Spurs 3 champs <> Lakers 3 champs

[TheTruth]

'99 spurs, '00 lakers, '01 lakers, '02 lakers, '03 spurs, '05 spurs.

Which team is the best?

[ducks]

is this head to head?

[missmyzte]

2001 Lakers

[HB22inSA]

Lakers--because they did it three in a row.

[Leetonidas]

The 2005 Spurs would beat any of those Laker teams asses.

[emveepee]

The 2005 Spurs would beat any of those Laker teams asses.

But which team will Horry side with? And another thing, do you actually think the '05 Horry > '02 Horry?

[SAtown]

But which team will Horry side with? And another thing, do you actually think the '05 Horry > '02 Horry?

Horry '05 performance >>>>>>>> Horry '02 performance.

[Amuseddaysleeper]

im sorry but the lakers hands down, they had much more of a killer instinct and consistency than any of our spurs teams (although you do have to give the '99 team props) i think the lakers as of right now are still gonna be looked back on at this decade so far as THE team, however if SA can get at least 2 more championships before 2010 which is likely, the decade should belong to them

[Spursdaone]

Lakers were more dominant in those 3 years. The spurs took advantage of the years where there weren't any dominant teams.

[DDS4]

I still think the best of the six mentioned is the 2001 Laker team. Although you can make a case for the 1999 Spur team being a close second. That 99 team did beat Kobe and Shaq.

[Spursdaone]

That was before Phil Jackson. Kobe got better later and Phil Jackson came up with some tricky schemes to beat the spurs later on and dominated those 3 years. They even beat a very good Sacramento team in their 3rd championship. They are clearly more dominant than San Antonio.

[polandprzem]

Yeah Scto with that Horry shot and PTB with miracle comeback when the Blazers couldn't score $h!t

[Spursdaone]

Yeah and that miracle miss by Horry against San Antonio. I guess Horry decided at that point if you can't beat them joint them.

[polandprzem]

Horry was with the spurs at the very begining

[Spurs košarka kultura]

if you can't beat them joint them.
Now that's what I'm talkin about :smokin

[Banks91]

forget the 3 laker champ teams, cuz by the time this is all said and done, Duncan will have as many rings and finals mvps as Jordan(maybe 1 short finals mvp, cuz manu eventually 1 win himself)

[exstatic]

'01 Lakers. Then again, the weakest and worst was the '00 Lakers.

spursdaone - you obviously don't think so, so maybe you should get a new handle.

[Spursdaone]

The lakers owned San Antonio from 2000-2002. It was not until Shaq got way out of shape from injuries that San Antonio won. If Horry made that shot San Antonio would never have beaten LAL that year.

[Mr Dio]

Every yr the Lakers won the title they didn't have to play a real team in the NBA Finals. The Lakers won the title when they won the West. LA found out what it is like to play a real team..LA should've been swept but Kobina put up some luck & they escaped with a 4 games to 1 AZZ KICKIN'!

[Spursdaone]

Unfortunately Detroit wasn't San Antonio in 2004. LAL owned San Antonio.

[ICE3000]

THE 2003 SPURS WITH SPEEDY AND JAX WAS THE CLOSEST THING THE SPURS EVER HAD TO A TEAM THAT WOULD BE ACCEPTED BY THE MASS MEDIA AND THEY EVEN WERE SATRTIN TO A KINDA BAD BOY EDGE WIT SPEEDY AND JAX ON THE TEAM... O WELL I GUESS THATS WHY WE DONT HAVE THOSE GUYS ON THE TEAM ANYMORE... BUT THAT TEAM WOULD BEAT THIS 2005 TEAM... TIMMY WAS PLAYIN AT A HIGHER LEVEL THE BACKUP PG WAS A KILLER JAX GAVE U JUST AS MUCH AS MANU BOWEN WAS YOUNGER...DANNY FERRY.. KERR... THAT TEAM WAS THE BEST SPURS TEAM EVER!!!! :blah

[cmc$purs]

SPURS 05 :king