carnino discovered that he was likely to be refused a visa, and that even if he got one, he would face a long wait—in which case his games would probably be out of date before he got it. So he took his idea to Chile instead. He was granted a visa in two weeks, and is now on his second start-up, running a firm called FanChimp that helps companies find new customers through Facebook.

Chile is one of several countries to have made a big effort to attract entrepreneurs (see article). Britain offers visas to people with promising ideas who attract £50,000 ($77,000) of venture capital to back them. Singapore requires an investment of only $40,000. New Zealand demands no specific sum, but grants permanent residency after two years if the business is “beneficial to New Zealand”. Chile vets business plans and gives the best ones $40,000 without taking any equity in return. America, by contrast, has no specific visa for start-ups. It does give visas to investors, but the terms are so tough—applicants must typically put up $1m—that the annual quota of 10,000 such visas often goes unfilled.

No immigration system is perfect. All must juggle competing interests. Some citizens simply dislike foreigners, and their views cannot be wished away. Some countries are crowded—though that does not stop Singapore from welcoming foreign talent. All countries, however, need entrepreneurs to create new businesses, new products and new jobs. And migrants are unusually likely to have the necessary get-up-and-go: 40% of Fortune 500 companies were founded by immigrants or their children. There is no easy way to spot the next Andy Grove or Vinod Khosla (the foreign-born co-founders of Intel and Sun Microsystems). But the costs of trying are negligible.

How much does it cost to stamp a passport?

Like governments elsewhere, America’s politicians are pretty lousy venture capitalists. But it seems a little odd, if a private investor wants to risk money on a new venture, for a government to strangle the business at birth simply because the founder is a foreigner. If the sum to be invested is above a certain minimum—say, $10,000, which is plenty for an online start-up—the entrepreneur should get a visa. And he or she should get it quickly. America often leaves would-be immigrants in limbo for years. Other countries, such as Canada and New Zealand, have streamlined and digitised the process. The country that gave the world McDonald’s should understand that speed matters.

There are fortunately other entrances to America for entrepreneurs: on student visas, as employees or, like Sergey Brin of Google, as children. But here, too, America is lagging. Relative to its population, Australia grants 13 times as many permanent visas on the basis of skills. It isn’t just the boost from China’s boom that explains why Oz is growing faster.

Wild Cobra
06-12-2012, 02:24 AM
Cool.

We need to accept people who are willing to contribute to the livelihood of others. legal immigration of wealthy means little chance of paying more in social programs, and gives the economy a boost in the process.

boutons_deux
06-12-2012, 03:07 AM
they buy US residency visas, not citizenship

I wonder how many, if any, are deported for failing to meet the requirements.

TeyshaBlue
06-12-2012, 09:53 AM
they buy US residency visas, not citizenship

I wonder how many, if any, are deported for failing to meet the requirements.

That's a good question. I wonder what the citizenship conversion rate is? Also, I wonder if that's a valid concern if they do indeed create jobs?

TDMVPDPOY
06-12-2012, 10:00 AM
even if you go through the legit way of applying, you still have to qualify to get in....whether its character and net assets....then u still have to wait in line like everyone else who go the legit way...

when the boat way is just as effective paying money up front and get smuggle in and wait in the camps to be processed