View Full Version : 2005-2006 NBA Team Committed Salaries
Aggie Hoopsfan
06-26-2005, 11:45 PM
Should help with the FA talk. I've provided the committed salaries for each NBA team, and any key free agents they have.
Atlanta 20.2 million
Boston 46.3 million
Antoine Walker
Charlotte 10.2 million
Brevin Knight
Kareem Rush
Keith Bogans
Chicago 30 million
Tyson Chandler
Eddie Curry
Cleveland 26 million
Zydrunas Ilgauskas
Jeff McInnis
Dallas 95.6 million
Denver 40.6 million
Earl Boykins
Detroit 51 million
Golden State 55 million
Houston 55.4 million
Indiana 74 million
LA Clippers 28.7 million
LA Lakers 60.2 million
Memphis 56.2 million
Earl Watson
Stromile Swift
Bo Outlaw
Miami 61.1 million
Udonis Haslem
Milwaukee 28.6 million
Michael Redd
Dan Gadzuric
Minnesota 46.6 million
Eddie Griffin
Latrell
New Jersey 49 million
New Orleans 16.2 million
New York 108 million :lol
expect 18 million to come off the books when they cut Allan Houston
Orlando 65.6 million
Phoenix 46.3 million
Joe Johnson
Portland 50 million
Shareef Abdur-Rahim
Damon Stoudemire
Nick Van Exel
Sacramento 58.4 million
San Antonio 51.8 million
Seattle 22.5 million
Ray Allen
Danny Fortson
Jerome James
Antonio Daniels
Reggie Evans
Flip Murray
Damien Wilkins
Radmanovic
Toronto 47.4 million
Donyell Marshall
Morris Peterson
Matt Bonner
Utah 46.1 million
Washington 37.5 million
Larry Hughes
7/6 - updated NJ
Aggie Hoopsfan
06-26-2005, 11:57 PM
By the way, if anyone has updates to this list, feel free to speak up and I'll change accordingly.
This was the best info I could find.
Mark in Austin
06-27-2005, 12:13 AM
I believe Richardson and Murphy were extended by Mullin.
I can't pretend to know why, though.
Aggie Hoopsfan
06-27-2005, 12:18 AM
Yeah I think so too but was too lazy to go look it up. Seengs this is part of the Spurstalk free agency toolkit now :lol I better go do some searching.
Aggie Hoopsfan
06-27-2005, 12:24 AM
Alright, looked it up. Jrich signed for an average of 11 million per year, Murphy 9 million per, I adjusted Golden State's #s.
Jimcs50
07-06-2005, 01:48 PM
LA Clippers 28.7 million
This is ridiculous, the Clippers are to the NBA what Tampa Bay is to MLB, if the owners show no desire to put a winning team on the floor and only seek to make money, then the fans do not need to go watch this horrible product, and they should not buy a ticket
We laugh at New York, but at least they are trying to spend money to get a winner on the floor, even if they suck at doing it, it is still better than owners like Sterling who are just fucking over their fans.
Kori Ellis
07-06-2005, 01:52 PM
You have NJ wrong too, AHF. I know they are over the cap because they have the MLE.
Mr. Ash
07-06-2005, 07:45 PM
New York 108 million :lol
That is just amazing.
Aggie Hoopsfan
07-06-2005, 07:59 PM
Granted they (NY) will be cutting back a little when they cut Houston.
JMarkJohns
07-07-2005, 01:30 PM
Don't cuts or waivers still count against the CAP. I know the new provision, but I believe that is only in reguards to the Luxery Tax, not the CAP.
By my understanding, Houston gets cut, his salary still counts against the CAP, but when the tax comes into play, his 18 million will not count against them.
I could be wrong.
Marklar MM
07-07-2005, 02:01 PM
Don't cuts or waivers still count against the CAP. I know the new provision, but I believe that is only in reguards to the Luxery Tax, not the CAP.
By my understanding, Houston gets cut, his salary still counts against the CAP, but when the tax comes into play, his 18 million will not count against them.
I could be wrong.
I think that the provision that allows teams to cut players with huge contracts this year works like the following, but could be wrong.
Houston gets cut, still makes $18 million for the upcoming season, but his salary does not count towards the teams cap. But as I said, I could be wrong.
Marklar MM
07-07-2005, 02:01 PM
This is ridiculous, the Clippers are to the NBA what Tampa Bay is to MLB, if the owners show no desire to put a winning team on the floor and only seek to make money, then the fans do not need to go watch this horrible product, and they should not buy a ticket
We laugh at New York, but at least they are trying to spend money to get a winner on the floor, even if they suck at doing it, it is still better than owners like Sterling who are just fucking over their fans.
You have to remember that they were trying to sign Kobe last season.
itzsoweezee
07-08-2005, 06:35 PM
I think that the provision that allows teams to cut players with huge contracts this year works like the following, but could be wrong.
Houston gets cut, still makes $18 million for the upcoming season, but his salary does not count towards the teams cap. But as I said, I could be wrong.
i believe it still counts towards the cap, just not the luxury tax. or something like that. but the jist of it is, team owners can cut a lot of costs by using that one time waiver, however, they gain no salary cap flexibility by doing so. So the knicks is still screwed.
itzsoweezee
07-08-2005, 06:35 PM
I think that the provision that allows teams to cut players with huge contracts this year works like the following, but could be wrong.
Houston gets cut, still makes $18 million for the upcoming season, but his salary does not count towards the teams cap. But as I said, I could be wrong.
Aggie Hoopsfan
07-08-2005, 06:39 PM
Yeah, that's a good point, their cap hit won't change. So nevermind on Houston, wasn't really putting that much though into things on that one.
CalsonicKansei
07-08-2005, 06:50 PM
Shaq 30 million Rest of team 31 million.
Banks91
07-10-2005, 11:00 AM
shaq makes more then the clipper players combined
looooooooooooooool
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.