PDA

View Full Version : Spurs Quietly Become a Two-Way Threat



ace3g
05-30-2013, 12:58 PM
Spurs Quietly Become a Two-Way Threat
By JIM CAVAN

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2013/05/30/sports/30spurs-offthedribble/30spurs-offthedribble-blog480.jpgKevin C. Cox/Getty Images

Kawhi Leonard of the Spurs guarding Jerryd Bayless of the Grizzlies in Game 4 of the Western Conference finals in Memphis.

Throughout the San Antonio Spurs’ impressive postseason march, the N.B.A. cognoscenti have homed in on one laudatory refrain more than any other: The Spurs take away what you do best.

From clamping down the hot-shooting Stephen Curry with the versatile Kawhi Leonard to packing the paint against the imposing Memphis frontcourt, Spurs Coach Gregg Popovich has turned these playoffs into a cross between a torture chamber and a mad doctor’s operating room – removing the opponent’s biggest weapon at just the right time, and with just the right tools.

But after brushing aside the Memphis Grizzlies to reach the N.B.A. finals – the franchise’s fifth appearance in 15 seasons – perhaps it is high time to consider augmenting the above superlative ever so slightly: Not only do the Spurs take away what you do best, they do what you do, only better.

First, some context: San Antonio has been tremendous on both sides of the ball all season, finishing seventh in offensive efficiency (105.9) and third in defensive efficiency (99.2). Over the past month, the Spurs have steadily taken both to the next level, arriving to the finals with a chance to redefine statistical greatness in the playoffs.

In the first round, the Spurs used the short-handed Lakers as a glorified practice squad, registering a ridiculous 20-plus point differential between their offensive (113.3) and defensive (93.1) ratings on the way to a painless four-game sweep.

If the Lakers were a once-proud team in the midst of a death rattle, the Warriors – San Antonio’s second-round opponent – were the dangerous upstarts. Having finished the regular season ranked 10th in offensive efficiency (104.2), Golden State, with its first-round blitz of the Denver Nuggets, proved Curry & Co. were not a crew to be trifled with. It took six helter-skelter games, but the Spurs upended the Warriors by giving them a dose of their own offensive medicine and besting them in the efficiency game (106.9 to 102.5).

Ahead of San Antonio’s showdown with the Memphis Grizzlies in the Western Conference finals, many people predicted the Spurs had finally met their match. The reason: Memphis’s stellar defense, which the Grizzlies parlayed from a second-place regular-season ranking (97.4) into a pair of impressive wins over the Clippers and the Thunder.

continue: http://offthedribble.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/05/30/spurs-quietly-become-a-two-way-threat/?smid=tw-nytsports&seid=auto

BlackSilver
05-30-2013, 01:15 PM
:toast

Knoxxx
05-30-2013, 01:51 PM
No real revelation there. We concentrated after the 2011 Memphis loss on becoming more balanced, in particular on developing Splitter. It showed as we went 8-0 against Lakers and Mem, the two teams with arguably the best big-men combos in the game. In between, we faced a very quick younger team with two of the games best perimeter shooting guards. That proved to be the most difficult matchup, but one we handled well with the combo of Parker-Green-Leonard.

So basically we are a team with no apparent weakness. We can effectively cut off the paint and handle any type of mess inside. On the perimeter as mentioned above we are also top notch, with the lengthy and quick Green/Leonard duo complimenting the speedy Parker and helping him avoid any overly taxing defensive assignments.

I actually think we match up best with Miami. The reason is they are a small team so Duncan/Splitter have a clear advantage inside and can also cut off one-on-one drivers such as James/Wade. We have a huge advantage at point guard, which can offset Miami's James/Wade duo along with Manu/Green/Leonard. Also we are great at team defense, which is the only way to effectively deal with James.

Indiana is more balanced, but we have a clear edge in star power and depth IMO.

I think we handle either in 4-5 games, "TBH."

Keepin' it real
05-30-2013, 02:10 PM
No real revelation there. We concentrated after the 2011 Memphis loss on becoming more balanced, in particular on developing Splitter. It showed as we went 8-0 against Lakers and Mem, the two teams with arguably the best big-men combos in the game. In between, we faced a very quick younger team with two of the games best perimeter shooting guards. That proved to be the most difficult matchup, but one we handled well with the combo of Parker-Green-Leonard.

So basically we are a team with no apparent weakness. We can effectively cut off the paint and handle any type of mess inside. On the perimeter as mentioned above we are also top notch, with the lengthy and quick Green/Leonard duo complimenting the speedy Parker and helping him avoid any overly taxing defensive assignments.

I actually think we match up best with Miami. The reason is they are a small team so Duncan/Splitter have a clear advantage inside and can also cut off one-on-one drivers such as James/Wade. We have a huge advantage at point guard, which can offset Miami's James/Wade duo along with Manu/Green/Leonard. Also we are great at team defense, which is the only way to effectively deal with James.

Indiana is more balanced, but we have a clear edge in star power and depth IMO.

I think we handle either in 4-5 games, "TBH."

No real revelation there.:wakeup

Knoxxx
05-30-2013, 02:16 PM
No real revelation there.:wakeup

Or there either we all know there are plenty of aholes on this board. I am honestly critiquing a professional writer's piece though, what are you trying to do? Belittle a reasonable take by a fellow Spurs fan?

lil'mo
05-30-2013, 03:14 PM
I think he is agreeing with you

The Reckoning
05-30-2013, 03:20 PM
lol "quietly" now that they're in the finals

Seventyniner
05-30-2013, 03:28 PM
lol "quietly" now that they're in the finals

Just what I was thinking.