Ron Paul 2016, sons!

[Clipper Nation]

http://dougwead.wordpress.com/2012/09/06/post-paul-what-now/

Once Obama gets done screwing shit up, we'll be calling in the good doctor to prescribe the cure for what ails us, tbh....

[boutons_deux]

RP :lol

liberatarians :lol

"screwing shit up" : be specific

[Jacob1983]

Can you imagine Ron Paul in a presidential debate with Obama and Romney? It would be a fuckin' cakewalk. All he would have to do is say "well folks, Obama and Romney are basically the same person".

[Clipper Nation]

Dr. Paul exposing Obama's hypocrisy on civil liberties and foreign policy to the whole nation would be priceless, tbh....

[SA210]

Can you imagine Ron Paul in a presidential debate with Obama and Romney? It would be a fuckin' cakewalk. All he would have to do is say "well folks, Obama and Romney are basically the same person".

People can pretend laugh all they want about Ron Paul, but Obama would be scared SHITLESS to debate Ron Paul.

RP would tear him to frickin shreds like no debate the world has ever seen. This is fact. Not even Bill Clinton could help Obama if Obama had to debate Ron Paul one on one lol The media and the RNC made sure this wouldn't happen, and when it was clearly evident that the election was rigged the President never stood up for principles to say anything. He allowed it, because he would be OVER going against RP.

Ron Paul would make Obama break his own stuttering records. There would be a clear choice, VERY clear differences to show the American people. But Obama facing Romney, they can both muddy the waters and confuse the stupid population. Fact.

[coyotes_geek]

Ugh. I'm a fan on Ron Paul too, but let's not pretend that a debate between him and Obama and/or Romney would be received by the American public as anything more than "who's that cranky old white guy talking about things we don't understand"? So in that sense, even if he "destroyed" Obama & Romney he still loses. Not saying it's right, and I wish it were different, but that's how it is.

[cheguevara]

it's been seen before. Ron Paul debated Giuliani + Mcain which pretty much equate to Obama + Romney. He made them look foolish, someone please find the videos

[cheguevara]

wanna see what would happen with ObomneyBot?

fKO7BxNNhMk

:lmao :lmao

[Latarian Milton]

yeah then he'll make the record as the oldest guy to be elected president imho. i believe if RP got republican nomination this year, he would have a decent shot at beating obama, but the republicans ended up giving it to the mormon for some reason. republican primaries were rigged imho

[DMC]

The entire circus is just a fancier version of the Nigerian email scam.

[Edward]

Presidential debates in this country are decided 20% by substance and 80% by style. No matter how much Paul would win the substance part, he'd get dicked in the style area just like he did in the Republican primary debates.

[howbouthemspurs]

Will Ron Paul even be alive then? isnt he like 100?

[Jacob1983]

Ron Paul would hammer Obama on the Patriot Act, the NDAA, expanding the war in Afghanistan, drone attacks, and Gitmo. It would be fuckin' priceless. It's a shame that so many people are blind sheep in America.

[Clipper Nation]

Presidential debates in this country are decided 20% by substance and 80% by style. No matter how much Paul would win the substance part, he'd get dicked in the style area just like he did in the Republican primary debates.

The only area Paul got dicked in during the primaries was the "electronic vote-stealing machine" area, tbh....

[Edward]

The only area Paul got dicked in during the primaries was the "electronic vote-stealing machine" area, tbh....
That's in your eyes (and my eyes for that matter). In the eyes of the average Republican, he came across as a "Weird old guy you wouldn't wanna have a beer with."

[fevertrees]

It's a shame that so many people are blind sheep in America.

You mean like Ron Paul supporters TOO?

[Jacob1983]

At least Ron Paul supporters tend to be more educated about politics and the constitution. Can't say the same for Obamney supporters.

[Edward]

Except for the Ron Paul supporters who think the Constitution was written by anti-Federalists who want small government (which means most Ron Paul supporters).

[SA210]

wanna see what would happen with ObomneyBot?

fKO7BxNNhMk

:lmao :lmao

:lmao and that's a fellow neo-con, imagine if he debated Obama lol

[Jacob1983]

So you would rather have Obamney?

[Spurs da champs]

Will Ron Paul even be alive then? isnt he like 100?

He'll be dead & then Paul bots will be left with his sellout son.

[Edward]

So you would rather have Obamney?
My comment had nothing to do with Obama or Romney. It was about how Ron Paul supporters have just as much of, if not an even bigger delusion about the founding fathers and the constitution. The fact you brought up "Obamney" when it was irrelevant proves my point. Ron Paul supporters don't know the difference between the Constitution and the Articles of Confederation :lol

[Jacob1983]

You can shit on Ron Paul supporters if you want to do so but at least they know the facts unlike Obamney supporters. Obama koolaid drinkers think Obama is a rockstar and nothing like Bush while Willard lovers think Willard is the best thing ever and has never flip flopped on the issues. That sums it up.

[SnakeBoy]

zqXLoJbS1_E

[Edward]

:lol no, Ron Paul supporters don't know the facts. They think the constitution was written by anti-Federalists who wanted a small federal government :lol

[Jacob1983]

Yeah, I don't get it but you do whatever makes you happy. Vote for Obamney.

Again, you can shit on Ron Paul and his supporters but the man is a walking encyclopedia. He could be a history teacher with amount of shit that he knows.

Anyways, this is pointless. You like Obamney so that's that. Good luck with it.

[Edward]

You don't get it because you don't know the facts :lol

:lol a walking history book who doesn't know shit about the founding fathers

[DarrinS]

The libertarian tortch needs to be passed to someone who has more charisma than PeeWee Herman and someone who doesn't give 9/11 twoofers any credence.

Just sayin

[SA210]

http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/c12.0.403.403/p403x403/546005_236632079792398_2111533103_n.jpg

[SnakeBoy]

http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/c12.0.403.403/p403x403/546005_236632079792398_2111533103_n.jpg

:lol Cry baby loser paulbots.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-cJjqRt7kFxM/Tz_G4PJGoDI/AAAAAAAAB8A/SfUWTKWURzY/s1600/your-a-loser.jpg

[Wild Cobra]

:lol Cry baby loser paulbots.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-cJjqRt7kFxM/Tz_G4PJGoDI/AAAAAAAAB8A/SfUWTKWURzY/s1600/your-a-loser.jpg
I wouldn't call it crying, but voicing that changing the rules in the middle of the game is flat out unethical.

Do you condone such practices?

[Latarian Milton]

Ron Paul would hammer Obama on the Patriot Act, the NDAA, expanding the war in Afghanistan, drone attacks, and Gitmo. It would be fuckin' priceless. It's a shame that so many people are blind sheep in America.

agree and i've even thought obama & his supporters rigged the republican presidential primaries and purposefully made a mormon the presidential candidate who would never have a chance to beat obama

[boutons_deux]

I wouldn't call it crying, but voicing that changing the rules in the middle of the game is flat out unethical.

Do you condone such practices?

rules are REGULATIONS.

Repugs are flat out, relentlessly against ALL regulations, wanting to be trusted to Do The Right Thing.

And when the Repugs flaunt the rules and YOUR man is screwed, you still don't support rules and regulations, you TRUST the Repugs anyway.

Politics is down there in nastiness with untreated, untreatable venereal disease.

[Wild Cobra]

rules are REGULATIONS.

Repugs are flat out, relentlessly against ALL regulations, wanting to be trusted to Do The Right Thing.

And when the Repugs flaunt the rules and YOUR man is screwed, you still don't support rules and regulations, you TRUST the Repugs anyway.

Politics is down there in nastiness with untreated, untreatable venereal disease.
What about the demonrats proclamation of Jerusalem against their delegates wishes? They are both for themselves first and against the people. Why do you only pick on repugs?

[Edward]

The libertarian tortch needs to be passed to someone who has more charisma than PeeWee Herman and someone who doesn't give 9/11 twoofers any credence.

Just sayin
:tu

As long as the Libertarian Party is filled with tin-foil hatters who come up with a new government conspiracy every other day it'll never be taken seriously. If people like Alex Jones want Ron Paul to be president, the best thing they can do would be to stop giving him so much public support.

I have a family member who lets just say is a pretty big leader in the Libertarian movement and his/her friends are the most batshit people I've ever met in my life.

[Homeland Security]

Ron Paul will be 81 years old in 2016. Apparently Paulbots think he's the Lubavitcher Rebbe and will live eternally.

[Winehole23]

I laughed.

[Edward]

Ron Paul will be 81 years old in 2016. Apparently Paulbots think he's the Lubavitcher Rebbe and will live eternally.
:lmao

[SA210]

What about the demonrats proclamation of Jerusalem against their delegates wishes? They are both for themselves first and against the people. Why do you only pick on repugs?

yup, notice how it's crickets in that thread.

http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=202992

HmaE2Aez_XY

[Winehole23]

you were late to the party, so you can keep your sloppy seconds. we already had a thread on that.

[ChumpDumper]

yup, notice how it's crickets in that thread.

http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=202992

hmae2aez_xy


you were late to the party, so you can keep your sloppy seconds. We already had a thread on that.pwned!

[SA210]

you were late to the party, so you can keep your sloppy seconds. we already had a thread on that.

Nah, not on this particular comparison and news story. And you miss the point anyhow, It's about how BOTH sides are ok with clear and open corruption/election fraud and too afraid to admit it for fear of admitting to themselves that they are brainwashed and ignorantly argue over red/blue rather than truth. lol

Nice try though. :tu

[ChumpDumper]

Nah, not on this particular comparison and news story. And you miss the point anyhow, It's about how BOTH sides are ok with corruption. lol

Nice try though. :tuIt's already been noted and demonstrated without your help.

Nice fail, though. The whining helped. :tu

[Galileo]

Rand 2016!

[Clipper Nation]

Except for the Ron Paul supporters who think the Constitution was written by anti-Federalists who want small government (which means most Ron Paul supporters).
I'd suggest that you read Article I Section 8, Article II Section 2, and Article III Section 2 in the Constitution, B.... that clearly lists all the powers given to each branch of government, and nowhere does it give a blank check to any branch for inflating the size and scope of the government....

[Clipper Nation]

The libertarian tortch needs to be passed to someone who has more charisma than PeeWee Herman and someone who doesn't give 9/11 twoofers any credence.

Just sayin
Translation: :cry "I don't like Ron Paul because he won't lie to me and promise me more Baby Boomer handouts!" :cry

By the way, Paul disavows the 9/11 truther nonsense, tbh, as do plenty of Ron Paul supporters....

[SnakeBoy]

Rand 2016!

I would support Rand if/when he runs. He would have a real shot at getting the nomination. Don't think he has the personality to win in the general though.

[Clipper Nation]

Rand is a total and complete sellout, Paul Ryan 2.0 tbh... if you want a faux-libertarian neocon who supports drones and sanctions, by all means, vote Rand if he runs... if you want liberty, Rand is NOT your guy....

[SnakeBoy]

Rand is a total and complete sellout, Paul Ryan 2.0 tbh... if you want a faux-libertarian neocon who supports drones and sanctions, by all means, vote Rand if he runs... if you want liberty, Rand is NOT your guy....

:lol In other words, real libertarians only support completely bat shit crazy candidates.

[Jacob1983]

Again, you can shit on Ron Paul and his supporters but at least the man stands for something and actually seems sincere and wants to do good for people. That's rare in politics. Is Ron Paul perfect? No. Does he have all the answers? No. Could he solve every problem in America? No. With that being said, Ron Paul is one of the most consistent sincere politicians in America. That has to count for something.

And Romney supporters can laugh all they want but they will be the ones crying on election day when the majority of Ron Paul supporters vote for 3rd party candidates and basically give Obama a 4th term of Bush. :lol

[SA210]

And Romney supporters can laugh all they want but they will be the ones crying on election day when the majority of Ron Paul supporters vote for 3rd party candidates

This is true :lol

http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/375799_282499421850058_240084319_n.jpg

[Galileo]

Rand is a total and complete sellout, Paul Ryan 2.0 tbh... if you want a faux-libertarian neocon who supports drones and sanctions, by all means, vote Rand if he runs... if you want liberty, Rand is NOT your guy....

Mitt Romney sold out, if you are a neocon NWO establishment RINO, you are not allowed to accept an endorsement from Rand Paul.

:lmao

[Jacob1983]

So basically Ron Paul supporters will give Romney and Ryan a big fuck you by voting for Gary Johnson and keeping Romney out of the White House. That's their revenge.

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

I'd suggest that you read Article I Section 8, Article II Section 2, and Article III Section 2 in the Constitution, B.... that clearly lists all the powers given to each branch of government, and nowhere does it give a blank check to any branch for inflating the size and scope of the government....
You must not have read my post since I never said the constitution gives a blank check to any branch for inflating the size of government.

The constitution was intended to create a strong federal government with proper checks and balances. Ron Paul supporters don't seem to know the difference between the constitution and the articles of confederation.

Long live the confederacy!

[SA210]

http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc6/262966_463826706983900_909227243_n.jpg

[Clipper Nation]

You must not have read my post since I never said the constitution gives a blank check to any branch for inflating the size of government.

The constitution was intended to create a strong federal government with proper checks and balances. Ron Paul supporters don't seem to know the difference between the constitution and the articles of confederation.

Long live the confederacy!You clearly have no clue what Paul believes....

[SA210]

You clearly have no clue what Paul believes....

This is the case for just about every RP hater.

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

You clearly have no clue what Paul believes....
I wasn't talking about Paul. I was talking about Paul supporters. I like Ron Paul himself.

[SA210]

http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/394514_282504545182879_695307515_n.jpg

[ChumpDumper]

lol philosophies

lol 100 years

I guess they will be "studied" by cult members, so that much is true.

[Jacob1983]

Laugh it up all you want but Ron Paul supporters will be the ones laughing in the end. They will be laughing at Romney and his sheep and how they defeated him. Thank you. Romney has no chance.

[Wild Cobra]

Laugh it up all you want but Ron Paul supporters will be the ones laughing in the end. They will be laughing at Romney and his sheep and how they defeated him. Thank you. Romney has no chance.
Yes, I think it's safe to say that most Paul supporters would have voted for Romney. Now that they did this BS at the convention, I think most will not.

[Latarian Milton]

i think most americans who have at least basic college degrees will vote for the person that they believe can do something good to this country and that person ain't gonna be a mormon that romney is imho

[Clipper Nation]

Yes, I think it's safe to say that most Paul supporters would have voted for Romney.
Laughably wrong.... most Ron Paul supporters weren't going to vote for Willard even before the convention cheating, because of the primary/caucus cheating and the fact that he goes against our principles, tbh...

[Wild Cobra]

Laughably wrong.... most Ron Paul supporters weren't going to vote for Willard even before the convention cheating, because of the primary/caucus cheating and the fact that he goes against our principles, tbh...
I think otherwise. The lesser of two evils concept.

[Clipper Nation]

I think otherwise. The lesser of two evils concept.
You're assuming that the majority of Paul supporters are dumb enough to vote for evil under the pretense that he's "less evil" than the other guy (which is highly debatable), tbh.... which, for the record, we aren't....

[Jacob1983]

Ron Paul supporters will either vote for Gary Johnson, write in Ron Paul's name(it won't count in most states), or not vote at all.

[SA210]

Ron Paul supporters will either vote for Gary Johnson, write in Ron Paul's name(it won't count in most states), or not vote at all.

The day Romney loses, the only thing running through his mind will be the day he fucked over Ron Paul :lol

[Jacob1983]

Exactly.

[boutons_deux]

Paul pere et fils, both living in fantasy land

Flabbergasted Rand Paul Learns Public Employment Decreased Under Obama

PAUL: The thing I don’t understand is that you’re arguing that the government sector is struggling. Are you arguing that there are fewer government employees under Obama than there were under Bush?

KRUGMAN: Of course. That’s a fact. That’s a tremendous fact.

PAUL: No, the size of growth of government is enormous under President Obama.

KRUGMAN: If government employment had grown as fast under Obama as it did under Bush, we’d have a million and a half more people employed right now — directly.

PAUL: Are there less people employed or more people employed now by government?

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/09/09/816761/flabbergasted-rand-paul-learns-public-employment-decreased-under-obama/

:lol