View Full Version : Chicago vs. Pittsburgh - The Dark Knight Rises?
scanry
08-14-2012, 09:22 PM
Now that we've all seen "The Rises", which city felt better?
I felt Chicago was much much better. Moreover I didn't see the reason why they moved away from Chicago in the first place. Was it due to tax incentives or for a change of venue?
I heard Steelers owner is one of the exec producer of the film? :wow
Trainwreck2100
08-14-2012, 11:27 PM
:cry gotham rouges jersey is $200
Buddy Holly
08-14-2012, 11:30 PM
Chicago was a better setting for Gotham. The New York/Gotham-esque density and building profiles with a grittiness that New York itself couldn't provide while Pittsburgh for the most part was blah, forgettable as a "Gotham" imo.
jaffies
08-14-2012, 11:32 PM
Chicago
lefty
08-15-2012, 12:15 AM
Wall Street :-)
Although I admit it was nice to see Raperburger and the other steelers getting shitted on by Bane
But TBH, they could have shot in New Orleans and it still would have turned out great
Jacob1983
08-15-2012, 01:01 AM
Rahm Emanuel probably said no because someone involved in The Dark Knight Rises ate at Chick Fil A or has stock in it.
Personally, I liked Chicago better. It had a better feel for Gotham City than Pittsburgh.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.