Magic: WashPo downgrades Rand Paul from "front-runner" to "contender"

[Galileo]

Magic: WashPo downgrades Rand Paul from "front-runner" to "contender"

On Friday, Rand Paul was the GOP front-runner for 2016:

Rand Paul, 2016 Republican front-runner
By Chris Cillizza, Published: September 13 at 12:33
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/09/13/rand-paul-2016-republican-frontrunner/

Then by magic on Sunday, the same article by the same author has a new headline!

Don’t underestimate Rand Paul as a 2016 presidential contender
By Chris Cillizza, Sunday, September 15, 11:40 AM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/dont-underestimate-rand-paul-as-a-2016-presidential-contender/2013/09/15/1c2925c6-1e1c-11e3-94a2-6c66b668ea55_story.html

Rand is no longer the front-runner, he is merely a contender. Never-mind that Rand has been a contender all year long in every poll and in the last set of power ratings.

LOL, Washington Post.

[ChumpDumper]

Consistent if one thinks about it.

Republican frontrunner.

Presidential contender.

His worshipers are too sensitive.

[boutons_deux]

Well, Herman fucking 999 Cain, Bachmann, Gingrich, InSaneTorum etc, were temporarily leading contenders in 2012. :lol

fringe, stupid asshole Rand Paul will get slaughtered in the Repug primaries.

Repugs will destroy their party this autumn and until the 2016 with ideological tea bagger fringe positions and policies and obstructionism, then run a bunch of unelectable assholes in the primaries, come up with an unelectable candidate, who will again lose, by huge margins, Latinos, blue states, blacks, independents, women, the young, LGBT.

[Galileo]

Well, Herman fucking 999 Cain, Bachmann, Gingrich, InSaneTorum etc, were temporarily leading contenders in 2012. :lol

fringe, stupid asshole Rand Paul will get slaughtered in the Repug primaries.

Repugs will destroy their party this autumn and until the 2016 with ideological tea bagger fringe positions and policies and obstructionism, then run a bunch of unelectable assholes in the primaries, come up with an unelectable candidate, who will again lose, by huge margins, Latinos, blue states, blacks, independents, women, the young, LGBT.

none of these were ever listed first in power rankings. Romney lead pretty much every time because even when he fell back a little in the polls, he always had the most money and establishment support.

So the essence of your post is incorrect.

[Clipper Nation]

:lol Power rankings
:lol Neocon Rand

You do realize Christie will be installed as the nominee no matter what, right? :lol

[FuzzyLumpkins]

:lol Power rankings
:lol Neocon Rand

You do realize Christie will be installed as the nominee no matter what, right? :lol

Christie has to have a good shot to take it all.

[boutons_deux]

none of these were ever listed first in power rankings.

they actually ran in the primaries, got votes, got quite a bit of press excitement, and even won a couple primaries. your asshole racist Rand Paul doesn't have any more a prayer in hell than his racist asshole father.

[Galileo]

Christie has to have a good shot to take it all.

Christie has a good chance to EAT it all!

:lmao

[Galileo]

they actually ran in the primaries, got votes, got quite a bit of press excitement, and even won a couple primaries. your asshole racist Rand Paul doesn't have any more a prayer in hell than his racist asshole father.

you are just disgruntled because Rand is in first.

[boutons_deux]

you are just disgruntled because Rand is in first.

disgruntled? hell no, AMUSED at your Paul suckers mislead into fantasyland.