Twisted_Dawg
07-18-2005, 01:44 PM
I was having a spirited debate with another long time Spurs fanactic. We were talking about when the Spurs joined the NBA. Our discussion and difference came regarding the following:
I recall that the former owners of the Spirits of St. Louis still receive a small percentage of the television revenue the Spurs receive from the NBA. I think it is a small percentage like about 5-10%. I am not sure if Denver, Indiana or the Nets have the same arrangement with those individuals.
My buddy maintains that this group of individuals receives 1/31 share of the total television money handed out to the existing 30 teams, in effect allowing them to receive the same TV money the other 30 teams receive. My buddy says that the writer of "Loose Balls", Terry Pluto, backs this fact up. I disagree.
The Spirit owners would only agree to sign off on the merger if they received television money since their team was not included.
Can any of you clear up this arguement.
I recall that the former owners of the Spirits of St. Louis still receive a small percentage of the television revenue the Spurs receive from the NBA. I think it is a small percentage like about 5-10%. I am not sure if Denver, Indiana or the Nets have the same arrangement with those individuals.
My buddy maintains that this group of individuals receives 1/31 share of the total television money handed out to the existing 30 teams, in effect allowing them to receive the same TV money the other 30 teams receive. My buddy says that the writer of "Loose Balls", Terry Pluto, backs this fact up. I disagree.
The Spirit owners would only agree to sign off on the merger if they received television money since their team was not included.
Can any of you clear up this arguement.