PDA

View Full Version : Kings: Kings sign Carl Landry



djohn2oo8
07-06-2013, 03:25 PM
353610338672979969

irishock
07-06-2013, 03:26 PM
overpayment

Clipper Nation
07-06-2013, 03:26 PM
For that kind of money, the Clippers made the right move by passing on him and bringing back Barnes instead, tbh....

unforeseen
07-06-2013, 03:39 PM
Same ole Kings.
Better off moving to Seattle.

spurraider21
07-06-2013, 03:56 PM
Dumb franchises overpaying per usual

Rogue
07-06-2013, 06:09 PM
Landry is worth a mid-level contract imho. PFs and Cs usually get overpaid in this league.

LarryDavid
07-06-2013, 06:14 PM
Didn't he play with them at one point in the past?

blkroadrunners
07-06-2013, 06:46 PM
Didn't he play with them at one point in the past?

Yup, and they already have Cousins, Thompson, Patterson, and Hayes. Stupid move by the Kings.

baseline bum
07-06-2013, 06:51 PM
Yup, and they already have Cousins, Thompson, Patterson, and Hayes. Stupid move by the Kings.

The last three are completely worthless. It's like saying the Spurs don't need another PG because they have Joseph, DeColo, and Mills.

Kai
07-06-2013, 07:03 PM
I'll take Chuck Hayes plz

blkroadrunners
07-06-2013, 07:07 PM
The last three are completely worthless. It's like saying the Spurs don't need another PG because they have Joseph, DeColo, and Mills.

Hayes has past his peak, so I agree.

Thompson is a solid 10 and 7 guy.

Patterson is basically another Landry.

I'm just not buying this signing for that amount unless a trade is stewing in Sactown.

spurraider21
07-06-2013, 07:25 PM
if you want lessons on how NOT to run a team, see the Pistons and Kings

racm
07-06-2013, 09:08 PM
Hayes has past his peak, so I agree.

Thompson is a solid 10 and 7 guy.

Patterson is basically another Landry.

I'm just not buying this signing for that amount unless a trade is stewing in Sactown.

We S&T Thompson for Bonner tbh

spurraider21
07-06-2013, 09:10 PM
We S&T Thompson for Bonner tbh

S&T? nobody gets signed in this deal you are proposing :lol