Evolution Died 20 years ago........

[mouse]

Evolution Died 20 years ago........
http://s125.photobucket.com/user/RackTheMouse/media/MIT-on-Evolution/Proof-of-Alternative-design.mp4.html

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/MIT-on-Evolution/th_Proof-of-Alternative-design.jpg (http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/MIT-on-Evolution/Proof-of-Alternative-design.mp4)

[mouse]

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/MIT-on-Evolution/th_Alternative-Design-003.jpg (http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/MIT-on-Evolution/Alternative-Design-003.mp4)

[Blake]

Why have you invested so much time in bombing evolution instead of actually researching it?

[mouse]

Why have you invested so much time in bombing evolution instead of actually researching it?

stop using Evolution as a pass to not going to Hell, this is not about Religion I'm talking about Science.

[pgardn]

The Earth is flat.
A mouse fell off.
Hit his head on a turtle.

[Blake]

stop using Evolution as a pass to not going to Hell, this is not about Religion I'm talking about Science.

wut

[TDMVPDPOY]

look at africa continent for 2000 years still same shit

look at commie run states, killing off intellectuals in place for dumb shits to be in control

[DMC]

I've seen his photos. I can understand why he think Evolution abandoned him.

[Nbadan]

I've seen his photos. I can understand why he think Evolution abandoned him.

:lol

He's no Golden Ratio....blame Fibonacci

[boutons_deux]

Discovery of 400,000-year-old DNA raises questions about human evolution

Researchers have read strands of ancient DNA teased from the thigh bone of an early human that died 400,000 years ago in what is now northern Spain.

The genetic material was pieced together from a clutch of cells found in bone fragments – the oldest human remains ever to yield their genetic code.

The work deepens understanding of the genetics of human evolution by some 200,000 years, raising hopes that researchers can build a clearer picture of the earliest branches of the human family tree by studying the genetic make-up of fossilised remains dug up elsewhere.

“This is proof of principle that it can be done,” said Matthias Meyer at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig. “We are now very eager to explore other sites of a similar age.”

The thigh bone was among the remains of at least 28 early human ancestors found at the bottom of a vertical shaft in a cave complex in the Atapuerca mountains in northern Spain. The Sima de los Huesos, or “pit of bones”, lies 30m underground and half a kilometre from the cave system’s nearest current entrance.

The individuals at Sima de los Huesos looked a little like Neanderthals, and many anthropologists classified them as Homo heidelbergensis, a potential forerunner of modern humans. The corpses at Sima de los Huesos were likely washed into the pit rather than buried intentionally.

Meyer’s team sequenced DNA found in tiny sausage-shaped structures called mitochondria which sit inside cells and provide them with power. Mitochondria are passed down the maternal line only, unlike DNA found in the cell nucleus, which carries genetic information from both parents and their ancestors.

The age of the bone fragments meant the cells and their DNA was badly degraded. “This is the hardest sample I have ever worked on that yielded a result,” said Meyer.

Meyer’s team dated the bone fragments to 400,000 years old, but further analysis left them baffled. The mitochondrial DNA did not match that of Neanderthals, but was closer to a sister group called the Denisovans that lived in Siberia. Details of the study appear in the journal Nature (http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12788).

Meyer says there are a number of explanations, but admits more work is needed. One possibility is that an older lineage of human ancestors, perhaps Homo erectus, bred with the ancestors of the Sima de la Huesos individuals, and passed on their mitochondria. But several other explanations are being explored by anthropologists.

“Either way, this new finding can help us start to disentangle the relationships of the various human groups known from the last 600,000 years,” said Chris Stringer, head of human origins at the Natural History Museum in London. “If more mitochondrial DNA can be recovered from the Sima population of fossils, it may demonstrate how these individuals were related to each other, and how varied their population was.”

Meyer said the Leipzig group now hopes to extract so-called nuclear DNA from the Sima fossils, which contains more information but will be much harder to extract because there is far less material.
“We have taken a first glimpse now and what we find is unexpected and confusing,” he said. “But I’m confident we’ll get more data, and then it’s very likely we’ll be able to nail down some hard facts, about whether these Sima de la Heusos guys are the ancestors of Neanderthals, the ancestors of both Neanderthals and Denisovans, or even something completely different.”

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/12/04/discovery-of-400000-year-old-dna-raises-questions-about-human-evolution/

[mouse]

Discovery of 400,000-year-old DNA raises questions about human evolution

Why should there be any questions? The school texts books clearly say when man got here and how he got here,


Researchers have read strands of ancient DNA teased from the thigh bone of an early human that died 400,000 years ago

According to who? send the same sample to three other dating laboratories and get back six different ages.



The genetic material was pieced together from a clutch of cells found in bone fragments –

"Hey Lucy" you got some spanning to do. When researchers tried to put "Lucy" together the bone fragments did not match and the dates were off so these guys are going down the wrong road.

Lucy Dethroned

http://www.apologeticspress.org/apcontent.aspx?category=9&article=76



the oldest human remains ever to yield their genetic code.

That is not confirmed by all scientists and paleontologists


The work deepens understanding of the genetics of human evolution

there it is the "excuse" I knew it was coming, what is there to "understand"? The school textbooks clearly say all we need to know about man and how he got here what is all this back tracking shit?




by some 200,000 years,

Bullshit alert! That is not confirmed by all scientists and paleontologists


raising hopes

:lmao will this be the evidence we need to prove Darwin was right? lets all hope together as the Evolutionist light a candle tonight.

there went your Science in a nut shell if your going to "hope" then the Bible thumpers can hope as they pray.

Science is about what we can examine to come up with facts not hopes and dreams."Science is the pursuit of knowledge and understanding of the natural and social world following a systematic methodology based on evidence."

So only two things can come from your article,

A: Science had it wrong all this time. or B: this new evidence is another crock of shit.




that researchers can build a clearer picture of the earliest branches of the human family tree by studying the genetic make-up of fossilised remains dug up elsewhere.

Ok hold the phone! Are you saying Scientists are still trying to put the branches of life together? If so what the hell have "uncertain" and "not sure" speculation in the texts books. The textbooks don't say Science is still studding the branches of life they say they have "strong evidence" and even put diagrams and artwork in the school textbooks.

http://www.clarifyingchristianity.com/images/philotr1.gif

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-k8uwrF50sK0/Ti5qHbkFY3I/AAAAAAAAA0g/bvyS-XehG8E/s1600/JohnsonTextTOL.JPG




This is proof of principle that it can be done,


now who is talking like a creationist? The Bible talks about all kinds of things that have been done,can be done, and will be done, but Science attacks those type of comments until they use them themselves?

Double standard and hypocrisy at its best.




” said Matthias Meyer at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig. “We are now very eager to explore other sites of a similar age.

Now you Evolutions are in trouble, every time science gets "eager" they start to not do they're jobs like in all the other proven theories they had to retract in the past. where was this "eagerness" when human footprints were found under dinosaur prints?





will continue to easily dissect the rest of this fairytale article later ..........