PDA

View Full Version : Gregg Popovich vs Mark Jackson



Brunodf
05-12-2013, 05:27 PM
1- Outcoached again(3-1 Mark Jackson)
2- Playing Neal and Bonner.
3- When Splitter finally was playing well he got benched(making Timmy play the last minutes tired)
4- Small Ball! THAT SHIT CAN'T GET STOPS!OUR OFFENSE IS ISOBALL!!!!!HOW THE FUCK Pop didn't understand that yet?????
5- Not playing Green on Curry the entire game?! Really???!!

Pop vs Mark Jackson is the biggest mismatch of the series.

Richie
05-12-2013, 05:28 PM
Gotta ask why we went small in the 4th.

mercos
05-12-2013, 05:28 PM
Pulling Splitter early in the fourth when the offense was rolling was a HUGE mistake. Warriors had no answer. Pop out coached himself with that one.

polandprzem
05-12-2013, 05:29 PM
1- Outcoached again(3-1 Mark Jackson)
2- Playing Neal and Bonner.
3- When Splitter finally was playing well he got benched(making Timmy play the last minutes tired)
4- Small Ball! THAT SHIT CAN'T GET STOPS!OUR OFFENSE IS ISOBALL!!!!!HOW THE FUCK Pop didn't understand that yet?????
5- Not playing Green on Curry the entire game?! Really???!!

I wanted to address some of this shit. Esp. small ball wtf?

biskvito
05-12-2013, 05:32 PM
the camera caught Pop saying something to Splitter when he was pulled, Tiago answered something laughing nervously

Pop and Splitter will never work to full potential, they don't trust each other

Brunodf
05-12-2013, 05:33 PM
I wanted to address some of this shit. Esp. small ball wtf?
The genius best coach of the NBA can't realize that? Wtf man?
Everybody is seeing that playing small is only good for GSW.

polandprzem
05-12-2013, 05:34 PM
the camera caught Pop saying something to Splitter when he was pulled, Tiago answered something laughing nervously

Pop and Splitter will never work to full potential, they don't trust each other

Splitt went for a risky doubleteam. I think that was Pops problem with him.


This is the worst spurs loss

Brunodf
05-12-2013, 05:39 PM
Splitt went for a risky doubleteam. I think that was Pops problem with him.


This is the worst spurs loss

Poor Splitter, he was guarding Jack and Lee at the same time and still had to help on the Barnes post ups

phxspurfan
05-12-2013, 05:43 PM
I was wondering why he was so stubborn about playing Diaw, even when it was clear Splitter was doing well out there.

polandprzem
05-12-2013, 05:43 PM
It's just strange Pop went off the schemes that won game 3.
Maybe he wanted to outsmart himself gotdamnit :pctoss


Tiago was on fire starting 4th quarter but why play him or Diaw when we losing the froncourt battle being worse in the backourt as well.

Poolboy5623
05-12-2013, 05:44 PM
If the spurs could hit some fts and play "spurs" ball, this series would have been over today. Instead, it's now 0-0 and best of 3. My biggest concern is will GS go back to shooting lights out, at at&t?? Spurs and pop fucked themselves, in this series.

phxspurfan
05-12-2013, 05:44 PM
Neal's defense on Barnes was better than Parker's though. I just wish he had more touches when the Spurs couldn't buy a bucket. Neal probabyl could've hit a couple shots late in the 4th when the rest of the Spurs were front ironing and sphincter tightening

Poolboy5623
05-12-2013, 05:44 PM
Pressure all back on S.A.

phxspurfan
05-12-2013, 05:45 PM
Btw why not attack Bogut more? Dude had 4 fouls in like the first quarter.

MR-Clutch
05-12-2013, 05:46 PM
Just don't understand why he doesn't play Tim and Tiago together when they have been so effective together all year.

Obstructed_View
05-12-2013, 05:48 PM
Neal's defense on Barnes was better than Parker's though.
1. lolwut?
2. The big question is, why do you have a point guard defending a small forward who's several inches taller?

Chomag
05-12-2013, 05:49 PM
getting pretty sick of ISO ball.

Brunodf
05-12-2013, 05:56 PM
Just don't understand why he doesn't play Tim and Tiago together when they have been so effective together all year.
:pop:"Neal and Bonner are better"