PDA

View Full Version : Stein: Seeing a bright Vegas future for NBA



Kori Ellis
07-11-2005, 04:12 PM
Seeing a bright Vegas future for NBA
By Marc Stein
ESPN.com

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/columns/story?columnist=stein_marc&id=2105306&num=0

LAS VEGAS -- What happens in the Vegas Summer League doesn't have to stay here.

Does it?

Let's dribble around before someone tells us differently.

• It took less than a week for this 16-team extravaganza to establish a summer-league record for NBA owners watching in the stands.

Sacramento's Joe and Gavin Maloof are virtual Vegas residents, so their presence was expected.

Scratching the Maloofs from consideration, the list is still extensive and impressive: Portland's Paul Allen, New York's James Dolan, Dallas' Mark Cuban, Cleveland's Dan Gilbert and Denver's Stan Kroenke. We've also seen the bashed brothers who should be trying to move their teams here: New Orleans' George Shinn and Donald Sterling of the L.A. Clippers. Two prominent ownership partners -- Boston's Stephen Pagliuca and Phoenix's Dick Heckman -- have also been spotted.

What does it all mean?

To a giddy Gavin Maloof, it's more proof his peers want to make this city a full-fledged NBA outpost by putting a team here someday soon.

"The summer league should always be here, over and out," Maloof said. "I think the NBA All-Star Game should be here every year, but we're just happy if we get the first one.

"I don't think there would be much opposition from NBA owners to have a team here in Vegas. I think it's a question of whether the casino owners would make the commitment to take the sport off the book. We took the NBA off the [sports] book at the Palms and it didn't hurt our business."

It's only a matter of time, people. The 2007 All-Star Game is all but officially Vegas-bound, and Maloof -- though quite aware of commissioner David Stern's reluctance to sanction an NBA franchise in a city that allows NBA betting -- predicts that the success of that event "will change all the negative attitudes about having a team here."

Chances are they won't change so drastically that the not-exactly-glitzy Shinn or the L.A.-obsessed Sterling would be willing to relocate to the Strip. And Maloof, insisting "we'll never take our fans for granted," reiterated for the umpteenth time that "it won't be the Kings." But I'm betting on an existing NBA franchise's relocating to Vegas before we see new ones in Europe.

• Other surprise guests in town so far include Kobe Bryant and Joe Johnson.

Bryant wasn't here to scout the summer league, obviously, but he did serve as the biggest name in a celebrity poker tournament for charity at The Mirage. "We were all a little shocked," said one fellow All-Star.

Johnson, meanwhile, made a brief appearance in the gym Sunday, one day after agent Arn Tellem provided a bigger spectacle than anything on the floor by engaging in a lengthy negotiations summit on the baseline with Suns president Bryan Colangelo and longtime Suns boss Jerry Colangelo.

Johnson's joining Tellem in town set up an easy meeting with Hawks general manager Billy Knight, who has committed to signing the restricted free agent to a five-year max offer sheet worth an estimated $70 million -- including an up-front payment of an estimated $20 million -- later this month. Johnson's camp was informed Saturday the Suns intend to match if Atlanta holds firm with that plan.

• My bad.

I actually wrote late Friday night that Darko Milicic was the biggest hooper playing this town.

A totally unintentional slight to Orlando's Dwight Howard.

Though still just 19, Howard is the real man among tykes in this league. He played all 82 games as a rookie and averaged a robust 12 points and 10 boards, so he really doesn't need to be here. Yet the Magic asked anyway and Howard isn't protesting, knowing he has a new system to learn (new coach Brian Hill's) and plenty of work to do on his offensive game (on his jump shot, passing out of double-teams and simply taking his time with the ball).

"I'm still a rookie until the first game next year," Howard said. "At first I wondered the same thing, 'Why am I coming up here?' But now I'm glad I came."

That's even though the pious Howard is hardly a Vegas guy. "I'm really not a gambler," he said, when asked if it's tough to be too young for the casinos.

Howard went on to speak with hope about next season, insisting he has learned from the tough times of year one -- the trade of close pal Cuttino Mobley, the fade from playoff contention and, most recently, the dismissal of mentor Clifford Ray along with the rest of the previous staff.

He's still humble, too, even after exceeding all statistical expectations for his first season out of high school.

Asked if we should put him down for 20 and 10 in year two, Howard said: "You can put us down for making the playoffs … and me doing anything I can to help."

• Howard wasn't any help, though, when asked if he has any insight into Mobley's free-agent thinking. Denver has high interest and the Clippers are offering the most money, but Howard says they haven't spoken since the free-agent period began.

"I wish he'd come back," Howard said with a laugh, "but it's not realistic."

• An upbeat end to a rough week for the Wiz: Antawn Jamison flew in over the weekend and worked out for team brass to show off his patched-up right knee.

Hobbled through the second half of the season, and especially in the playoffs, Jamison underwent arthroscopic surgery on May 26 and says he feels worlds better now after having scar tissue removed.

• The rough part, of course, was the free-agent defection of Larry Hughes. The Wiz, though, think they can parlay a Kwame Brown sign-and-trade into a decent Hughes replacement who won't be as expensive.

Signing Hughes to a major-money deal made much more sense for the Cavs than the Wiz. Even though Hughes isn't going to take any pressure off LeBron James with his shaky jumper, he is a versatile guard like LeBron who can pretty much do everything else. Hughes will score, pass and defend … and get to the line.

The Cavs also have an owner (Gilbert) who won't let a slew of big contracts (LBJ, Hughes and the forthcoming re-signing of Zydrunas Ilgauskas) discourage future tweaking via trades. For Washington and the thriftier Abe Pollin, signing Hughes at a Jamison/Gilbert Arenas level would have essentially stopped the Wiz right there. That would have been Washington's team for the foreseeable future, forcing the front office to continually scrounge for bargain parts to add to a smallish core.

As one insider noted: "It's tough to lose Larry right now, but in two years we'll be glad we don't have that contract."

• Cleveland isn't worried about Hughes' perimeter shortcomings because it has the inside track on one of the best shooters available: Stein Line favorite Sarunas Jasikevicius.

Jasikevicius, spotted in London watching Wimbledon with Big Z (Ilgauskas) last month, is still being chased by several teams. Indiana's Larry Bird is a big fan who went to Israel late last season to visit the Maccabi Tel-Aviv point guard in person. And Portland, which boasts its own Lithuanian tradition after a long association with Arvydas Sabonis, is said to view Jasikevicius as an ideal veteran complement to the developing Sebastian Telfair.

The Cavs, though, should still have ample cap room to tempt Sarunas after signing Hughes and Ilgauskas. There are serious concerns about Jasikevicius' ability to defend at the NBA level -- especially if he's on the floor with the plodding Ilgauskas -- but they are offset by the spunky guard's history of clutch shot-making and his pick-and-roll prowess. Jasikevicius isn't a pure point, but he would form a dangerous perimeter with James and Hughes, since all three can handle the ball and hurt a defense.

Don't forget, furthermore, new Cavs GM Danny Ferry was part of the Spurs' front office that tried hard two summers ago to pry Jasikevicius away from Maccabi Tel-Aviv and a contract that didn't allow for NBA passage. Jasikevicius went on to lead the Israeli powerhouse to the past two Euroleague titles, adding to his rep for delivering in the clutch. A rep Team USA knows well after the past two Olympics.

"And he's much more under control than he used to be," said one NBA personnel man who has watched Jasikevicius for years.

• Boston was another Jasikevicius contender, but the Celtics took themselves out of the running by committing a portion of their mid-level exception to Nets forward Brian Scalabrine. Really.

• Mobley indeed tempts the Nuggets, but they privately chuckle at the notion they'd consider a sign-and-trade featuring Nene for Cuttino. Denver, remember, was torn last season about whether to engage in a Nene-for-Michael Redd trade -- a move Milwaukee considered only because it feared losing Redd in free agency.

• Donyell Marshall, widely considered 1A on the list of veteran front-court free agents available alongside Shareef Abdur-Rahim, is another Clippers target along with Mobley. The Clips, as always, can pay more than most, which gives them a shot.

• It's not yet known if Seattle's desire to stay in-house for a Nate McMillan replacement -- by promoting longtime Sonics assistant Bob Weiss -- is iron-clad, but you can safely rule out Don Nelson and Doug Collins. Both have been mentioned because of their close ties to Sonics GM Rick Sund, and either one would be a coup for Seattle, but neither is ready for a bench return. Nelson, 65, insists that he's retired from coaching, and friends say he'll need at least a year off before considering one more run anywhere. TNT's Collins, meanwhile, was close to signing on in Milwaukee before abruptly telling the Bucks he couldn't stomach more coaching, which helped line up Terry Stotts' Milwaukee comeback.

• Don't worry. Didn't forget the games.

One of the best things about the Vegas Summer League is the depth of the field. With 16 teams, there's someone new you want to see in just about every game.

However …

The overall talent level in the modern summer league is low (and dropping). Every year, it seems, summer league seems to tell you less and less about what a big-name draftee will be able to do in the big time.

The most impressive performances so far?

Detroit's Jason Maxiell still has to prove he can do this against real men in the real pros, but the undersized power forward has been a beast for the Pistons when he's not roughing up Darko Milicic in practice.

Telfair hasn't wowed folks as you'd expect in this environment, but Portland has been able to show us a more polished Travis Outlaw and the promising shooting touch of Martell Webster.

Cleveland's Luke Jackson has his mobility back, to go with his passing eye, after back trouble ruined his rookie season. He's not making many shots yet, but he's not getting the spot-up opportunities he'll get when he's playing with LeBron and Co.

Nate Robinson's speed and flair almost make you forget that Channing Frye looks a lot farther away than Isiah Thomas seems to think. Almost.

And Howard, as mentioned, is an absolute treat to have in this setting.

We wish there was more to share about New Orleans' Chris Paul and the Clippers' Shaun Livingston, but the guards we wanted to see most haven't been able to play much yet. Paul banged his wrist in a hard fall Friday night, and Livingston -- whose poster hangs as a banner above one of the baskets here -- came to town with a bruised thumb.

I hope to see both before I have to leave. What they display shouldn't stay here, either.

Vashner
07-11-2005, 05:15 PM
This is why Vegas can never have a team..

Mob would corrupt the franchise and maybe the league..... but I bet Shaq would be there REAL FAST..
Oh yea.. Shaq with another pimped up ride only Gold ....

Aggie Hoopsfan
07-11-2005, 06:29 PM
This is why Vegas can never have a team..

Mob would corrupt the franchise and maybe the league..

1. They would suspend gambling on the team and games it's playing in.

2. You do realize that "the mob" probably has NY on tighter lockdown than Las Vegas, right?


Somewhere Buddy Holly/Badly Drawn Boy/etc. is sharpening the razor blades, prepping the pill bottles, and lining up the vodka tonics. :lol

tlongII
07-11-2005, 07:29 PM
The All Star game in Vegas would be sweet.

blaze89
07-11-2005, 11:04 PM
Las Vegas, I think, is not controlled by the mob but more from corporations, who probably act more ruthless than the mob.

Plus if there were any signs of games being fixed, Las Vegas...well the state of Nevada would be on it like flies on shit. I mean, legit gambling is still the moneymaker in Vegas so why would they let someone screw it up.

Vashner
07-11-2005, 11:26 PM
The Sports Betting bar inside Paris Las Vegas is kinda uber too. I would love to bet on Spurs but I bet the odds suck.

Duncanoypi
07-12-2005, 03:23 AM
I think Philippine team will join the vegas summer league...

nickbroken
07-12-2005, 03:31 AM
Please there isn't shit for a mob in Vegas anymore they don't run casinos here anymore, the corporations took over years ago.Vegas has more family appeal then it ever had before I should know I've lived here 20 years, the problem with having a team here is too many people are from all over, so I doubt they would get a great fan base.

Phenomanul
07-12-2005, 08:11 AM
Please there isn't shit for a mob in Vegas anymore they don't run casinos here anymore, the corporations took over years ago.Vegas has more family appeal then it ever had before I should know I've lived here 20 years, the problem with having a team here is too many people are from all over, so I doubt they would get a great fan base.


Family Appeal????


Would that explain the legality of prostitution... I went last year, and I would have to say there isn't a place on earth where I have seen such blatant solicitation by 'pigs' seeking 'high-class fun'.... It was apalling.

BigShotBob
07-12-2005, 08:18 AM
Vegas would be a smart decision for the NBA. Think of all the cities that only have an NBA team, and no other sports representing them. San Antonio, Sacramento, Salt Lake City to name a few. Those are all cities with a large diehard fanbase for the NBA, enough so that I think every one one of those cities has or did have a WNBA team at one time. They love their hoops teams. I think it's more important to have sold out arenas, crazy noise, and a visibly passionate fanbase, instead of big market tv ratings.

kskonn
07-12-2005, 08:23 AM
Family Appeal????


Would that explain the legality of prostitution... I went last year, and I would have to say there isn't a place on earth where I have seen such blatant solicitation by 'pigs' seeking 'high-class fun'.... It was apalling.

But if you get off the strip and head downtown there is stuff for a family to do. most people only think that Vegas is made up by a couple of roads with casinos on them and nothing else.

pache100
07-12-2005, 08:34 AM
But if you get off the strip and head downtown there is stuff for a family to do. most people only think that Vegas is made up by a couple of roads with casinos on them and nothing else.

That is very true; but, there is PLENTY of stuff on the strip itself for families to do. We walked on the strip for two days and never went in a casino. We had a 10-yr old and an 8-yr old with us. They absolutely LOVED the hotel amusement parks, all the stuff to do and see at Aladdin, the M&M museum (I think we spent 2 hrs in there!), the Harley Davidson cafe (lunch - 2 hrs to see the whole thing!), the beach at Mandalay Bay, all the "stuff" to do and see at Treasure Island, the malls (not just shopping, but gamerooms), the Coca-Cola museum (right next to the M&M place - thought we'd never leave that block!), the NASCAR restaurant (there's a roller coaster train that runs in that block), the Hard Rock...the restaurants are not just places to eat, either, they are entertainment in and of themselves. There are plenty of shows that are "kid-friendly", too. And downtown, Fremont Street! Tons of stuff to do and see there.

Anyone who says Las Vegas is not a place for families is not interested in finding stuff for their family to do. If you want to do the casinos, leave the kids at home. But, don't bitch about there being nothing for kids/families; you just ain't lookin'!

nickbroken
07-12-2005, 12:03 PM
Family Appeal????


Would that explain the legality of prostitution... I went last year, and I would have to say there isn't a place on earth where I have seen such blatant solicitation by 'pigs' seeking 'high-class fun'.... It was apalling.


Prostitution isn't legal in city limits, and thats legal in Nevada, it isn't a Vegas law, and yes there is a lot more family appeal in Vegas nowadays.Theme parks here, lots of shows for kids, art galleries,lots of things, don't believe what you see on tv it isn't all gambling,drugs,and hookers.

Phenomanul
07-12-2005, 01:46 PM
That is very true; but, there is PLENTY of stuff on the strip itself for families to do. We walked on the strip for two days and never went in a casino. We had a 10-yr old and an 8-yr old with us. They absolutely LOVED the hotel amusement parks, all the stuff to do and see at Aladdin, the M&M museum (I think we spent 2 hrs in there!), the Harley Davidson cafe (lunch - 2 hrs to see the whole thing!), the beach at Mandalay Bay, all the "stuff" to do and see at Treasure Island, the malls (not just shopping, but gamerooms), the Coca-Cola museum (right next to the M&M place - thought we'd never leave that block!), the NASCAR restaurant (there's a roller coaster train that runs in that block), the Hard Rock...the restaurants are not just places to eat, either, they are entertainment in and of themselves. There are plenty of shows that are "kid-friendly", too. And downtown, Fremont Street! Tons of stuff to do and see there.

Anyone who says Las Vegas is not a place for families is not interested in finding stuff for their family to do. If you want to do the casinos, leave the kids at home. But, don't bitch about there being nothing for kids/families; you just ain't lookin'!

BTW I didn't even step inside a single casino to gamble... except for the MGM Grand in order to get to their arena for a concert.

I went to those attractions (from your post)... And I would agree they are very enjoyable (and expensive)... the stuff I noted was subtle but blatantly obvious... Obvious enough that my 6 and 7 year old nephews picked up on it.

pache100
07-12-2005, 02:08 PM
I went to those attractions (from your post)... And I would agree they are very enjoyable (and expensive...)

I don't know why anyone would go to Vegas expecting things not to be expensive. If you can't afford it, don't go.

Although, I have to tell you...the last time I went to Vegas (Jan 2004), my whole 3-day trip cost me under $700, including air fare, and I spent $95 of that on a George Strait at the MGM Grand concert ticket! You can't do Vegas on the cheap, but you can keep your expenses down if you shop around on the internet for great room rates and air fares. I shared a hotel room w/ a friend. Food there is cheap. I set limits on my slots (that's all I do there), and when I lose my limit for a day, I quit.

I love Vegas and I always feel that I have gotten my money's worth and had a blast when I come home.