PDA

View Full Version : I want to see HARRY REID'S tax returns!



CosmicCowboy
08-15-2012, 01:09 PM
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/314025/how-did-harry-reid-get-rich-betsy-woodruff

Try this thought experiment. Imagine that someone grows up in poverty, works his way through law school by holding the night shift as a Capitol Hill policeman, and spends all but two years of his career as a public servant. Now imagine that this person’s current salary — and he’s at the top of his game — is $193,400. You probably wouldn’t expect him to have millions in stocks, bonds, and real estate.

But, surprise, he does, if he’s our Senate majority leader, whose net worth is between 3 and 10 million dollars, according to OpenSecrets.org. When Harry Reid entered the Nevada legislature in 1982, his net worth was listed as between $1 million and $1.5 million “or more,” according to the Las Vegas Review-Journal. So, since inquiring minds inquire, let’s try to figure out how Reid’s career in public service ended up being so lucrative. He hasn’t released his tax returns, which makes this an imperfect science, but looking at a few of his investments helps to show how he amassed his wealth.

In 2004, the senator made $700,000 off a land deal that was, to say the least, unorthodox. It started in 1998 when he bought a parcel of land with attorney Jay Brown, a close friend whose name has surfaced multiple times in organized-crime investigations and whom one retired FBI agent described as “always a person of interest.” Three years after the purchase, Reid transferred his portion of the property to Patrick Lane LLC, a holding company Brown controlled. But Reid kept putting the property on his financial disclosures, and when the company sold it in 2004, he profited from the deal — a deal on land that he didn’t technically own and that had nearly tripled in value in six years.

When his 2010 challenger Sharron Angle asked him in a debate how he had become so wealthy, he said, “I did a very good job investing.” Did he ever. On December 20, 2005, he invested $50,000 to $100,000 in the Dow Jones U.S. Energy Sector Fund (IYE), which closed that day at $29.15. The companies whose shares it held included ExxonMobil, ChevronTexaco, and ConocoPhillips. When he made a partial sale of his shares on August 19, 2008, during congressional recess, IYE closed at $41.82. Just a month later, on September 17, Reid was working to bring to the floor a bill that the Joint Committee on Taxation said would cost oil companies — including those in the fund — billions of dollars in taxes and regulatory fees. The bill passed a few days later, and by October 10, IYE’s shares had fallen by 42 percent, to $24.41, for a host of reasons. Savvy investing indeed.
Here’s another example: The Los Angeles Times reported in November 2006 that when Reid became Senate majority leader he committed to making earmark reform a priority, saying he’d work to keep congressmen from using federal dollars for pet projects in their districts. It was a good idea but an odd one for the senator to espouse. He had managed to get $18 million set aside to build a bridge across the Colorado River between Laughlin, Nev., and Bullhead City, Ariz., a project that wasn’t a priority for either state’s transportation agency. His ownership of 160 acres of land nearby that stood to appreciate considerably from the project had nothing to do with the decision, according to one of his aides. The property’s value has varied since then. On his financial-disclosure forms from 2006, it was valued at $250,000 to $500,000. Open Secrets now lists it as his most valuable asset, worth $1 million to $5 million as of 2010.

How Reid acquired that land is interesting, too. He put $10,000 into a pension fund his friend Clair Haycock controlled, to take over the 160-acre parcel at a price far below its assessed value. Six months later, Reid introduced legislation that would help Haycock’s industry, a move many observers said appeared to be a quid pro quo, though Reid and Haycock denied that the legislation was the result of a property deal.

We don’t know how much more money Reid has or how he made all of it. For that, we’d have to see his tax returns.

boutons_deux
08-15-2012, 01:16 PM
Insider trading by Congress was fully legal until the Repug-weakened STOCK act.

Plenty of poor Congressman, even REPUG ones, got wealthy (and lifetime health care) after a term or two in Congress.

Why single out Reid?

National Review :lol

The USA wants to see:

Gecko MA governor records (destroyed/secreted)

Gecko's Olympic records (destroyed/secreted)

Gecko's 10 years of tax returns.

boutons_deux
08-15-2012, 01:17 PM
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/314025/how-did-harry-reid-get-rich-betsy-woodruff

Try this thought experiment. Imagine that someone grows up in poverty, works his way through law school by holding the night shift as a Capitol Hill policeman, and spends all but two years of his career as a public servant. Now imagine that this person’s current salary — and he’s at the top of his game — is $193,400. You probably wouldn’t expect him to have millions in stocks, bonds, and real estate.

But, surprise, he does, if he’s our Senate majority leader, whose net worth is between 3 and 10 million dollars, according to OpenSecrets.org. When Harry Reid entered the Nevada legislature in 1982, his net worth was listed as between $1 million and $1.5 million “or more,” according to the Las Vegas Review-Journal. So, since inquiring minds inquire, let’s try to figure out how Reid’s career in public service ended up being so lucrative. He hasn’t released his tax returns, which makes this an imperfect science, but looking at a few of his investments helps to show how he amassed his wealth.

In 2004, the senator made $700,000 off a land deal that was, to say the least, unorthodox. It started in 1998 when he bought a parcel of land with attorney Jay Brown, a close friend whose name has surfaced multiple times in organized-crime investigations and whom one retired FBI agent described as “always a person of interest.” Three years after the purchase, Reid transferred his portion of the property to Patrick Lane LLC, a holding company Brown controlled. But Reid kept putting the property on his financial disclosures, and when the company sold it in 2004, he profited from the deal — a deal on land that he didn’t technically own and that had nearly tripled in value in six years.

When his 2010 challenger Sharron Angle asked him in a debate how he had become so wealthy, he said, “I did a very good job investing.” Did he ever. On December 20, 2005, he invested $50,000 to $100,000 in the Dow Jones U.S. Energy Sector Fund (IYE), which closed that day at $29.15. The companies whose shares it held included ExxonMobil, ChevronTexaco, and ConocoPhillips. When he made a partial sale of his shares on August 19, 2008, during congressional recess, IYE closed at $41.82. Just a month later, on September 17, Reid was working to bring to the floor a bill that the Joint Committee on Taxation said would cost oil companies — including those in the fund — billions of dollars in taxes and regulatory fees. The bill passed a few days later, and by October 10, IYE’s shares had fallen by 42 percent, to $24.41, for a host of reasons. Savvy investing indeed.
Here’s another example: The Los Angeles Times reported in November 2006 that when Reid became Senate majority leader he committed to making earmark reform a priority, saying he’d work to keep congressmen from using federal dollars for pet projects in their districts. It was a good idea but an odd one for the senator to espouse. He had managed to get $18 million set aside to build a bridge across the Colorado River between Laughlin, Nev., and Bullhead City, Ariz., a project that wasn’t a priority for either state’s transportation agency. His ownership of 160 acres of land nearby that stood to appreciate considerably from the project had nothing to do with the decision, according to one of his aides. The property’s value has varied since then. On his financial-disclosure forms from 2006, it was valued at $250,000 to $500,000. Open Secrets now lists it as his most valuable asset, worth $1 million to $5 million as of 2010.

How Reid acquired that land is interesting, too. He put $10,000 into a pension fund his friend Clair Haycock controlled, to take over the 160-acre parcel at a price far below its assessed value. Six months later, Reid introduced legislation that would help Haycock’s industry, a move many observers said appeared to be a quid pro quo, though Reid and Haycock denied that the legislation was the result of a property deal.

We don’t know how much more money Reid has or how he made all of it. For that, we’d have to see his tax returns.

Knowing the above, if true, already divulges more public data on Reid than we have on Gecko! :lol

ChumpDumper
08-15-2012, 03:39 PM
Sure, let's see his -- and Romney's -- and Rick Perry's.

Why not?

spurraider21
03-31-2015, 05:30 PM
Harry Reid is proud he lied about Mitt Romney's taxes (http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/harry-reid-is-proud-he-lied-about-mitt-romneys-taxes/article/2562300)


Harry Reid, D-Nev. has no regrets about his 2012 claims that then presidential candidate Mitt Romney paid no taxes for 10 years.

The outgoing Senate Minority Leader even bragged to CNN that the comments, which had been described as McCarthyism, helped keep Romney from winning the election.
"They can call it whatever they want. Romney didn't win did he?" Reid said during a wide-ranging interview (http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/31/politics/harry-reid-retirement-senate-legacy/).

So, in Reid's world, it is perfectly acceptable to make a defamatory charge against an opponent to damage his campaign.

Reid first made the accusation (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/31/harry-reid-romney-taxes_n_1724027.html) against the former Massachusetts governor in a 2012 interview with the Huffington Post. At the time, Reid claimed that a Bain Capital investor told him Romney didn't pay taxes for the previous 10 years. This, Reid claimed, was why Romney hadn't released his tax returns.

"He didn't pay taxes for 10 years!" Reid said. "Now, do I know that that's true? Well, I'm not certain, but obviously he can't release those tax returns. How would it look?"

A few days after the HuffPo interview, Reid made the same charge (http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CREC-2012-08-02/pdf/CREC-2012-08-02-pt1-PgS5901-5.pdf#page=1) on the Senate floor, this time claiming as fact that Romney paid no taxes.

"As we know, he has refused to release his tax returns. If a person coming before this body wanted to be a Cabinet officer, he couldn't be if he had the same refusal Mitt Romney does about tax returns," Reid said. "So the word is out that he has not paid any taxes for 10 years. Let him prove he has paid taxes, because he has not."

Even though Reid made a slanderous statement that Romney had in fact paid not taxes, without mentioning anything about his Bain source or skepticism, he cannot be sued for that particular statement. Article I, Section 6 of the Constitution states that members of Congress shall "be privileged from arrest during their attendance at the session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any speech or debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other place." The only exceptions to this rule are for treason, felonies and "breach of the peace."

After his floor speech, Reid made the claim again, except this time he again cited his "extremely credible source (http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-congress/2012/08/reid-extremely-credible-source-said-romney-didnt-pay-130987.html)" for the accusation.

So when Reid directly accused Romney of being a tax dodge, he did so from the safety of the Senate floor. Outside the protection of legislative immunity, Romney was only possibly a tax dodge.
Not only does Reid not think he did anything wrong, he's actually proud that his lies might have helped cost Romney the election.

Note: The Washington Post's fact checker gave Reid "4 Pinocchios (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/four-pinocchios-for-harry-reids-claim-about-mitt-romneys-taxes/2012/08/06/c31a1402-e007-11e1-8fc5-a7dcf1fc161d_blog.html)" for his claims. PolitiFact gave the claim a "pants on fire (http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/aug/06/harry-reid/harry-reid-says-anonymous-source-told-him-mitt-rom/)" rating.

FuzzyLumpkins
03-31-2015, 06:13 PM
:lol He is stepping down. Go after Schumer. He is just as easy of a target.

ElNono
03-31-2015, 10:08 PM
Dirty Harry always has been a terrible person and politician, tbh

Aztecfan03
03-31-2015, 11:47 PM
So, in Reid's world, it is perfectly acceptable to make a defamatory charge against an opponent to damage his campaign.

That fits most politicians, pundits, and reporters nowadays, but especially liberals.

boutons_deux
04-01-2015, 05:33 AM
Bishop Gecko CLEARLY, INARGUABLY has something to hide about his tax returns. and his Queen Anne said "You People" aren't going to get that info.

My guess he got caught in the Swiss tax evasion exposed by the whistleblower of 50K American tax evaders , took advantage of the IRS AMNESTY! (pay back taxes + interest, NO penalties, NO prison for tax evasion, and get the secrecy of NO name-and-shame (that's reserved for local low-level criminals in the 99% in the local newspapers, not for the 1%) )

And I bet his "tax bill" that he fudged up to under 15% included his property taxes, his sales taxes, every fucking little tax his accountants could come up with to tack onto his mythical income tax, and they still couldn't get to 15%. :lol

As the govt-hating Repugs say, tax avoidance and tax evasion are Patriotic. Repugs have killed 30K+ of IRS employees, just Repug fucking up everything they can.

All Repug Fuckups, All The Time.

And you right-wingnuts are offended by Reid outing, slandering Gecko as a tax evader? but were OK with, amused by wRepugs and Fox slandering Obama as birth certificate forger/liar, secret Muslim, non-Christian (aka "religious test" for office), etc, etc? :lol

TeyshaBlue
04-01-2015, 07:20 AM
lol @ clearly.
lol @ your guesses.

boutons_deux
04-01-2015, 08:16 AM
lol @ clearly.
lol @ your guesses.

yes, CLEARLY. Why do you think he repeatedly REFUSED to release his tax returns, O snarky Boutons stalker?

Wild Cobra
04-01-2015, 12:04 PM
What's new about a politician being dirty?

They are a protected class of people, except from each other.

TeyshaBlue
04-01-2015, 12:20 PM
yes, CLEARLY. Why do you think he repeatedly REFUSED to release his tax returns, O snarky Boutons stalker?

I didnt ask him and neither did you, delusional hack.

boutons_deux
04-01-2015, 01:12 PM
I didnt ask him and neither did you, delusional hack.

:lol coward!

TeyshaBlue
04-01-2015, 01:33 PM
Eat a bag of dicks, shithead.

Wild Cobra
04-01-2015, 03:13 PM
Gecko's 10 years of tax returns.

Gecko just was recently release from jail. Are you saying he had tax returns from jail?

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1027718/