If the Knicks had a better coach, are they better?

[whitemamba]

lets say George Karl, or Pop, or PJax , thibs, or any elite coach, are the knicks a better team?

discuss.

[Robz4000]

Depends on whether the FO will let them do their thing or let the players' ego dictate everything. New York's problem is the fact their "talent" is full of themselves.

[Clipper Nation]

Not really that much better, because they'd still have a way too old and imbalanced roster of injury-prone guys, tbh....

[rayjayjohnson]

No. Melo had Karl and he fucked that up

[Robz4000]

No. Melo had Karl and he fucked that up

:lmao That's right, half these fucks were on the Nugs a couple years ago and still sucked balls (though they did get to the WCF in a fluke year I guess)...

[Jacob1983]

No because they aren't good enough and Carmelo is a pussy.

[whitemamba]

:lmao That's right, half these fucks were on the Nugs a couple years ago and still sucked balls (though they did get to the WCF in a fluke year I guess)...

was it a fluke rayjay?

[ElNono]

None of those coaches can trade Amare (no insurance on his knee) and most would try to swap Melo and JR for players they could coach. And yeah, they probably would end up with a better team and better record. Having Chandler there is already a big boost.

[rayjayjohnson]

was it a fluke rayjay?

Not really, the west in 09 wasn't as stacked as it is now

[Latarian Milton]

knicks have so many problems here and there but not having a good coach might be the last one on their trouble list imho. i mean with such level of talents they should've done MUCH better than they actually do even with a shitty coach like phillibeaner tbh.