PDA

View Full Version : What Happened to Gecko's 20% tax cut for everybody?



boutons_deux
09-27-2012, 02:09 AM
Mitt Romney tells voters: If I'm elected, don't expect huge tax cuts


Mitt Romney tells voters: If I'm elected, don't expect huge tax cuts

Mitt Romney provided nuance to his proposed tax cuts, saying they must fit his goal of reducing federal deficits. But left unanswered is the question of how this will affect the middle class.

Mitt Romney says Americans shouldn't expect a big tax cut from him if he's elected president, because the nation also has to think about how to tame out-of-control federal deficits.

"Don't be expecting a huge cut in taxes, because I'm also going to be closing loopholes on deductions," Mr. Romney said Wednesday in Westerville, Ohio, flanked by a national debt clock, chronicling the nation's rising burden on future taxpayers.

The comments in some ways raise as many questions as they answer.

On one hand, they may be aimed in part at addressing skeptics who say Romney's tax plan is "mathematically impossible." He wants to lower the deficit by cutting spending while keeping tax revenues neutral. To do the latter, he would cut income tax rates across the board by 20 percent and make up the difference by eliminating some deductions and credits. Wednesday's comments could be a nod to the scope of those proposed deduction eliminations.

Yet, according to a recent independent analysis, such a plan could result in the unpopular prospect of a net tax decrease for the wealthy and a net tax increase for the middle class.

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Elections/President/2012/0926/Mitt-Romney-tells-voters-If-I-m-elected-don-t-expect-huge-tax-cuts?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+feeds%2Fcsm+%28Christian+Scie nce+Monitor+|+All+Stories%29&utm_content=Google+Reader

Wild Cobra
09-27-2012, 02:56 AM
Well, I hope he cuts all deductions except the standard deduction.

People should not be given a tax break if they can buy a house or have children. It's an unnecessary shift to those who don't have children, or can't afford to buy.

boutons_deux
10-01-2012, 09:48 AM
Paul Ryan: "I Don’t Have the Time," to Explain My Tax Plan


For much of the general election, the Romney campaign has avoided any discussion of specifics, especially when it comes to the tax plan that he and Paul Ryan have put forward. On Fox News Sunday, host Chris Wallace gave Ryan an opportunity to finally talk about the details of his plan to a national audience, how much it will cost and how the Romney administration would pay for it.

Instead, Ryan said he didn’t have time to get into the nuts and bolts of the proposal:
WALLACE: So how much would it cost?

RYAN: It’s revenue neutral…

WALLACE: No no, I’m just talking about cuts. We’ll get to the deductions, but the cut in tax rates.

RYAN: The cut in tax rates is lowering all Americans’ tax rates by 20 percent.

WALLACE: Right, how much does that cost?

RYAN: It’s revenue neutral.

[...]

WALLACE: But I have to point out, you haven’t given me the math.

Ryan: No, but you…well, I don’t have the time. It would take me too long to go through all of the math. But let me say it this way: you can lower tax rates by 20 percent across the board by closing loopholes and still have preferences for the middle class. For things like charitable deductions, for home purchases, for health care. So what we’re saying is, people are going to get lower tax rates.

Watch it:


Ryan has been the Republican vice presidential nominee for nearly three months, and has still not found the time to explain how a Romney administration would fund its tax plan of 20 percent deductions across the board. Perhaps that is because if he did, voters would balk at the cuts that would need to occur (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/wp/2012/08/14/romneys-budget-plan-is-a-fantasy/) in programs like Medicare (http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/08/11/677751/paul-ryans-original-medicare-plan-ends-medicare-period/) for the plan to remain revenue neutral.

Ryan’s refusal to talk specifics only lends further credibility to the various studies (http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/papers/2012/8/01%20tax%20reform%20brown%20gale%20looney/01%20tax%20reform%20brown%20gale%20looney.pdf)and reports (http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/02/mitt-romneys-tax-plan-is-a-mathematical-disaster/253494/) that have found time to do the math. And as ThinkProgress has reported, those studies from non-partisan organizations show that the Romney/Ryan tax plan would actually result in a huge tax cut (http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/02/24/431844/romney-tax-cut-half-benefits-rich/) for the wealthiest Americans. And the only way to keep it revenue neutral is to balance their plan on the backs of middle class families, who would see a tax increase (http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/08/01/620561/tpc-romney-study-taxes/)of more than $2,000.

http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/paul-ryan-i-dont-have-time-explain-my-tax-plan

iow, (you 99% suckers must just) TRUST US (and we'll fuck you hard, fast, and deep)

CosmicCowboy
10-01-2012, 11:21 AM
Probably cutting shit like my free golf carts.

Wild Cobra
10-01-2012, 11:22 AM
Probably cutting shit like my free golf carts.
LOL...

Do you really think he will cut the stuff he should?

CosmicCowboy
10-01-2012, 12:13 PM
LOL...

Do you really think he will cut the stuff he should?

Not and get it through the house and senate.