How Far Can Climate Change Go

[InRareForm]

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=how-far-can-climate-change-go

[Wild Cobra]

SA has become a science fiction magazine.

[scott]

Wild Cobra is the world's foremost scientist.

[Wild Cobra]

Wild Cobra is the world's foremost scientist.
Hardly. It's just Scientific American isn't what it used to be.

What ever happened to scientific skepticism?

[SnakeBoy]

SA has become a science fiction magazine.

Did you read the article?

[InRareForm]

SA has become a science fiction magazine.

I subscribe to SA. To say they are "science fiction" wouldn't be fair for all the great in depth articles they provide. Climate change and science is probably one of the few things where skepticism can be brought upon most notably.. I give you that. Great magazine nonetheless.

[Wild Cobra]

Did you read the article?
Yes, and shit like this is bothersome:

At present, humanity is altering the climate 5,000 times faster than the pace of the most rapid natural warming episode in our planet’s past.
No mention of the natural changes as well, the reader is left to assume only man is responsible.

[Wild Cobra]

I subscribe to SA. To say they are "science fiction" wouldn't be fair for all the great in depth articles they provide. Climate change and science is probably one of the few things where skepticism can be brought upon most notably.. I give you that. Great magazine nonetheless.
They have for the last several years I remember, never sided on the true science of being a skeptic first when it comes to global warming causes. Always the cheerleaders for the alarmist cult.

Is my viewpoint of that wrong?

[SnakeBoy]

Yes, and shit like this is bothersome:


I just see a little preview, do you have to subscribe to get the full article?

[DarrinS]

I just see a little preview, do you have to subscribe to get the full article?

That's what I was wondering.

[Drachen]

https://encrypted-tbn3.google.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRs5-j_V3j5a-rKJW0iBziTDEqXCECIvsjjIurvWzaToNcoyyzhaA

[Wild Cobra]

That's what I was wondering.
No, can't see the whole article. I thought that was it.

[boutons_deux]

It's all Hussein's fault

Rush Limbaugh Suggests Obama Manipulated Hurricane Predictions To Get GOP To Cancel Convention

http://thinkprogress.org/election/2012/08/27/752491/limbaugh-hurricane-isaac/

gecko/ryan/repug showtime will lose a lot of viewers and coverage to Isaac beating up New Orleans.

[DarrinS]

It's all Hussein's fault

Rush Limbaugh Suggests Obama Manipulated Hurricane Predictions To Get GOP To Cancel Convention

http://thinkprogress.org/election/2012/08/27/752491/limbaugh-hurricane-isaac/

gecko/ryan/repug showtime will lose a lot of viewers and coverage to Isaac beating up New Orleans.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tongue-in-cheek

[Fabbs]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tongue-in-cheek
Are you sure it was said by Limbaugh tongue-in-cheek?
Because it's not much of a stretch to believe Blowhard would spew such crap.

Or that his followers would believe it. :rollin

[DarrinS]

Are you sure it was said by Limbaugh tongue-in-cheek?


Hmmm. Let me think about it.

Yep, I'm sure.

[scott]

Hardly. It's just Scientific American isn't what it used to be.

What ever happened to scientific skepticism?

Being a dumbass is not the same as being a skeptic.

[ElNono]

Being a dumbass is not the same as being a skeptic.

http://www.threadbombing.com/data/media/2/1291342664746.gif

[Vici]

Being a dumbass is not the same as being a skeptic.

This. Amazing how people with absolutely no scientific background consider themselves such experts on subjects like Climate Change and Evolution.

[baseline bum]

Being a dumbass is not the same as being a skeptic.

http://i920.photobucket.com/albums/ad43/LascelleLegend/9760j4.gif

[boutons_deux]

This. Amazing how people with absolutely no scientific background consider themselves such experts on subjects like Climate Change and Evolution.

They invent their own reality matching the blind ideology.

[Agloco]

Being a dumbass is not the same as being a skeptic.

:lol

[MannyIsGod]

Being a dumbass is not the same as being a skeptic.


http://www.threadbombing.com/data/media/2/1291342664746.gif


http://i920.photobucket.com/albums/ad43/LascelleLegend/9760j4.gif

:lmao

[SnakeBoy]

Being a dumbass is not the same as being a skeptic.

http://www.my-youth-basketball-player.com/images/technical_foul.jpg

[Jacob1983]

Isn't bitching about climate change on the same level as bitching about abortion? Nothing is going to change so why bitch about it?

[SnakeBoy]

Isn't bitching about climate change on the same level as bitching about abortion? Nothing is going to change so why bitch about it?

Isn't bitching about people bitching about things the same as people bitching about things?

[Jacob1983]

Yep. Touche.

[Wild Cobra]

Being a dumbass is not the same as being a skeptic.
I see...

Are you saying you are a dumbass rather than a skeptic?

[Wild Cobra]

This. Amazing how people with absolutely no scientific background consider themselves such experts on subjects like Climate Change and Evolution.
It's amazing that people can't see that when an article states bullshit, there is reason not to believe the rest.