boutons_deux
04-12-2013, 02:23 PM
1. Any private business that displays signage which prohibits public invitees, business visitors, and employees from carrying a concealed weapon on the premises owned or occupied by such private business shall be liable for any injury or damages incurred by such public invitees, business visitors, and employees as a result of such prohibition if such public invitee, business visitor, or employee establishes by a preponderance of evidence that having access to a firearm may have prevented his or her injury or damage.
2. Any private business that does not prohibit public invitees, business visitors, and employees from carrying a concealed weapon on the premises owned or occupied by such private business shall be immune from any liability arising from its decision to permit concealed weapons to be carried on business premises.
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2013/04/12/1858351/missouri-bill-seeks-to-coerce-business-owners-into-allowing-guns-on-their-property/
2. Any private business that does not prohibit public invitees, business visitors, and employees from carrying a concealed weapon on the premises owned or occupied by such private business shall be immune from any liability arising from its decision to permit concealed weapons to be carried on business premises.
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2013/04/12/1858351/missouri-bill-seeks-to-coerce-business-owners-into-allowing-guns-on-their-property/