Minnesota testimony about gay marriage

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/12/minnesota-gay-marriage-hearing-mike-frey_n_2861330.html?utm_hp_ref=politics&ir=Politics


Mike Frey, a "concerned" father and husband, spoke in front of the committee on Tuesday and cited Minnesota's sodomy law (http://www.aclu.org/lgbt-rights_hiv-aids/court-strikes-down-minnesota-sodomy-law-ventura-administration-may-fight-state-), struck down in 2001, which defined sodomy as both anal and oral sex. He attempted to argue that gay sex poses a danger to citizens of the state (http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=1uY9E18lm68) because it results in the spread of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS).He claimed that heterosexual sex could be safer because the vagina has a "barrier of cellular tissue that doesn't allow the sperm ... to penetrate the blood flow," but anal sex doesn't have such protections.
"When ejaculation occurs inside of a colon, it's highly absorbent material, the cells do not have a barrier for the sperm and those enzymes to enter into the blood flow," Frey said. "When the enzymes enter into the blood flow, and a continued, prolonged environment of that happens, these enzymes in the blood flow, it causes what we know as AIDS.

:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao

:lmao magical vagina AIDS fighting powers

[TeyshaBlue]

I don't want to know what you were googling to pull that up.

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

I don't want to know what you were googling to pull that up.
Saw it on my FB feed tbh

[TeyshaBlue]

I'm not judging....you do what you do. hf :lol

[Blake]

Oral sex was against the law as late as 2001?

[rjv]

this is interesting:

Minnesota's sodomy law, which has been on the books since the 1800s, prohibits both oral and anal sex between any adults. Penalties include up to a year in jail and up to $3,000 in fines. In recent years, the law has been directly enforced and also has been indirectly used to deny opportunities, especially to lesbians and gay men in employment, child custody and other areas. For years, efforts to repeal the law in the state legislature were unsuccessful. Right-wing groups unsuccessfully tried to alter the law in recent years, so it would not apply to married, straight couples.