View Full Version : If the Lakers have the best record...
whitemamba
10-01-2012, 03:17 PM
Does mike brown deserve any credit? is he a candidate for coach of the year??
discuss.
Venti Quattro
10-01-2012, 03:19 PM
Does mike brown deserve any credit? is he a candidate for coach of the year??
discuss.
No and no
spurs_fan_in_exile
10-01-2012, 03:24 PM
His prospective starting line up consists of a TOSB chucker, a T-er O-er SB at point guard, a SF who has lost a step and possibly whatever's left of his mind, a soft choker PF and a center coming off back surgery. Plus, zero bench. If Mike Brown can get a #1 seed out of that then he deserves to have the COY renamed after him.
Ryan Fitzpatrick
10-01-2012, 04:18 PM
I don't get this "zero bench" nonsense. Zero is what we've had since 2004. Well, with the exception of LO's career as a 6th man. Jamison, Meeks, and Hill are all solid contributors.
LkrFan
10-01-2012, 04:35 PM
No and no
:lol
If he can maximize the talent by somehow getting Kobe to not be a chucker for the first time in his career, then hed have my vote tbh.
whitemamba
10-01-2012, 05:06 PM
His prospective starting line up consists of a TOSB chucker, a T-er O-er SB at point guard, a SF who has lost a step and possibly whatever's left of his mind, a soft choker PF and a center coming off back surgery. Plus, zero bench. If Mike Brown can get a #1 seed out of that then he deserves to have the COY renamed after him.
you have failed to read the title.. its If the lakers get the #1 seed...but since you brought it up....
tim duncan- ultimate TOSB
Manu- get this nigga a bosley appointment.. thats beyond TOSB
Stephen Jackson... did u guys bring him back because hes reached TOSB status?
parker- too busy fuckin his team mates wives to get anything done.. reached TOSB stage 1
ElNono
10-01-2012, 05:10 PM
There's just no chance... everybody knows the Spurs are going to 3-peat the regular season 'ship :lobt2:
whitemamba
10-01-2012, 05:13 PM
There's just no chance... everybody knows the Spurs are going to 3-peat the regular season 'ship :lobt2:
that might be the only thing your repeating
ElNono
10-01-2012, 05:33 PM
that might be the only thing your repeating
Wouldn't mind a Lakeshow 2nd round 3-peat either, tbh...
Stalin
10-01-2012, 06:38 PM
lol mike brown and coach of year in same sentence
Mike Brown's a regular season coach. 66 wins with a "big three" of LeBron, Mo Williams and Ben Wallace.
Of course, he's gone to the Finals exactly once and has zero wins in the Finals. Compare to philibeaner's 6 Finals wins.
Jeff Van Gundy
10-01-2012, 07:57 PM
I hope he does well in the regular season. If he does well for this season, the Lakers might give him an extension and that's an advantage for everyone else tbh.
ElNono
10-01-2012, 08:24 PM
tbh Mike has to watch his back... Dwight is a known coach-killer...
Ryan Fitzpatrick
10-01-2012, 08:27 PM
Like always, the importance of NBA head coaching is vastly overrated. Erik Spoelestra has a ring
irishock
10-01-2012, 09:16 PM
Spoelstra is a decent coach.
With AJ instead of Carlisle, no way the '11 Mavs are sniffing the Finals
Then you have the elite company in PJ, Popovich, Brown and Riley.
Philibeaner's good because Riley's his mentor, tbh...
:lol Mike Brown
:lol former Spurs assistant
Does mike brown deserve any credit? is he a candidate for coach of the year??
discuss.
This is Mike's last season. Anyone can coach a stacked team (Except Mike D). Mike won't get respect that Stan couldn't get from Howard. Howard will be Bynum x 9,847 and I don't even know what that is.
Mike Brown: "It will be up to him to determine whether he (Steve Nash) wants to play pick and roll or if he wants to transition us into some Princeton looks or some looks that we had last year by a simple pass, by a simple cut, by a simple hand signal. So he has the keys to drive the engine."
Translation: Steve's the coach.
Philibeaner has a stacked team. Otherwise he's Lawrence Frank V 1.1.
Mike Brown: "It will be up to him to determine whether he (Steve Nash) wants to play pick and roll or if he wants to transition us into some Princeton looks or some looks that we had last year by a simple pass, by a simple cut, by a simple hand signal. So he has the keys to drive the engine."
Translation: Steve's the coach.
Of course, when the Lakers have pissed off 23 seconds off the clock, who still takes the contested jumper? Dwight?
Latarian Milton
10-02-2012, 09:33 PM
it's never a doable task for mike brown to wield a stacked team w/o a regent (like pat riley) behind him imho
Kidd K
10-03-2012, 01:17 AM
Deserves some credit, but not much.
Absolutely not COTY candidate. You can only fuck up with a team like that. You can't "exceed expectations" with that team unless they win way over 70 games or some shit. Even then it's still hard to give him credit for it. Best center in NBA. Best or 2nd best SG in NBA. Top 7 PG in NBA. Top 3-5 PF in NBA. Top 3 defensive SF in NBA. Arguably best guy coming off bench in NBA.
How can you possibly get "coaching credit" for that? The COTY should go to the Laker's owner's bank account before it should Mike Brown, for paying more than double the salary cap for his team this season.
NRHector
12-19-2012, 12:34 AM
:wakeup
irishock
12-19-2012, 12:52 AM
LOL
ElNono
12-19-2012, 01:11 AM
whitemamba with the consistent incredibly bad bads :lol
NRHector
12-19-2012, 01:13 AM
Does mike brown deserve any credit? is he a candidate for coach of the year??
discuss.
he might be a good candidate for the unemployment line
Clipper Nation
12-19-2012, 01:14 AM
:lol Student becoming the teacher
LOL faggot lakerfan avoiding this thread and posting on the LOL Spurs thread. The ultimately ignorance. :lol
NRHector
12-19-2012, 01:34 AM
2 coaches later and ego problems they can hardly win against scrub teams
Clipper Nation
12-19-2012, 02:06 AM
Speaking of records, the Magic without Dwight have only a slightly worse record than the Lakers with Dwight... spin that shit, Lakerfan :downspin:
whitemamba
12-19-2012, 02:29 AM
Speaking of records, the Magic without Dwight have only a slightly worse record than the Lakers with Dwight... spin that shit, Lakerfan :downspin:
2011-12 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/2011_2012_nba.htm)
Los Angeles
40
26
.606
2nd
Pacific Division
4
7
.364
Lost West Conf Semis
2010-11 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/2010_2011_nba.htm)
Los Angeles
32
50
.390
4th
Pacific Division
-
-
-
DNQ
2009-10 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/2009_2010_nba.htm)
Los Angeles
29
53
.354
3rd
Pacific Division
-
-
-
DNQ
2008-09 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/2008_2009_nba.htm)
Los Angeles
19
63
.232
4th
Pacific Division
-
-
-
DNQ
2007-08 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/2007_2008_nba.htm)
Los Angeles
23
59
.280
5th
Pacific Division
-
-
-
DNQ
2006-07 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/2006_2007_nba.htm)
Los Angeles
40
42
.488
4th
Pacific Division
-
-
-
DNQ
2005-06 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/2005_2006_nba.htm)
Los Angeles
47
35
.573
2nd
Pacific Division
7
5
.583
Lost West Conf Semis
2004-05 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/2004_2005_nba.htm)
Los Angeles
37
45
.451
3rd
Pacific Division
-
-
-
DNQ
2003-04 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/2003_2004_nba.htm)
Los Angeles
28
54
.341
7th
Pacific Division
-
-
-
DNQ
2002-03 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/2002_2003_nba.htm)
Los Angeles
27
55
.329
7th
Pacific Division
-
-
-
DNQ
2001-02 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/2001_2002_nba.htm)
Los Angeles
39
43
.476
5th
Pacific Division
-
-
-
DNQ
2000-01 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/2000_2001_nba.htm)
Los Angeles
31
51
.378
6th
Pacific Division
-
-
-
DNQ
1999-00 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/1999_2000_nba.htm)
Los Angeles
15
67
.183
7th
Pacific Division
-
-
-
DNQ
1998-99 * (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/1998_1999_nba.htm)
Los Angeles
9
41
.180
7th
Pacific Division
-
-
-
DNQ
1997-98 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/1997_1998_nba.htm)
Los Angeles
17
65
.207
7th
Pacific Division
-
-
-
DNQ
1996-97 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/1996_1997_nba.htm)
Los Angeles
36
46
.439
5th
Pacific Division
0
3
.000
Lost West Conf 1st Rd
1995-96 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/1995_1996_nba.htm)
Los Angeles
29
53
.354
7th
Pacific Division
-
-
-
DNQ
1994-95 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/1994_1995_nba.htm)
Los Angeles
17
65
.207
7th
Pacific Division
-
-
-
DNQ
1993-94 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/1993_1994_nba.htm)
Los Angeles
27
55
.329
7th
Pacific Division
-
-
-
DNQ
1992-93 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/1992_1993_nba.htm)
Los Angeles
41
41
.500
4th
Pacific Division
2
3
.400
Lost West Conf 1st Rd
1991-92 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/1991_1992_nba.htm)
Los Angeles
45
37
.549
5th
Pacific Division
2
3
.400
Lost West Conf 1st Rd
1990-91 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/1990_1991_nba.htm)
Los Angeles
31
51
.378
6th
Pacific Division
-
-
-
DNQ
1989-90 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/1989_1990_nba.htm)
Los Angeles
30
52
.366
6th
Pacific Division
-
-
-
DNQ
1988-89 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/1988_1989_nba.htm)
Los Angeles
21
61
.256
7th
Pacific Division
-
-
-
DNQ
1987-88 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/1987_1988_nba.htm)
Los Angeles
17
65
.207
6th
Pacific Division
-
-
-
DNQ
1986-87 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/1986_1987_nba.htm)
Los Angeles
12
70
.146
6th
Pacific Division
-
-
-
DNQ
1985-86 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/1985_1986_nba.htm)
Los Angeles
32
50
.390
4th
Pacific Division
-
-
-
DNQ
1984-85 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/1984_1985_nba.htm)
Los Angeles
31
51
.378
5th
Pacific Division
-
-
-
DNQ
1983-84 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/1983_1984_nba.htm)
San Diego
30
52
.366
6th
Pacific Division
-
-
-
DNQ
1982-83 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/1982_1983_nba.htm)
San Diego
25
57
.305
6th
Pacific Division
-
-
-
DNQ
1981-82 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/1981_1982_nba.htm)
San Diego
17
65
.207
6th
Pacific Division
-
-
-
DNQ
1980-81 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/1980_1981_nba.htm)
San Diego
36
46
.439
5th
Pacific Division
-
-
-
DNQ
1979-80 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/1979_1980_nba.htm)
San Diego
35
47
.427
5th
Pacific Division
-
-
-
DNQ
1978-79 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/1978_1979_nba.htm)
San Diego
43
39
.524
5th
Pacific Division
-
-
-
DNQ
1977-78 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/1977_1978_nba.htm)
Buffalo
27
55
.329
4th
Atlantic Division
-
-
-
DNQ
1976-77 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/1976_1977_nba.htm)
Buffalo
30
52
.366
4th
Atlantic Division
-
-
-
DNQ
1975-76 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/1975_1976_nba.htm)
Buffalo
46
36
.561
3rd
Atlantic Division
4
5
.444
Lost East Conf Semis
1974-75 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/1974_1975_nba.htm)
Buffalo
49
33
.598
2nd
Atlantic Division
3
4
.429
Lost East Conf Semis
1973-74 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/1973_1974_nba.htm)
Buffalo
42
40
.512
3rd
Atlantic Division
2
4
.333
Lost East Conf Semis
1972-73 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/1972_1973_nba.htm)
Buffalo
21
61
.256
3rd
Atlantic Division
-
-
-
DNQ
1971-72 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/1971_1972_nba.htm)
Buffalo
22
60
.268
4th
Atlantic Division
-
-
-
DNQ
1970-71 (http://www.nbauniverse.com/yearbyyear/1970_1971_nba.htm)
Buffalo
22
60
.268
4th
Atlantic Division
-
-
-
DNQ
speaking of records, heres the clippers over the past 4 decades :downspin::toast
Clipper Nation
12-19-2012, 02:31 AM
:lol Deflecting
whitemamba
12-19-2012, 02:42 AM
Speaking of records, the Magic without Dwight have only a slightly worse record than the Lakers with Dwight... spin that shit, Lakerfan :downspin:
:nopeau contraire my monkey loving friend... im actually right on topic according to you bring up the magic, who arecompletely irrelevant to the lakers.. thus showing how your :loldeflecting of topic...
well i would call you stupid, but since you spend so much time watching monkeys i guess its only a matter of time until your brain morphs into a monkey size brain
midnightpulp
12-19-2012, 03:15 AM
:nopeau contraire my monkey loving friend... im actually right on topic according to you bring up the magic, who arecompletely irrelevant to the lakers.. thus showing how your :loldeflecting of topic...
well i would call you stupid, but since you spend so much time watching monkeys i guess its only a matter of time until your brain morphs into a monkey size brain
Lol at a a Dwight Howard and Metta World Peace fan calling anyone else a monkey lover.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.