DMC
07-13-2013, 11:44 PM
It was explained that 1 in 3 black men are convicted felons so getting a "jury of your peers" for a black man is borderline impossible especially if you consider the low ratio of qualified:selected jurors. That was explained by a white female "expert" on the most liberal news channel of all "MSNBC" and the black female and Al Sharpton began a response but were cut off because they cut away to live coverage outside where the little black kid with the only black male parent on the premise with his real son with him, and who could actually put a sentence together, said the jury got it right before his father tugged his shoulder and the kid changed his story.
Of course only a liberally leaning media would even think the jury was there for Martin. The term "jury of your peers" is for the accused, not the prosecution or the dead. Odd that the term "crime" keeps being mentioned even after the verdict. There was no crime. None was committed except for the attack by the thug who brought a bag of skittles to a gun fight. Event, sure... death... sure... crime? No. So sayeth the jury.
I don't think the prosecution should have the open mic to accuse the defendant of being guilty after being acquitted by the jury, especially seeing that they are state prosecutors. It basically says the justice system failed the Martin family and that they are culpable. The truth is that there was never grounds for a 2nd degree murder case, someone was pandering to political pressure and would have gone for rape if they were told to. Not sure Zimmerman fucked the bullet hole though, but he was said to have been on top of Martin. Did they do a swab?
P.S. Fuck you, I haven't responded to anyone so I owe no one shit.
Of course only a liberally leaning media would even think the jury was there for Martin. The term "jury of your peers" is for the accused, not the prosecution or the dead. Odd that the term "crime" keeps being mentioned even after the verdict. There was no crime. None was committed except for the attack by the thug who brought a bag of skittles to a gun fight. Event, sure... death... sure... crime? No. So sayeth the jury.
I don't think the prosecution should have the open mic to accuse the defendant of being guilty after being acquitted by the jury, especially seeing that they are state prosecutors. It basically says the justice system failed the Martin family and that they are culpable. The truth is that there was never grounds for a 2nd degree murder case, someone was pandering to political pressure and would have gone for rape if they were told to. Not sure Zimmerman fucked the bullet hole though, but he was said to have been on top of Martin. Did they do a swab?
P.S. Fuck you, I haven't responded to anyone so I owe no one shit.