The Spurs would have __ LOBs if PJ was coach throughout Duncan's tenure

[LkrFan]

?

[irishock]

PJ wouldn't let 6 and 0.4 happen so 6

[Rogue]

PJ would need an elite SG. The prime Manu was good but still came short from the standard required by PJ imho.

[AchillesHeel]

I'd say about the same amount, having a different coach changes everything. Would he rest Timmy and Manu enough in the regular season for them to have a solid PO's? Would he make the same mistakes Pop did? If in same situation as Pop at the end of 4th in Game 6, would he bench Manu or do something differently? We will never know.

[DMC]

We had PJ.

[Michael Jordan.]

?
More than Kobe would have without Phil.

[DMC]

1. Phil would never coach a small market team.
2. Phil would never coach a team that doesn't have the best talent, on paper, of any team in the league.
3. Phil wasn't nearly as much of a coach as he was a baby sitter. That's why the Lakers needed developed talent to win.
4. Phil couldn't do anything with 2003 Tony Parker and Manu Ginobili. They'd never see any playing time and never develop ergo...
5. 2005, 2007 and 2013 never happen.

[Katherine Robinson]

Five, pop is an inferior coach

[LkrFan]

Five, pop is an inferior coach
Truth bomb. They won 50+ for how many consecutive years? All they have to show for are 4* rangs. Pathetic if you ask me. :lol

[LkrFan]

1. Phil would never coach a small market team.
2. Phil would never coach a team that doesn't have the best talent, on paper, of any team in the league.
3. Phil wasn't nearly as much of a coach as he was a baby sitter. That's why the Lakers needed developed talent to win.
4. Phil couldn't do anything with 2003 Tony Parker and Manu Ginobili. They'd never see any playing time and never develop ergo...
5. 2005, 2007 and 2013 never happen.
11 > 4 son. No matter how you :downspin: it. PJ is a better coachPERIOD. ;)

[Arnold Toht]

Real question is how many rings would the Spurs have if PJ was coach for 28 fuckin' seconds?

Look at my sig. There's your answer.

[spurraider21]

none because the spurs were never the most stacked team in the NBA. well maybe he would have won in 05.

[DMC]

11 > 4 son. No matter how you :downspin: it. PJ is a better coachPERIOD. ;)

Spo > Larry Brown because 2>1

[DMC]

Real question is how many rings would the Spurs have if PJ was coach for 28 fuckin' seconds?

Look at my sig. There's your answer.

Since Phil got swept out in his last series as a head coach in the NBA, I'd say none.

[Vash StampedE]

More than Kobe would have whenever Kobe tries to be the Alpha.

[LkrFan]

Spo > Larry Brown because 2>1
That makes no sense. -10 points.

Blithering idiot BNSFs. :downspin:

[Rogue]

DMC with the truth napalm bombs per par. Phil only achieved successes with established players, and when there wasn't such a team available he'd rather sit outside watching the game among the fans, instead of picking one and building the team from ground up, like Pop and Sloan did.

[lefty]

PJ wouldn't let 6 and 0.4 happen so 6
This TBH

[Killakobe81]

Pop was the right coach for Timmy silly ? tbh ...

[spurraider21]

This TBH

:lol masochist