PDA

View Full Version : Warriors or Nuggets?



TE
04-28-2013, 08:45 PM
Who would you prefer tbh?

Stabula
04-28-2013, 08:46 PM
Spurs would beat either in 5

Uriel
04-28-2013, 08:47 PM
Golden State. Denver has more all-around talent and a higher ceiling.

SpurPadre
04-28-2013, 08:48 PM
Dubs haven't won in San Antonio in how many years? And yet they would have to beat us in 7 with 4 possible games in San Antonio? 'Nuff said.

RD2191
04-28-2013, 08:51 PM
dubs

Brunodf
04-28-2013, 08:52 PM
Nuggets

tmtcsc
04-28-2013, 08:53 PM
Yes

DPG21920
04-28-2013, 08:54 PM
Spurs would beat either in 5

Here we go with typical Spur fan over confidence. Spurs played a terrible (largely due to injury) Laker team so now Spurs fan thinks everyone is a sweep or 5 games.

100%duncan
04-28-2013, 08:56 PM
Warriors. Should have been a poll tbh.

playblair
04-28-2013, 08:56 PM
warriors............

SpurSwag
04-28-2013, 08:56 PM
Its a tossup, both match ups provide problems. Curry is the best player on either team, and him, jack, and thompson are threats to go crazy in every game. They also have a ridiculous home court. Denver has more overall talent, and say what you want about McGee, but he can make things really tough for Duncan and the guards. I think at the end of the day, I'd rather play Golden State tbh

ManuTastic
04-28-2013, 08:57 PM
GS. No Lee.

Stabula
04-28-2013, 09:00 PM
Here we go with typical Spur fan over confidence. Spurs played a terrible (largely due to injury) Laker team so now Spurs fan thinks everyone is a sweep or 5 games. No. Only teams in Spurs league are Heat, Thunder, Clippers, and possibly Knicks.

DPG21920
04-28-2013, 09:01 PM
I know that people say GS, but they have so many shooters and that sort of concerns me more than Denver. Sure, Denver is more athletic, but they don't have the scorers/shooters. They score because of pace. I think I would prefer Denver in all reality.

Lee is out, but he was so bad defensively that I think they might actually be better overall without him too.

DPG21920
04-28-2013, 09:02 PM
No. Only teams in Spurs league are Heat, Thunder, Clippers, and possibly Knicks.

SMH. Memphis pounded the Spurs as an 8th seed. Even if you believe what you say, that doesn't mean it's a sweep or 5. Could it be? Sure, but using the LA series as any sort of barometer outside of health is quite silly to me.

HarlemHeat37
04-28-2013, 09:03 PM
I don't really care, tbh..

I'd lean towards Golden State, but it doesn't really make a difference..David Lee gives the Spurs trouble and he's out, so that helps..Denver can throw Iguodala/Brewer/Chandler at Parker/Ginobili, while the Warriors only have Klay Thompson(which will force him to exert energy, hurting him since he's a one-dimensional player)..

The Warriors don't have any bigs other than Bogut, either..Bogut defends Duncan very well, though..

Denver can't shoot and don't have any consistent creators, they are a regular season team..

crc21209
04-28-2013, 09:04 PM
Tough to decide. Both teams have strengths and some weaknesses.

Warriors

1. Fast paced team that relies on guards and their 3's.
2. Curry and Thompson are some of the best shooters in the league.
3. GREAT home crowd.

But...

1. They don't have much size or length on the perimeter, and arent known for their defense.
2. Ezeli, Bogut, and Landry arent really known for their offense.

Nuggets

1. Much faster, tougher defenders on the perimeter. They have guards and wing players of all sizes, from Lawson to Iguodala to Chandler to Brewer. I think they would give the Spurs guards and wings a much tougher time on the offensive end.

2. Bigger, more athletic bigs than GS with Faried and McGee.

3. GREAT home crowd and also add in the altitude factor.

007nites
04-28-2013, 09:04 PM
I would prefer Denver. We are better at defending the paint.

spurraider21
04-28-2013, 09:04 PM
Warriors

DPG21920
04-28-2013, 09:05 PM
To me it boils down to this logic: While there are match up concerns (like the amount of athletic wings Denver has) defensively it's much harder for the Spurs to shut down Curry/Klay/Jack than anyone on Denver IMO.

SpursBills
04-28-2013, 09:05 PM
I think spurs are better than either team. While Denver is certainly more talented, warriors are a more high-variance team with their 3 point shooters, so I would probably prefer Denver

jag
04-28-2013, 09:07 PM
Rather have the Nuggets. GS has the type of shooters that can go on a serious hot streak over the course of a few games. Bogut gives Duncan a lot of problems.

DesignatedT
04-28-2013, 09:09 PM
Pros and cons to both but I'd say Golden State. A lot of youth and inexperience there and if you can somehow contain the shooting then series over. Denver is playing right into the hands of GS with all this run n gun, allowing open three's while the Spurs would likely try to slow it down and make GS beat them in the half court set. The Spurs should be able to regulate the glass vs GS because they aren't so worried about leaking out (Denver).

Denver gives Duncan trouble with their length (McGee) and Lawson is quick enough to stay with Tony whereas Tony should run wild vs GS. Definitely don't like the idea of going up to GS and playing there. Wow what a home court but I would still say them. If you get Bogut in foul trouble I don't think they have anyone over 6'8 that's worth a shit.

Either way, If the Spurs are healthy I think they will be able to handle either team.

J.T.
04-28-2013, 09:09 PM
SMH. Memphis pounded the Spurs as an 8th seed. Even if you believe what you say, that doesn't mean it's a sweep or 5. Could it be? Sure, but using the LA series as any sort of barometer outside of health is quite silly to me.

Wasn't that with Rookie Splitter and Broken Arm Ginobili though? Appropriate fear and what not but I don't think that shit happens again.

therealtruth
04-28-2013, 09:10 PM
Here we go with typical Spur fan over confidence. Spurs played a terrible (largely due to injury) Laker team so now Spurs fan thinks everyone is a sweep or 5 games.

I think it really comes down to Pop's decision making. If he makes the right moves the next round could go pretty quickly. I was pleasantly surprised by his decision to go with Baynes and I think it paid off.

DPG21920
04-28-2013, 09:11 PM
Wasn't that with Rookie Splitter and Broken Arm Ginobili though? Appropriate fear and what not but I don't think that shit happens again.

Sure, that is not the point. Point is, Spur fan (GNSF mostly though to be fair) always expects sweeps and uses the craziest excuses/logic.

lefty
04-28-2013, 09:12 PM
Nuggets tbh


Bogut is playing well as we speak, and he killed the Spurs so many times when he played with the Bucks

therealtruth
04-28-2013, 09:12 PM
Wasn't that with Rookie Splitter and Broken Arm Ginobili though? Appropriate fear and what not but I don't think that shit happens again.

I thought Pop didn't have appropriate fear. There's no way he should have gone into that Grizzlies series with that bigman rotation.

DPG21920
04-28-2013, 09:14 PM
I think it really comes down to Pop's decision making. If he makes the right moves the next round could go pretty quickly. I was pleasantly surprised by his decision to go with Baynes and I think it paid off.

For sure. Pop coached well in what sometimes turns into a tough situation (other team missing guys, tough to prepare, overthink...). The depth of the Spurs bigs when healthy is such a luxury. The bigs all played well overall and that is a great sign.

SpursRock20
04-28-2013, 09:15 PM
Easily the Warriors. Not sure if S.A. could win in Denver if they had to tbh.

TXstbobcat
04-28-2013, 09:16 PM
I want to see the warriors play the spurs next round.

Brazil
04-28-2013, 09:16 PM
Don't care tbh, there are pros and cons. Not gonna be easy :lol @overconfidents spurs fans. Spurs will be favored tho

SanDiegoSpursFan
04-28-2013, 09:16 PM
I hope the Spurs are ready. This first series was really easy and the games didn't feel like playoff games.

ironman2886
04-28-2013, 09:17 PM
Warriors. You live by the three, you're eventually gonna die by the 3. Bogut and Landry aren't a threat like Dwight and Gasol. I don't see any doubling in that series. It was funny hearing Reggie Miller talking up Curry and Thompson that they were going to be a handfull for the spurs. Reggie basically dissing Parker and Manu. Spurs are going to make Warriors work in the paint and at the three point line. Spurs in 6 against either.

DesignatedT
04-28-2013, 09:18 PM
Easily the Warriors. Not sure if S.A. could win in Denver if they had to tbh.

The Spurs have always played pretty well in Denver.

DPG21920
04-28-2013, 09:22 PM
Denver is just a more flawed team IMO and they don't have shooters. Spurs defend the paint well and that is what DEN does.

DesignatedT
04-28-2013, 09:24 PM
Bogut is fuckin beast though. That Ellis/Bogut trade was a heist for GS.

SpursRock20
04-28-2013, 09:29 PM
The Spurs have always played pretty well in Denver.

Seemed to struggle in both games at Denver this year.

ironman2886
04-28-2013, 09:30 PM
Maybe when Bogut was with the Bucks he beasted against the Spurs. I don't think Bogut will come close to doing what Dwight even did.

RD2191
04-28-2013, 09:31 PM
Who would guard Curry? Green would get shitted on. Kawhi?

DesignatedT
04-28-2013, 09:31 PM
Seemed to struggle in both games at Denver this year.

We went 1-1 there and the game we lost was without Parker and Manu.

mercos
04-28-2013, 09:31 PM
Warriors. The Nuggets give us more trouble, and road games at the higher elevation in Denver would be harder than those played at Golden State.

jbspurs
04-28-2013, 09:31 PM
I want the Warriors to win their series. However, I think Nuggets will be a lot easier for SPURS...

DatBoyGood
04-28-2013, 09:33 PM
Damn both teams are tough to play. I rather face Denver tbh. I really don't wanna see Jarrett Jack go off vs our bench and that arena gets crazy LOUD when they go on runs.

exstatic
04-28-2013, 09:35 PM
Bogut is fuckin beast though. That Ellis/Bogut trade was a heist for GS.


bogut WAS a beast. He's almost a zero on offense now.

exstatic
04-28-2013, 09:36 PM
Warriors. They play at sea level.

jbspurs
04-28-2013, 09:37 PM
Damn both teams are tough to play. I rather face Denver tbh. I really don't wanna see Jarrett Jack go off vs our bench and that arena gets crazy LOUD when they go on runs.

Exactly! The energy level of the GS fans here in the Bayarea is something else. That will be a big factor against Spurs young players.

emanueldavidginobili
04-28-2013, 09:38 PM
GS. No Lee.

Tim_duncan21
04-28-2013, 09:38 PM
Golden State

DesignatedT
04-28-2013, 09:39 PM
http://assets.sbnation.com/assets/2547955/bogatSMASH_medium.gif

DPG21920
04-28-2013, 09:39 PM
You see what teams with shooters and a good post defender can do to Denver, right? GS could easily be up 3-0 (Miller hit a game winner at the buzzer at home for their only win so far).

Spurs have shooters. Spurs have more than one good post defender.

jbspurs
04-28-2013, 09:40 PM
Don't forget Landry...

RD2191
04-28-2013, 09:40 PM
Fuk bogut, we got Baynes :hat

td4mvp21
04-28-2013, 09:41 PM
Nuggets, I think the Spurs need a challenging second round if they're gonna push for WCF/Finals.

pgardn
04-28-2013, 09:41 PM
We lost to both of these teams and looked fairly bad in doing so.

What I would like to assess is how much good it did to play a High School team first round. Health wise it was great barring Tiago. But...

Is Parker really getting better? considering what he had to play against...

DesignatedT
04-28-2013, 09:44 PM
Is Parker really getting better? considering what he had to play against...


Lol go back and watch the end of the regular season. He is a lot better than where he was. I get your point but he looks day and night compared to how he was looking 2 weeks ago. Another week off is very promising as well.

Legacy
04-28-2013, 09:45 PM
Warriors. The Nuggets give us more trouble, and road games at the higher elevation in Denver would be harder than those played at Golden State.

My thoughts exactly, mercos.

GrandeDavid
04-28-2013, 09:45 PM
Golden State for all the reasons Sean stated in Spurs live.

Floyd Pacquiao
04-28-2013, 09:45 PM
damn with the way the warriors are shooting right now I think id rather them play the nuggs tbh but what ever happens happens, i'm ready...

Budkin
04-28-2013, 09:45 PM
Warriors for sure with no Lee

DatBoyGood
04-28-2013, 09:45 PM
Ahh yes its gonna be interesting to see how we do. Our first round series couldn't get any easier. Now every game is gonna actually have playoff intensity.

DesignatedT
04-28-2013, 09:46 PM
You see what teams with shooters and a good post defender can do to Denver, right? GS could easily be up 3-0 (Miller hit a game winner at the buzzer at home for their only win so far).

Spurs have shooters. Spurs have more than one good post defender.

You might be right. I really don't know who would be a better matchup. I keep going back every day. It's like LAC/MEM. In your opinion who would you prefer out of MEM/LAC. Just wondering if it where to come down to that.

Malice
04-28-2013, 09:46 PM
Neither one of these teams are playing anything close to playoff Defense. The potential to steal a game, maybe 2 because of their shooters is there...but thats it.

DPG21920
04-28-2013, 09:48 PM
You might be right. I really don't know who would be a better matchup. I keep going back every day. It's like LAC/MEM. In your opinion who would you prefer out of MEM/LAC. Just wondering if it where to come down to that.

Memphis for the same reasons as Denver. MEM is a better defensive team, but they lack the scoring punch and the top flight player (CP3, just like Curry). Spurs defend the post well, MEM is a post team.

z0sa
04-28-2013, 09:50 PM
Looks like its gonna be GS. Denver throwing the ball away and not playing with enough intensity.

DesignatedT
04-28-2013, 09:51 PM
I think it's at least going 6. I don't see GS winning in DEN twice.

DPG21920
04-28-2013, 09:52 PM
Spurs, if healthy should beat these teams, but both do have the ability to be tough series (especially compared to round one obviously).

Curry just kills the Spurs though. Denver doesn't have that player that just kills the Spurs. I've made up my mind, would rather have Denver. Let's see what happens in the 2nd half though - Denver needs a win bad here. Tough to beat a team like GS 3 straight because they usually will have at least one scorching hot shooting night.

DPG21920
04-28-2013, 09:53 PM
I think it's at least going 6. I don't see GS winning in DEN twice.

I don't know man, hopefully you are right. Still have the 2nd half though. But GS almost did win twice there already. They played well in both games and have a ton of confidence (especially if they hold on tonight).

Legacy
04-28-2013, 09:56 PM
Golden State for all the reasons Sean stated in Spurs live.

Yep. This, too, pretty much.

SpursRock20
04-28-2013, 09:58 PM
We went 1-1 there and the game we lost was without Parker and Manu.

Lost both games there.

letmk
04-28-2013, 10:00 PM
Warriors for being far less physical. When Bogut is healthy, he is a very defender and shot-blocker. But he still is not physical type. Plus, he is the only one who can defend Tim, while Denver has three. Plus, as well as Curry plays (he is the best player in that series), Wilson Chandler still remains the worst match-up for the Spurs.

Even if Warriors are not an easier out between those two teams, I would still prefer Warriors just for the sake of less wear for Tim and Tony.

DesignatedT
04-28-2013, 10:02 PM
Lost both games there.

You're right. Historically we have still played well there.

ffadicted
04-28-2013, 10:14 PM
dubs no doubt

ironman2886
04-28-2013, 10:15 PM
Curry will get his, but so will Parker. Jarret Jack kills us more than curry, but Ginobili can neutralize Jack's output with his own. Thompson had one good game against us at the end of the season. I'm not gonna take anything out of that half hearted back to back game. Spurs have the favorable front court, just as good shooting, and more experience to take it in this series. Did I mention the Spurs have the best coach in the league?

therealtruth
04-28-2013, 10:16 PM
Neither one of these teams are playing anything close to playoff Defense. The potential to steal a game, maybe 2 because of their shooters is there...but thats it.

That's the key for the Spurs. They need to make sure their defense is good enough. It's not enough to hope to outscore these teams on offense.

RD2191
04-28-2013, 10:16 PM
Fuk i wouldn't mind denver either. Toss up tbh

ironman2886
04-28-2013, 10:18 PM
Curry's defense is laughable. Parker is gonna do work.

z0sa
04-28-2013, 10:21 PM
I wonder which team has the better homecourt. GS fans are the best around but Denver has that altitude advantage.

Arcadian
04-28-2013, 10:23 PM
I don't have a strong preference. Honestly, I expect a Spurs sweep either way. It's not overconfidence because 1) the Big 3 are all looking 100% healthy, and 2) the Spurs are looking deep again, with Joseph playing good backup-PG and Baynes getting minutes at C.


SMH. Memphis pounded the Spurs as an 8th seed. Even if you believe what you say, that doesn't mean it's a sweep or 5. Could it be? Sure, but using the LA series as any sort of barometer outside of health is quite silly to me.

Why would you use the Spurs from 2 years ago as a barometer? The 2013 Spurs are way better than the 2011 Spurs. If anything, use last year as a barometer. We swept the Clippers in round 2 after their previous series had gone 7 games. This year will be very similar, as Denver/GS could go 7 games, while the Spurs are waiting and resting. I'd say the 2012 Clippers were better than either the Nuggets or Warriors this year. So with the Spurs playing well, yes we should expect a Spurs sweep or 5 games max.

The Nuggets and Warriors are playoff fodder because they have no superstars. This is the kind of team that real contenders want to play. We should be so lucky.

Floyd Pacquiao
04-28-2013, 10:29 PM
imagine danny tryng to guard steph curry...hope cojo would get that honor tbh

RD2191
04-28-2013, 10:36 PM
Curry going apeshit. Lets see if that Spurs defense is for real.

jimbo
04-28-2013, 10:38 PM
Nuggets

Curry/Thompson would demolish Parker/Ginobili/Green on the defensive end. Closing games would be iffy since Ginobili doesn't match up well with anyone on the defensive end.

I think the Warriors have the higher ceiling anyways. If either of Curry/Thompson go unconscious they'll almost certainly win.

SpursRock20
04-28-2013, 10:38 PM
Starting to lean towards Denver as I'm watching Curry go off :wow

crc21209
04-28-2013, 10:38 PM
I know it's early, but here's an interesting thing I just thought about. The Spurs could possibly go through all California teams in the West to get to the NBA Finals. They just beat the Lakers. Golden State could be the next opponent, and if they make it passed them, it could possibly be the Clippers....

ironman2886
04-28-2013, 10:39 PM
imagine danny tryng to guard steph curry...hope cojo would get that honor tbh
Why would Danny guard Curry? Parker will be on him. Cojo will guard Curry if Parker is on the bench. I want to see that though.

SpurPadre
04-28-2013, 10:39 PM
Fuck, looks like Splitter and the rest of the boys won't get too much rest if Curry and the Dubs keep shooting like they are against the Nugs right now. That series might be over soon.

RD2191
04-28-2013, 10:40 PM
Nuggets

Curry/Thompson would demolish Parker/Ginobili/Green on the defensive end. Closing games would be iffy since Ginobili doesn't match up well with anyone on the defensive end.

I think the Warriors have the higher ceiling anyways. If either of Curry/Thompson go unconscious they'll almost certainly win.

Please stop posting.

ironman2886
04-28-2013, 10:41 PM
Please stop posting.
This.

SpursRock20
04-28-2013, 10:41 PM
Fuck, looks like Splitter and the rest of the boys won't get too much rest if Curry and the Dubs keep shooting like they are against the Nugs right now. That series might be over soon.

I don't see the next series beginning any sooner than Friday, even if the GSW-DEN series ends in 5 games.

RD2191
04-28-2013, 10:42 PM
Fuck, looks like Splitter and the rest of the boys won't get too much rest if Curry and the Dubs keep shooting like they are against the Nugs right now. That series might be over soon.

Seriously doubt the dubs can close it out in Denver. Going 6 for sure.

spurraider21
04-28-2013, 10:43 PM
of course after i say warriors curry starts going apeshit :lol

jimbo
04-28-2013, 10:45 PM
Please stop posting.


This.

So upset.

Steve Blake blew by Parker at times, and you think he can stay in front of Curry :lol.

":cry b-but Parker only shows up to play against real point guards :cry"

Ginobili is too slow to defend against Thompson. With all of Ginobili's gambling, enjoy all those 3s Thompson gonna drain.

ploto
04-28-2013, 10:46 PM
Anyone want to change his opinion?

Floyd Pacquiao
04-28-2013, 10:46 PM
Why would Danny guard Curry? Parker will be on him. Cojo will guard Curry if Parker is on the bench. I want to see that though.

Why would pop make his best player expend energy on defense when we need him for offense lol thats just bad coaching tbh. danny has always guarded the best perimeter player on the other team sometimes even kawhi but never tp.

spurraider21
04-28-2013, 10:48 PM
Why would pop make his best player expend energy on defense when we need him for offense lol thats just bad coaching tbh. danny has always guarded the best perimeter player on the other team sometimes even kawhi but never tp.

TP guards westbrook, so....

DPG21920
04-28-2013, 10:48 PM
Anyone want to change his opinion?

You're sexist.

SpurPadre
04-28-2013, 10:48 PM
Seriously doubt the dubs can close it out in Denver. Going 6 for sure.

Nugs were lucky to win Game 1 so anything's possible.

ploto
04-28-2013, 10:49 PM
You're sexist.
Who that preferred GS is a female?

DPG21920
04-28-2013, 10:50 PM
Me

BatManu20
04-28-2013, 10:50 PM
Warriors but damn Curry is in an incredible scoring mode right now. They'd be a tough out for sure.

phyzik
04-28-2013, 10:50 PM
I'm ambivalent in regards to either team. Bring either of them on.

Dont get me wrong, either one will provide a challenge, but in different ways. It really doesn't matter which one we face, its going to be a much better series than the D league team we played in the first round.

RD2191
04-28-2013, 10:51 PM
Dubs dont scare me. Outside of curry and a streaky jack, what else do they have?

exstatic
04-28-2013, 10:51 PM
Nobody shoots well for a whole series. I'd much rather play a jump shooting team than a defensive/running team at altitude.

jimbo
04-28-2013, 10:51 PM
TP guards westbrook, so....

Green defends CP3 though.

Floyd Pacquiao
04-28-2013, 10:52 PM
TP guards westbrook, so....ive seen it for short stretches but not the whole game...pop would always sprinkle in green and neal for the most part

SpurPadre
04-28-2013, 10:52 PM
I don't see the next series beginning any sooner than Friday, even if the GSW-DEN series ends in 5 games.

Let's see. Game 5 is on Tuesday and if it ends then, we can possibly start playing by Thursday depending on how the other playoff series turn out for scheduling purposes.

ploto
04-28-2013, 10:53 PM
Outside of curry and a streaky jack, what else do they have?
Richard Jefferson :lol

100%duncan
04-28-2013, 10:54 PM
Yuuuuup. Bring on Golden State.

ironman2886
04-28-2013, 10:55 PM
Why would pop make his best player expend energy on defense when we need him for offense lol thats just bad coaching tbh. danny has always guarded the best perimeter player on the other team sometimes even kawhi but never tp.
So? Parker guards Chris Paul. Danny Green has shit the bed defensively and offensively in the playoffs. I don't want to see 6'2" Tony Parker defending 6'7" Klay Thompson. TP sure as hell isn't going to guard Harrison Barnes.

emanueldavidginobili
04-28-2013, 10:55 PM
We are beating either team tbh and im not being cocky

jimbo
04-28-2013, 10:58 PM
So? Parker guards Chris Paul. Danny Green has shit the bed defensively and offensively in the playoffs. I don't want to see 6'2" Tony Parker defending 6'7" Klay Thompson. TP sure as hell isn't going to guard Harrison Barnes.

Green definitely defended CP3 in the playoffs last year.

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=197034

SpurPadre
04-28-2013, 10:58 PM
Dubs dont scare me. Outside of curry and a streaky jack, what else do they have?

Can't underestimate Klay Thompson. That home crowd is also crazy as hell and if we somehow play them, I'm gonna do my best to watch the game live since I live 20 minutes away from Oakland. That being said, they haven't won a game in San Antonio in over 10 years so how can anyone expect them to possibly win more than 1 there in a 7 game series now? Not happening.

Legacy
04-28-2013, 10:59 PM
I had The Warriors in 6 or 7 anyway, tbh. We know ANYTHING can happen, though. So.... just.... breeeaaathe (myself included, I'm getting sleepy).... :sleep

ironman2886
04-28-2013, 11:01 PM
Green definitely defended CP3 in the playoffs last year.

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=197034
I have definitely watched Parker guard CP3 this season.

Spurs 4 The Win
04-28-2013, 11:02 PM
Either team gets beat in 5. I personally think we would abuse Golden State in the paint and slow down the game too much for Curry and Thompson to win a game on their own unless they hit 65% plus from the field. I also think Denver is more likely to be more physical and with having to play at higher altitude I worry about fatigue and injuries.

RD2191
04-28-2013, 11:03 PM
George Karl is a terrible coach. The key to beating the dubs is playing half court ball. Dubs are thriving off of Denver turnovers. He needs to slow it down.

SpurPadre
04-28-2013, 11:06 PM
George Karl is a terrible coach. The key to beating the dubs is playing half court ball. Dubs are thriving off of Denver turnovers. He needs to slow it down.

Manu's gotta be extra careful with the ball if Dubs advance. They got active hands out there.

RD2191
04-28-2013, 11:07 PM
Manu's gotta be extra careful with the ball if Dubs advance. They got active hands out there.

Very true, but then again it wouldn't be manu without some high risk high reward passes. Lol

SpurPadre
04-28-2013, 11:08 PM
Watching the Dubs play, they are the perfect team for Neal to play for, tbh. They jack up crazy, unwarranted shots and are encouraged to do so. Neal would love that environment.

Spurs and Mavs fan
04-28-2013, 11:09 PM
Wow seriously? Are the Warriors this good?

Austin_Toros
04-28-2013, 11:10 PM
Defo Golden State. Jarrett Jack won't keep shooting > 60%

SpurPadre
04-28-2013, 11:11 PM
Very true, but then again it wouldn't be manu without some high risk high reward passes. Lol

Oh yeah, in Manu we trust but it is something to keep an eye on.

Trainwreck2100
04-28-2013, 11:11 PM
Spurs need to win for America for what this woman did there is no forgiveness


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-_9YcRJBR0

HarlemHeat37
04-28-2013, 11:11 PM
:p:Denver was the best possible matchup that Golden State could have drawn, tbh..

They were able to play a gimmicky zone and get away with it, because the Nuggets half-court offense is terrible, and they don't have any shooters..

Denver doesn't have any capable scoring bigs, so the Warriors were able to go small and not get punished..

They can run with Denver, which is the Nuggets only elite aspect..

The Warriors live and die by the J, tbh..that doesn't work against good defenses in the NBA..

I'd have Danny Green or Manu guarding Thompson, Parker on Jack and Leonard on Curry, btw..

Floyd Pacquiao
04-28-2013, 11:12 PM
So? Parker guards Chris Paul. Danny Green has shit the bed defensively and offensively in the playoffs. I don't want to see 6'2" Tony Parker defending 6'7" Klay Thompson. TP sure as hell isn't going to guard Harrison Barnes.

parker rarely guards cp3 it's mostly green...but yeah i know danny shits the bed on both sides of the ball thats why i said imagine green trying to guard curry, he would get raped. But i know pop he'll probably try to hide tp on thompson and make green and cojo chase curry around all game, save tp's energy for offense.

spurraider21
04-28-2013, 11:13 PM
Wow seriously? Are the Warriors this good?

They match up perfectly with Denver. Denver, having almost no half court game, tries to run as much as possible. That just makes it easier for the dubs to get their 3 ball going

racm
04-28-2013, 11:13 PM
Dubs close out with Curry/Jack/Thompson/Barnes/Bogut.

Pop closes out with Parker/Ginobili/Green/Leonard/Duncan.

Spurs 4 The Win
04-28-2013, 11:13 PM
Denver was the best possible matchup that Golden State could have drawn, tbh..

They were able to play a gimmicky zone and get away with it, because the Nuggets half-court offense is terrible, and they don't have any shooters..

Denver doesn't have any capable scoring bigs, so the Warriors were able to go small and not get punished..

The Warriors live and die by the J, tbh..that doesn't work against good defenses in the NBA..

Yeah, exactly, this team is more dependent on the jumpshot than the 11 spurs and we all know what happened when we faced a formidable defense in the Griz....

McGusto55
04-28-2013, 11:14 PM
GS...kawhi on curry ... Nuff said!

RD2191
04-28-2013, 11:15 PM
Oh yeah, in Manu we trust but it is something to keep an eye on.

That's why we got tmac. To keep an eye on things.

HarlemHeat37
04-28-2013, 11:16 PM
Also, Bogut is their only big that has a chance against Tim, and if Bogut is on the floor, expect Hack-a-Bogut, tbh..

ironman2886
04-28-2013, 11:17 PM
parker rarely guards cp3 it's mostly green...but yeah i know danny shits the bed on both sides of the ball thats why i said imagine green trying to guard curry, he would get raped. But i know pop he'll probably try to hide tp on thompson and make green and cojo chase curry around all game, save tp's energy for offense.
True. I just dont like the height diffence for parker guarding Thompson. Cojo is great defensively, and just got a lot of offensive confidence from the previous series.

HarlemHeat37
04-28-2013, 11:20 PM
Danny Green is atrocious at running through screens, I wouldn't risk having him on Curry, tbh..

Either trap and rotate, or put Leonard against him..

Thompson is hit or miss offensively, he's streaky and has tunnel vision..also, the Warriors are going to have him guarding Parker, since he's good at guarding PGs and he did well against Tony during the regular season..Thompson will be fatigued from guarding Tony, thus Green/Manu should be able to guard him well on the other end, tbh..

HarlemHeat37
04-28-2013, 11:22 PM
Regardless of how we feel about the Warriors, Spurs should feel good that they avoided the Clippers or Grizzlies in round 2, tbh..

Even if it's a long series, the Warriors aren't a physical team and they don't have any fake thugs, unlike Memphis/Clippers, much less damaging to the Spurs players..

freetiago
04-28-2013, 11:23 PM
Have to wonder how much tall ball spurs will play
theyve defended the Warriors pretty good this season minus Jarret Magic Jack
and if Pop will change his philosophies
GS just closed out games with Draymond Green at C
Bogut is on minute restriction and Landry is undersized
a Splitter/Duncan/Leonard frontline should dominate the glass vs them

RD2191
04-28-2013, 11:24 PM
Regardless of how we feel about the Warriors, Spurs should feel good that they avoided the Clippers or Grizzlies in round 2, tbh..

Clips don't scare me. Memphis on the other hand is looking pretty damn good.

SpursRock20
04-28-2013, 11:25 PM
Wow seriously? Are the Warriors this good?

They play the same style that Phoenix did back in the mid-00's and they are not half as good, tbh.

SpursIndonesia
04-28-2013, 11:26 PM
I don't like Denver high altitude, though no back to back game in post season, but still .....

Legacy
04-28-2013, 11:27 PM
Regardless of how we feel about the Warriors, Spurs should feel good that they avoided the Clippers or Grizzlies in round 2, tbh..

Even if it's a long series, the Warriors aren't a physical team and they don't have any fake thugs, unlike Memphis/Clippers, much less damaging to the Spurs players..

Absolutely agreed! :tu

Legacy
04-28-2013, 11:29 PM
Let's still just see how this all pans out, though, of course ... :p:

J.T.
04-28-2013, 11:33 PM
Alright, well after thinking about it I prefer Golden State for the simple reason that the only WC teams the Spurs have not defeated in the playoffs during the Tim Duncan era are the Rockets and Warriors. And that's only because the Spurs have never played either team.

For the douches that will say we haven't beaten OKC, I seem to recall pushing the Seattle SuperSonic's shit in during Game 6 of the 2005 WCSF. Same franchise, that counts.

phxspurfan
04-28-2013, 11:35 PM
Warriors. Double Curry and where does their offense go? Plus George Karl has another playoff upset left in him.

DPG21920
04-28-2013, 11:36 PM
GS...kawhi on curry ... Nuff said!

If it was that easy, having Iggy on him for Denver should have done the trick.

freetiago
04-28-2013, 11:40 PM
Warriors. Double Curry and where does their offense go? Plus George Karl has another playoff upset left in him.

im guessing you didnt actually watch the Nuggets vs GS
all theyve done is trap Curry and he finds the open man or scores anyway

therealtruth
04-29-2013, 12:04 AM
Regardless of how we feel about the Warriors, Spurs should feel good that they avoided the Clippers or Grizzlies in round 2, tbh..

Even if it's a long series, the Warriors aren't a physical team and they don't have any fake thugs, unlike Memphis/Clippers, much less damaging to the Spurs players..

They're eventually going to have to beat the Clippers/Grizzlies in the WCF. I'm not sure OKC will make it out of the next round.

Spurs21Fan4Ever
04-29-2013, 12:14 AM
Golden State, they're more immature and in-experienced. I feel like Golden State would really outshoot themselves against the Spurs. Also, just seeing how emotional they were getting tonight, their decision making against SA would probably be horrible. I would prefer Golden State and I would have Spurs winning on 5. Ideally, I want GS to win in 7 games, but I'd take 6 games, that will still give the starters plenty of time to rest. If we do get GS, would Splitter make a huge difference? I feel like Spurs would still win in 5 without him.

jmanu20
04-29-2013, 12:23 AM
GOLDEN STATE.

1) Inexperienced in later rounds. When Richard Jefferson has the most playoff experience on your team, that doesn't inspire much confidence.

2) Only Bogut really has a chance to defend Duncan. No other bigs of note on the Warriors.

3) Unlike the Nuggets, the Spurs know how to play a halfcourt game, and that type of game is kryptonite to a run-and-gun team.

I think we'd take GS in 6. I'll allow for Curry and Jack to each have one game to go apeshit, lol.

Obstructed_View
04-29-2013, 12:26 AM
Warriors. Double Curry and where does their offense go? Plus George Karl has another playoff upset left in him.

It's not Curry's shooting that's killing the Nuggets, it's the open teammates, hockey assists and broken-down defense. Let Curry score 40 on 29 shot attempts and keep everyone else from killing you.

therealtruth
04-29-2013, 12:45 AM
Defo Golden State. Jarrett Jack won't keep shooting > 60%

He's shot pretty well against us in the past.

DejuanorwhatDude
04-29-2013, 12:51 AM
It's not Curry's shooting that's killing the Nuggets, it's the open teammates, hockey assists and broken-down defense. Let Curry score 40 on 29 shot attempts and keep everyone else from killing you.

This. Of the parts of games I've seen, all GS did was expose all the flaws that people had been complaining about Denver all year. No legitimate superstar. No defense. Too many points in transition. They haven't kept focused and are mediocre outside of Denver.

Having a guy like Curry will help them win this series(probably in six), but you just treat him like Kobe. Let him go off. Let him take as many shots as he likes but limit his teammates and in the long run the Spurs are the better team.

TJastal
04-29-2013, 12:55 AM
It's not Curry's shooting that's killing the Nuggets, it's the open teammates, hockey assists and broken-down defense. Let Curry score 40 on 29 shot attempts and keep everyone else from killing you.
If you give Curry 29 shots he will easily score 50+.. you may want to rethink that strategy.

RD2191
04-29-2013, 01:05 AM
The key is to run curry off of the 3 point line. Thats where the majority of his points come from. Putting Danny Green on him would be a huge mistake. Maybe Kawhi could at least contain him.

DejuanorwhatDude
04-29-2013, 01:10 AM
That being said, the role players did not inspire confidence tonight.

Obstructed_View
04-29-2013, 03:10 AM
If you give Curry 29 shots he will easily score 50+.. you may want to rethink that strategy.

If it were a one game series that might be a concern. Denver's proven that trying to chase him around with two people is a mistake.

hater
04-29-2013, 03:19 AM
Healthy spurs would beat either in 6 imo

will_spurs
04-29-2013, 04:06 AM
The Spurs (and more specifically Parker's) kryptonite is a team with 2 big enforcers in the paint, so I want to play the team that has the least (healthy) bigs.

The Spurs are really good at defending the fastbreak, they are ok on help defense and although Duncan is the only true quality big, the depth of decent bigs is unparalleled. I don't think either team posesso many problems, to be honest. GSW vs Denver is simply Phoenix vs Phoenix. If Pop doesn't make the mistake of going super small and playing an uptempo game, none of these teams should pose a real threat.

Robz4000
04-29-2013, 05:19 AM
Spurs beat either in 5, 6 max. I'd prefer Golden State because they're inexperienced as hell and have a black coach (:lol). They also lack good defenders and bigs outside Bogut.

TJastal
04-29-2013, 05:49 AM
Spurs beat either in 5, 6 max. I'd prefer Golden State because they're inexperienced as hell and have a black coach (:lol). They also lack good defenders and bigs outside Bogut.

Spurs fans thinking the warriors are going to lay down and die are going to be in for a rude awakening in game 1. :lol

hater
04-29-2013, 06:54 AM
Spurs fans thinking the warriors are going to lay down and die are going to be in for a rude awakening in game 1. :lol

I don't think predicting spurs in 6 is saying opponent will lay down and die. 6 games is a tough opponent, but both Denver + GS are injured and lack experience. they are not making the WCF unless a major injury to their 2nd round opponent IMO

100%duncan
04-29-2013, 06:58 AM
TBH, if the Spurs can't win against any of these two teams then they just don't deserve shit, if they can't dominate either of these two they can't do anything against OKC much less against the Heat :lol. I'm just sayin Spurs should beat the teams they are supposed to beat if they want that fifth. My instincts say Spurs in 5.

benefactor
04-29-2013, 07:00 AM
As others have said, if the Spurs don't give in to the temptation to go small they should be able to handle the Warriors. Playing big will force Jackson to play Landry or Ezeli more which takes a shooter away from them. If he doesn't and tries to stay with the lineup he had against Denver they will get destroyed inside and on the glass.

100%duncan
04-29-2013, 07:07 AM
And fuck, Pop>>>>>>>>>>>>M:lolrk J:lolckson

TampaDude
04-29-2013, 07:08 AM
Spurs in 5 over either, tbh...

DAF86
04-29-2013, 07:12 AM
Really close call, I think the Nuggets would be easier but if they come from behind to take this series their confidence would be pretty damn high and they could be scary playing with a high confidence level. So I think I will go with the Warriors, if healthy the Spurs should beat them and playing on a loud GS arena with bullshit jumpers falling from everywhere would be a nice warm-up for the OKC series.

John B
04-29-2013, 08:04 AM
SMH. Memphis pounded the Spurs as an 8th seed. Even if you believe what you say, that doesn't mean it's a sweep or 5. Could it be? Sure, but using the LA series as any sort of barometer outside of health is quite silly to me.
This Spurs is a very different team. We have much better Post Defense and better skilled young players who can run with any team. Big or small. Even Baynes was a surprise great post defender against Howard. So bring on anyone TBH.

TJastal
04-29-2013, 08:13 AM
As others have said, if the Spurs don't give in to the temptation to go small they should be able to handle the Warriors. Playing big will force Jackson to play Landry or Ezeli more which takes a shooter away from them. If he doesn't and tries to stay with the lineup he had against Denver they will get destroyed inside and on the glass.

I'm going to assume you aren't talking about Bonner, Blair, or Diaw.

Which means Splitter .. since Pop has done virtually nothing this season with the spurs only other 7 footer, Baynes.
Not to knock on my boy Splitter but he hasn't exactly looked like a world beater thus far in the playoffs. And he will be playing gingerly for the most part coming off the ankle sprain. Because of this .. I think the spurs will have problems and Pop will be forced to go small and this will play right into the warriors hands unfortunately. Pop will probably answer by going with his trusty security blanket, Bonner. Which will probably fail miserably. I can totally see Pop panic and send Mcgrady out there. It would really get ugly from there.

TampaDude
04-29-2013, 08:20 AM
I'm going to assume you aren't talking about Bonner, Blair, or Diaw.

Which means Splitter .. since Pop has done virtually nothing this season with the spurs only other 7 footer, Baynes.
Not to knock on my boy Splitter but he hasn't exactly looked like a world beater thus far in the playoffs. And he will be playing gingerly for the most part coming off the ankle sprain. Because of this .. I think the spurs will have problems and Pop will be forced to go small and this will play right into the warriors hands unfortunately. Pop will probably answer by going with his trusty security blanket, Bonner. Which will probably fail miserably. I can totally see Pop panic and send Mcgrady out there. It would really get ugly from there.

Ginobili is gonna go HAM on the Warriors, tbh. Spurs in 5. Book it.

Spur|n|Austin
04-29-2013, 08:31 AM
SMH. Memphis pounded the Spurs as an 8th seed. Even if you believe what you say, that doesn't mean it's a sweep or 5. Could it be? Sure, but using the LA series as any sort of barometer outside of health is quite silly to me.

I wouldn't put too much thought into what Stabula is saying; I've yet to read a knowledgeable comment from him.

bklynspursfan
04-29-2013, 08:37 AM
I think the Spurs are capable of running with them, like they did with the Suns years ago despite being the defensive juggernaut they were. But having GS play a half court game would be ideal. Make them adjust to what you do, and force them to beat you with execution, not running and getting transition 3's. Obviously, not turning the ball over helps a ton in that regard

Russo21
04-29-2013, 08:59 AM
How did the Warriors only win 47 games this year? Thought they were better then that. Bougut and Lee up front, Thompson on the wing, Jack and Curry as the guards. Bench: SF Harrison Barnes, Backup big is Landry, he's ok but do they have like no depth at all after those guys? They have a very good starting 5. I'm surprised they only won 47 games, but not surprised they're pounding a 57 win team who finished just behind the Spurs.

Were the Warriors losing cause they were playing like shit? Did they not have enough healthy talented guys playing? Cause it looks like they have a lot of talent, but that talent falls off a cliff and they only have seriously 7 NBA quality players on the roster? Have they been playing their top 7 big big minutes making them tired? I havent paid much attention to the Warriors this year. Looks like they are too scared to put there bench on the court cause they are duds. Heck even Richard Jefferson played 9 minutes for them and had -9.

So it'll be Spurs v GS TOP 7 Players. Golden State put up a fight but eventually crack when their main guys tire and their nobodies on the bench piss away any chance of keeping it close to get the W.

Our starters will have a fight but outdo their starters anyway and our deep, skillful, well rounded bench should go shock and awe on their shitty bench and put the games away for us. Are Golden State the type of team that let their stars play the full 48 or as close as possible so the bench dont get much courttime?

RD2191
04-29-2013, 09:13 AM
Going small would be a big mistake.

Bruno
04-29-2013, 09:58 AM
The Warriors vs Denver is far from being over. Denver must win the next 3 games but 2 of them are at home and with Lee out, Denver has a significantly better team on the paper.

Amuseddaysleeper
04-29-2013, 10:06 AM
I'd rather see the Warriors. Denver is on the ropes right now but their athleticism worries me.

As for the Warriors, I think they would push us to 6 games. I worry about SA being forced to chase all the excellent shooters through screens all night but I'll take those chances.

I can't see Golden State winning in SA, but if the Spurs can get just one road game in Oakland the series will be wrapped up.

Spurs da champs
04-29-2013, 10:08 AM
The Warriors vs Denver is far from being over. Denver must win the next 3 games but 2 of them are at home and with Lee out, Denver has a significantly better team on the paper.

Golden State has the best player on the court, Mark Jackson is taking George Karl to school & their role players have stepped up big time, Denver's have not. Denver to have a chance assuming they win at home must beat Golden State & being that Denver is a mediocre road team that has been run out the building every time in Oakland.

Tony better take advantage of Steph's bum ankle when the time comes.

Obstructed_View
04-29-2013, 10:16 AM
Spurs fans thinking the warriors are going to lay down and die are going to be in for a rude awakening in game 1. :lol

Spur fan thinking the Spurs are going to leave shooters in order to trap Jarrett Jack and put the corpse of Andre Miller on Curry.

Mugen
04-29-2013, 10:42 AM
No team left in the West scares me against a healthy Spurs team tbh.

Mr. Body
04-29-2013, 11:12 AM
The Spurs looked surprisingly good in the first round, but then the Lakers are complete rubbish. Still, with Ginobili and Parker looking healthy, I don't see GSW having a lot of luck. Game one will be the big key - if Curry goes off and they win, a longer series. If not, I see trouble for the Warriors. A steady diet of pounding it inside and getting into the lane.

benefactor
04-29-2013, 11:14 AM
I'm going to assume you aren't talking about Bonner, Blair, or Diaw.

Which means Splitter .. since Pop has done virtually nothing this season with the spurs only other 7 footer, Baynes.
Not to knock on my boy Splitter but he hasn't exactly looked like a world beater thus far in the playoffs. And he will be playing gingerly for the most part coming off the ankle sprain. Because of this .. I think the spurs will have problems and Pop will be forced to go small and this will play right into the warriors hands unfortunately. Pop will probably answer by going with his trusty security blanket, Bonner. Which will probably fail miserably. I can totally see Pop panic and send Mcgrady out there. It would really get ugly from there.
For the record, know that I'm never speaking to you when I post...as I don't care what you think about anything.

Thanks.

roland0
04-29-2013, 11:45 AM
GS. Denver is a better team overall, however the dubs are just a bad match-up for them.

emanueldavidginobili
04-29-2013, 02:22 PM
GS, they are way more aggressive and big and long, Brewer Wilson Faried JaVale, Iggy. And Ty Lawson is pretty damn good

Obstructed_View
04-29-2013, 05:16 PM
I'm sure I'm not the only one who didn't think Mark Jackson was going to be this good of a coach. He's a good motivator, a calm influence, and an excellent tactician. He's nearly as under-appreciated as a coach as he was as a player.

TD 21
04-29-2013, 06:13 PM
Since neither stands a chance at even forcing a game seven (barring a significant injury or two to the Spurs), it doesn't really matter, but . . .

I'll take the Warriors, because Curry, Jack, Thompson and Barnes, are being run into the ground, Curry's ankle is hanging by a thread and they're not a physical team. And if them making the playoffs wasn't their championship, then making it to the 2nd round, without Lee no less, definitely will be. They'll also have virtually no meaningful experience on that stage (Landry is the only rotation player who's been that far and even he only got their once) and deep down, probably had no expectation of getting to it this season, making them more likely to be overwhelmed by it.

It's got Spurs in five written all over it. I'll give them the one game where they shoot out of their minds from three and they ride the wave of the crowd, but that's it.

That being said, I don't think this series is over yet. Game six will decide it.

TJastal
04-29-2013, 06:55 PM
GS, they are way more aggressive and big and long, Brewer Wilson Faried JaVale, Iggy. And Ty Lawson is pretty damn good

And how's all that length and athleticism working out for them so far? There's more to basketball than being a hyper athletic freak of nature.

therealtruth
04-29-2013, 09:49 PM
I think the Spurs are capable of running with them, like they did with the Suns years ago despite being the defensive juggernaut they were. But having GS play a half court game would be ideal. Make them adjust to what you do, and force them to beat you with execution, not running and getting transition 3's. Obviously, not turning the ball over helps a ton in that regard

Good point. The Spurs outscored the Suns back in '05 and the Lakers used the same tactic back in '10. But at the same time the Spurs had a post presence to balance things. That allowed them to get whatever they wanted.

RuffnReadyOzStyle
04-29-2013, 09:57 PM
Good question. I think I'd rather the Warriors as we could pound them inside and on the pnr, but it'll be tough to win one in SF with that frenzied crowd and Steph Curry as hot as he is right now.

Play like we did the past two games and we can take anyone in the West. ;)

exstatic
04-29-2013, 11:01 PM
Good question. I think I'd rather the Warriors as we could pound them inside and on the pnr, but it'll be tough to win one in SF with that frenzied crowd and Steph Curry as hot as he is right now.

Play like we did the past two games and we can take anyone in the West. ;)

No player stays that hot. It'll be completely different for them going back home down 0-2. Sphincter factor in a major way. The fronts of the rims will take a beating.

MSPaint
04-29-2013, 11:15 PM
I know that people say GS, but they have so many shooters and that sort of concerns me more than Denver. Sure, Denver is more athletic, but they don't have the scorers/shooters. They score because of pace. I think I would prefer Denver in all reality.

Lee is out, but he was so bad defensively that I think they might actually be better overall without him too.



SMH. Memphis pounded the Spurs as an 8th seed. Even if you believe what you say, that doesn't mean it's a sweep or 5. Could it be? Sure, but using the LA series as any sort of barometer outside of health is quite silly to me.

This and this. Spurs defense hasn't quite returned to the level it was in the early part of the season, imo, and GS is a team that can heat up in a freaking hurry. I still think the Spurs should win, but I wouldn't be surprised if it turns out to be a tough series.

Memphis is definitely another wildcard team, although I don't think us getting bounced by them previously is relevant. That was a whole different set of circumstances. The Spurs match up way better with the Grizz now. 2011 was a prime example of being in the wrong place at the wrong time.

RuffnReadyOzStyle
04-29-2013, 11:21 PM
No player stays that hot. It'll be completely different for them going back home down 0-2. Sphincter factor in a major way. The fronts of the rims will take a beating.

Indeed, streaks only last so long.

I like our chances against GSW, but wouldn't be surprised if the series went 6 or even 7. That SF crowd is fearsome!

exstatic
04-29-2013, 11:52 PM
Indeed, streaks only last so long.

I like our chances against GSW, but wouldn't be surprised if the series went 6 or even 7. That SF crowd is fearsome!

Unless the crowd takes the floor to help defend, it'll be 5 games, 6 max. They're going to have WAY more problems with us than we'll have with them.

RuffnReadyOzStyle
04-30-2013, 02:24 AM
Unless the crowd takes the floor to help defend, it'll be 5 games, 6 max. They're going to have WAY more problems with us than we'll have with them.

You're probably right, I'm just cautious when I see a team getting as hot as the Warriors are now. Then again, they're killing the beaten-up Nuggets on matchups, and we present them a lot more problems, so I probably should chill. There are some fascinating matchups in the series though:

TP vs Steph - speedy guards who are sure to duel the whole series
Danny vs Klay - both lights out shooters under the right conditions
Duncan vs Bogut - even though he's had a porr season, Bogut can be a defensive difference-maker
And one bench matchup that intrigues me: CoJo vs Jack - bulldog vs bulldog!

Kawhi should go ballistic in this series, and I see Splitter (if he's healthy) beating Landry with his combination of size, speed and effort.

baseline bum
04-30-2013, 02:28 AM
I'll pick Denver, just because that would mean they had to play 7 games and would roll into San Antonio with only one rest day after the Spurs had more than a week of rest.

DesignatedT
04-30-2013, 12:26 PM
This site says semi-finals start May 6 or 7. So does the length of the series really effect the start time?

http://www.nba.com/news/important-dates/index.html

JR3
04-30-2013, 04:28 PM
I choose Golden State. They don't play as much defense and they will eventually die by the the 3...

spurraider21
04-30-2013, 04:32 PM
And how's all that length and athleticism working out for them so far? There's more to basketball than being a hyper athletic freak of nature.

Matchups, matchups, matchups.

tmtcsc
04-30-2013, 04:36 PM
I think Denver romps GS tonight. Hopefully GS closes them out in Game 6. I dont want the Spurs getting too chilly.

emanueldavidginobili
04-30-2013, 04:50 PM
And how's all that length and athleticism working out for them so far? There's more to basketball than being a hyper athletic freak of nature.

Obviously. The point im making is that Warriors would be the easier team to face because the Nuggets athleticism could cause some problems for us, and the Warriors aren't very athletic and aggressive.

superbigtime
04-30-2013, 06:51 PM
GSW.

dbreiden83080
04-30-2013, 07:04 PM
I like the personnel on the Warriors better...

Dr Cox
04-30-2013, 07:05 PM
Would rather have Nuggets....


Bring on the Warriors !!!!!!!


I hope Den wins tonight though....I will be out of town for game one if not.

Obstructed_View
04-30-2013, 07:07 PM
Obviously. The point im making is that Warriors would be the easier team to face because the Nuggets athleticism could cause some problems for us, and the Warriors aren't very athletic and aggressive.

If the Spurs face the Nuggets it's because the Nuggets suddenly figured out what they've been doing wrong and beat a team three times that's kicked the shit out of them for the last four. That, combined with their home dominance, is pretty tough.

Old School 44
04-30-2013, 07:08 PM
Warriors. Athletic bigs seem to give the Spurs problems, but I don't think either team will pose a tough challenge.
I'm just ready to watch the next round.

Dr Cox
04-30-2013, 07:10 PM
Den: Spurs in 4

GS Spurs in 5,

benefactor
04-30-2013, 07:31 PM
Jackson just pulled a shooter off the floor to match Denver's size. That's a good sign for the match up with the Spurs.

iminol
04-30-2013, 07:39 PM
so we playing on monday.

DesignatedT
04-30-2013, 07:40 PM
The other side of that argument is that Denver will end up expending a lot of energy to win this series if they are able to. A quick turnaround after an emotional comeback like that could cause problems for them in the 2nd round. Especially when facing a team who's been resting for a week.


Another argument is do you think the Spurs are better off with the series ending in 6 so they have an extra day or two to work on and install a game plan or that doesn't really matter?

itzsoweezee
04-30-2013, 08:19 PM
On the one hand, GSW is really young, terrible in San Antonio, and has no bench.

On the other hand, George Karl coaches Denver. This should be enough of a reason. But he also gives major minutes to the corpse of Andre Miller.

I like the Spurs chances against either, but I think a matchup with GSW is slightly easier.

superjames1992
04-30-2013, 08:39 PM
We'll rip either team apart. Those jokers can't play a lick of defense. It's sad. Pop can't wait to steal George Karl's milk money or put Mark Jackson back in his broadcast booth where he belongs, tbh (LOL, just kidding, but we should crush either team).

Robz4000
04-30-2013, 08:45 PM
On the one hand, GSW is really young, terrible in San Antonio, and has no bench.

On the other hand, George Karl coaches Denver. This should be enough of a reason. But he also gives major minutes to the corpse of Andre Miller.

I like the Spurs chances against either, but I think a matchup with GSW is slightly easier.

Andre Miller has abused the Spurs a couple times this year tbh. Two of those games came without TP or with TP just coming back from injury tho, so who the fuck knows.

The Spurs would beat either in 5 more than likely.

Edit: Actually, now that I look, he had 3 good to great games against the Spurs, 2 coming in SA.

foodie2
04-30-2013, 08:48 PM
Curry is hobbled and GS plays undisciplined ball. And tbh I am scared of a cheapshotting, George Karl-coached team doing physical damage to the Spurs. I'll take GS.

milkyway21
04-30-2013, 09:30 PM
GWS came back from a 20pt deficit...looks like they can close this out tonight

milkyway21
04-30-2013, 09:37 PM
I hope Denver wins to extend the Spurs rest day :wakeup

Spurs and Mavs fan
04-30-2013, 09:43 PM
As long as the series goes to 7 games (GSW vs. DEN,) I don't particularly care/mind.

Spurs and Mavs fan
04-30-2013, 09:46 PM
I hope Denver wins to extend the Spurs rest day :wakeup



Yup, 6-game series now.

milkyway21
04-30-2013, 09:50 PM
107-100 Denver.

3-2 GSW. 20pts won't make Curry :yield & :deadhorse

whew! :D

Budkin
04-30-2013, 09:53 PM
Golden State will wrap it up Thursday without a doubt.

Bruno
04-30-2013, 09:53 PM
Game 5 was damn weak quality wise.

Now, I don't see GS losing game 6 in front of their great home crowd. Nuggets are talented but are also very flawed.

Spurs and Mavs fan
04-30-2013, 10:50 PM
Wouldn't it be neat if, for the second year in a row, the Spurs started the playoffs with two series sweeps - 4-0 in the first round and 4-0 in the WCSF?

TampaDude
04-30-2013, 11:11 PM
Thanks, Nuggz, for extending the series.

Warriors in 6, though.

Aztecfan03
05-01-2013, 01:08 AM
I would rather there be more rest after golden state series(or less rest for the thunder) I want golden state to win next game

slick'81
05-01-2013, 01:12 AM
Gotta go with a pissed curry and warriors at home bring on gst

Obstructed_View
05-01-2013, 07:16 AM
Karl's starting McGee now. I'd rather play the Warriors.

eric365
05-01-2013, 09:55 AM
GSW and Richard Jefferson will hit all his 3s against the spurs and will have more and more minutes as the series goes

Obstructed_View
05-01-2013, 10:33 AM
GSW and Richard Jefferson will hit all his 3s against the spurs and will have more and more minutes as the series goes

Jefferson's definitely due to hit a shot or two in the postseason for a change.

TJastal
05-09-2013, 05:30 AM
I'm going to assume you aren't talking about Bonner, Blair, or Diaw.

Which means Splitter .. since Pop has done virtually nothing this season with the spurs only other 7 footer, Baynes.
Not to knock on my boy Splitter but he hasn't exactly looked like a world beater thus far in the playoffs. And he will be playing gingerly for the most part coming off the ankle sprain. Because of this .. I think the spurs will have problems and Pop will be forced to go small and this will play right into the warriors hands unfortunately. Pop will probably answer by going with his trusty security blanket, Bonner. Which will probably fail miserably. I can totally see Pop panic and send Mcgrady out there. It would really get ugly from there.

Took all of what... 1 game and Pop has already pushed the panic button..overplaying Bonner/Neal. Over/under on seeing Mcgrady in game 3?

100%duncan
05-09-2013, 06:06 AM
Took all of what... 1 game and Pop has already pushed the panic button..overplaying Bonner/Neal. Over/under on seeing Mcgrady in game 3?

Let's settle the ELE tbh. Spurs win you'll be gone till the season starts, spurs lose then I'd be gone till the season starts.

therealtruth
05-09-2013, 06:24 AM
Took all of what... 1 game and Pop has already pushed the panic button..overplaying Bonner/Neal. Over/under on seeing Mcgrady in game 3?

Pop's panicking early this year. Doesn't want to wait till game 5.

jimbo
05-09-2013, 06:28 AM
Nuggets

Curry/Thompson would demolish Parker/Ginobili/Green on the defensive end. Closing games would be iffy since Ginobili doesn't match up well with anyone on the defensive end.

I think the Warriors have the higher ceiling anyways. If either of Curry/Thompson go unconscious they'll almost certainly win.

Well instead Ginobili doesn't match up with anyone all game, not just at the end.


Please stop posting.


This.

:wakeup

TJastal
05-09-2013, 06:35 AM
Let's settle the ELE tbh. Spurs win you'll be gone till the season starts, spurs lose then I'd be gone till the season starts.

Lol trying to slip a fastball by me? The original bet was whether the series would go at least 6 games. Honor that then we have a bet. Otherwise... just be glad we never got around to getting the derails worked out. :lol

Budkin
05-09-2013, 06:37 AM
You know if we'd played Denver something similar would have gone on and then we'd be bumping this thread the same way. Murphy's Law.

100%duncan
05-09-2013, 07:00 AM
Lol trying to slip a fastball by me? The original bet was whether the series would go at least 6 games. Honor that then we have a bet. Otherwise... just be glad we never got around to getting the derails worked out. :lol

I didn't. I forgot. Ok, Spurs win in 6 or less you are gone till the next season. Spurs win in 7 or lose, I'm out till the next season.

RD2191
05-09-2013, 12:45 PM
You're a sick bastard, Jimbo.

spurraider21
05-09-2013, 12:57 PM
I didn't. I forgot. Ok, Spurs win in 6 or less you are gone till the next season. Spurs win in 7 or lose, I'm out till the next season.

nope. i made the same bet with tjastal as you did (though for $, not ele) and if it goes 6 games, you lose. only way we win our bets is if spurs win in 4 (now impossible) or 5

Brazil
05-09-2013, 01:12 PM
If you give Curry 29 shots he will easily score 50+.. you may want to rethink that strategy.


Spurs fans thinking the warriors are going to lay down and die are going to be in for a rude awakening in game 1. :lol

good call TJ

Legacy
05-09-2013, 01:38 PM
:lmao

Brunodf
05-09-2013, 01:42 PM
Nuggets
Can't say i didn't see that coming

Legacy
05-09-2013, 01:42 PM
Wow seriously? Are the Warriors this good?

Yes. They are. Now you know. :lol

... And onto my ignore list you will go.

DPG21920
05-09-2013, 03:27 PM
Do most people feel the same way as they did pre-series about this?

Budkin
05-09-2013, 03:57 PM
Do most people feel the same way as they did pre-series about this?

Denver would have been running our asses out of the gym with their speed. Golden State is still a much better matchup despite their shooters going Big Head Mode.

100%duncan
05-10-2013, 12:42 AM
TJastal, what are the exact details of our bet tbh

Robz4000
05-10-2013, 12:47 AM
Do most people feel the same way as they did pre-series about this?

Meh, with the way the Spurs have looked the first two games, I imagine Denver would've nabbed a game as well. Just glad the Spurs don't have to go play in that altitude, but winning in Oracle will prove to be just as tough a challenge in itself I guess.

100%duncan
05-10-2013, 01:08 AM
nope. i made the same bet with tjastal as you did (though for $, not ele) and if it goes 6 games, you lose. only way we win our bets is if spurs win in 4 (now impossible) or 5

Can you quote it? I can't find it in this thread :lol I don't remember what thread was that exactly. If that's the details then sure, I'm not backing out.

Paging TJastal tbh.