Have fun Liberals

[Wild Cobra]

Just don't cream yourselves reading it.

Article Link: Ann Coulter Refuses to Board Airplane With Black Pilot (http://dailycurrant.com/2013/01/29/ann-coulter-refuses-board-airplane-black-pilot/)


"Clearly this woman has some sort of mental illness," explains TSA spokesperson Dirk Diggler, "We recommended against pressing charges, and mandated a full psychiatric evaluation."

Looks like she stepped over the line on this one, and in the shit, on this one.

[boutons_deux]

Black Nurses Banned from Caring for Child in Michigan Hospital

In Michigan, a neonatal nurse reports that she was removed from her job because a Swastika-tattooed father who didn’t want his daughter treated by any African Americans.


The nurse, Tonya Battle, had been working at Hurley Medical Center in Flint, Michigan, since 1988. Yet when a newborn girl came into the neonatal intensive care unit recently, Battle was abruptly removed from the case because “the father told the [nurse in charge] that he did not want and African Americans taking care of his baby."

http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/black-nurses-banned-caring-child-michigan-hospital

Conservatives, right-wingers, The Pinnacle of American Civilization

[ChumpDumper]

You wouldn't do the same, WC?

[Wild Cobra]

You wouldn't do the same, WC?
Hell no. When will you ever put your prejudicial views of people aside? That attitude of yours is every bit as bad a Coulter's, or maybe worse.

[ChumpDumper]

Hell no. When will you ever put your prejudicial views of people aside? That attitude of yours is every bit as bad a Coulter's, or maybe worse.Your attempt at doublespeak is Orwellian, I'll grant you that.

[GoodOdor]

So Pilots are okay, but not surgeons, WC? where do you draw the line, tbh?

[Wild Cobra]

So Pilots are okay, but not surgeons, WC? where do you draw the line, tbh?
I see.

You guys continue to insist, a "what if" scenario I presented, as meaning I think and act that way? Even after fully explaining it over and over?

My God.

You guys are far too easy to troll, without even trying.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

It's pretty sad when someone needs to stoop down to this shit to get attention. Kaufman knew how to do it. WC is just a moron that cannot keep up with his own bullshit.

[GoodOdor]

I see.

You guys continue to insist, a "what if" scenario I presented, as meaning I think and act that way? Even after fully explaining it over and over?

My God.

You guys are far too easy to troll, without even trying.

You didn't answer my question: we already know you won;t trust a black person to perform surgery on you - but where do you draw the line?

Would fixing your car be acceptable? what about serving you at a restaurant?

I'm guessing piloting would definitely be on your "no blacks allowed" list.

[Wild Cobra]

You guys do keep it interesting. I don't draw such lines. I'm not a bigot like you.

http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x262/Wild_Cobra/Misc/Tomakeitinterseting_zps65845a8d.jpg

[CuckingFunt]

explains TSA spokesperson Dirk Diggler

Um...



http://img832.imageshack.us/img832/2624/boogie3.jpg

?

[baseline bum]

What are you still doing here WC? I thought I told you to go fuck your mother?

[Wild Cobra]

What are you still doing here WC? I thought I told you to go fuck your mother?
Must be annoying that I'm the only person who disregards what you say.

[Agloco]

Daily Currant. Gold.

lulz @ WC once more.

[GoodOdor]

I love how WC had to preemptively post this to minimize the damage:lol

[CuckingFunt]

I love how he seems genuinely unaware the Daily Currant is a satirical newspaper.

[Woo Bum-kon]

lol Dirk Diggler

[CubanMustGo]

Good God, WC, once again you can't tell fantasy news from real news ... like so many of your ilk.

[CubanMustGo]

Here's another Currant story for you

Sarah Palin to Join Al Jazeera as Host (http://dailycurrant.com/2013/02/04/sarah-palin-join-al-jazeera-host/)


Just weeks after leaving Fox News, Sarah Palin is bouncing back by joining the fledgling Al Jazeera America (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Jazeera_America) news network as a host and commentator.
The former vice presidential nominee confirmed today that she has signed a multi-million dollar deal to host her own shows and to provide commentary on United States issues for Al Jazeera, which is best known for its news coverage of the Middle East.

After leaving Fox News, Palin said she was hoping to reach a broader audience (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/29/sarah-palin-new-job-leaves-fox-news_n_2574437.html) with her message. When contacted by phone, Palin said Al Jazeera - with its extensive international network - offered her the best opportunity to broadcast to millions of people.

“As you all know, I’m not a big fan of newspapers, journalists, news anchors and the liberal media in general,” Palin said. “But I met with the folks at Al-JaJizzraa (sic) and they told me they reach millions of devoutly religious people who don’t watch CBS or CNN. That tells me they don’t have a liberal bias.”

[Drachen]

Hell no. When will you ever put your prejudicial views of people aside? That attitude of yours is every bit as bad a Coulter's, or maybe worse.

Its definitely not prejudicial if he is basing it off of your past postings. That is just judgemental of your positions

[Drachen]

Here's another Currant story for you

Sarah Palin to Join Al Jazeera as Host (http://dailycurrant.com/2013/02/04/sarah-palin-join-al-jazeera-host/)


Just weeks after leaving Fox News, Sarah Palin is bouncing back by joining the fledgling Al Jazeera America (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Jazeera_America) news network as a host and commentator.
The former vice presidential nominee confirmed today that she has signed a multi-million dollar deal to host her own shows and to provide commentary on United States issues for Al Jazeera, which is best known for its news coverage of the Middle East.

After leaving Fox News, Palin said she was hoping to reach a broader audience (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/29/sarah-palin-new-job-leaves-fox-news_n_2574437.html) with her message. When contacted by phone, Palin said Al Jazeera - with its extensive international network - offered her the best opportunity to broadcast to millions of people.

“As you all know, I’m not a big fan of newspapers, journalists, news anchors and the liberal media in general,” Palin said. “But I met with the folks at Al-JaJizzraa (sic) and they told me they reach millions of devoutly religious people who don’t watch CBS or CNN. That tells me they don’t have a liberal bias.”

I don't care who you are, this is funny

[Blake]

Roflmao @ Wild Cobra

Just another day in the life of a fucking idiot.

[Latarian Milton]

thats why the only right workshops for them bitches are kitchens and bedrooms tbh

[GoodOdor]

Good God, WC, once again you can't tell fantasy news from real news ... like so many of your ilk.

In this case, I could see how he mistook this for a real story - after all, he thinks the same way, so he figured there must be like minded folks out there.

[mavs>spurs]

ann coulter is such a stupid fucking bitch

[Juggity]

The article reads like a satire. Is "The Daily Currant" a legit site?

As much as I believe Ann would be capable of doing this, it just feels too good to be true.

[spursncowboys]

You all realize that this is a satire website right???

[spursncowboys]

Romney: "I should of offered them fried chicken"

[spursncowboys]

I don't care who you are, this is funny
What was funny was how some msm people ran with it...

[Wild Cobra]

What was funny was how some msm people ran with it...
Yes it was. I was hoping people here would run with it too. More so than what happened.

CF blew the whistle too soon.

[johnsmith]

Yes it was. I was hoping people here would run with it too. More so than what happened.

CF blew the whistle too soon.

It's funny because anyone that has read your posts knows for sure, 100%, that you had no clue that the article you posted was a joke. Your sense of humor has proved time and time again to be awful on this site and we all know....EVERY SINGLE ONE OF US....knows that you're a complete and total fucking idiot. Whenever you're exposed for being a fucking clown, which is pretty much daily, you immediately fall back on the, "I was trolling" card.

You know who else does that all the time when he's exposed....my fucking 4 year old!

You're a pathetic child that needs to smash his computer before anyone out there actually takes you serious and catches stupid thru their computer.

[Capt Bringdown]

Is the same guy who thought the US returned Hong Kong to mainland China? Hard to tell all these board conservatives/libertarians apart.

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

It's funny because anyone that has read your posts knows for sure, 100%, that you had no clue that the article you posted was a joke. Your sense of humor has proved time and time again to be awful on this site and we all know....EVERY SINGLE ONE OF US....knows that you're a complete and total fucking idiot. Whenever you're exposed for being a fucking clown, which is pretty much daily, you immediately fall back on the, "I was trolling" card.

You know who else does that all the time when he's exposed....my fucking 4 year old!

You're a pathetic child that needs to smash his computer before anyone out there actually takes you serious and catches stupid thru their computer.

:lmao

[ElNono]

It's funny because anyone that has read your posts knows for sure, 100%, that you had no clue that the article you posted was a joke. Your sense of humor has proved time and time again to be awful on this site and we all know....EVERY SINGLE ONE OF US....knows that you're a complete and total fucking idiot. Whenever you're exposed for being a fucking clown, which is pretty much daily, you immediately fall back on the, "I was trolling" card.

You know who else does that all the time when he's exposed....my fucking 4 year old!

You're a pathetic child that needs to smash his computer before anyone out there actually takes you serious and catches stupid thru their computer.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-eAMH0BOyrFk/ThPTDl_4nmI/AAAAAAAAPOA/jWPFEQqRJiU/s1600/FGShaqShove.gif

[z0sa]

5 star thread

[clambake]

It's funny because anyone that has read your posts knows for sure, 100%, that you had no clue that the article you posted was a joke. Your sense of humor has proved time and time again to be awful on this site and we all know....EVERY SINGLE ONE OF US....knows that you're a complete and total fucking idiot. Whenever you're exposed for being a fucking clown, which is pretty much daily, you immediately fall back on the, "I was trolling" card.

You know who else does that all the time when he's exposed....my fucking 4 year old!

You're a pathetic child that needs to smash his computer before anyone out there actually takes you serious and catches stupid thru their computer.

excellent!

[Woo Bum-kon]

:lol Wild Autism strikes again!

[Trainwreck2100]

didn't that bitch see flight?

[Wild Cobra]

You guys can believe what you want. You always do anyway. I know I won't change your hatred that causes such bias.

It was fun for the short spin it had. Had two takers on it though.

[leemajors]

try reading WC's posts in Zoidberg's voice.

[Blake]

It was fun for the short spin it had. Had two takers on it though.

Three including you

[Wild Cobra]

Three including you
There is no way I can convince a hard headed idiot like you otherwise, so I'm not even going to try.

[Blake]

There is no way I can convince ...... you.

Truth bomb

[boutons_deux]

Man allegedly slapped ‘n*gger baby’ for crying on flight

The 60-year-old man told Bennett to “shut that (‘N word’) baby up,” and slapped the 2-year-old boy in his face as the plane prepared for landing.

“And he was so drunk that he fell onto my face, and his mouth moved over to my ear and he said it, just directly into my ear.

”http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/02/17/flyer-allegedly-slapped-fellow-passengers-crying-ngger-baby/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29

In Vino Veritas! :lol

[Woo Bum-kon]

Wild Cobra missed the joke all the time, so him trying to convince us that he actually didn't fall for this article is pretty hilarious.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

:lol Wild Autism strikes again!

I really do not think that this is too far from the truth. Spectrum disorder is disorder.

[CuckingFunt]

try reading WC's posts in Zoidberg's voice, why not...

Fixed.

[Oh, Gee!!]

Yes it was. I was hoping people here would run with it too. More so than what happened.

CF blew the whistle too soon.

good cover, wc. tricked us all. you're not really some idiot that can't distinguish satire from reality; no, you're a real jokester.

[Wild Cobra]

Wild Cobra missed the joke all the time, so him trying to convince us that he actually didn't fall for this article is pretty hilarious.
Well, there is often a bit of ebonic slang used. You are right, I miss such jokes.

RljdyXeft04

[TeyshaBlue]

try reading WC's posts in Zoidberg's voice.

Win!

[Vladimir Lenin]

http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/02/18/shocker-alec-baldwin-goes-on-racist-rant/

[ChumpDumper]

lol dangerous

[LnGrrrR]

Edit: Nevermind...

[RandomGuy]

Yes it was. I was hoping people here would run with it too. More so than what happened.

CF blew the whistle too soon.

I would have, had I seen it. "Dirk diggler" in the OP gave it away. If you had simply edited it out, you might have gotten more play.

Sadly... the OP isn't all that implausible. Coulter really is a disgusting human being.

[Wild Cobra]

I would have, had I seen it. "Dirk diggler" in the OP gave it away. If you had simply edited it out, you might have gotten more play.

Well, I didn't recognize the name.


Sadly... the OP isn't all that implausible. Coulter really is a disgusting human being.

That's why is was so fun to try. People think that. She pushes the limits in controversy, and it sells her books.

[Blake]

Well, I didn't recognize the name.

Even more evidence you thought this was a real story.

[TeyshaBlue]

Coulter really is a disgusting human being.

meh. He's not so bad once you get to know him.

[Wild Cobra]

Even more evidence you thought this was a real story.
Yes, to a third grader like yourself, I'm sure it is.

I have actually listened to Coulter and read her books. Most of you who take shots at here only hear what the media says about her. I have a very difficult time believing she would ever do such a thing. I push the limits too, and some of you... my God... it's so laughable what idiots like you persist to say.

[Blake]

Yes, laughable.

[Oh, Gee!!]

I have actually listened to Coulter and read her books. Most of you who take shots at here only hear what the media says about her.

or the stuff she says with her own mouth


I have a very difficult time believing she would never do such a thing.

so.....she would do such a thing? :scratcheshead

[clambake]

he reads her books, lol.

[TeyshaBlue]

or the stuff she says with her own mouth



so.....she would do such a thing? :scratcheshead

She would not never do such a thing!!!!11

[Oh, Gee!!]

She would not never do such a thing!!!!11

you can be the official WC translator

[TeyshaBlue]

you can be the official WC translator

I'll pass. I've already had one stroke.

[CuckingFunt]

I have actually listened to Coulter and read her books. Most of you who take shots at here only hear what the media says about her. I have a very difficult time believing she would ever do such a thing.

Sure. But you also have a difficult time believing you're a racist. So it's hardly shocking we doubt your judgment here.

[Wild Cobra]

Sure. But you also have a difficult time believing you're a racist. So it's hardly shocking we doubt your judgment here.
Huh?

Is that what you meant to say? Maybe it is. Let me get this strait. You say I am a racist because I am not racially sensitive or politically correct. Right?

I challenge you to show me any post where I say blacks are inferior because of race/color. The closest you will find is I call out family values, which whites are guilty of too. I suggest you look up the definition of racist. One thing you guys use against me is that I say the racists are those who want quota systems. I say that because such people believe blacks are inferior, and need special treatment. Stop treating blacks inferior please. They are not.

Next time, how about not blowing the whistle so soon, and see what my intent really is.

[boutons_deux]

I have actually listened to Coulter and read her books. ... I have a very difficult time believing she would ever do such a thing

Like Malkin and other right-wing hate bitches, Coulter is a joke, nothing but a show-business, self-promoting provocateur. Figures you'd listen to and read her shit and take it seriously. Refusing to fly with a black pilot would be exactly the kind the headline-grabbing, rabble-rousing, racist stunt that would endear more to the Repugs and the Confederacy.

I have a friend who read one of her books and exclaimed excitedly "I believe her, she has FOOTNOTES!" :lol She also said her hated socialism got started with the French Revolution. :lol Figures she would side with the autocratic oppression of the French Royalty + Catholic Church for over the the French 99%. She's your kind of establishment/1% bitch.

[Wild Cobra]

Shazbot with his typical hate mongering.

[Winehole23]

figures you would make fun of your friend on a bulletin board

[LnGrrrR]

WC, if you use race to inform your decision about something, that's pretty much the textbook case of racism.


a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.


Edit: I guess you could argue that you don't believe there's an inherent difference in the races, the difference is only because of quotas.

[CuckingFunt]

Huh?

Is that what you meant to say?

Yes. It's exactly what I meant to say.


Maybe it is. Let me get this strait. You say I am a racist because I am not racially sensitive or politically correct. Right?

No. I say that you are racist because you have on several occasions expressed views that are prejudiced based on race and because you actively support policies that promote systemic racism.


I challenge you to show me any post where I say blacks are inferior because of race/color. The closest you will find is I call out family values, which whites are guilty of too.

No. The closest I would find, were I inclined to look, would be your statements that black people make you personally uncomfortable because they are generally uncivilized and your refusal to be operated on by a black surgeon.


I suggest you look up the definition of racist.

Any confusion in our disagreement is not related to my misunderstanding of the term, I assure you.


One thing you guys use against me is that I say the racists are those who want quota systems. I say that because such people believe blacks are inferior, and need special treatment. Stop treating blacks inferior please. They are not.

Affirmative Action is not a quota system. Affirmative Action does not apply just to issues of race; it has in fact been more beneficial to white women than it has to any other group. Affirmative Action is not predicated on the belief that "blacks are inferior." The whole "liberals are secret racists" line of thought is one of the more ridiculous talking points that has sprung up in recent years.


Next time, how about not blowing the whistle so soon, and see what my intent really is.

If I hadn't pointed it out, someone else would have. This thread was destined for failure regardless your intention and/or my reaction.

[CuckingFunt]

WC, if you use race to inform your decision about something, that's pretty much the textbook case of racism.

Edit: I guess you could argue that you don't believe there's an inherent difference in the races, the difference is only because of quotas.

No, he couldn't. No matter what else is going on in Wild Cobra's argument, he has specifically singled out black surgeons as the likely recipients of special treatment and/or beneficiaries of "quota systems." When I questioned him further on the subject a couple of years ago, Cobra admitted that he would not have the same reservations about surgeons who were women or who belonged to some other minority group that could have also benefited from Affirmative Action. Nor would he have any reservations about a white male surgeon, despite the possibility he may have been grandfathered into the most prestigious programs.

Any claims Cobra might make about only being suspicious of so-called quota systems and/or the forced hiring of less qualified minorities is immediately nullified by the fact it is only and specifically black people who raise these fears. Being wary of putting your life in the hands of unqualified medical professionals would result in a distrust of all doctors. Being wary of putting your life in the hands of black surgeons is a racist sentiment based on the assumption that they would be more likely to have gotten where they are ONLY due to Affirmative Action; the assumption that black people are somehow less likely than any other group to have been promoted due to merit.

[Blake]

No, he couldn't. No matter what else is going on in Wild Cobra's argument, he has specifically singled out black surgeons as the likely recipients of special treatment and/or beneficiaries of "quota systems." When I questioned him further on the subject a couple of years ago, Cobra admitted that he would not have the same reservations about surgeons who were women or who belonged to some other minority group that could have also benefited from Affirmative Action. Nor would he have any reservations about a white male surgeon, despite the possibility he may have been grandfathered into the most prestigious programs.

Any claims Cobra might make about only being suspicious of so-called quota systems and/or the forced hiring of less qualified minorities is immediately nullified by the fact it is only and specifically black people who raise these fears. Being wary of putting your life in the hands of unqualified medical professionals would result in a distrust of all doctors. Being wary of putting your life in the hands of black surgeons is a racist sentiment based on the assumption that they would be more likely to have gotten where they are ONLY due to Affirmative Action; the assumption that black people are somehow less likely than any other group to have been promoted due to merit.

:lol

I bet the majority of people here can accurately predict Wild Cobra's upcoming response.

[TeyshaBlue]

:lol

I bet the majority of people here can accurately predict Wild Cobra's upcoming response.

If I were ever going to create a troll, this would be the time for it.

[spursncowboys]

No, he couldn't. No matter what else is going on in Wild Cobra's argument, he has specifically singled out black surgeons as the likely recipients of special treatment and/or beneficiaries of "quota systems." When I questioned him further on the subject a couple of years ago, Cobra admitted that he would not have the same reservations about surgeons who were women or who belonged to some other minority group that could have also benefited from Affirmative Action. Nor would he have any reservations about a white male surgeon, despite the possibility he may have been grandfathered into the most prestigious programs.

Any claims Cobra might make about only being suspicious of so-called quota systems and/or the forced hiring of less qualified minorities is immediately nullified by the fact it is only and specifically black people who raise these fears. Being wary of putting your life in the hands of unqualified medical professionals would result in a distrust of all doctors. Being wary of putting your life in the hands of black surgeons is a racist sentiment based on the assumption that they would be more likely to have gotten where they are ONLY due to Affirmative Action; the assumption that black people are somehow less likely than any other group to have been promoted due to merit.

You are viewing WC's comments in a time capsul, as if he can not change them.

[Clipper Nation]

:lol

I bet the majority of people here can accurately predict Wild Cobra's upcoming response.
:cry "Libtard! Hatemonger!" :cry

[clambake]

You are viewing WC's comments in a time capsul, as if he can not change them.

what do you have in mind?

[CuckingFunt]

You are viewing WC's comments in a time capsul, as if he can not change them.

Considering the lengths to which he frequently goes to defend those comments, I think it's pretty safe to assume they haven't changed.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

That's quite noble of you snc but we are talking about the guy that says that he is not racist for saying he dislikes and distrusts black people because he also doesn't like white people. That argument 'works' for him.

[SA210]

I find it very telling of people when all they want to do online is bash a fellow poster to no end every moment or chance they get. Very telling of the people themselves. Don't care what side they are politically, people seem ready to bash and tear down someone and get joy out of it. Most of the time it just happens to be towards someone who thinks differently. It amazes me how people simply just want YES men on this message board. It's very easy to always gang up on one poster with different views. Bunch of trolls doing what trolls do, no life, just spending whatever free time they have, for some it's 24/7, just to try their best in degrading a fellow poster. lol Amazing. Instead of using the political forum for it's intended use, let's all just make ourselves feel better about our loser lives and jump on the bandwagon. I hardly ever even agree with WC, definitely don't agree with him 99% of the time, but the attacks on him and on certain other posters says more about the people attacking than it does the person they are attacking, regardless of the lies anyone tries to say after this post. "They bring it on themselves, you're not perfect, he does it too, you just called us losers, etc.. blah blah blah". Pathetic. I guess people don't feel loved at home so they must hide behind computers and talk all the smack they want that they would NEVER talk in person lol. Insecurities standing out big time, and every-time they follow posters around just to troll and hate. Major insecurities and personal problems, that's for sure. :tu

[clambake]

you just hurt my feelings

[redzero]

Wild Cobra claims that he was trying to TRICK people with this thread, and people act like he is being unfairly persecuted? He comes off as a douche either way.

[boutons_deux]

Shazbot with his typical hate mongering.

I am Christ-like, driving the LIE mongerers out the Temple of Democracy.

[Wild Cobra]

WC, if you use race to inform your decision about something, that's pretty much the textbook case of racism.



Edit: I guess you could argue that you don't believe there's an inherent difference in the races, the difference is only because of quotas.
Like all words, the definition has changed in some sources because of usage. The one thing all dictionary agree on is that racism is the belief that one race is superior to another. The rest that adds confusion.

Find an older dictionary, and see what it says.

[Wild Cobra]

CF.

I'll spend some time on a response in about 10 hours. I have to leave soon.

[clambake]

you don't need to. snc said you could change.

[Blake]

I am Christ-like, driving the LIE mongerers out the Temple of Democracy.

:lol

[ChumpDumper]

I find it very telling of people when all they want to do online is bash a fellow poster to no end every moment or chance they get. Very telling of the people themselves. Don't care what side they are politically, people seem ready to bash and tear down someone and get joy out of it. Most of the time it just happens to be towards someone who thinks differently. It amazes me how people simply just want YES men on this message board. It's very easy to always gang up on one poster with different views. Bunch of trolls doing what trolls do, no life, just spending whatever free time they have, for some it's 24/7, just to try their best in degrading a fellow poster. lol Amazing. Instead of using the political forum for it's intended use, let's all just make ourselves feel better about our loser lives and jump on the bandwagon. I hardly ever even agree with WC, definitely don't agree with him 99% of the time, but the attacks on him and on certain other posters says more about the people attacking than it does the person they are attacking, regardless of the lies anyone tries to say after this post. "They bring it on themselves, you're not perfect, he does it too, you just called us losers, etc.. blah blah blah". Pathetic. I guess people don't feel loved at home so they must hide behind computers and talk all the smack they want that they would NEVER talk in person lol. Insecurities standing out big time, and every-time they follow posters around just to troll and hate. Major insecurities and personal problems, that's for sure. :tuIf you had any balls at all you would post what you think really happened on 9/11 instead of making lame post count smack, you flaming hypocrite. You have major insecurities and personal problems, that's for sure. :tu

[Wild Cobra]

No. I say that you are racist because you have on several occasions expressed views that are prejudiced based on race and because you actively support policies that promote systemic racism.

You refuse to see what I am doing. I am pointing out that such a system is flawed. Have you heard the saying that some of the worse things come from good intentions?

I do not support racist policies. I do not support special rights either.

wiki link: Special Rights (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_rights)

first part:


Special rights is a term originally used by libertarians to refer to laws granting rights to one or more groups which are not extended to other groups. Ideas of special rights are controversial, as they clash with the principle of equality before the law.

Potential examples of special rights include affirmative action policies or hate crime legislation with regard to ethnic, religious or sexual minorities, or the state recognition of marriage as a group with different taxation than those who are non-married.



No. The closest I would find, were I inclined to look, would be your statements that black people make you personally uncomfortable because they are generally uncivilized and your refusal to be operated on by a black surgeon.

Now first off, you are twisting my actual words. If you must lie to find victory, then I feel sorry for you. Your interpretation of my words, and your paraphrasing them is wrong, to the point of a lie. I suggest you look up my quotes referring to that.

So... even at that...

I conclude your beef is that I am not racially sensitive. I bring into conversations situations statistical facts.

Please show me where I said i would never be operated on by a black surgeon. Search all you want. It doesn't exist, liar.


Any confusion in our disagreement is not related to my misunderstanding of the term, I assure you.

If not, then just your hatred of people like me, who refuse to treat black people like kittens.


Affirmative Action is not a quota system.
I have covered this before. In it's original conception, affirmative action was good and proper. Most affirmative action programs have become quota systems though.

I have already, several times, specified quota based affirmative action.

Shit, why can't you get that though your head?

Affirmative Action does not apply just to issues of race; it has in fact been more beneficial to white women than it has to any other group.
Again, I like affirmative action. As long as it is not either quota based, or preferential in some point system.

Have you ever read the original language of affirmative action when it began? I suggest you look it up, and see how far removed it is from that.

Affirmative Action is not predicated on the belief that "blacks are inferior." The whole "liberals are secret racists" line of thought is one of the more ridiculous talking points that has sprung up in recent years.

Sure it is. There is no other excuse for other than ignorance. Maybe those privileged by it, not wanting to lose those special rights. Anyone honest, unselfish, and informed on the subject, cannot support the quota based or special rights version of affirmative action.

After all these years, the percentage of any employment, schooling, etc. that may have someone that decides that is a racist, is such a small percentage, it no longer is an issue. You can cheery pick and find examples, but then you are being intellectually dishonest.


If I hadn't pointed it out, someone else would have. This thread was destined for failure regardless your intention and/or my reaction.

Just the same. I see little honor in a person who refused to give the benefit of doubt, on such shaky and spun evidence. Doesn't say anything good about your character.

[ChumpDumper]

Please show me where I said i would never be operated on by a black surgeon. Search all you want. It doesn't exist, liar.You said most smart people simply avoid black surgeons. Do you count yourself among those smart people?

Yes or no.

[Wild Cobra]

You said most smart people simply avoid black surgeons. Do you count yourself among those smart people?

Yes or no.
Yes, I am smart. You obviously are not.

Most ≠ all, you fucking moron.

[ChumpDumper]

Yes, I am smart. You obviously are not.

Most ≠ all, you fucking moron.I asked if you counted yourself among those smart people who simply avoid black surgeons altogether.

Thank you for answering honestly.

[CuckingFunt]

You refuse to see what I am doing. I am pointing out that such a system is flawed. Have you heard the saying that some of the worse things come from good intentions?

That's not a saying. The road to hell is paved with good intentions; that's a saying.

However, all these years and all these conversations later, and you've never brought up a single convincing argument showing that Affirmative Action programs are on such a road. You've never even really tried. Even when I have in the past asked for specific examples of Affirmative Action having been twisted into a quota system or examples of just how such a system operates. You've mentioned several times that Affirmative Action started as one thing, which you claim to support, but has turned into some other thing, which you're against, yet you have failed to offer up even a single shred of support for this assertion.


I do not support racist policies. I do not support special rights either.

wiki link: Special Rights (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_rights)

first part:

Special rights is a term originally used by libertarians to refer to laws granting rights to one or more groups which are not extended to other groups. Ideas of special rights are controversial, as they clash with the principle of equality before the law.

Potential examples of special rights include affirmative action policies or hate crime legislation with regard to ethnic, religious or sexual minorities, or the state recognition of marriage as a group with different taxation than those who are non-married.

All that shows is that "special rights" is a term adopted by Libertarians, not that it refers to a problem that actually exists.


Now first off, you are twisting my actual words. If you must lie to find victory, then I feel sorry for you. Your interpretation of my words, and your paraphrasing them is wrong, to the point of a lie. I suggest you look up my quotes referring to that.

So... even at that...

This is the umpteenth time I've suggested this, but perhaps it would be in your best interest to put more energy into clearly expressing the point you ACTUALLY want to make, and less energy into complaining about the fact I and the rest of the board just won't give you a fair shake. If you're consistently being misunderstood, by EVERYONE, at a certain point it becomes your responsibility to express yourself better. Your failure/inability to do so indicates not that you're being misunderstood, but that you're unhappy with our correct reading of your intentions.


I conclude your beef is that I am not racially sensitive.

It's not. I stated clearly that it wasn't. And provided reasons for why it's not. You're welcome to conclude whatever you like, but know that it has absolutely no basis in reality.


I bring into conversations situations statistical facts.

You don't. Ever. In fact you balk and get defensive when you're asked to provide them.


Please show me where I said i would never be operated on by a black surgeon. Search all you want. It doesn't exist, liar.

You said that smart people would/should avoid them. Whether or not you would personally avoid them or would refuse to be operated on by a black surgeon is incidental. The sentiment remains that black surgeons are more likely than any other racial/ethnic group to have been promoted due to unfair "quota systems" and that they are therefore worthy of additional scrutiny.


If not, then just your hatred of people like me, who refuse to treat black people like kittens.

I don't hate you. As I've said before, I don't know you well enough to hate you. Me calling you a racist is not because I hate you, it's because you say racist shit. And defend it. A lot.

And there is a tremendous difference between not treating black people like kittens and assuming that black people, based solely on their blackness, are likely promoted only because of "quota systems."


I have covered this before. In it's original conception, affirmative action was good and proper. Most affirmative action programs have become quota systems though.

I have already, several times, specified quota based affirmative action.

Shit, why can't you get that though your head?

You said this before. You've covered it never. I asked you years ago for specific examples of Affirmative Action being treated as a quota system and I'm still waiting. Saying "things have changed" does not, on its own, prove that things have changed.


Again, I like affirmative action. As long as it is not either quota based, or preferential in some point system.

Have you ever read the original language of affirmative action when it began? I suggest you look it up, and see how far removed it is from that.

I have read the verbiage. It hasn't changed. If people/companies are genuinely using quota systems, it is because they do not understand or have misinterpreted Affirmative Action laws. It's not because the laws themselves, or their intended use, have changed.


After all these years, the percentage of any employment, schooling, etc. that may have someone that decides that is a racist, is such a small percentage, it no longer is an issue. You can cheery pick and find examples, but then you are being intellectually dishonest.

I genuinely haven't a clue what you're trying to say here.


Just the same. I see little honor in a person who refused to give the benefit of doubt, on such shaky and spun evidence. Doesn't say anything good about your character.

The fact I pointed out your fake article was fake besmirches my character? For seriously?

I still don't believe, for even an instant, that you knew the article was fake and that you posted it to troll all of us. HOWEVER, if that was actually your intention (and lacking any explanation from you to the contrary), the only way I can see that possibly working would be if your hope was that all of the board liberals would be tricked by the article and would then get up in arms about Ann Coulter's blatant racism. IF that's the case, my pointing out that the article was fake was not me thwarting your plan. It was your plan failing.

Either you failed in being fooled by a spoof article, or you failed in trolling the board liberals, but neither of those were my doing. In other words, man up, take your lumps, and move the fuck on.

[leemajors]

boom

[Wild Cobra]

LOL...

All that, and CF, you still have it wrong.

I may say stuff that racists also say, but that does not make me a racist. I don't use my words in any form off hate, or in any manner that shows I think someone is superior, or inferior by race.

I get tired of intolerant closed minded people like yourself. How about trying to get past your hate, and see what my words actually mean.

[clambake]

we know what you mean.

[Wild Cobra]

we know what you mean.
Which means you are delusional if you cannot accept my words and repeated clarifications. For you to think you know my mind better than I do...

Must be nice, having those delusions of grandeur, and feeling like a god.

[ChumpDumper]

Must be nice, saying all manner of racist stuff and not feeling racist.

[Wild Cobra]

Must be nice, saying all manner of racist stuff and not feeling racist.
Are you so blind, that you don't see you are attempting censorship by using political correctness?

I can say the things I do, because I have no guilt about saying them. I'm not a closet racist like many liberals are who feel guilty, and feel they must atone with special rights for other groups.

Why is it that someone immediately thinks one-way about open and honest words. Doesn't this closed minded prejudice indicate that the problem is yours, not mine?

[clambake]

no way in hell we think you"re a closet racist.

[ChumpDumper]

Are you so blind, that you don't see you are attempting censorship by using political correctness?:lol

Man, you never pass up a chance to play the victim. I am not attempting to censor anything by using anything. I actively encourage you to post all your racist beliefs.


I can say the things I do, because I have no guilt about saying them. I'm not a closet racist like many liberals are who feel guilty, and feel they must atone with special rights for other groups.Right, you're an unashamed, open racist.


Why is it that someone immediately thinks one-way about open and honest words. Doesn't this closed minded prejudice indicate that the problem is yours, not mine?I have no problem with your racism per se other than strongly disagreeing with it. People believe what they want to believe. Just quit denying it.

[TeyshaBlue]

Clambake...answer your PM you racist!!!1111!

[clambake]

i got a pm?

[TeyshaBlue]

Get an adult to help you.

[clambake]

Get an adult to help you.

wouldn't help. we're all childish here.

[clambake]

just hope you understand the magnitude of our decision.

[TeyshaBlue]

:lol:lol:lol

[FuzzyLumpkins]

WC, can you name a person that you consider racist from contemporary popular or political culture?

You say that you are not a racist so I am curious what type of behavior or beliefs are racist in your view.

[ChumpDumper]

WC, can you name a person that you consider racist from contemporary popular or political culture?Madcow!

[spursncowboys]

WC, can you name a person that you consider racist from contemporary popular or political culture?

You say that you are not a racist so I am curious what type of behavior or beliefs are racist in your view.
Do you think someone who makes a racist joke is a racist?

[ChumpDumper]

Do you think someone who makes a racist joke is a racist?Would have to hear the joke.

[awaits Joe Biden gotcha attempt]

[spursncowboys]

Ohhh that's...that's just as they say where I'm from malarkey

[ChumpDumper]

Ohhh that's...that's just as they say where I'm from malarkeyI don't see any racism in that sentence.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Do you think someone who makes a racist joke is a racist?

Chump pretty much covered it but that really depends on the joke, the forum, and any number of things.

This is besides the point because WC has done quite a bit more than 'a racist joke' to earn the designation.

Do you consider someone that says "I don't like most black people" to be racist?

[2centsworth]

I find it very telling of people when all they want to do online is bash a fellow poster to no end every moment or chance they get. Very telling of the people themselves. Don't care what side they are politically, people seem ready to bash and tear down someone and get joy out of it. Most of the time it just happens to be towards someone who thinks differently. It amazes me how people simply just want YES men on this message board. It's very easy to always gang up on one poster with different views. Bunch of trolls doing what trolls do, no life, just spending whatever free time they have, for some it's 24/7, just to try their best in degrading a fellow poster. lol Amazing. Instead of using the political forum for it's intended use, let's all just make ourselves feel better about our loser lives and jump on the bandwagon. I hardly ever even agree with WC, definitely don't agree with him 99% of the time, but the attacks on him and on certain other posters says more about the people attacking than it does the person they are attacking, regardless of the lies anyone tries to say after this post. "They bring it on themselves, you're not perfect, he does it too, you just called us losers, etc.. blah blah blah". Pathetic. I guess people don't feel loved at home so they must hide behind computers and talk all the smack they want that they would NEVER talk in person lol. Insecurities standing out big time, and every-time they follow posters around just to troll and hate. Major insecurities and personal problems, that's for sure. :tu

:tu:tu Pussies.

[spursncowboys]

Chump pretty much covered it but that really depends on the joke, the forum, and any number of things.

This is besides the point because WC has done quite a bit more than 'a racist joke' to earn the designation.

Do you consider someone that says "I don't like most black people" to be racist?

Me no. It's insensitive. Like for the black surgeon thing.
Someone saying they don't like black surgeons for this and that: not racist
Actually not wanting a black surgeon: not racist
Not hiring or changing locations because the surgeon is black (even if 9 out of 10 black surgeons openly admit to trying to kill white people they operate on): racist

Whether it's the proper definition or not. That's how I view it. I don't want the word racist to lose its value or meaning.

[Blake]

Actually not wanting a black surgeon: not racist


lolwut

[spursncowboys]

Creeper Alert

[GoodOdor]

Me no. It's insensitive. Like for the black surgeon thing.
Someone saying they don't like black surgeons for this and that: not racist
Actually not wanting a black surgeon: not racist
Not hiring or changing locations because the surgeon is black (even if 9 out of 10 black surgeons openly admit to trying to kill white people they operate on): racist

Whether it's the proper definition or not. That's how I view it. I don't want the word racist to lose its value or meaning.

You make 0 sense, Sean. Do you and Wild Cobra belong to a special club where words have different meanings?

[GoodOdor]

See, this is where formal education post high school would have done you and WC a world of good.

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

You make 0 sense, Sean. Do you and Wild Cobra belong to a special club where words have different meanings?

Two clubs actually: the Christian Church and the US military :lol

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Me no. It's insensitive. Like for the black surgeon thing.
Someone saying they don't like black surgeons for this and that: not racist
Actually not wanting a black surgeon: not racist
Not hiring or changing locations because the surgeon is black (even if 9 out of 10 black surgeons openly admit to trying to kill white people they operate on): racist

Whether it's the proper definition or not. That's how I view it. I don't want the word racist to lose its value or meaning.

Some of the definitions of racism are asinine. I can go with that. Most commonly from what I have observed, it's held that holding negative views on an individual or group on the basis of race is what makes something 'racist.'

I could get racism being based on action and not on words but how is declining use of a surgeon because he is black not racist when moving away from someone on the basis of race is racist?

What logic is that?

I mean if you are presented with the choice of doctor and you decide on the basis of race ie you prefer a certain race over another that seems the very definition of racism. Having a bias on who you like and don't like on the basis of race does not strike me as an unfair standard either.

[CuckingFunt]

LOL...

All that, and CF, you still have it wrong.

I may say stuff that racists also say, but that does not make me a racist. I don't use my words in any form off hate, or in any manner that shows I think someone is superior, or inferior by race.

I get tired of intolerant closed minded people like yourself. How about trying to get past your hate, and see what my words actually mean.

All I or anyone else here can use to judge you and your opinions are the words you choose to type. We can't climb into your brain and figure out your intentions when you're typing them. If the words you've used don't accurately reflect your intentions, perhaps you should use different words.

Until you do, I stand by everything I've said about the words you've used thus far. If I'm wrong, and if you'd really prefer I get it right, put your effort into convincing rather than complaining.

[CuckingFunt]

Someone saying they don't like black surgeons for this and that: not racist
Actually not wanting a black surgeon: not racist

No, no. No. Pretty racist, actually.

[redzero]

There's nothing racist about thinking that Black surgeons probably can't do their job as well as White surgeons. Not racist at all.

[MannyIsGod]

try reading WC's posts in Zoidberg's voice.

Holy shit. Thank you so much. I can't even tell you how mind blown I am right now.

[MannyIsGod]

LOL wow at that post. Just wow. Thats textbook racism.

[Edward]

Me no. It's insensitive. Like for the black surgeon thing.
Someone saying they don't like black surgeons for this and that: not racist
Actually not wanting a black surgeon: not racist
Not hiring or changing locations because the surgeon is black (even if 9 out of 10 black surgeons openly admit to trying to kill white people they operate on): racist

Whether it's the proper definition or not. That's how I view it. I don't want the word racist to lose its value or meaning.
:lmao you are one retarded jarheaded motherfucker. I hope your slut inbred mother dies of AIDS. Fortunately your dad has probably already died due to the alcoholism white trash dads typical have, so I don't have to hope for his death.

:lmao Sean Jacquemotte

[Wild Cobra]

All I or anyone else here can use to judge you and your opinions are the words you choose to type.
true, and your judgement is wrong.
We can't climb into your brain and figure out your intentions when you're typing them.

You sure think you can, no matter how much I say you are wrong.


If the words you've used don't accurately reflect your intentions, perhaps you should use different words.

My words usually do accurately make my point. Now i do sometimes have to elaborate or sometimes make a mistake, but I stand by what I remember saying. I challenge you to bring me a direct quote, in full context, and explain to me why it is racist. I will show you why you are wrong. The problem is that too many people are indoctrinated to think the wrong things. You guys are corrupted by PC. You think anything derogatory when speaking of a black person is because that person is black. How fucking stupid can people be about that?


Until you do, I stand by everything I've said about the words you've used thus far.

And I stand by my words.


If I'm wrong, and if you'd really prefer I get it right, put your effort into convincing rather than complaining.

Why? I get a laugh about your stupidity, no matter how many times I correct you. You are still too bullheaded and indoctrinated to see the facts as they stand. Instead, you read your own bias into them.

[Wild Cobra]

LOL wow at that post. Just wow. Thats textbook racism.
I'll bet you can find it in textbooks at any University of Indoctrination.

[spursncowboys]

See, this is where formal education post high school would have done you and WC a world of good.
:lmao

[spursncowboys]

I could get racism being based on action and not on words but how is declining use of a surgeon because he is black not racist when moving away from someone on the basis of race is racist?



I mean if you are presented with the choice of doctor and you decide on the basis of race ie you prefer a certain race over another that seems the very definition of racism. Having a bias on who you like and don't like on the basis of race does not strike me as an unfair standard either.
No I agree completely.

[spursncowboys]

:lmao you are one retarded jarheaded motherfucker. I hope your slut inbred mother dies of AIDS. Fortunately your dad has probably already died due to the alcoholism white trash dads typical have, so I don't have to hope for his death.

:lmao Sean Jacquemotte
How dare you!!!
Who do you think you are!!
I cannot believe you!
How dare you call me a jarhead!

[TeyshaBlue]

:lmao you are one retarded jarheaded motherfucker. I hope your slut inbred mother dies of AIDS. Fortunately your dad has probably already died due to the alcoholism white trash dads typical have, so I don't have to hope for his death.

:lmao Sean Jacquemotte

Die in a fire.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Die in a fire.

3H-MeS6LhhU

[CuckingFunt]

I challenge you to bring me a direct quote, in full context, and explain to me why it is racist. I will show you why you are wrong.

No, you won't. You'll tell me over and over that I am wrong, but that is not the same thing as showing me that I am wrong.


You think anything derogatory when speaking of a black person is because that person is black.

No. I do not think derogatory comments about a single black person are always/necessarily made because that person is black.

I do, however, think that comments made about a group of black people are made because they are black when the color of their skin is the only factor that separates them from the other groups being discussed.

You are the person with a posting history that includes comments such as "I do not like most black people" and "Most smart people would avoid black surgeons." You've gone to great lengths since making those statements to clarify that you really meant that you didn't like loud people with low morals, in the first case, and that you were wary of surgeons who may have been promoted sue to quota systems, in the second. But these are things that you said. That you stand by. If you didn't associate low morals and unfair advantages with black people, specifically, you wouldn't have made your statements initially or have defended them so vehemently for years.


And I stand by my words.

Oh, I know you do.


Why? I get a laugh about your stupidity, no matter how many times I correct you.

Your laughter sure reads a lot like whining.

[spursncowboys]

3H-MeS6LhhU
M9BNoNFKCBI

[FuzzyLumpkins]

No, you won't. You'll tell me over and over that I am wrong, but that is not the same thing as showing me that I am wrong.

No. I do not think derogatory comments about a single black person are always/necessarily made because that person is black.

I do, however, think that comments made about a group of black people are made because they are black when the color of their skin is the only factor that separates them from the other groups being discussed.

You are the person with a posting history that includes comments such as "I do not like most black people" and "Most smart people would avoid black surgeons." You've gone to great lengths since making those statements to clarify that you really meant that you didn't like loud people with low morals, in the first case, and that you were wary of surgeons who may have been promoted sue to quota systems, in the second. But these are things that you said. That you stand by. If you didn't associate low morals and unfair advantages with black people, specifically, you wouldn't have made your statements initially or have defended them so vehemently for years.

Oh, I know you do.

Your laughter sure reads a lot like whining.

Here you go Funt. I put this together awhile back.

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=200756&page=8&p=6019156&viewfull=1#post6019156

[clambake]

Here you go Funt. I put this together awhile back.

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=200756&page=8&p=6019156&viewfull=1#post6019156

lol he singles out black people the way white people single out him.