PDA

View Full Version : Supreme Court will hear two gay marriage cases



baseline bum
12-07-2012, 06:37 PM
The Supreme Court announced on Friday that it will decide two major gay marriage cases next year that could have a sweeping effect on the rights of same-sex couples to wed. The cases, which likely won't be decided until June, mark the first time the justices will consider arguments for and against same-sex marriage.

The court will review California's gay marriage ban, which passed in a 2008 ballot initiative months after California's high court had legalized same-sex unions and thousands of gay Californians had already tied the knot. Two federal courts have struck down Proposition 8 as discriminatory, leaving the Supreme Court to render a final judgment.

The justices will also hear a challenge to the federal Defense of Marriage Act, a law passed under President Bill Clinton that prevents the federal government from recognizing gay marriages.

(continue reading at http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/supreme-court-hear-gay-marriage-cases-201555862.html )

Wild Cobra
12-07-2012, 07:02 PM
They voted to let Obamacare stand because it was voted in, they just about have to let the people's vote stand.

Drachen
12-07-2012, 07:07 PM
his comprehension abilities are worse than I thought, or more likely, he made some shit up

ChuckD
12-07-2012, 10:55 PM
They voted to let Obamacare stand because it was voted in, they just about have to let the people's vote stand.

People voted to enact Jim Crow laws. Not everything voted on is Constitutional.

They also let the AHCA stand because no part of it violated the Constitution, not because it was "voted in".

Wild Cobra
12-07-2012, 11:03 PM
People voted to enact Jim Crow laws. Not everything voted on is Constitutional.

They also let the AHCA stand because no part of it violated the Constitution, not because it was "voted in".

That is different. We've been down this road before. Refer to past threads on what was said.

Latarian Milton
12-07-2012, 11:09 PM
his comprehension abilities are worse than me, or more likely, he made some shit up
well, that says alot tbh

ChuckD
12-08-2012, 12:13 AM
That is different. We've been down this road before. Refer to past threads on what was said.

No it's not. Monstrous things are "voted in" all the time.

You seem to think the SCOTUS litmus test is if something was "voted in", then it can't be overturned. The actual test is if it violates the US Constitution or not.

Wild Cobra
12-08-2012, 12:17 AM
There is nothing monstrous as maintaining marriage as between a man and woman.

ElNono
12-08-2012, 12:59 AM
in before jacob's 'i don't care about teh gays' post...

ChuckD
12-08-2012, 08:44 AM
There is nothing monstrous as maintaining marriage as between a man and woman.

Again, with the Jim Crow laws, also voted in.

mouse
12-08-2012, 09:26 AM
So redzero and Avente finally get their 15 minutes?

Edward
12-08-2012, 09:42 AM
There is nothing monstrous as maintaining marriage as between a man and woman.



There is nothing unconstitutional about making the n!ggers use their own bathroom