SSDI Death Index: Sandy Hook ‘Shooter’ Adam Lanza Died One Day Before School Massacre

[Galileo]

SSDI Death Index: Sandy Hook ‘Shooter’ Adam Lanza Died One Day Before School Massacre

The SSDI database shows Adam Lanza to be expired on December 13, 2012, one day prior to the school shooting. Confirmation Status is listed as “Proven”.

MORE:

http://theintelhub.com/2013/01/21/ssdi-death-index-sandy-hook-shooter-adam-lanza-died-one-day-before-school-massacre/

:rolleyes

[redzero]

Even if that was true, so?

[Galileo]

Even if that was true, so?

How could he mass murder people if he were already dead the day before?

:hat

[FromWayDowntown]

How could he mass murder people if he were already dead the day before?

:hat

Who killed the children and adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School?

Even if you don't know a particular person's name, at least have the courage to provide us with some sort of theory.

It's a pretty repugnant thing to bat around the deaths of 26 innocents for political purposes, so I'm sure you've developed some well-researched theory to explain why you'd endorse such a sad and pathetic viewpoint.

[boutons_deux]

SSDI Death Index: Sandy Hook ‘Shooter’ Adam Lanza Died One Day Before School Massacre

The SSDI database shows Adam Lanza to be expired on December 13, 2012, one day prior to the school shooting. Confirmation Status is listed as “Proven”.

MORE:

http://theintelhub.com/2013/01/21/ssdi-death-index-sandy-hook-shooter-adam-lanza-died-one-day-before-school-massacre/

:rolleyes

Another great Galileo thread :lol

[Galileo]

Who killed the children and adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School?



someone else.

[FromWayDowntown]

someone else.

Coward.

[Galileo]

Coward.

YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!

[FromWayDowntown]

YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!


Apparently, you can't explain "the truth."

After all, I'm not the one who's choked up with too much fear to anonymously explain to a bunch of strangers what I think happened on a horrific day that saw 26 innocents slaughtered.

I'm also not attempting to use their deaths to advance some political point.

[FromWayDowntown]

n/m

[KL2]

The ads on that site are pretty funny.

[SA210]

Apparently, you can't explain "the truth."

After all, I'm not the one who's choked up with too much fear to anonymously explain to a bunch of strangers what I think happened on a horrific day that saw 26 innocents slaughtered.

I'm also not attempting to use their deaths to advance some political point.

How much do you pretend grieve for the hundreds of murdered kids from Obama's illegal drones, Mr. unemployed lawyer?

20 kids > Hundreds??? Hypocrite


http://www.a-w-i-p.com/media/blogs/articles/Articles3/Articles4/obama-drone-strike-by-children-dead.jpg?mtime=1354003467

[Th'Pusher]

The ads on that site are pretty funny.
:lol 37 things to hoard :lol

[FromWayDowntown]

How much do you pretend grieve for the hundreds of murdered kids from Obama's illegal drones, Mr. unemployed lawyer?

20 kids > Hundreds??? Hypocrite


http://www.a-w-i-p.com/media/blogs/articles/Articles3/Articles4/obama-drone-strike-by-children-dead.jpg?mtime=1354003467

You have a remarkable ability to read my mind. And an amazing ability to change the topic so as to avoid answering questions.

As a father, I'm appalled by the death of any children. For that matter, I stay up nights thinking about ways to ease the plight of children who don't have the advantages that mine have.

I'd write more, but I've got a mountain of work to get through with millions of dollars on the line.

[SA210]

You have a remarkable ability to read my mind. And an amazing ability to change the topic so as to avoid answering questions.


I'd write more, but I've got a mountain of work to get through with millions of dollars on the line.

Doubt it, with all the time and years you spend on message boards, you must not have much lawyer work, or your work must really fail. But Ok, I'll pretend with you. And on the kids, I just wanted to point out ur bullshit when you act like you are so offended, but yet don't see you talking shit about your fraudulent President murdering even way more kids than Sandy Hook.

[FromWayDowntown]

Who do you think killed the kids in Sandy Hook?

[ChumpDumper]

Doubt it, with all the time and years you spend on message boards, you must not have much lawyer work, or your work must really fail. But Ok, I'll pretend with you. And on the kids, I just wanted to point out ur bullshit when you act like you are so offended, but yet don't see you talking shit about your fraudulent President murdering even way more kids than Sandy Hook.Have you rounded up the WWII airmen yet, Simon?

[mouse]

How much do you pretend grieve for the hundreds of murdered kids from Obama's illegal drones, Mr. unemployed lawyer?

20 kids > Hundreds??? Hypocrite


http://www.a-w-i-p.com/media/blogs/articles/Articles3/Articles4/obama-drone-strike-by-children-dead.jpg?mtime=1354003467


/thread

[mouse]

Who do you think killed the kids in Sandy Hook?


Ignorance killed those children.

[ChumpDumper]

Ignorance killed those children.Ignorance is not a person.

[FromWayDowntown]

Ignorance killed those children.

Trying to use some glib statement to dodge the question is still dodging the question.

[ChumpDumper]

And geneology.com is not the SSDI Death Index. You might as well say you found the information in an SA210 video.

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

I'm guessing the website in the OP listed Lennay Kekua's death from leukemia as "proven"

[Wild Cobra]

Even if that was true, so?
If this guy were really dead, it would raise a concern for me. However, I think it's a clerical error or another person with the same name being misidentified as him.

[Agloco]

:lol

What a sack full of shit.

[cheguevara]

How much do you pretend grieve for the hundreds of murdered kids from Obama's illegal drones, Mr. unemployed lawyer?

20 kids > Hundreds??? Hypocrite


http://www.a-w-i-p.com/media/blogs/articles/Articles3/Articles4/obama-drone-strike-by-children-dead.jpg?mtime=1354003467

boom

[LnGrrrR]

Doubt it, with all the time and years you spend on message boards, you must not have much lawyer work, or your work must really fail. But Ok, I'll pretend with you. And on the kids, I just wanted to point out ur bullshit when you act like you are so offended, but yet don't see you talking shit about your fraudulent President murdering even way more kids than Sandy Hook.

You know, if those kids you care about ever met you, they would wish death upon you.

[Clipper Nation]

You know, if those kids you care about ever met you, they would wish death upon you.
Sheep!

[ElNono]

Who do you think killed the kids in Sandy Hook?

boom

[SA210]

boom

lol fake victories

[ElNono]

lol still dodging the question

[SA210]

lol still dodging the question

Not really. I'm still waiting for the part time paralegal to tell me why he gets so outraged and vocal on Spurstalk about 20 dead kids here, but not openly outraged about Obama's illegal drone murders of 11 times more dead children than Sandy Hook. Nice try though.

[ElNono]

:lol he did tell you:


You have a remarkable ability to read my mind. And an amazing ability to change the topic so as to avoid answering questions.

As a father, I'm appalled by the death of any children. For that matter, I stay up nights thinking about ways to ease the plight of children who don't have the advantages that mine have.

lol still dodging the question

[SA210]

:lol he did tell you:



lol still dodging the question

No, he never explained why he isn't equally outraged and vocal on the message boards about Obamas murder of hundreds of children by illegal drones. But it's funny to see you so desperately wanting some meaningless fake victory. lol I never came in this thread claiming anyone in particular killed the Sandy Hook kids, my point was his hypocrisy (as well as others) in his pretend outrage on American children versus the mass number of children murdered in the Middle East. To answer the "spin" question though, I think they should release some actual evidence and maybe some videotape so we can all better understand the terrible Sandy Hook shootings.

What I do know for a certainty, without question, is that Obama did indeed murder the children of Yemen, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, Lybia, etc...Many more than Sandy Hook's tragedy. Paralegals should be outraged at that too.

[ElNono]

lol still dodging the question

[ElNono]

Who do you think killed the kids in Sandy Hook?

[SA210]

lol you were wrong, so then you just repeated yourself

:lmao what an idiot

[ElNono]

So...

Who do you think killed the kids in Sandy Hook?

[SA210]

Me: Why do you seem so openly upset about American kids but not openly upset about murdered Middle East kids?

Elnono/FWD: Who do you think killed the sandy hook kids?

:lmao talk about a dodge

[ElNono]

We know what you think about dead kids in the middle east... you only said it a gazillion times....

What we want to know is:


Who do you think killed the kids in Sandy Hook?

[ElNono]

:lol you sure seem pretty vocal when hiding behind dead children to advance your political agenda... not sure why you can't answer a simple question

[SA210]

We know what you think about dead kids in the middle east... you only said it a gazillion times....

What we want to know is:

I think I know why ya'll live on Spurstalk and have no life outside of it. On the internets you can always change the subject and spin and feel special. :lol

What does that question have to do with the question I asked him? You lost, he lost, so you asked a question to deflect that lol

[ElNono]

Then again, there's only one hypocrite here with an echo chamber and an ignore list... :lol

So let's hear more empty words and more hiding behind dead children... :blah

[ElNono]

I think I know why ya'll live on Spurstalk :blah:blah:blah:blah:blah

more dodging and spinning... :lmao


What does that question have to do with the question I asked him? You lost, he lost, so you asked a question to deflect that lol

This is a thread about Sandy Hook... the question is entirely relevant...

Maybe it's time to put down the hypocrisy, stop hiding behind dead children and answering a simple question...

[SA210]

:lol you sure seem pretty vocal when hiding behind dead children to advance your political agenda... not sure why you can't answer a simple question



I feel sorry for internet lowlifes like you who see dead children as an "agenda" and as a joke. You will have to deal with that demon someday I'm sure.

You already know what I think, so asking me this question I have already answered on this board before just shows your desperation to get a fake E-win and to change the subject from the question originally asked of him.

So whether you like it or not, he dodged my question.

Still waiting.

Thanks for trying though.

[SA210]

This is a thread about Sandy Hook... the question is entirely relevant...



I'm still waiting for the paralegals answer. lol moron

[ElNono]

I feel sorry for internet lowlifes like you

Not sure you noticed but this is the internet and nobody cares what you feel.... in the meantime, hypocrites dodge questions, so you dodging that one wasn't unexpected at all.

Now go back to hiding behind dead children you don't really give a shit about unless they bring about the political agenda you think works for you.

lol still dodging the question

[SA210]

We know what you think about dead kids in the middle east... you only said it a gazillion times....

What we want to know is:

I didn't ask him what I thought, but nice spin.

I'm still waiting..

[ElNono]

I'm still waiting for the paralegals answer. lol moron

:cry hypocrite called me a moron. e-feelings be hurting :cry

lol measures of outrage

[ElNono]

I didn't ask him what I thought, but nice spin.

Nobody ever asked you what you think about children in the middle east because we already know you don't give a shit about them anymore than being a vehicle to bitch and moan...

He did ask you who thought killed the kids in Sandy Hook.

lol still dodging the question

[SA210]

Not sure you noticed but this is the internet and nobody cares what you feel.... in the meantime, hypocrites dodge questions, so you dodging that one wasn't unexpected at all.

Now go back to hiding behind dead children you don't really give a shit about unless they bring about the political agenda you think works for you.

lol still dodging the question

This is how much of a fake you are. You know my stance on vaccines, FDA, pharmaceutical drugs, the wars, GMO's, Obama, Bush, 9/11, and you somehow want to "pretend" that I'm afraid to tell you what I have already said in other threads about Sandy Hook?! You know damn well I don't giva F**** lol

:lmao what a moron

[ElNono]

This is how much of a fake you are.

:lol you keep trying to make this about me, when this is entirely about you dodging a very simple question.

No amount of you're this or that is going to change the fact that you're a hypocrite that hides behind dead children for political reasons and don't want to answer a very, very simple question...

lol still dodging
lol trying to deflect making it personal and STILL dodging
lol measures of outrage

[SA210]

:lol you keep trying to make this about me, when this is entirely about you dodging a very simple question.

No amount of you're this or that is going to change the fact that you're a hypocrite that hides behind dead children for political reasons and don't want to answer a very, very simple question...

lol still dodging
lol trying to deflect making it personal and STILL dodging
lol measures of outrage

lol Still lying and dodging the fact that my original question was dodged

[ElNono]

lol Still lying and dodging the fact that my original question was dodged

:lol your question was clearly answered and you keep dodging

The hypocrisy echo chamber knows no bounds... next up you're going to put me on ignore and then run back to hide behind dead children you don't give a shit about unless it furthers your political agenda...

[SA210]

:lol your question was clearly answered and you keep dodging

The hypocrisy echo chamber knows no bounds... next up you're going to put me on ignore and then run back to hide behind dead children you don't give a shit about unless it furthers your political agenda...

lol Don't get it twisted, the ignore is used to ignore trolls, anyone spinning that into anything else is simply just a lie. There have been a few in here who can't debate anything, they simply just spin and personally attack. I just decided recently to attack back and you just can't take it lol so you have to lie. I have no time for trolls, and yup ur heading in that direction. You have nowhere really ever debated me, from the get go you have only trolled my topics or messages and have added nothing at all. So a troll is a troll whether you admit it or not.

And no he didn't answer. He told me about a "private" grieving. My question is clearly about what he talks about here online. Somehow he and many others are outraged on here about 20 kids, but aren't outspoken about other countries children that Obama murders. You trying to spin that and troll away an entire topic with silly wannabe "gotcha" questions message after message is simply just trolling, childish and it shows your defeat :lol Thanks for trying. Next troll response from you earns the ignore :tu If you don't wanna troll anymore you have earned a day off the list. lol

[FromWayDowntown]

No, he never explained why he isn't equally outraged and vocal on the message boards about Obamas murder of hundreds of children by illegal drones.

Why must I be publicly scornful of drone attacks that kill children on an internet message board for me to actually be scornful of drone attacks that kill children in foreign countries?

Is the only acceptable way for me to actually grieve the loss of innocent lives in those places -- whether by drone attack or any other means of warfare -- to post bombast on SpursTalk?

For whatever it's worth, your assumption that my lack of posts on an internet message board somehow marks the totality of my views on that subject (or any other subject, for that matter) is remarkably self-serving given your choice (for whatever reason) to deride me for no apparent reason.

But don't let any of that deter you. You're certainly entitled to think of me whatever you wish. If you think your view of me and my character is justified based on whatever fraction of my worldview you can actually glean from what I post here (cue SA210's silly joke about my post count), all the better.

For my part, I wouldn't ever suppose that I could read all of your posts and discover everything that you truly think and believe on any subject. Who has the time to express the universe of his or her views on an internet message board? Certainly not me. (cue SA210's silly joke questioning either my professional credentials or my current employment status).


I never came in this thread claiming anyone in particular killed the Sandy Hook kids, my point was his hypocrisy (as well as others) in his pretend outrage on American children versus the mass number of children murdered in the Middle East.

My point in this thread was to question the silliness of a conspiracy theory about the Sandy Hook shootings. Hence my original question.

You've chosen to simply assume you know what I think and believe on other subjects and to use your assumptions to conclude that my disagreement with a conspiracy theory makes me a hypocrite. I'm not sure truly how one follows the other, but you've clearly made a connection and it suits your purposes here. I know my heart -- far better than you know my heart, I suspect. I can tell you that you're wrong, but I'm not sure that it would make any difference to you. So, if it makes you feel somehow better to anonymously ridicule people and to question their sentiments without even the slightest clue about them, well who am I to stop you?

Enjoy the rest of your morning, SA210.

[ElNono]

lol Don't get it twisted, the ignore is used to ignore trolls, anyone spinning that into anything else is simply just a lie. There have been a few in here who can't debate anything, they simply just spin and personally attack. I just decided recently to attack back and you just can't take it lol so you have to lie. I have no time for trolls, and yup ur heading in that direction. You have nowhere really ever debated me, from the get go you have only trolled my topics or messages and have added nothing at all. So a troll is a troll whether you admit it or not.

And no he didn't answer. He told me about a "private" grieving. My question is clearly about what he talks about here online. Somehow he and many others are outraged on here about 20 kids, but aren't outspoken about other countries children that Obama murders. You trying to spin that and troll away an entire topic with silly wannabe "gotcha" questions message after message is simply just trolling, childish and it shows your defeat :lol Thanks for trying. Next troll response from you earns the ignore :tu If you don't wanna troll anymore you have earned a day off the list. lol

:lol He gave you a perfectly reasonable answer. The fact that you didn't like it it's a completely different matter.

Your ideas of how other people should grieve, express themselves or disagree with you are entirely constructions within your head. Things like 'measures of outrage' are exactly the type of stupid, unquantifiable metrics that a hypocrite like you comes up with when you're getting your ass handed to you (which happens quite often these days).

What's even funnier is the fake outrage you display when Barry (who's a piece of shit) parades kids around politicizing dead children, then you turn around and use the same dead children for the exact same political purpose (which makes you the exact same piece of shit).

Your avoidance again of answering a very simple question, going on personal tirades, self-proclaiming internet e-victories, etc only because it doesn't advance your political views is just another sad chapter in your continuous string of hypocrisy.

The ignore list is yours to use, you can do whatever you want with it, it just goes to show that you're not interested in debate at all, you want it your way or the highway. The fact that it includes very reasonable posters like LNGRrr really says a lot more about you than it says about anybody else.

Of course, now you're gonna go in another rant about sheep, the 'truth', lies... All irrelevant and simple euphemisms behind the sad reality: you're a hypocrite that uses dead fucking children to further your political agenda. And you'll continue to do so, because they're the tool that are useful to you. You don't care about children, you care about advancing the message that brings the political leaders of your choosing to power. And you use dead children to do so. You're as much of a despicable person as the ones you accuse and as far as I'm concerned I'm going to keep,laughing my ass off as the political assholes you pick to support get their asses handed to them. Not because of them, but because of you.

[SA210]

Why must I be publicly scornful of drone attacks that kill children on an internet message board for me to actually be scornful of drone attacks that kill children in foreign countries?

Why not? You clearly are about Sandy Hooks kids on message boards. Is it because you voted Obama?


Is the only acceptable way for me to actually grieve the loss of innocent lives in those places -- whether by drone attack or any other means of warfare -- to post bombast on SpursTalk?

Of course not. Why do you feel the need to exaggerate with "bombast"? All I said was equal.



to deride me for no apparent reason.

You seem to jump on the bandwagon and talk some smack about me from time to time with the others in other topics, what's the difference, at least I actually have a point.


For my part, I wouldn't ever suppose that I could read all of your posts and discover everything that you truly think and believe on any subject. Who has the time to express the universe of his or her views on an internet message board?

Right, Which is why I never said I knew everything about you. I only called you out specifically about the 20 kids Obama has used as pawns for political agenda and your silence on the political forum on his murder of 11 times more children than those kids he used as pawns. But nice extreme there, again.



My point in this thread was to question the silliness of a conspiracy theory about the Sandy Hook shootings. Hence my original question.

Fair enough, I understand this, but I still brought up a valid point. Maybe an even better point would be that it's pretty silly of you to act like it is so silly for one to believe that the government would ever try such a conspiracy. If you want to keep thinking silly like that, then look up Operation Northwoods, completely and then tell me about our trustworthy government that would never do, attempt, or ever plan such a thing.




You've chosen to simply assume you know what I think and believe on other subjects and to use your assumptions to conclude that my disagreement with a conspiracy theory makes me a hypocrite.

I already explained the connection I made, see above. You have had your share in ridiculing me, that is for sure so that in itself makes you a hypocrite, especially now with you playing the victim card. Can't take the heat, then don't start it. Again, read Operation Northwoods before you act so appalled about "Conspiracy Theories".


Enjoy the rest of your morning, SA210.

Likewise

[SA210]

:lol He gave you a perfectly reasonable answer. The fact that you didn't like it it's a completely different matter.



You should take your own advice. Stop asking the same questions when you don't like the answers and keep getting ur ass handed to you :lol Funny how you were never interested in debate at all. Not once, it was all about trolling, so you have earned the spot :lmao

Well, it's been nice kicking your ass this past week as bad as I have. Especially gave me a few chuckles at your pretend victories and spin. Peace in the Middle East :tu


lol

[ElNono]

lol back to hiding behind dead children
lol more self e-victories proclamations
lol hypocrites can't read this post

[FromWayDowntown]

I honestly don't recall ridiculing you. If I have, then please have my apology -- I try to make it a point around here to disagree with ideas (sometimes sarcastically) but to never ridicule those who offer them. Perhaps that's a shortsighted finesse on my part and perhaps I've failed to stay true to that vow. Either way, I will rethink that approach.

I'm still struck by my apparent obligation to weigh in on all potentially-related topics in order to avoid being a hypocrite as to any of them. But if you believe I'm a hypocrite because I don't post on every subject that comes up in this forum, so be it. We can agree to disagree on that.

[SA210]

I honestly don't recall ridiculing you. If I have, then please have my apology -- I try to make it a point around here to disagree with ideas (sometimes sarcastically) but to never ridicule those who offer them. Perhaps that's a shortsighted finesse on my part. I will rethink that approach.

I'm still struck by my apparent obligation to weigh in on all potentially-related topics in order to avoid being a hypocrite as to any of them. But if you believe I'm a hypocrite because I don't post on every subject that comes up in this forum, so be it. We can agree to disagree on that.

Very well, no problem. But I never assumed that you do or should post on all topics, that is still an exaggeration. I made the connection between Obama and children. Not all topics.

Either way, have a good day. :tu

[FromWayDowntown]

Very well, no problem. But I never assumed that you do or should post on all topics, that is still an exaggeration. I made the connection between Obama and children. Not all topics.

Either way, have a good day. :tu

You apparently assume that I can't post on Sandy Hook without posting on drones -- or at least that if I post on one without the other, I'm a hypocrite. I'm not really bothered by you calling me a hypocrite, since I'm not that, but you've devoted quite a bit of cyber ink to impugning me (and others) -- and not just my views -- based on your assumptions drawn from what I (we) haven't posted. That's a pretty remarkable willingness to attack people based purely on an assumption.

Frankly, most of the time, I choose not to post in threads precisely because I think the discussions have devolved into partisan name calling and rampant assumptions about motives such that the threads themselves no longer provide a particularly useful forum for discussion. So, I'd advise you to discern beliefs from silence with some caution.

[LnGrrrR]

No, he never explained why he isn't equally outraged and vocal on the message boards about Obamas murder of hundreds of children by illegal drones. But it's funny to see you so desperately wanting some meaningless fake victory. lol I never came in this thread claiming anyone in particular killed the Sandy Hook kids, my point was his hypocrisy (as well as others) in his pretend outrage on American children versus the mass number of children murdered in the Middle East. To answer the "spin" question though, I think they should release some actual evidence and maybe some videotape so we can all better understand the terrible Sandy Hook shootings.

What I do know for a certainty, without question, is that Obama did indeed murder the children of Yemen, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, Lybia, etc...Many more than Sandy Hook's tragedy. Paralegals should be outraged at that too.

I don't remember FWDT coming on here after the Sandy Hook incident and expressing rage.

[SA210]

You apparently assume that I can't post on Sandy Hook without posting on drones -- or at least that if I post on one without the other, I'm a hypocrite. I'm not really bothered by you calling me a hypocrite, since I'm not that, but you've devoted quite a bit of cyber ink to impugning me (and others) -- and not just my views -- based on your assumptions drawn from what I (we) haven't posted. That's a pretty remarkable willingness to attack people based purely on an assumption.

Frankly, most of the time, I choose not to post in threads precisely because I think the discussions have devolved into partisan name calling and rampant assumptions about motives such that the threads themselves no longer provide a particularly useful forum for discussion. So, I'd advise you to discern beliefs from silence with some caution.

That's not true. I was pointing out that a greater number of children were killed by the President you support, and that it's sad that you didn't show outrage for that, but instead chose to wanna tear someone down for believing a conspiracy theory about children that the President you support used as pawns for political agenda, as if the government has never been a part of a conspiracy or planned things like that before. I'd advise you to be a bit more open minded and read Operation Northwoods before assuming the government is so innocent and that others are so offensive for suggesting otherwise. And you are correct on the name calling. I barely did that myself just recently to some others who have done this to every single one of my topics. But I blocked the trolls, and that's a better way to deal with that, however you may disagree.

[ChumpDumper]

You know, SA210 is this close to making me in favor of dead babies.

[redzero]

lol SA210 being a lying douchebag as usual.

[Clipper Nation]

:lol SA210
:lol Using dead kids as a prop for his agenda
:lol Entire forum is on his ignore list

[SA210]

:lol SA210
:lol Using dead kids as a prop for his agenda
:lol Entire forum is on his ignore list

My agenda is poverty, but right now there seems to be a huge group of people in America, yourself included who won't really speak up for defensless kids. So you know, I bring that subject up, and lowlife trolls like yourself feel like you aren't doing enough in your life and the only way to hide that is to troll the person bringing it up, just to make yourself feel better. That about sums it up. Thanks again for not adding anything whatsoever to the forum. I have some libertarian friends btw who laughed at your posts and are truly ashamed that you call yourself one, no joke lol. You will be headed to my list pretty soon, since you have proven time and again (regardless of anything else unfunny that you spew after this) that you never ever debate anything with me at all, you only troll. You should get a girlfriend or something, find a hobby besides living online. For your own mental health :tu

[Blake]

You add piles of youtube/meme shit to the forum, hypocrite.

[Clipper Nation]

My agenda is poverty, but right now there seems to be a huge group of people in America, yourself included who won't really speak up for defensless kids.
Wonder how the parents would feel if they knew you were using their dead kids to score political points on a website...

[SA210]

Wonder how the parents would feel if they knew you were using their dead kids to score political points...

If you really gave a damn you would know they are protesting over there to call attention to their children being murdered by drones, it isn't for political points, I try discussing it because it's important to me, and I figured other human beings would care as well. You and other childish jerks have used every opportinty to turn that all around and makes jokes out of the situation. You should be ashamed of yourself. I'm sure they would appreciate you trying to silence someone trying to bring up a discussion on what they are trying to bring attention to.

[rascal]

The drones killing of children is a different topic than the conspiracy of the killings at Sandy Hook. You shifted from one topic to another in this thread and still have not answered what you believe the conspiracy is all about at Sandy Hook.


And just because someone doesn't comment on one topic doesn't mean he shouldn't comment on another because they are two different topics.

[ChumpDumper]

This is how much of a fake you are. You know my stance on vaccines, FDA, pharmaceutical drugs, the wars, GMO's, Obama, Bush, 9/11, and you somehow want to "pretend" that I'm afraid to tell you what I have already said in other threads about Sandy Hook?! You know damn well I don't giva F**** lol

:lmao what a moronYou never actually said what you think really happened on 9/11 tbh. You melted down like you did here last night, but you never answered any questions about it.

I'd be satisfied if you just stay on topic here and say who you think killed the kids at Sandy Hook. Is it really that difficult for you?

[ElNono]

If you really gave a damn you would know they are protesting over there to call attention to their children being murdered by drones, it isn't for political points, I try discussing it because it's important to me, and I figured other human beings would care as well. You and other childish jerks have used every opportinty to turn that all around and makes jokes out of the situation. You should be ashamed of yourself. I'm sure they would appreciate you trying to silence someone trying to bring up a discussion on what they are trying to bring attention to.

:lol absolute bullcrap

This is all about advancing gubment conspiracies, Barry/libtards being corrupt and peddling the great Ron Paul behind dead childrens photos, memes and youtubes.

CN is somebody I probably don't agree with on many topics politically or economically, but one thing he can do is articulate his ideas without hiding behind dead children, tbh...

[LnGrrrR]

Someone so concerned about poverty should probably sell their PC and move to one of those countries that gets bombed a lot in order to make a difference.

[ChumpDumper]

Yes, poverty is killing more babies than Obama dreams (from his father) of killing.

[Woo Bum-kon]

Someone so concerned about poverty should probably sell their PC and move to one of those countries that gets bombed a lot in order to make a difference.

Preferably to the places where terrorists are suspected of hiding out.

[ChumpDumper]

Human shield!

[ElNono]

Much easier to proclaim internet e-victories! As far as he knows, he already won!

[Creepn]

What's even funnier is the fake outrage you display when Barry (who's a piece of shit) parades kids around politicizing dead children, then you turn around and use the same dead children for the exact same political purpose (which makes you the exact same piece of shit).
Whoa whoa whoa now. How is Obama a piece of shit? Those kids came to him first and requested for Obama to do something about it. Those kids wanted to be there so he wasn't standing behind him, he was standing next to them.

[ChumpDumper]

SA210 saves hundreds of babies with every post.

[ChumpDumper]

Whoa whoa whoa now. How is Obama a piece of shit? Those kids came to him first and requested for Obama to do something about it. Those kids wanted to be there so he wasn't standing behind him, he was standing next to them.They just didn't want Obama to kill them. That probably bought them a few years.

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

Yes, poverty is killing more babies than Obama dreams (from his father) of killing.

:lmao:lmao:lmao

[ElNono]

Whoa whoa whoa now. How is Obama a piece of shit? Those kids came to him first and requested for Obama to do something about it. Those kids wanted to be there so he wasn't standing behind him, he was standing next to them.

I don't care if Virgin Mary showed up... When talking about such a hot topic as gun control, you don't want to look like a demagogue by parading children around.

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

Whoa whoa whoa now. How is Obama a piece of shit? Those kids came to him first and requested for Obama to do something about it. Those kids wanted to be there so he wasn't standing behind him, he was standing next to them.

I don't think ElNono is calling Obama a POS because of that. He thinks Obama is a POS for other reasons but mentioned it in that post so SA210 wouldn't respond with a, "Typical Obama apologist!" ad-hominem comeback.

[Woo Bum-kon]

SA210 will call anybody who disagrees with him an Obama apologist, whether or not it even makes sense in the context of the topic at hand. That's basically all he has going for him.

[coyotes_geek]

Can someone save me some reading and tell me if we've gotten to the part in the thread where SA210 tells us who he thinks killed the Sandy Hook kids? Thanks in advance!

[ElNono]

I don't think ElNono is calling Obama a POS because of that. He thinks Obama is a POS for other reasons but mentioned it in that post so SA210 wouldn't respond with a, "Typical Obama apologist!" ad-hominem comeback.

I do think Barry is a hypocrite for using children to try to push his gun agenda (IMO). I don't care if the children asked to be there, a politician (especially a politician!) knows appearances matter.

But SA210 is exactly the same hypocrite. Hides behind dead children to bitch about politicians and try to prop up his retarded conspiracy theories/whoever he shares political affinity with.

What's even sadder is that when asked point blank about their theories, they never say shit. :lol Absolute delusion :lol

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

Can someone save me some reading and tell me if we've gotten to the part in the thread where SA210 tells us who he thinks killed the Sandy Hook kids? Thanks in advance!
Sorry to disappoint, but we have not.

I'd ask him but I'm on his ignore list :depressed

[ElNono]

Sorry to disappoint, but we have not.

I'd ask him but I'm on his ignore list :depressed

:lmao you made it too?

[coyotes_geek]

Sorry to disappoint, but we have not.

I'd ask him but I'm on his ignore list :depressed

Bummer. Thanks for letting me know. I'll check back in around page 7.

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

:lmao you made it too?

Yes. I called him a bad father and it sent him into a fit of tin-foil hat wearing rage.

[Creepn]

I do think Barry is a hypocrite for using children to try to push his gun agenda (IMO). I don't care if the children asked to be there, a politician (especially a politician!) knows appearances matter.

But SA210 is exactly the same hypocrite. Hides behind dead children to bitch about politicians and try to prop up his retarded conspiracy theories/whoever he shares political affinity with.


What's even sadder is that when asked point blank about their theories, they never say shit. :lol Absolute delusion :lol

Wow, Obama letting kids on stage who experienced a tragedy to promote safer gun laws is the same SA210 using dead children for pointless fear mongering and conspiracy? You are way too cynical.

[ElNono]

Wow, Obama letting kids on stage who experienced a tragedy to promote safer gun laws is the same SA210 using dead children for pointless fear mongering and conspiracy? You are way too cynical.

Feel free to disagree.

IMO, we need to stop with this notion that politicians do all this stuff to :cry protect the children :cry... If you want to talk about children, talk about children with children. If you want to talk about guns, then leave the children alone and stop using them as a crutch.

[Jacob1983]

Obama caring about dead white children from Connecticut or Obama caring about dead Middle Eastern children? Which do you think will get him more political gain? Of course, the dead white kids from Connecticut will give him more political gain than if he gives a crap about dead kids in the Middle East. It's harsh but true. Even if Obama is lying, it would help him if he would at least say he feels bad about collateral damage and blowback. At least, speak out about it.

[Clipper Nation]

:lol absolute bullcrap

This is all about advancing gubment conspiracies, Barry/libtards being corrupt and peddling the great Ron Paul behind dead childrens photos, memes and youtubes.
The most ironic part is that Ron Paul built a relevant political movement without having to hide behind memes and pictures of dead kids in lieu of having his own actual opinions, tbh.... in SA210's warped mind, I guess Dr. Paul is a "fake libertarian" :lol

[Creepn]

Feel free to disagree.

IMO, we need to stop with this notion that politicians do all this stuff to :cry protect the children :cry... If you want to talk about children, talk about children with children. If you want to talk about guns, then leave the children alone and stop using them as a crutch.

That doesn't make sense but yes we will disagree. It wasn't just about the children, it was about everybody. You talk as if Obama uses children every time he brought up gun issues. I'm sure he used gun crime stats as a crutch than children.

[ElNono]

That doesn't make sense but yes we will disagree. It wasn't just about the children, it was about everybody. You talk as if Obama uses children every time he brought up gun issues. I'm sure he used gun crime stats as a crutch than children.

It doesn't matter "how many times", IMO. One time is one time too many.

We disagree.

[coyotes_geek]

That doesn't make sense but yes we will disagree. It wasn't just about the children, it was about everybody. You talk as if Obama uses children every time he brought up gun issues. I'm sure he used gun crime stats as a crutch than children.

If it was about everybody, he'd have been pushing this agenda long before Sandy Hook ever happened.

[TSA]

That doesn't make sense but yes we will disagree. It wasn't just about the children, it was about everybody. You talk as if Obama uses children every time he brought up gun issues. I'm sure he used gun crime stats as a crutch than children.

He doesn't dare use gun crime stats since they've been on the decline while gun sales have gone up.

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

The most ironic part is that Ron Paul built a relevant political movement without having to hide behind memes and pictures of dead kids in lieu of having his own actual opinions, tbh.... in SA210's warped mind, I guess Dr. Paul is a "fake libertarian" :lol

In SA210's mind Dr. Paul is an Obama apologist :lmao

[HI-FI]

Feel free to disagree.

IMO, we need to stop with this notion that politicians do all this stuff to :cry protect the children :cry... If you want to talk about children, talk about children with children. If you want to talk about guns, then leave the children alone and stop using them as a crutch.

actually I'm happy El Nono brought this up. when he was calling out SA210 for using the children pictures, I was thinking Nono was being a total hypocrite with Obama. I can never tell if Nono is a liberal or not at times, sometimes it seems he's balls deep in blue team, eating out Evita's lefty pussy as well. other times he seems conservative. but props for him pointing out Obama doing that shit with the kids, just a sickening and manipulative bit of political theater, but that's per par with politicians like him.

[TeyshaBlue]

actually I'm happy El Nono brought this up. when he was calling out SA210 for using the children pictures, I was thinking Nono was being a total hypocrite with Obama. I can never tell if Nono is a liberal or not at times, sometimes it seems he's balls deep in blue team, eating out Evita's lefty pussy as well. other times he seems conservative. but props for him pointing out Obama doing that shit with the kids, just a sickening and manipulative bit of political theater, but that's per par with politicians like him.

Like most of us, cept for the moonbat/wingnut ideologues, EN floats towards center.