Updates South Dakota Bill Could Legitimize Murder

[boutons_deux]

just two days after a female member of the Minuteman militia was convicted of murdering two innocent people--including a 9-year-old girl--while attempting to murder another, South Dakota legislators have introduced legislation that could de-criminalize the shooting of doctors, nurses, patients and volunteers at clinics providing abortion care.


Yup. You read that right. Elected officials--all of whom supposedly swore to uphold the law--are now encouraging people to literally take the law--as they understand it--into their own gun-owning hands.

HB 1171 would expand the definition of "justifiable homicide" to killings that are intended to prevent harm to a fetus, which many feel would make it legal to kill doctors who perform abortions. It states:


Section 1. That § 22-16-34 be amended to read as follows:

22-16-34. Homicide is justifiable if committed by any person while resisting any attempt to murder such person, or to harm the unborn child of such person in a manner and to a degree likely to result in the death of the unborn child, or to commit any felony upon him or her, or upon or in any dwelling house in which such person is.
Section 2. That § 22-16-35 be amended to read as follows:

22-16-35. Homicide is justifiable if committed by any person in the lawful defense of such person, or of his or her husband, wife, parent, child, master, mistress, or servant, or the unborn child of any such enumerated person, if there is reasonable ground to apprehend a design to commit a felony, or to do some great personal injury, and imminent danger of such design being accomplished.

http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/node/15552

fucking red-state assholes.

[Wild Cobra]

Another fine article brought to you by ShazBot.

I don't see how that applies to making it justifiable to kill abortion doctors. Is the mother or baby resisting the abortion attempt? It would then be understandable.

[coyotes_geek]

Yawn. Wake me up when something like this actually becomes law. Until then, it's just blue team grandstanding about red team grandstanding.

[boutons_deux]

We'll see how the vote goes.

But these ELECTED REPUG ASSHOLES are dog-whistling to the "Christian" pro-lifers (the people who elected them) that it's alright to go ANTI-life on abortion staff.

[coyotes_geek]

I already know how the vote is going to go. There won't be one.

[boutons_deux]

I already know how the vote is going to go. There won't be one.

the dog-whistling has already been heard loud and clear

[Wild Cobra]

I already know how the vote is going to go. There won't be one.

Actually, the bill was tabled on 2/17/11... with a 61 to 4 vote...

ShazBot...

Don't you ever research anything for relevance or accuracy?

[coyotes_geek]

Step 1: Wingnut citizen with an axe to grind makes campaign contribution to legislator.
Step 2: Legislator placates wingnut citizen / campaign contributor by introducing ridiculous bill that 1) would directly address wingnut citizen's concern and 2) has no shot at passing.
Step 3: Ridiculous bill goes nowhere, legislator tells wingnut citizen / campaign contributor "I tried".
Step 4: Repeat at next legislative session.

[Wild Cobra]

Step 1: Wingnut citizen with an axe to grind makes campaign contribution to legislator.
Step 2: Legislator placates wingnut citizen / campaign contributor by introducing ridiculous bill that 1) would directly address wingnut citizen's concern and 2) has no shot at passing.
Step 3: Ridiculous bill goes nowhere, legislator tells wingnut citizen / campaign contributor "I tried".
Step 4: Repeat at next legislative session.
And that's one way they buy votes...

[coyotes_geek]

Actually, the bill was tabled on 2/17/11... with a 61 to 4 vote...

ShazBot...

Don't you ever research anything for relevance or accuracy?

:lmao

lol boutons.

lol 2 year old story about a bill that went nowhere.

[TeyshaBlue]

lol reality check.org

Delicious sauce is delicious.

[Wild Cobra]

:lmao

lol boutons.

lol 2 year old story about a bill that went nowhere.
Went nowhere two days after the story.

See why I call him ShazBot?

Familiar with Mork and Mindy?

[TeyshaBlue]

Which folder should I put this thread in? Hmmm........



http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y64/teyshablue/Subscriptions_zps7984977d.jpg

[Wild Cobra]

It is interesting if you follow the links in this sausage making factory:

http://legis.state.sd.us/sessions/2011/Bill.aspx?Bill=1171

[Wild Cobra]

FYI, here is the current law of 34 and 35 of chapter 22-16:


22-16-34. Justifiable homicide--Resisting attempted murder--Resisting felony on person or in dwelling house. Homicide is justifiable if committed by any person while resisting any attempt to murder such person, or to commit any felony upon him or her, or upon or in any dwelling house in which such person is.


22-16-35. Justifiable homicide--Defense of person--Defense of other persons in household. Homicide is justifiable if committed by any person in the lawful defense of such person, or of his or her husband, wife, parent, child, master, mistress, or servant if there is reasonable ground to apprehend a design to commit a felony, or to do some great personal injury, and imminent danger of such design being accomplished.

All the legislation was to do, was to include protection for the unborn child.

Added is bolded:

22-16-34. Homicide is justifiable if committed by any person while resisting any attempt to murder such person, or to harm the unborn child of such person in a manner and to a degree likely to result in the death of the unborn child, or to commit any felony upon him or her, or upon or in any dwelling house in which such person is.


22-16-35. Homicide is justifiable if committed by any person in the lawful defense of such person, or of his or her husband, wife, parent, child, master, mistress, or servant, or the unborn child of any such enumerated person, if there is reasonable ground to apprehend a design to commit a felony, or to do some great personal injury, and imminent danger of such design being accomplished.

the original intent, the first reading, was:

FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to provide that the use of force by a pregnant woman for the protection of her unborn child is an affirmative defense to prosecutions for certain crimes.

[TSA]

:lmao this made lunch much more enjoyable.

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

I like how boutons makes these threads and then disappears like mookie from a salad bar.

[Blake]

See why I call him ShazBot?

Familiar with Mork and Mindy?

even the year 1979 thinks you're a flaglot

[Wild Cobra]

even the year 1979 thinks you're a flaglot
But you don't even know what a flaglot is. Do you?

[Blake]

Smh.

[Spurminator]

Yeah there's really no way any reasonable person could read that amendment as justifying murder of people at abortion clinics. Most reasonable people would read an article like this and decide not to ever read anything on that website again, because the insult to their intelligence is so offensive.

[ElNono]

lol boutons

[mavs>spurs]

lmao leftist dumbfuck

[redzero]

GFY Repug Bubbas

[Latarian Milton]

and the consititution should also make it legal to kill them pregnant bitches if you think the bitches feel endangered and will probably open fire at you to protect the unborn bastards inside their piss bags tbh. feminists have put it so far away that something must be done to prevent them going any farther in the wrong way, and that's exactly the reason why im calling for the foundation of a misogynist fraternity tbh

[TeyshaBlue]

bump, because a self bitch slap like this should be remembered.:lmao

[Clipper Nation]

:lol Boutons
:lol Dumbfuck spammer
:lol Hypocrite
:lol Calls conservatives "dumb bubbas" when he can't even read the shit he posts
:lol Calls conservatives "racist" while referring to Obama as "The Cool N!gg@"

[Clipper Nation]

Yup. You read that right.
WE read that right.... YOU didn't :lmao

[coyotes_geek]

The high probability of self-ownage is the lure that reels me into boutons threads in the first place.

[Agloco]

Damn B, you suffering from dementia or something?