Article: People Are Over Exaggerating Tim Duncan's Greatness

[Koolaid_Man]

I agree totally...according to the article:


More and more, I’m hearing about how great Tim Duncan (http://bleacherreport.com/tim-duncan) is, and how great he has been over the course of his sixteen year career in the NBA (http://bleacherreport.com/nba).



In a video aired on ESPN, analyst Bill Simmons (http://bleacherreport.com/bill-simmons) claims that Duncan is the best player of his generation—better than “Kobe Bryant (http://bleacherreport.com/kobe-bryant), [Kevin] Garnett, Shaq—greater than anyone,” Simmons says.


Stop it.


Duncan is arguably the greatest power forward of all time and is, without a shadow of a doubt, a first-ballot Hall of Famer. Sure, he probably was better than Garnett and won more than Shaquille O'Neal (http://bleacherreport.com/shaquille-oneal), so I’m going to leave those two alone. But Bryant’s legacy I will touch on because, to be frank, it's greatness is far superior to Duncan’s.




Statistically, Bryant has been better—there is no getting around that. He's averaged 25.5 points per game over the course of his 17-year career while appearing in the Finals seven times. He's been on 12 NBA All-Defensive teams and has twice won the scoring title. Probably the most impressive thing about Bryant's career is that he is the fourth-leading scorer in the history of the NBA (via Basketball Reference (http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/b/bryanko01.html)).


The argument most people make for Duncan is that he has accumulated more accolades than the Black Mamba, but even that isn’t entirely true.

The Big Fundamental has won two MVPs, four rings and three Finals MVP awards in comparison to Bryant’s one MVP, five rings and two Finals MVPs.


While it's hard to distinguish the two in areas other than scoring, what you can compare is a variable like their best season.

Duncan’s best year was in 2002 as he averaged 25.5 points and 12.7 boards per night and shot an efficient 50.8 percent from the field.

Bryant’s came in 2006 when he put up 35.4 points, 4.5 assists and 5.3 rebounds per night.


Advantage: Mamba.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1665593-kobe-bryant-why-the-mambas-greatness-exceeds-that-of-tim-duncan

[Leetonidas]

:lol bleacher report


so your basic argument here comes down to Kobe averaged 10 more PPG in 2006 than Duncan did in 2003? holy shit full retard status initiated


While it's hard to distinguish the two in areas other than scoring, what you can compare is a variable like their best season.

Considering Timmy destroys him on the glass, still averages a good amount of assists for a big and destroys him in blocks, that's a pretty ridiculous statement. but that's what you get with bleacher report articles written by 14 year olds

[Koolaid_Man]

:lol bleacher report


so your basic argument here comes down to Kobe averaged 10 more PPG in 2006 than Duncan did in 2003? holy shit full retard status initiated



Considering Timmy destroys him on the glass, still averages a good amount of assists for a big and destroys him in blocks, that's a pretty ridiculous statement. but that's what you get with bleacher report articles written by 14 year olds

the guy was clear in his argument....since they play different positions the main variable to distinguish them is best season...plus scoring since scoring in all sports is the ultimate measure of success...

Football is touchdowns
Soccer is goals
Hockey is scoring the puck
Baseball is home runs and rbi's
Boxing who scores the most points
Basketball is all about scoring

Scoring is the ultimate measure of success..even with women....or if you're gay with men...it's all about the Score :lol

[Leetonidas]

when you factor in that the Spurs played at a much slower pace, scored less points, Duncan shot a higher percentage, and that Kobe chucked like crazy on a team full of crap, your argument is invalid. when comparing these players we should look at individual accolades and when it comes to non-team accomplishments, TD has the rapist beat in MVPs and Finals MVPs, which is all that matters when determining individual greatness along with ring count as the main focus of the team. Tim Duncan has won multiple titles without an all-NBA teammate, Kobe Bryant has had the most dominating center ever for 3 of his titles and the best frountcourt in the NBA for the other 2. so go fuck yourself you butt play loving homosexual

[spurraider21]

Tmac > Duncan

[Juggity]

Guys, Koolaid Man is now quoting bleacher report articles.

Let me repeat that:

Koolaid Man is now quoting bleacher report articles.

...

Bleacher Report

[elmanutres]

:lol this is hilarious coming from laker fan. kobe is greater than Jordan. :lmao. Man koon aid you've really fallen off this summer

[AchillesHeel]

Duncan averaged 24.2 ppg 17 reb 5.3 ast 5.3 blk in the NBA Finals in 03

Kirby's best Finals(against the Nets) equals TP's in 07, Kirby was a sidekick 4 out of 7 Finals, in the 3 that he wasn't Lakers only won 1 out of them, meanwhile Duncan won every single Finals he was the 1st option, losing a Finals at 37 is like MJ missing the playoffs in his Wizards days, it doesn't affect his legacy.

[Clipper Nation]

:lol The White-Water Rafting:lol The Acromym:lol The Bum Play:lol The Bleacher Report:lmao Cedric

[Koolaid_Man]

Duncan averaged 24.2 ppg 17 reb 5.3 ast 5.3 blk in the NBA Finals in 03

Kirby's best Finals(against the Nets) equals TP's in 07, Kirby was a sidekick 4 out of 7 Finals, in the 3 that he wasn't Lakers only won 1 out of them, meanwhile Duncan won every single Finals he was the 1st option, losing a Finals at 37 is like MJ missing the playoffs in his Wizards days, it doesn't affect his legacy.

means nothing in the context of 5>4..we're talking longevity here...we're talking success over careers....Kobe's legacy will go down as greater than Duncans, Parkers, and Ginobelly combined...that's a fact..he's more accomplished than those guys...and all over the world he's worshipped...no one gives a rats ass about Timmy outside of SA...Kobe's trumps him where it ultimately counts in the ring dept...and no I do not mean tongue ring or cock ring :lol

[Koolaid_Man]

:lol The White-Water Rafting:lol The Acromym:lol The Bum Play:lol The Bleacher Report:lmao Cedric



Kobe 5
CP3 0 & Forever

[Leetonidas]

Tom Heinsohn > Kobe Bryant

[AchillesHeel]

means nothing in the context of 5>4..we're talking longevity here...we're talking success over careers....Kobe's legacy will go down as greater than Duncans, Parkers, and Ginobelly combined...that's a fact..he's more accomplished than those guys...and all over the world he's worshipped...no one gives a rats ass about Timmy outside of SA...Kobe's trumps him where it ultimately counts in the ring dept...and no I do not mean tongue ring or cock ring :lol

longetivity...Kirby hasn't been to the WCF since he was 32 years old while Duncan has been to the WCF and Finals at ages 36 and 37, Kirby will never sniff another title again while Duncan actually has a chance getting back there at least once.

Duncan will retire at around 40 years old while Kirby will be out of the league at 36-37.

And Duncan has solidified himself as the GOAT PF while guys like Lebron and Durant are going to pass Kirby's all-time scoring position when their careers are done. Lebron already is ranked higher all-time than Kirby, I know that makes you mad. 2 years ago nobody said Lebron could be the better all-time player, now he already has the same amount of FMVPs, 4x the MVPs and will pass Kirby in every category(pts,reb,ast,stl,blk) and will likely win at least 1-2 more rings.

Kirby's legacy is fading quickly and you're trying to compensate by bashing the Spurs but the only thing you're doing is giving the real laker fans a bad name. Good job, Cedric.

[AaronY]

Knew this was gonna be bleacher report