PDA

View Full Version : Changes in CBA



Kori Ellis
06-24-2005, 09:07 PM
This was in an article that someone else posted in the NBA forum, but I posted it here because it's very relevant to stuff that will happen this summer.

If anyone doesn't understand one of the changes, just ask and someone on the board will explain it to you.

1. The salary cap will be set each year at 51% of Basketball Related Income (BRI), up from 48%. That means last years cap of 43.87M will go up to the 47-50M range this summer, once revenue increases are factored into the equation.
2. The players will be guaranteed a total of 57% of BRI each year, up from no guarantee.
3. The escrow tax on player salaries will gradually be reduced from 10% to 8% over the life of the agreement.
4. The escrow tax will only be retained by the owners to offset salary costs when total salaries exceed 57%, just like in the prior deal, but in the new deal that threshold will be raised if overall league revenues increase to certain preset levels.
5. There are no changes being made to the general cap exception mechanisms which allow teams to exceed the cap to add players, such as the Mid-level Exception, etc.
6. For teams over the cap, trades will be allowed as long as they trade away as much first-year salary as they receive within 25% (up from 15%) + $100,000.
7. Base-year compensation rules, for trades involving players who just received a sizable raise, will be relaxed in some as-yet-undisclosed fashion.
8. The luxury tax will stay as is (dollar-for-dollar on teams above the same 61% threshold), but all teams (including those who pay tax) under the new deal will receive a full share of the escrow and tax collections. (In the old deal, they received amounts that were reduced or eliminated entirely, according to their spending level.)
9. The salary cap and luxury tax exceptions for players who are deemed ‘permanently injured’ will begin after one year rather than two.
10. Luxury tax exceptions will be added in some form for minimum salary players.
11. Minimum salary levels will be increased by 3.5%.
12. The maximum length of a new contract will now be 6 years for a player who signs with his current team (down from 7), and 5 years for a player who signs with another team (down from 6).
13. The maximum raises on a new contract will now be 10.5% annually (not compounded) for a player who signs with his current team (down from 12.5%), and 8% for a player who signs with another team (down from 10%).
14. Teams will be required to have a minimum of 14 players (up from 11) under contract. Maximum? Undisclosed, but presumably will still be 15.
15. The active roster will still be limited to 12 players, but the designation for the others will now be ‘inactive’ rather than ‘injured.’
16. The NBA age limit will be 19, and/or one year past high school, based on calendar year. There is likely to be a related league rule implemented that prohibits NBA scouts and personnel from scouting any high school games.
17. The NBA Developmental League (NBDL) age limit will be 18, down from 20.
18. Teams will be able to send players with less than two years experience to the NBDL for needed development during the year, while still retaining full rights, with the ability to recall any such player at any time as desired. Such players will receive their full NBA pay.
19. Teams will be able to send an assistant coach to their associated NBDL team to work with and monitor the development of their players.
20. First-round picks will be given standard contracts with two years guaranteed (down from 3), followed by two years of team options (up from 1). The contract amounts will remain standardized.
21. Second-round picks will be restricted through three years, and will be limited to the MLE for the first year of a new deal if they become a free agent within the 3 years, allowing their original team to match any offer and retain them as long as they have their MLE available.
22. Players will be subject to as many as 4 random drug tests per year (up from 1), with penalties increasing for failing a test on a 4-strike system (5-10 games, 25 games, 1 year, lifetime).
23. Suspensions for on-court misbehavior will be subject to arbitration if the penalty exceeds 12 games (formerly there was no arbitration regardless of length).
24. A team will have 7 days to match an offer for a restricted free agent (down from 14).
25. This summer, teams will be given a one-time opportunity to waive one player and eliminate luxury tax on any future contractual payments to that player. The salary will still count towards the cap, and payment will still have to be paid to the player according to the contract, but the team will not be subject to tax on that player’s contract.
26. There will be a longer-than-usual July moratorium this summer, as the wording on the deal is hashed out, but summer leagues and negotiations with draft picks and free agents will be allowed to take place during that time without interruption. No new contract signings (including draft picks) can take place til the moratorium ends this summer.
27. More money will be added to pension payments for the long ago players, pending approval under IRS regulations.
28. New rules begin with the new season that starts July 1, 2005.

http://www.dallasbasketball.com/headline_C.asp?pr=

T Park
06-24-2005, 09:12 PM
This summer, teams will be given a one-time opportunity to waive one player and eliminate luxury tax on any future contractual payments to that player. The salary will still count towards the cap, and payment will still have to be paid to the player according to the contract, but the team will not be subject to tax on that player’s contract

Interesting.

You pay the guys, yet you cut em.

What is the use if you cut a guy but still pay him?!?

Kori Ellis
06-24-2005, 09:17 PM
Interesting.

You pay the guys, yet you cut em.

What is the use if you cut a guy but still pay him?!?

Even though you pay them, they aren't subject to the luxury tax. It will save some teams major money.

midgetonadonkey
06-24-2005, 09:19 PM
[QUOTE=Kori Ellis]17. The NBA Developmental League (NBDL) age limit will be 18, down from 20.

I wonder if this is the beginning of the eventual NBA minor league system. If they would have raised the minimum age of the NBA to 20, that would have made for a pretty good league.

shyne
06-24-2005, 09:21 PM
ya i heard thats what the mavs are fixing to do with Mike Finley

Gummi
06-24-2005, 09:21 PM
Allan Houston of the Knicks is being talked about in that rule change. So is Michael Finley. The Spurs don´t have anybody with a horrific contract like those two teams.

ceds
06-24-2005, 11:32 PM
18. Teams will be able to send players with less than two years experience to the NBDL for needed development during the year, while still retaining full rights, with the ability to recall any such player at any time as desired. Such players will receive their full NBA pay.

Dont you guys have the rights to a bunch of overseas players?

May as well bring em in to play in the NBDL

T Park
06-24-2005, 11:35 PM
The Spurs don´t have anybody with a horrific contract like those two teams.

at the worst is Nesterovic, but if the contract doesn't come off the books, fuck it, keep him around.

Gummi
06-24-2005, 11:39 PM
Yeah, it´s not a great one, but we could always trade him for someone else. Many teams are looking for a legit center.

Das Texan
06-25-2005, 12:03 AM
too bad that stupid rule allowing a traded player to return to the team that traded him via free agency after getting waived wasnt altered.


unless i missed it.

Aggie Hoopsfan
06-27-2005, 12:36 AM
They closed up the Gilbert Arenas loophole too...


Maybe it should be called the Carlos Boozer rule after the way Boozer, a restricted free agent last season, tempted the Cleveland Cavaliers into let him test the waters and then bolted to the Jazz while the Cavs sat by helplessly.

Currently teams that draft a player in the second round but don't sign him to a three-year contract risk losing the player via free agency if they are not under the cap.

This happened most recently with the Golden State Warriors when Gilbert Arenas got a huge offer from the Washington Wizards after his second season with the Warriors. Because the Warriors were over the cap, they were unable to match the deal.

The new agreement creates an exception for second-round picks. Teams can now match offers to second-round picks as long as the team still owns its mid-level exception. To make this rule work, the new agreement says that any team signing a second rounder to an offer sheet cannot offer more than the mid-level amount in the first year of the contract. However, after the first season of the contract, the player's salary can jump to the maximum allowable for a player with three or more years in the league.

So, to keep Arenas as an example, the Wizards would have been forced to offer Arenas $4.9 million in his first year. As long as the Warriors hadn't already spent their mid-level exception, they could have matched the Wizards offer and kept him under contract.

goliath
06-27-2005, 12:38 AM
at the worst is Nesterovic, but if the contract doesn't come off the books, fuck it, keep him around.


Plus I dont see Holt still having to pay Rasho 30 mil and him not being on the team

jochhejaam
06-28-2005, 05:56 AM
Even though you pay them, they aren't subject to the luxury tax. It will save some teams major money.

If another team picks up the player waived/cut are they responsible for the entirety of his salary or is that something they can work out with his former team, such as each team pays half?

Warlord23
06-28-2005, 06:31 AM
If another team picks up the player waived/cut are they responsible for the entirety of his salary or is that something they can work out with his former team, such as each team pays half?

I think in that case the player gets paid by both teams (Ain't that so, Kori/Timvp/AHF?).

So if Finley is waived by the Mavs, look for him to sign up with a contender for the MLE or less ... Dallas will foot his huge salary anyways

Rick Von Braun
06-28-2005, 07:09 AM
If another team picks up the player waived/cut are they responsible for the entirety of his salary or is that something they can work out with his former team, such as each team pays half? The new team will pay the waived player his salary based exclusively on the new contract. The player will still receive the money from his former team as if he were playing for them.

In this scenario, any money received by the waived player from a new team could be considered an extra bonus. This is the reason why it becomes attractive to hire players like Finley, Houston, et al. if they are waived by their respective teams to save money.

The teams save money by avoiding paying one-to-one dollar of luxury tax for the players' salary, teams still have to pony up the money for the remaining of the contract. For example, a team like Dallas still owes Michael Finley $52M in salary over the next 3 years. Since the Mavericks are way over the luxury tax threshold, they will have to pay $52M in luxury tax for Finley's salary over the next 3 years (in addition to the player's salary). By waiving/cutting the player now, Cuban still owes Finley the remaing of his contract, but he will avoid paying extra $52M in luxury tax. Cuban may be tempted to off load Finley to save money.

All teams with very high payrolls, which are deep into the luxury tax territory may be tempted to off load one big contract to save money.

FromWayDowntown
06-28-2005, 10:16 AM
One net effect of the new CBA should be more trades.

The relaxation of the rules for trading between teams that are over the cap (increasing the take-back from 15% +$100K to 25% + $100K) coupled with the relaxation of BYC rules makes it much easier, as a practical matter, to make deals.

The reduction in the maximum length of contracts and some of the protections concerning permanently injured players make it easier for teams to stomach trades, too.

Guru of Nothing
06-28-2005, 10:25 AM
I think several of the players who get cut will relax their demands quite a bit to sign with teams they think can challenge for a ring, and possibly get back at their former teams.

The rich will get richer. Specifically those without great depth - Detroit, Miami, Phoenix and Houston. I don't think the Spurs will attract a lot of attention, due to possible lack of playing time. On the flipside, this flood of free-agents into the market might make it easier to retain a Glenn Robinson.

boutons
06-28-2005, 10:35 AM
The $albatross clause really lets the worst franchises escape a bunch of luxury tax, while penalizing the the best managed/most frugal frachises (a smaller luxury tax pot to share).

And it's huge gift to the (usually underperformaing/over-the-hill/injury-diminished) $albatrosses as they get paid by 2 teams.

Is the $albatross clause a one-time deal or can a team use it repeatedly?

spurster
06-28-2005, 10:35 AM
The active roster will still be limited to 12 players, but the designation for the others will now be ‘inactive’ rather than ‘injured.’
No more creative writing to describe players on the "inactive" list.

Guru of Nothing
06-28-2005, 10:37 AM
No more creative writing to describe players on the "inactive" list.

And in other news, medical researchers discover cure for plantar fasciitis.

SWC Bonfire
06-28-2005, 10:38 AM
Left/right patellar tendonitis cases will drop 300%!

A good effort by the league to diminish this devastating injury. :lol

jochhejaam
06-28-2005, 04:50 PM
I think in that case the player gets paid by both teams (Ain't that so, Kori/Timvp/AHF?).

So if Finley is waived by the Mavs, look for him to sign up with a contender for the MLE or less ... Dallas will foot his huge salary anyways

Thanks and thanks to rickvanbraun too.

Rick Von Braun
06-28-2005, 04:59 PM
Thanks and thanks to rickvanbraun too. You are very welcome. I hope you stick around to provide us insight from the East Conference teams. I only have time to watch 30 to 40 games played by top East Coast teams during the regular season http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/images/smilies/smispin.gif

FromWayDowntown
06-28-2005, 06:18 PM
Just for the record, there is a suggestion in a FW Star-Telegram story on the Finley waiver (see here (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=20589)) that teams might be able to set-off some of what the waived player gets from another team, though that seems somewhat uncertain. Basically, I read it to suggest that if Finley signs with, say, Phoenix for something like the MLE (totally hypothetical, I don't know if PHX even has its MLE available), the Mavs might be able to further offset that amount in seeking some cap relief.