PDA

View Full Version : THINK TANK: Richard Jefferson back to San Antonio? What do you guys think?



mute
09-02-2013, 12:00 AM
What do you guys think about the possibility of bringing back Richard Jefferson? Before you guys get get mad and think this is a far fetched idea, let me remind you that both Sean ****** and Avery Johnson (two guys, whose numbers are in the rafters) along with Brent Barry were all traded away from the Spurs and came back for a second go-around and played key roles in 3 of our 4 titles. Let that sink in for a second. I'm thinking Richard Jefferson + 2014 1st Round Pick for Nando De Colo + Patty Mills.

Here's why it makes sense for both teams...

JAZZ:
The Jazz were a pretty good team last year. I know they didn't make the playoffs, but they have some promise. In other words, they are in a position to make a run this upcoming year. They have some young front court players and Hayward is blossoming into quite a two-way player. Not to mention their first round pick this past draft in Trey Burke.

I've heard from sources (within the Jazz organization) that they aren't expected to re-sign Jamaal Tinsley. I doubt they want to throw Burke right into the fire, and that's where NDC comes in. NDC could start while they groom Burke for the future. This trade also frees up some cap space, allowing them some flexibility -- maybe a sign and trade could be in the works to bring in a veteran or something. Plus, Mills is rotting on our bench. He (I like to compare him to Eric Blesdoe) definitely could be a 15-18ppg kind of player if he got the touches on a daily basis. The Jazz can use this scoring. Remember how they averaged like 80-85 ppg back in 2012 against us?

SPURS:
Well, it's obvious for us why we need Jefferson. We let Gary Neal walk (aka the only guy would could get his own shot). We need a SG/SF combo player with some size, who won't be exposed defensively. I'm tired of these small SG (Neal, Mills, and Roger Mason Jr.) RJ could actually guard a guy like Wade or Kobe. Plus, we get a 2014 1st round pick (which we could always flip for a player later on or just take someone in the draft at 10-15).

I honestly believe that Jefferson didn't get a fair shot during his time with us. The first year was really a wash. He went from being the #1 scoring option to the 4th or 5th option. As always, it takes at least one year to learn the Spurs system (see sophomore year improvements from Ginobili, Parker, and Kwahi). In his second year, he actually played pretty well (within the system and with regards to his role on the team). His scoring was much more "within the flow" of the team and he shot 44% from three.

RJ brings with him a ton of playoff experience (go-to scorer for the 2002-2003 Nets, which had back-to-back finals appearances). We won't have to worry about the "deer in the headlights look". Do I need to remind you how short our bench was in the Miami series? RJ has NBA-finals pedigree and that's the "it" factor that you can't teach.

Sigz
09-02-2013, 12:16 AM
no.

ThePop
09-02-2013, 12:18 AM
fuck you

TrainOfThought5
09-02-2013, 12:22 AM
I thumb my nose at you sir, and wish A plague upon your house.

Ice009
09-02-2013, 12:35 AM
I didn't read the post, but I will fucking BEAT you for trying to start shit up.

Libri
09-02-2013, 12:38 AM
http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m4vf2iBoKH1r5jt46o1_400.gif

mute
09-02-2013, 12:52 AM
I didn't read the post, but I will fucking BEAT you for trying to start shit up.

Why not? We have the cap space to take on his contract and we will be getting a 1st round pick in return for taking on his contract. Jazz free up cap space for a sign-and-trade. RJ knows the system, has size (6'7"+), can shoot the three ball, and has NBA finals experience. With Manu declining, this means that RJ gets more touches (a role he is more familiar with... see his days in NJ and with the Bucks).

TXstbobcat
09-02-2013, 12:58 AM
Good God No!!!!!!!!!!!

mute
09-02-2013, 01:06 AM
Who says no to this trade?? keep in mind how the deep this years draft is supposed to be... YES, we are taking on his contract (but it's expiring) and we're getting a 1st round pick for taking it on

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tmibr6czB8s

Oh wow quickly you guys forgot... "taking off like jefferson catch me in the sky". Easily the most exciting player after Manu.
:lol oh history revisionists

spurs10
09-02-2013, 01:21 AM
I know it's the middle of the night, but I'm sure Pop won't mind if you go over there and let him in on your genius idea! You will hate yourself forever if you don't go over there right fucking now and shout it from the top of your lungs, "Wake up Pop! Bring back RJ! Get your ass up Pop! Bring back RJ!!!"

mute
09-02-2013, 01:26 AM
http://espn.go.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=400467339

playing 6 guys lol... that's why we lost, kwahi, duncan, parker got no blow down the stretch

Sean Cagney
09-02-2013, 01:37 AM
fuck you

I came in here to say just this. He even turned the momentum in game one for us last playoffs with the two missed FT's lol, he even helped us win a huge game one with his lack of clutch ability. He is a pussy and he sucks, period.
Why not? We have the cap space to take on his contract and we will be getting a 1st round pick in return for taking on his contract. Jazz free up cap space for a sign-and-trade. RJ knows the system, has size (6'7"+), can shoot the three ball, and has NBA finals experience. With Manu declining, this means that RJ gets more touches (a role he is more familiar with... see his days in NJ and with the Bucks).
Manu declining, means Kawhi and Belli more touches IMO, FUCK JEFFERSON!

lefty
09-02-2013, 02:03 AM
http://famouswonders.com/wp-content/gallery/christ-the-redeemer/thumbs/thumbs_jesus-in-rio.jpg

capek
09-02-2013, 02:28 AM
http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m4vf2iBoKH1r5jt46o1_400.gif


http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m4vf2iBoKH1r5jt46o1_400.gif


http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m4vf2iBoKH1r5jt46o1_400.gif


http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m4vf2iBoKH1r5jt46o1_400.gif


http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m4vf2iBoKH1r5jt46o1_400.gif

Juggity
09-02-2013, 02:50 AM
Is this supposed to be funny? It's not funny or creative.

It doesn't even make sense from the Jazz perspective. They need Jefferson's crazy huge contract and general shittiness. They are going full tank this year.

Juggity
09-02-2013, 02:54 AM
SPURS:
Well, it's obvious for us why we need Jefferson. We let Gary Neal walk (aka the only guy would could get his own shot). We need a SG/SF combo player with some size, who won't be exposed defensively. I'm tired of these small SG (Neal, Mills, and Roger Mason Jr.) RJ could actually guard a guy like Wade or Kobe. Plus, we get a 2014 1st round pick (which we could always flip for a player later on or just take someone in the draft at 10-15).


I'm 99.999% sure this post is intended to be satire, but this is too much. Jefferson might actually be the worst and most lackadaisical defender in the NBA. His goddamn embarrassing defense is at the top of the list of reasons why the spurs had trouble in early rounds of the playoffs from 2009-2011.

Not only is it wrong to say that he would improve the spurs defensively, it's ludicrous.

mute
09-02-2013, 03:12 AM
I'm 99.999% sure this post is intended to be satire, but this is too much. Jefferson might actually be the worst and most lackadaisical defender in the NBA. His goddamn embarrassing defense is at the top of the list of reasons why the spurs had trouble in early rounds of the playoffs from 2009-2011.

Not only is it wrong to say that he would improve the spurs defensively, it's ludicrous.

First off, Kwahi and Green are our starters (along with Parker). There's no denying that anymore. RJ will most likely be on the bench (playing the Gary Neal role). What I meant to say is that RJ is 6'7" (and maybe even taller) and explosive and athletic as hell. I don't see any of our other guards (outside Green and Kwahi) checking a Paul Pierce or Joe Johnson or James Harden. Who do you suppose we put on scoring SG/SFs? Mills? DeColo?

anakha
09-02-2013, 04:05 AM
First off, Kwahi and Green are our starters (along with Parker). There's no denying that anymore. RJ will most likely be on the bench (playing the Gary Neal role). What I meant to say is that RJ is 6'7" (and maybe even taller) and explosive and athletic as hell. I don't see any of our other guards (outside Green and Kwahi) checking a Paul Pierce or Joe Johnson or James Harden. Who do you suppose we put on scoring SG/SFs? Mills? DeColo?

1) The Spurs aren't paying a guy 9 mill to come off the bench and play spot minutes behind Kawhi. And before you mention Jackson, just keep in mind how well that experiment went.
2) Explosive? Athletic as hell? Not anymore.
3) So you're looking for a bench swingman who is capable of defending starter-quality players. You're basically looking for a starter swingman then.

exstatic
09-02-2013, 06:10 AM
Why not? We have the cap space to take on his contract and we will be getting a 1st round pick in return for taking on his contract. Jazz free up cap space for a sign-and-trade. RJ knows the system, has size (6'7"+), can shoot the three ball, and has NBA finals experience. With Manu declining, this means that RJ gets more touches (a role he is more familiar with... see his days in NJ and with the Bucks).
Don't confuse space under the TAX line with actual cap space. We have ZERO cap room left. If the Spurs had enough cap room for this, they sure as fuck would have signed AK47 instead.

Raven
09-02-2013, 06:21 AM
so the jazz just took him to tank the season without getting anything in return, and now they give up a first to get rid of him? :lmao

iManu
09-02-2013, 08:35 AM
Someone run over this idea 5 times to make sure that its dead.
http://www.countercurrents.org/tank-man-tiananmen-square-19891.jpg

DJR210
09-02-2013, 09:34 AM
You son of a bitch!!

itzsoweezee
09-02-2013, 09:39 AM
I think you should never post again.

Das Texan
09-02-2013, 09:40 AM
I'd rather shoot off a testicle first.

Brazil
09-02-2013, 09:45 AM
I think OP should kill himself tbh

Drachen
09-02-2013, 09:46 AM
No.Gif

td4mvp2k
09-02-2013, 10:07 AM
We need a SG/SF combo player with some size, who won't be exposed defensively. I'm tired of these small SG (Neal, Mills, and Roger Mason Jr.) RJ could actually guard a guy like Wade or Kobe.tru but prob not RJ @ his $

mudyez
09-02-2013, 10:36 AM
The Jazz were a pretty good team last year. I know they didn't make the playoffs, but they have some promise. In other words, they are in a position to make a run this upcoming year.

Most of you probably stoped reading after "THINK TANK: Richard Jefferson bac" but I made it to this line. :lmao

Prime Time
09-02-2013, 10:41 AM
:lol giving up a first to get rid of RJ, deal away another one to bring him back

xmas1997
09-02-2013, 11:05 AM
I think the Spurs learned their lesson the first time with RJ, it won't happen again.

RD2191
09-02-2013, 11:06 AM
:pctoss

Spur-Addict
09-02-2013, 11:10 AM
76p_ncbffCE

MolaMola790
09-02-2013, 11:12 AM
I honestly wouldn't mind seeing him, always liked RJ

Budkin
09-02-2013, 11:38 AM
Kill yourself.

SpurSwag
09-02-2013, 12:19 PM
I actually completely agree depending on how he looks. If he is the same player he was with us, I'd love him off the bench playing around 10 - 15 minutes a game as a shooter who hopefully still has a little athleticism left. The guy really wasn't a horrible player for us, we would have been pretty happy with his production had we not all had such high expectations. Though I do consider him one of the biggest disappointments the Spurs have ever had, I don't think he is nearly as bad as everyone made him out to be if that makes sense. Idk I'd be open to the idea of him spotting kawhi and nailing some 3's.

wildbill2u
09-02-2013, 12:42 PM
You picked a good username. MUTE.

STAY THAT WAY!

superbigtime
09-02-2013, 01:21 PM
No thanks.

therealtruth
09-02-2013, 01:30 PM
http://espn.go.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=400467339

playing 6 guys lol... that's why we lost, kwahi, duncan, parker got no blow down the stretch

That's because Pop thought he had the younger team.

Embedded
09-02-2013, 02:55 PM
I'm blowing lunch. I ate Spaghetti-O's for lunch. I threw up 'OH HELL NO'

Embedded
09-02-2013, 02:56 PM
I figured it out. mute = RJ. Gooooo Awayyyyyyyyyyyyy

Vash StampedE
09-02-2013, 03:19 PM
He's a proven bad fit to our system.

DynastySpurs210
09-02-2013, 03:33 PM
i like this idea!! richard jefferson will give us that boost we need to get back into the finals and with a 2014 first rounder??! what more can we ask!!

weebo
09-02-2013, 04:46 PM
I just clicked this thread for the insults.

Leetonidas
09-02-2013, 04:50 PM
What do you guys think about the possibility of bringing back Richard Jefferson? Before you guys get get mad and think this is a far fetched idea, let me remind you that both Sean ****** and Avery Johnson (two guys, whose numbers are in the rafters) along with Brent Barry were all traded away from the Spurs and came back for a second go-around and played key roles in 3 of our 4 titles. Let that sink in for a second. I'm thinking Richard Jefferson + 2014 1st Round Pick for Nando De Colo + Patty Mills.

Here's why it makes sense for both teams...

JAZZ:
The Jazz were a pretty good team last year. I know they didn't make the playoffs, but they have some promise. In other words, they are in a position to make a run this upcoming year. They have some young front court players and Hayward is blossoming into quite a two-way player. Not to mention their first round pick this past draft in Trey Burke.

I've heard from sources (within the Jazz organization) that they aren't expected to re-sign Jamaal Tinsley. I doubt they want to throw Burke right into the fire, and that's where NDC comes in. NDC could start while they groom Burke for the future. This trade also frees up some cap space, allowing them some flexibility -- maybe a sign and trade could be in the works to bring in a veteran or something. Plus, Mills is rotting on our bench. He (I like to compare him to Eric Blesdoe) definitely could be a 15-18ppg kind of player if he got the touches on a daily basis. The Jazz can use this scoring. Remember how they averaged like 80-85 ppg back in 2012 against us?

SPURS:
Well, it's obvious for us why we need Jefferson. We let Gary Neal walk (aka the only guy would could get his own shot). We need a SG/SF combo player with some size, who won't be exposed defensively. I'm tired of these small SG (Neal, Mills, and Roger Mason Jr.) RJ could actually guard a guy like Wade or Kobe. Plus, we get a 2014 1st round pick (which we could always flip for a player later on or just take someone in the draft at 10-15).

I honestly believe that Jefferson didn't get a fair shot during his time with us. The first year was really a wash. He went from being the #1 scoring option to the 4th or 5th option. As always, it takes at least one year to learn the Spurs system (see sophomore year improvements from Ginobili, Parker, and Kwahi). In his second year, he actually played pretty well (within the system and with regards to his role on the team). His scoring was much more "within the flow" of the team and he shot 44% from three.

RJ brings with him a ton of playoff experience (go-to scorer for the 2002-2003 Nets, which had back-to-back finals appearances). We won't have to worry about the "deer in the headlights look". Do I need to remind you how short our bench was in the Miami series? RJ has NBA-finals pedigree and that's the "it" factor that you can't teach.

http://cdn.alltheragefaces.com/img/faces/large/fuck-yeah-gtfo-l.png

CubanMustGo
09-02-2013, 06:40 PM
What do you guys think about the possibility of bringing back Richard Jefferson?

http://static.someecards.com/someecards/usercards/MjAxMi1lOGQ3ZWQ2MTMyYmUwNGRk.png

mute
09-02-2013, 07:19 PM
I actually completely agree depending on how he looks. If he is the same player he was with us, I'd love him off the bench playing around 10 - 15 minutes a game as a shooter who hopefully still has a little athleticism left. The guy really wasn't a horrible player for us, we would have been pretty happy with his production had we not all had such high expectations. Though I do consider him one of the biggest disappointments the Spurs have ever had, I don't think he is nearly as bad as everyone made him out to be if that makes sense. Idk I'd be open to the idea of him spotting kawhi and nailing some 3's.

that's what I'm saying... he was used the wrong way his first go around. he went from being the primary scorer to the 5th option... you guys dont remember all of the praise he was getting his 2nd year and how much more comfortable he looked? put him on the bench and let him run the 2nd team, give him all of the touches. LOL u guys already forgot that we TRADED AWAY SEAN + AVERY + BARRY right? it's not the first time we've traded guys, only to have them come back.

anakha
09-02-2013, 08:18 PM
put him on the bench and let him run the 2nd team, give him all of the touches.

Sure, give a guy who helped the Spurs win Game 1 of the WCSF while playing for the opposing team all the touches.


LOL u guys already forgot that we TRADED AWAY SEAN + AVERY + BARRY right? it's not the first time we've traded guys, only to have them come back.

The Barry trade was a nudge nudge, wink wink deal by the Spurs and Sonics. Seattle had no intention of keeping him, and the Spurs were planning on getting him back all along. Totally different situation from what happened with Elliott and Johnson.

Drachen
09-02-2013, 08:32 PM
What do you guys think about the possibility of bringing back Richard Jefferson? Before you guys get get mad and think this is a far fetched idea, let me remind you that both Sean ****** and Avery Johnson (two guys, whose numbers are in the rafters) along with Brent Barry were all traded away from the Spurs and came back for a second go-around and played key roles in 3 of our 4 titles. Let that sink in for a second. I'm thinking Richard Jefferson + 2014 1st Round Pick for Nando De Colo + Patty Mills.

Here's why it makes sense for both teams...

JAZZ:
The Jazz were a pretty good team last year. I know they didn't make the playoffs, but they have some promise. In other words, they are in a position to make a run this upcoming year. They have some young front court players and Hayward is blossoming into quite a two-way player. Not to mention their first round pick this past draft in Trey Burke.

I've heard from sources (within the Jazz organization) that they aren't expected to re-sign Jamaal Tinsley. I doubt they want to throw Burke right into the fire, and that's where NDC comes in. NDC could start while they groom Burke for the future. This trade also frees up some cap space, allowing them some flexibility -- maybe a sign and trade could be in the works to bring in a veteran or something. Plus, Mills is rotting on our bench. He (I like to compare him to Eric Blesdoe) definitely could be a 15-18ppg kind of player if he got the touches on a daily basis. The Jazz can use this scoring. Remember how they averaged like 80-85 ppg back in 2012 against us?

SPURS:
Well, it's obvious for us why we need Jefferson. We let Gary Neal walk (aka the only guy would could get his own shot). We need a SG/SF combo player with some size, who won't be exposed defensively. I'm tired of these small SG (Neal, Mills, and Roger Mason Jr.) RJ could actually guard a guy like Wade or Kobe. Plus, we get a 2014 1st round pick (which we could always flip for a player later on or just take someone in the draft at 10-15).

I honestly believe that Jefferson didn't get a fair shot during his time with us. The first year was really a wash. He went from being the #1 scoring option to the 4th or 5th option. As always, it takes at least one year to learn the Spurs system (see sophomore year improvements from Ginobili, Parker, and Kwahi). In his second year, he actually played pretty well (within the system and with regards to his role on the team). His scoring was much more "within the flow" of the team and he shot 44% from three.

RJ brings with him a ton of playoff experience (go-to scorer for the 2002-2003 Nets, which had back-to-back finals appearances). We won't have to worry about the "deer in the headlights look". Do I need to remind you how short our bench was in the Miami series? RJ has NBA-finals pedigree and that's the "it" factor that you can't teach.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hfYJsQAhl0

Ice009
09-02-2013, 08:46 PM
This thread is why mutes should never, ever, talk.

therealtruth
09-02-2013, 08:55 PM
that's what I'm saying... he was used the wrong way his first go around. he went from being the primary scorer to the 5th option... you guys dont remember all of the praise he was getting his 2nd year and how much more comfortable he looked? put him on the bench and let him run the 2nd team, give him all of the touches. LOL u guys already forgot that we TRADED AWAY SEAN + AVERY + BARRY right? it's not the first time we've traded guys, only to have them come back.

Don't forget he couldn't crack the rotation with the Warriors. His confidence might be shot at this point and Pop's one of the worst confidence builders.

Dex
09-02-2013, 08:57 PM
Would rather get Paul George back tbqh.

SpurSwag
09-02-2013, 10:19 PM
that's what I'm saying... he was used the wrong way his first go around. he went from being the primary scorer to the 5th option... you guys dont remember all of the praise he was getting his 2nd year and how much more comfortable he looked? put him on the bench and let him run the 2nd team, give him all of the touches. LOL u guys already forgot that we TRADED AWAY SEAN + AVERY + BARRY right? it's not the first time we've traded guys, only to have them come back.

I actually disagree with the sentiment that we should just give him the keys to the second unit though. I just don't think he has that skill set anymore to create. I'm nnot sure what happened but he really lost his ability to create during his tenure here. He'd still have some great size, decent defense, and solid shooting to add though

elmanutres
09-02-2013, 10:36 PM
We we got RJ, we went backwards. Got swept by the suns, upset by memphis, had a meltdown against okc.



After we got rid of him we went straight back to the finals the following season.


let's sink that in.


We made progress going back to the finals after getting rid of his ass and you want us to back pedal again? Fuck you

therealtruth
09-02-2013, 10:49 PM
We we got RJ, we went backwards. Got swept by the suns, upset by memphis, had a meltdown against okc.



After we got rid of him we went straight back to the finals the following season.


let's sink that in.


We made progress going back to the finals after getting rid of his ass and you want us to back pedal again? Fuck you

It wasn't RJ that caused that. It was Pop's attempt to try to become the San Antonio Suns. His finally going back to defense is what got us back to the Finals. Getting RJ was part of the Spurs change in philosophy at the time that they needed to outscore people more than play better defense. If we hadn't tried going the offense route we would have probably gone after a guy like Shane Battier and returned to the Finals sooner.

mute
09-02-2013, 11:12 PM
Sure, give a guy who helped the Spurs win Game 1 of the WCSF while playing for the opposing team all the touches.



The Barry trade was a nudge nudge, wink wink deal by the Spurs and Sonics. Seattle had no intention of keeping him, and the Spurs were planning on getting him back all along. Totally different situation from what happened with Elliott and Johnson.

i hope you realize that's illegal right? the timberwolves if im not mistaken gone fined heavily for the joe smith scandal and had to give up draft picks

anakha
09-03-2013, 12:32 AM
i hope you realize that's illegal right? the timberwolves if im not mistaken gone fined heavily for the joe smith scandal and had to give up draft picks

Different situation entirely. The Joe Smith scandal was a free-agent situation and did not involve any trades.

The Barry trade situation was a loophole that got closed off in the latest CBA by preventing a player from resigning with the team that traded him until 12 months have passed or his deal runs out and July 1 comes around (whichever occurs sooner). Antonio McDyess got traded from Detroit to Denver, waived, and returned to Detroit back in 08 in a similar deal, so the opportunity was always there before the latest CBA.

Next time, have a clue about what you're talking about before you spout off. Thanks.

Sean Cagney
09-03-2013, 01:58 AM
I honestly wouldn't mind seeing him, always liked RJ

YOUR ALONE....... Go see him, we don't want to see him again here unless it is missing FT's to help us win a playoff game.
We we got RJ, we went backwards. Got swept by the suns, upset by memphis, had a meltdown against okc.



After we got rid of him we went straight back to the finals the following season.


let's sink that in.


We made progress going back to the finals after getting rid of his ass and you want us to back pedal again? Fuck you
I agree but we had Jax against OKC and almost single handidly saved us in that game 6! If we have RJ we don't even make it that far IMO last year. This year you are right again, we got even further without him! When he was here it was either first round or second round at the most, he sucked.

Chillen
09-03-2013, 02:26 AM
Losing to the Suns in a sweep and getting pounced by Memphis had nothing to do with Richard Jefferson, the Spurs finally started playing better in 2012 and got beat in the WCF by OKC (it seems after game 2 the Thunder couldn't miss a shot). It's all about playing your ass off, emergence of certain Spurs role players, playing great D, smart basketball, etc, they did that in 2013 and that is why the made it to the NBA Finals which also resulted in a loss unfortunately. If the Spurs want to win the NBA title in 2014 it will take an even more herculean effort to get back there and finally do it. That is why in a sense losing to Miami bites because they came so close and played championship basketball those playoffs and it's never easy, it took them 6 years to get back there. I don't see any reason why they shouldn't be motivated next season to win it all, they almost did against Miami, they have to feel confident if the whole team can stay healthy.

OrEmuN
09-03-2013, 06:01 AM
LOL.
The same guy who want to bring Yao Ming back from retirement and lament about Spurs trading away Paul George...

snickles
09-03-2013, 11:13 AM
i love the offseason.

SenorSpur
09-03-2013, 11:40 AM
Kill me. Kill me now. :nope

Brazil
09-03-2013, 12:22 PM
wait OP is also the guy with we shouldn't have traded Paul George ? :lmao

Mugshot
09-03-2013, 12:50 PM
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2723/4312842170_19578d511a_o.jpg

fresnodog
09-03-2013, 06:04 PM
RJ omg no. What a disgusting idea.

fresnodog
09-03-2013, 06:39 PM
RJ omg no. What a disgusting idea.

SpurCharger
09-03-2013, 07:31 PM
NO, And How About NO....

SpurSpurSpurs
09-03-2013, 07:59 PM
Live by your name, please!

TE
09-03-2013, 08:02 PM
I'd rather have HIV

mute
09-03-2013, 08:08 PM
I'm just thinking about all of the guys we used to have that could step in and play right now. RJ knows the system, and if we bring in a new guy, it will take the new guy at least 1 year to learn the system and the year will be a wash. 2014 could be Duncan and Manu's last years...

Juggity
09-03-2013, 08:53 PM
I'm convinced that half the people in this thread didn't watch spurs basketball in the Richard jefferson era.

This guy was indefensible. Everyone knows he's a bottom-tier defender in the NBA. Nothing will change that at this point in his career. He was absolutely a huge reason the spurs lost early in the playoffs every year he was with us.

Initially, it seemed he had promise on offense. Every year, he came out of the gate shooting lights out, giving spurfans hope, but every year he was stone cold by March and couldn't make a shot in the playoffs.

mute
09-03-2013, 09:12 PM
I'm convinced that half the people in this thread didn't watch spurs basketball in the Richard jefferson era.

This guy was indefensible. Everyone knows he's a bottom-tier defender in the NBA. Nothing will change that at this point in his career. He was absolutely a huge reason the spurs lost early in the playoffs every year he was with us.

Initially, it seemed he had promise on offense. Every year, he came out of the gate shooting lights out, giving spurfans hope, but every year he was stone cold by March and couldn't make a shot in the playoffs.

sun series: u cant put this on rj lol, honestly the 4th-5th is NEVER to blame, it falls on the stars and of course the coach... where was the big 3, no one showed up and defended
memphis: we got killed down low, memphis bigs ate us alive, enough said
thunder: wasnt even there

RuffnReadyOzStyle
09-03-2013, 09:55 PM
Fuck NO. :nope

Sean Cagney
09-03-2013, 11:20 PM
sun series: u cant put this on rj lol, honestly the 4th-5th is NEVER to blame, it falls on the stars and of course the coach... where was the big 3, no one showed up and defended
memphis: we got killed down low, memphis bigs ate us alive, enough said
thunder: wasnt even there

THANK GOD the Spurs are not even rumored to be interested in this guy! He will never be in the Spurs uni again, rightfully so. I still can't believe you want this guy in a Spurs uni again when even when he was not on the team last year he was our ally missing key FT's against us in that game one to turn the momentum!

Darius Bieber
09-03-2013, 11:22 PM
Damn, OP must be on some good shit. I need some of that.

spurs10
09-03-2013, 11:33 PM
Damn, OP must be on some good shit. I need some of that. No you don"t!:lol

mbass
09-04-2013, 05:20 PM
NO NO NO NO NO

timtonymanu
09-04-2013, 06:57 PM
T-Mac/Jack/40 year old Finley >>> Jefferson

phxspurfan
09-04-2013, 08:11 PM
lol...thanks I needed that

Splits
09-05-2013, 12:56 AM
Jeezus y'all getting trolled so hard.

ElNono
09-05-2013, 02:41 AM
http://i1.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/094/333/YallN1ggazPostinInATrollThread.jpg