boutons_deux
04-26-2013, 01:02 PM
but:
12 Programs Congress Refuses To Save From Automatic Spending Cuts (http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/04/26/1927581/12-programs-congress-refuses-to-save-from-automatic-spending-cuts/)
1. Long-term unemployment: There are 4.7 million Americans who have been unemployed for longer than six months, but sequestration cut federal long-term unemployment insurance checks by up to 10.7 percent (http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/04/02/1810621/sequester-budget-cuts-unemployment-insurance/), costing recipients as much as $450 over the rest of the year. Those cuts compound the cuts eight (http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/02/11/1569621/states-cut-unemployment-insurance/) states (http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/02/19/1610571/north-carolina-unemployment-cuts/) have made to their unemployment programs, and 11 states (http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/02/19/1610571/north-carolina-unemployment-cuts/) are considering dropping the federal program altogether because of sequestration — even though the long-term unemployed are finding it nearly impossible (http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/04/16/1867941/long-term-unemployed-chart/) to return to work.
2. Head Start: Low-income children across the country have been kicked out of Head Start (http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/03/15/1725841/head-start-sequestration/) education programs because of the 5-percent cuts mandated by sequestration, as states have cut bus transportation services and started conducting lotteries to determine which kids would no longer have access to the program, even though the preschool program has been proven to have substantial benefits (http://thinkprogress.org/education/2011/03/25/177541/gop-shrug-head-start/) for low-income children. In all, about 70,000 children will lose access to Head Start and Early Head Start programs.
3. Cancer treatment: Budget cuts have forced doctors and cancer clinics to deny chemotherapy treatments (http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/04/04/1819811/sequestration-cancer-clinics/) to thousands of cancer patients thanks to a 2 percent cut to Medicare. One clinic in New York has refused to see more than 5,000 (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/04/03/cancer-clinics-are-turning-away-thousands-of-medicare-patients-blame-the-sequester/) of its Medicare patients, and many cancer patients have had to travel to other states to receive their treatments, an option that obviously isn’t available to lower-income people. Rep. Renee Ellmers (R-NC) proposed restoring the funding (http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/04/10/1845591/gop-congresswoman-cancer-sequester/), but the legislation so far hasn’t moved in Congress.
4. Health research: The National Institutes of Health lost $1.6 billion thanks to sequestration, jeopardizing important health research into AIDS, cancer, and other diseases. That won’t just impact research and the people who do it, though. It will also hurt the economy, costing the U.S. $860 billion in lost economic growth and at least 500,000 jobs (http://www.cnbc.com/id/100444803). Budget cuts will also hamper research at colleges and universities.
5. Low-income housing: 140,000 low-income families — primarily seniors with disabilities and families with children — will lose rental assistance (http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/04/03/1815401/budget-cuts-to-deny-rent-assistance-for-140000-low-income-families/) thanks to sequestration’s budget cuts. Even worse, the cuts could likely make rent and housing more expensive for those families, as agencies raise costs to offset the pain of budget cuts, and sequestration will also cut from programs that aid the homeless and fund the construction of low-income housing.
6. Student aid: Sequestration is already raising fees (http://thinkprogress.org/education/2013/03/18/1736531/sequestration-student-loans/) on Direct student loans, increasing costs for students who are already buried in debt. The budget cuts reduce funding for federal work study grants by $49 million and for
educational opportunity grants by $37 million, and the total cuts will cost 70,000 college students (http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/02/sequester-snapshot-student-loans/) access to grants they depend on.
7. Meals On Wheels: Local Meals on Wheels programs, which help low-income and disabled seniors access food, have faced hundreds of thousands of dollars in cuts (http://www.kansascity.com/2013/04/02/4157140/sequestration-may-mean-hard-times.html), costing tens of thousands of seniors access to the program. Many of those seniors have little access to food without the program, but Congress has made no effort to replace the funding.
8. Women, Infant, and Children programs: WIC helps 9 million low-income women and children (http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&id=3909) with nutrition and health care referrals. Among these women, the program has led to healthier births, a higher intake of important nutrients, and a strong connection to preventative services. Sequestration means that the program would have to cut off about 600,000 participants (http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/02/08/fact-sheet-examples-how-sequester-would-impact-middle-class-families-job).
9. Heating assistance: The Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) helps nearly 9 million households afford their heating and cooling bills. Sequestration will cut the program by an estimated $180 million, meaning about 400,000 households will no longer receive aid (http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2013/02/22/1626221/10-ways-the-sequester-will-expose-americans-to-greater-health-risks-and-other-perils/). These cuts come on top of $1.6 billion in reductions (http://markey.house.gov/press-release/markey-mcgovern-welch-protect-liheap-sequester-cuts) since 2010.
10. Workplace safety: The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has long suffered from a lack of funds, which means its staff is so stretched that many workplaces go without an inspection for 99 years (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324763404578431270477197746.html). The fertilizer plant that exploded in West, Texas, for example, hadn’t had a visit from OSHA since 1985 (http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/04/19/1893601/update-last-inspection-of-west-texas-fertilizer-plant-was-in-1985/). That will get worse, as sequestration will cut the agency’s budget by $564.8 million (http://info.emilcott.com/ehswire-blog/bid/272939/How-Will-The-Sequester-Cuts-Affect-OSHA), likely leading to 1,200 fewer workplace inspections (http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/02/08/fact-sheet-examples-how-sequester-would-impact-middle-class-families-job).
11. Obamacare: Sequestration cuts a number of important programs in the Affordable Care Act (http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2013/03/02/1662271/the-dumbest-and-most-devastating-sequester-cuts/): $13 million from the Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan Program, or CO-OPs; $57 million from the Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control program; $51 million from the Prevention and Public Health Fund; $27 million from the State Grants and Demonstrations program; and $44 million from the Affordable Insurance Exchange Grants program, or the insurance exchanges.
12. Child care: Child care costs can exceed rent payments or college tuition (http://www.naccrra.org/sites/default/files/default_site_pages/2012/cost_report_2012_final_081012_0.pdf) and waiting lists for getting assistance are already long. Yet sequestration will reduce funds even further, meaning that 30,000 children (http://www.nwlc.org/what-federal-budget-sequestration-will-mean-child-care-and-head-start) will lose subsidies for care. For example, Arizona will experience a $3 million cut to funding (http://www.azcentral.com/news/politics/articles/20130325cps-oversight-committee-talks-sequester-effects.html) that will force 1,000 out of care.
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/04/26/1927581/12-programs-congress-refuses-to-save-from-automatic-spending-cuts/
12 Programs Congress Refuses To Save From Automatic Spending Cuts (http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/04/26/1927581/12-programs-congress-refuses-to-save-from-automatic-spending-cuts/)
1. Long-term unemployment: There are 4.7 million Americans who have been unemployed for longer than six months, but sequestration cut federal long-term unemployment insurance checks by up to 10.7 percent (http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/04/02/1810621/sequester-budget-cuts-unemployment-insurance/), costing recipients as much as $450 over the rest of the year. Those cuts compound the cuts eight (http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/02/11/1569621/states-cut-unemployment-insurance/) states (http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/02/19/1610571/north-carolina-unemployment-cuts/) have made to their unemployment programs, and 11 states (http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/02/19/1610571/north-carolina-unemployment-cuts/) are considering dropping the federal program altogether because of sequestration — even though the long-term unemployed are finding it nearly impossible (http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/04/16/1867941/long-term-unemployed-chart/) to return to work.
2. Head Start: Low-income children across the country have been kicked out of Head Start (http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/03/15/1725841/head-start-sequestration/) education programs because of the 5-percent cuts mandated by sequestration, as states have cut bus transportation services and started conducting lotteries to determine which kids would no longer have access to the program, even though the preschool program has been proven to have substantial benefits (http://thinkprogress.org/education/2011/03/25/177541/gop-shrug-head-start/) for low-income children. In all, about 70,000 children will lose access to Head Start and Early Head Start programs.
3. Cancer treatment: Budget cuts have forced doctors and cancer clinics to deny chemotherapy treatments (http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/04/04/1819811/sequestration-cancer-clinics/) to thousands of cancer patients thanks to a 2 percent cut to Medicare. One clinic in New York has refused to see more than 5,000 (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/04/03/cancer-clinics-are-turning-away-thousands-of-medicare-patients-blame-the-sequester/) of its Medicare patients, and many cancer patients have had to travel to other states to receive their treatments, an option that obviously isn’t available to lower-income people. Rep. Renee Ellmers (R-NC) proposed restoring the funding (http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/04/10/1845591/gop-congresswoman-cancer-sequester/), but the legislation so far hasn’t moved in Congress.
4. Health research: The National Institutes of Health lost $1.6 billion thanks to sequestration, jeopardizing important health research into AIDS, cancer, and other diseases. That won’t just impact research and the people who do it, though. It will also hurt the economy, costing the U.S. $860 billion in lost economic growth and at least 500,000 jobs (http://www.cnbc.com/id/100444803). Budget cuts will also hamper research at colleges and universities.
5. Low-income housing: 140,000 low-income families — primarily seniors with disabilities and families with children — will lose rental assistance (http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/04/03/1815401/budget-cuts-to-deny-rent-assistance-for-140000-low-income-families/) thanks to sequestration’s budget cuts. Even worse, the cuts could likely make rent and housing more expensive for those families, as agencies raise costs to offset the pain of budget cuts, and sequestration will also cut from programs that aid the homeless and fund the construction of low-income housing.
6. Student aid: Sequestration is already raising fees (http://thinkprogress.org/education/2013/03/18/1736531/sequestration-student-loans/) on Direct student loans, increasing costs for students who are already buried in debt. The budget cuts reduce funding for federal work study grants by $49 million and for
educational opportunity grants by $37 million, and the total cuts will cost 70,000 college students (http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/02/sequester-snapshot-student-loans/) access to grants they depend on.
7. Meals On Wheels: Local Meals on Wheels programs, which help low-income and disabled seniors access food, have faced hundreds of thousands of dollars in cuts (http://www.kansascity.com/2013/04/02/4157140/sequestration-may-mean-hard-times.html), costing tens of thousands of seniors access to the program. Many of those seniors have little access to food without the program, but Congress has made no effort to replace the funding.
8. Women, Infant, and Children programs: WIC helps 9 million low-income women and children (http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&id=3909) with nutrition and health care referrals. Among these women, the program has led to healthier births, a higher intake of important nutrients, and a strong connection to preventative services. Sequestration means that the program would have to cut off about 600,000 participants (http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/02/08/fact-sheet-examples-how-sequester-would-impact-middle-class-families-job).
9. Heating assistance: The Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) helps nearly 9 million households afford their heating and cooling bills. Sequestration will cut the program by an estimated $180 million, meaning about 400,000 households will no longer receive aid (http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2013/02/22/1626221/10-ways-the-sequester-will-expose-americans-to-greater-health-risks-and-other-perils/). These cuts come on top of $1.6 billion in reductions (http://markey.house.gov/press-release/markey-mcgovern-welch-protect-liheap-sequester-cuts) since 2010.
10. Workplace safety: The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has long suffered from a lack of funds, which means its staff is so stretched that many workplaces go without an inspection for 99 years (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324763404578431270477197746.html). The fertilizer plant that exploded in West, Texas, for example, hadn’t had a visit from OSHA since 1985 (http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/04/19/1893601/update-last-inspection-of-west-texas-fertilizer-plant-was-in-1985/). That will get worse, as sequestration will cut the agency’s budget by $564.8 million (http://info.emilcott.com/ehswire-blog/bid/272939/How-Will-The-Sequester-Cuts-Affect-OSHA), likely leading to 1,200 fewer workplace inspections (http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/02/08/fact-sheet-examples-how-sequester-would-impact-middle-class-families-job).
11. Obamacare: Sequestration cuts a number of important programs in the Affordable Care Act (http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2013/03/02/1662271/the-dumbest-and-most-devastating-sequester-cuts/): $13 million from the Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan Program, or CO-OPs; $57 million from the Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control program; $51 million from the Prevention and Public Health Fund; $27 million from the State Grants and Demonstrations program; and $44 million from the Affordable Insurance Exchange Grants program, or the insurance exchanges.
12. Child care: Child care costs can exceed rent payments or college tuition (http://www.naccrra.org/sites/default/files/default_site_pages/2012/cost_report_2012_final_081012_0.pdf) and waiting lists for getting assistance are already long. Yet sequestration will reduce funds even further, meaning that 30,000 children (http://www.nwlc.org/what-federal-budget-sequestration-will-mean-child-care-and-head-start) will lose subsidies for care. For example, Arizona will experience a $3 million cut to funding (http://www.azcentral.com/news/politics/articles/20130325cps-oversight-committee-talks-sequester-effects.html) that will force 1,000 out of care.
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/04/26/1927581/12-programs-congress-refuses-to-save-from-automatic-spending-cuts/