It's Pretty Simple...If You Believe In Right From Wrong - You Believe In God

[silverblk mystix]

No, that's a contradiction in terms. If you say all isn't well, then say all is well, you've just contradicted yourself. You can say "the world is in ruins but I don't give a fuck", that's not a paradox, that's just apathy.

You really have nothing. I'd bet that, if you have a degree, it's in liberal arts.


No, actually the paradox is that -even though the planet has gone to shit -

the mystics are in agreement that - All IS Well. Strange paradox - but a paradox all the same.

When you delve deeply into how the mind works and as you make your way on your journey and make discoveries, gain insights and gain understanding - you will begin to understand that - All is Well.

The planet was fine - no it was perfect - before humans arrived and the planet will continue on when humans are gone and it will remain perfect.

Paradox. Appears like chaos and random fuckery - but All is Well.

As far as you being on your "I got an education and I am so proud kick" you have something to look forward to. When we go through the university we are pretty pompous assholes who feel superior to the masses and the douche professors encourage this douchebaggery. Then you go further up the ladder - and you completely buy into the "I am - insert academic label -so and so and I have a - insert label- so & so"

Then titles, accolades, honors and plaudits follow and you are completely and wholeheartedly full of yourself.

Then life happens. Then experience. Then - reality happens.

You then get on the "unlearning" kick. This is the other side of your journey. This is where you begin to see that all the garbage that was programmed into you and taught to you and "imprinted" on you - is exactly why you are a pompous, arrogant, blind fool.

Most don't get this far - they remain in the douchebag mode until they die and never having seen or never having woken up.

If you are still seeking truth, knowledge, reality at this point - you will have to unlearn all this garbage that you are so proud of and that is preventing you from seeing anything and keeping you blind.

Then you will understand how "proud" I am not of my education.

I got a pretty extensive education - it has taken me years and years to get over it and it still holds me back sometimes.

Think of me in 30 years when you arrive to where I am now - and I will be 30 years ahead still.

[Blake]

No, actually the paradox is that -even though the planet has gone to shit -

the mystics are in agreement that - All IS Well. Strange paradox - but a paradox all the same.

When you delve deeply into how the mind works and as you make your way on your journey and make discoveries, gain insights and gain understanding - you will begin to understand that - All is Well.

The planet was fine - no it was perfect - before humans arrived and the planet will continue on when humans are gone and it will remain perfect.

Paradox. Appears like chaos and random fuckery - but All is Well.

As far as you being on your "I got an education and I am so proud kick" you have something to look forward to. When we go through the university we are pretty pompous assholes who feel superior to the masses and the douche professors encourage this douchebaggery. Then you go further up the ladder - and you completely buy into the "I am - insert academic label -so and so and I have a - insert label- so & so"

Then titles, accolades, honors and plaudits follow and you are completely and wholeheartedly full of yourself.

Then life happens. Then experience. Then - reality happens.

You then get on the "unlearning" kick. This is the other side of your journey. This is where you begin to see that all the garbage that was programmed into you and taught to you and "imprinted" on you - is exactly why you are a pompous, arrogant, blind fool.

Most don't get this far - they remain in the douchebag mode until they die and never having seen or never having woken up.

If you are still seeking truth, knowledge, reality at this point - you will have to unlearn all this garbage that you are so proud of and that is preventing you from seeing anything and keeping you blind.

Then you will understand how "proud" I am not of my education.

I got a pretty extensive education - it has taken me years and years to get over it and it still holds me back sometimes.

Think of me in 30 years when you arrive to where I am now - and I will be 30 years ahead still.

even though it was long, i read it.

Well done, tbh. That was greatness worth saving for later. :tu

[silverblk mystix]

even though it was long, i read it.

Well done, tbh. That was greatness worth saving for later. :tu

No it was just truth that you have to look forward to in a few decades...for you Blake - uh - not gonna happen.

Cuckdom was pretty much your ceiling.



:lmao

[ChumpDumper]

When someone questions SBM's intelligence he makes really long posts to show how intelligent he is.

[silverblk mystix]

When someone questions or insults my Blake - I run up my post count to show the world what a bad-ass I am - then afterwards - I just daaaance!!!! Bitches!!!!


:lmao

[ChumpDumper]

saltymoticons

[Blake]

No it was just truth that you have to look forward to in a few decades...for you Blake - uh - not gonna happen.

Cuckdom was pretty much your ceiling.



:lmao

Neh, there was no truth in there. Just kung fu movie cliches.

Thanks again for the funny. :lol

[DMC]

I can't help it if you refuse to check it out.
Your loss, not mine.
Obviously you have no idea what a universal paradox is.
No surprise there since when your arguments break down, or someone disagrees with you, your only recourse is to insult.
And that is the result of someone who has no confidence whatsoever in their point of view.
Again not surprising after hearing about your antics from other posters here.
Good luck with that.
Oddly enough I had thought your posts interesting at first, and was willing to respect your opinion, but about the only thing you were able to prove was how eager you were to engage in pissing contests. Sad. What a waste!
Does it make you feel superior, massage your fragile ego, when you come up with a new and original insult?
The irony is there is nothing new, unless you count something that opens your eyes to some truth, if indeed that is what you are seeking.
In any case, enjoy your childish ridiculing, the only one you are affecting is yourself, from a credibility standpoint.
No offense meant.
Just saying, it is what it is.
Yet I have to admit, I do get a good laugh at your feeble attempts at sarcasm.
So how far has that gotten you up to now?
Good luck with that too. :lol

tl;dr

[DMC]

No, actually the paradox is that -even though the planet has gone to shit -

the mystics are in agreement that - All IS Well. Strange paradox - but a paradox all the same.

When you delve deeply into how the mind works and as you make your way on your journey and make discoveries, gain insights and gain understanding - you will begin to understand that - All is Well.

The planet was fine - no it was perfect - before humans arrived and the planet will continue on when humans are gone and it will remain perfect.

Paradox. Appears like chaos and random fuckery - but All is Well.

As far as you being on your "I got an education and I am so proud kick" you have something to look forward to. When we go through the university we are pretty pompous assholes who feel superior to the masses and the douche professors encourage this douchebaggery. Then you go further up the ladder - and you completely buy into the "I am - insert academic label -so and so and I have a - insert label- so & so"

Then titles, accolades, honors and plaudits follow and you are completely and wholeheartedly full of yourself.

Then life happens. Then experience. Then - reality happens.

You then get on the "unlearning" kick. This is the other side of your journey. This is where you begin to see that all the garbage that was programmed into you and taught to you and "imprinted" on you - is exactly why you are a pompous, arrogant, blind fool.

Most don't get this far - they remain in the douchebag mode until they die and never having seen or never having woken up.

If you are still seeking truth, knowledge, reality at this point - you will have to unlearn all this garbage that you are so proud of and that is preventing you from seeing anything and keeping you blind.

Then you will understand how "proud" I am not of my education.

I got a pretty extensive education - it has taken me years and years to get over it and it still holds me back sometimes.

Think of me in 30 years when you arrive to where I am now - and I will be 30 years ahead still.

I'm sure you had no problem with the unlearning thing. The salary thing, that's been a challenge for you, as well as has the weight control thing.

[xmas1997]

SBM, the key is to get him so flustered that he has to resort to insults, then you've got him right where you want him.
No one can make a bigger fool than he can of himself.
So far, he is doing a magnificent job.
Man, I never knew this place had so much to laugh about!
:lmao

[silverblk mystix]

SBM, the key is to get him so flustered that he has to resort to insults, then you've got him right where you want him.
No one can make a bigger fool than he can of himself.
So far, he is doing a magnificent job.
Man, I never knew this place had so much to laugh about!
:lmao


he is insecure & angry lol

[xmas1997]

he is insecure & angry lol

I know about Blake, whichever one he is #16 or #8, thanks to mouse.
But DMC had me going for awhile.
I had thought he possessed some intelligence, but was I ever mistaken. :lol
He tries awfully hard though, you have to give him that.
We live and we learn.

[silverblk mystix]

I know about Blake, whichever one he is #16 or #8, thanks to mouse.
But DMC had me going for awhile.
I had thought he possessed some intelligence, but was I ever mistaken. :lol
He tries awfully hard though, you have to give him that.
We live and we learn.


DMC/johnsmith is an angry insecure douche - but he is entertaining and gets worked easily by Avante and myself...


too fuckin' easy I might add

[xmas1997]

DMC/johnsmith is an angry insecure douche - but he is entertaining and gets worked easily by Avante and myself...


too fuckin' easy I might add

I was answering his questions for a while, but then it became apparent he kept confusing opinions with facts.
And then I guess he got so frustrated and confused that he resorted to insults.
What's up with that? :lol
Oh well, it takes all kinds to make this world go 'round.

[Blake]

I know about Blake, whichever one he is #16 or #8, thanks to mouse.


lol that's funny right there

[Blake]

DMC/johnsmith is an angry insecure douche - but he is entertaining and gets worked easily by Avante and myself...


too fuckin' easy I might add

That's pretty funny too.

Insults and emoticons coming soon.

[silverblk mystix]

That's pretty funny too.

Insults and emoticons coming soon.

This is funny too;

Blake now

Blake BC (before cuckdom)

Absolutely no difference whatsoever.

A salty prick then - A salty prick now.


:rollin:rollin

[silverblk mystix]

These emoticons are dedicated to the cute gay couple - Blake-Humper - who really come into their own- no pun intended - when they finish each others emoticon sentences


:rollin:rollin:rollin:rollin:rollin


:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao


:lol:lol:lol:lol

[xmas1997]

Well, hopefully some seeds were planted.
They'll maybe wake up some time in the future and a light will go off in their heads, kind of like it did for me when we were discussing things, and some of their veils will fall away.
And then we'll see how well atheistic stances stand up to their own self imposed scrutiny.
One can only hope.
I kind of envy them. :lol

[RD2191]

:lmao

[silverblk mystix]

Well, hopefully some seeds were planted.
They'll maybe wake up some time in the future and a light will go off in their heads, kind of like it did for me when we were discussing things, and some of their veils will fall away.
And then we'll see how well atheistic stances stand up to their own self imposed scrutiny.
One can only hope.
I kind of envy them. :lol


I wouldn't hold my breath - it is pretty hard to see when you are convinced you "know"

[Blake]

You're convinced you "know"

Most of the people on this board are convinced you don't know anything except how to whine, contradict yourself and then melt down.

[RandomGuy]

Neh, there was no truth in there. Just kung fu movie cliches.

Thanks again for the funny. :lol

Some people find wisdom at the bottom of a shot glass, some find it in the bible, some ... go the fortune cookie route.

[RandomGuy]

Well, hopefully some seeds were planted.
They'll maybe wake up some time in the future and a light will go off in their heads, kind of like it did for me when we were discussing things, and some of their veils will fall away.
And then we'll see how well atheistic stances stand up to their own self imposed scrutiny.
One can only hope.
I kind of envy them. :lol

Sorry, the weak handwaving and inability to answer very simple questions isn't going to convince anyone about "veils".

Answer me this:

What does it say about a moral/logical stance when the simple question "is it moral to hack a child to death?" is not answered?

Lift my veil. Go ahead.

[RandomGuy]

I know you're "just saying", but making a claim that is clearly false to a rational thinking person.
1. You have no idea what I am discarding or not. Instead you are projecting what you think I am doing to satisfy your own biases.
2. You need to clarify what exactly "the bible" is, or more specifically which bible, before you determine what is or isn't the infallibility part of it.
I don't doubt that Gods word are infallible, and I don't doubt that much of His word is in the bible.
I do however doubt that our understanding of it Is infallible. I do doubt our interpretations of it are infallible. And I do doubt that the bible in its present format is complete and conclusive of ALL of Gods word, and that it has not been tampered with in order to confuse and influence many agendas besides Gods.

Ah the paradox rears its ugly head.

A) I am fallible
B) Fallible beings need infallible God to tell them what is true.

I need infallible God to tell me what is true. If A, then B.

A) I am fallible.
B) I have chosen to read the bible to know what is infallible.

See where this is going?

If you are capable of making mistakes, how do you know that the bible in its present form isn't exactly what infallible God wanted it to be?

[RandomGuy]

To Random guy posting all that old testament stuff here is my pastoral response on why God allowed War in the Old Testament

That is some mental gymnastics right there.

My moral system allows me to answer simple questions quite easily. Yours doesn't.

Why is that?

The Bible/Torah God is a sick fuck, and you are apologizing for him drowning babies, and massacring children.

If God told you to slit the throats of everyone in a city men, women, and children, would you?

[xmas1997]

Sorry, the weak handwaving and inability to answer very simple questions isn't going to convince anyone about "veils".

Answer me this:

What does it say about a moral/logical stance when the simple question "is it moral to hack a child to death?" is not answered?

Lift my veil. Go ahead.

Your very analogy is weak, as is your attributing to me things I did not say, and in fact argued against.
You need to keep up with the discussion if you are going to be able to contribute coherently.
But for your edification, it is not moral to hack a child to death.
If you think it is then you are quite sick and should be put away!
And if you choose to believe that part of the bible, then that is your prerogative, but I do not, nor will I ever.
Good luck with those sick beliefs.
IMHO it is beliefs like that that allow people like you to justify war, racial cleansings, and all sorts of other atrocities.

[xmas1997]

Ah the paradox rears its ugly head.

A) I am fallible
B) Fallible beings need infallible God to tell them what is true.

I need infallible God to tell me what is true. If A, then B.

A) I am fallible.
B) I have chosen to read the bible to know what is infallible.

See where this is going?

If you are capable of making mistakes, how do you know that the bible in its present form isn't exactly what infallible God wanted it to be?

Your reasoning is faulty and quite limited if that is what you think IMHO.
You should read some other great books, use science, and if all that fails you, then fall back on your conscience and some good common sense.
Then maybe, just maybe some of those veils that are self imposed by your own lack of understanding and faulty reading comprehension might be lifted.
I can not help you, nor do I presume that it is my job to do so. It is your job to figure this stuff out.
I've done my due diligence, and come to my own personal conclusions.
You do yours, it isn't my job to do it for you, sorry.
But I feel sorry for you if you think it is ok to believe that God, universal consciousness, the great sky daddy, Yahweh, or whatever you choose to call Him would say it was ok, or command, to do the things you say.
And furthermore, IMHO it is very naive to believe such a literal translation as that in the first place.

[Mr. Blonde]

I believe in God you know...kinda, but I don't really believe in right from wrong. so your theories fucked.

[xmas1997]

You might try making some sort of conclusive point, instead of useless gibberish.
This is a discussion, not an exercise in ridicule.
Get it?
Or is that too much for you to comprehend? :lol

[Blake]

You should read some other great books, use science, and if all that fails you, then fall back on your conscience and some good common sense.

.....IMHO it is very naive to believe such a literal translation as that in the first place.

but it's not naive and it's perfect common sense to believe in an invisible magic man that loves you.

Ok.

[Mr. Blonde]

never argue with a christmas kitty.

[xmas1997]

but it's not naive and it's perfect common sense to believe in an invisible magic man that loves you.

Ok.

There are a lot stranger beliefs than that out there.
No one is trying to persuade you that God exists, are they?
They are just telling you what they believe.
Some people believe that aliens have visited them.
Others believe they are Napoleon or Alexander the Great.
Aren't you confusing facts with opinions?
Or is it your contention that it is facts versus fiction?
It really doesn't matter, "belief" in and of itself is a "subjective" exercise, nothing less, nothing more.
And thus is not something that you can argue over unless you like getting caught up in trivialities.
IMHO. :lol

[Blake]

There are a lot stranger beliefs than that out there.
No one is trying to persuade you that God exists, are they?
They are just telling you what they believe.

Nobody is telling you what to believe either. If you want to believe in an illogical sky father that defies rational thought, go for it.

[JustaGirl21]

why do all your thoughts have to be rational. leads to a boring life.

[xmas1997]

why do all your thoughts have to be rational. leads to a boring life.


Truer words were never spoken!

[xmas1997]

Nobody is telling you what to believe either. If you want to believe in an illogical sky father that defies rational thought, go for it.

I never said He was "an illogical sky father", you did.
Thus we have different beliefs, and by extension, different opinions.
So how can you dispute someone's opinion?
You can't. To do so is fruitless and thus illogical, so IMHO you are the one engaging in illogical activities.

[Blake]

why do all your thoughts have to be rational. leads to a boring life.

are all your thoughts irrational then?

[Blake]

I never said He was "an illogical sky father", you did.
Thus we have different beliefs, and by extension, different opinions.
So how can you dispute someone's opinion?
You can't. To do so is fruitless and thus illogical, so IMHO you are the one engaging in illogical activities.

Yes, I called Bible God illogical because by definition he is.

And indirectly, you think he's illogical too or you wouldn't be cherry picking from the Bible.

[xmas1997]

are all your thoughts irrational then?

Why do you never acknowledge the gray areas? Things are rarely if ever purely black or white, as your questions presuppose, i.e. "all" your thoughts rational, or "all" your thoughts irrational.

[xmas1997]

Yes, I called Bible God illogical because by definition he is.

And indirectly, you think he's illogical too or you wouldn't be cherry picking from the Bible.

By your definition only, am I cherry picking. And even if chose to do so "by your definition", who said there was anything wrong with that? You?
Who made you an authority on cherry picking?
And furthermore, what do you consider so offensive if someone cherry picks?
Seems to me you are being pretty anal about all of this. :lol

[Blake]

By your definition only, am I cherry picking. And even if chose to do so "by your definition", who said there was anything wrong with that? You?
Who made you an authority on cherry picking?
And furthermore, what do you consider so offensive if someone cherry picks?
Seems to me you are being pretty anal about all of this. :lol

By the entire world's definition of cherry picking, you staying that it's naive to take the Old Testament literally is cherry picking.

nobody is telling you not to be a cherry picker, but you can't say that you're not.

Sorry it's becoming a source of butthurt for you.

[xmas1997]

No, on the contrary, I have yet to be "butt hurt" as you call it.
What have I to be that way about?
If you feel that I am, then that is a misconception on your part and thus your problem to deal with as best you can.
When the truth is I am highly amused by all of this. You see, I let it go almost as quickly as I arrive at my opinion.
And sure, I can say I am not cherry picking simply because IMHO I believe I am not.
Only "you" think that I am, and that is just your opinion. It remains to me to accept or reject your opinion.
In this case I choose to reject it because IMHO your opinion about me has no basis in truth, simply because no matter what you think, the reality is you have no inkling of who I am, and you barely have an inkling of what I believe.
Do you understand where I am going with all of this? I doubt you do, but that is ok too, it's really not very important when you consider the grand scheme of things.
However, it does allow me to continue to discuss these things, these opinions, with a certain amount of dispassion and thus maintain civility without resorting to making a fool of myself by resorting to ridiculing you as so many here do.
You have only one recourse left to you as well, and that is whether to accept or reject my opinions.
Because when you get right down to the nitty gritty, that is all any of this is, no matter how much either of us wish to disguise it as fact.

[Blake]

Tldr

[RandomGuy]

Your very analogy is weak, as is your attributing to me things I did not say, and in fact argued against.
You need to keep up with the discussion if you are going to be able to contribute coherently.
But for your edification, it is not moral to hack a child to death.
If you think it is then you are quite sick and should be put away!
And if you choose to believe that part of the bible, then that is your prerogative, but I do not, nor will I ever.
Good luck with those sick beliefs.
IMHO it is beliefs like that that allow people like you to justify war, racial cleansings, and all sorts of other atrocities.

Um, I didn't really make an analogy.

And, if you read closely, I didn't really say it was *you* specifically that said these things, or could not answer a question. I was simply referring to coolaidman and whatshisbutt evading that question.


3 So Joshua arose, and all the people of war, to go up against Ai; and Joshua chose thirty thousand mighty men of valor and sent them away by night. 4 And he commanded them, saying: “Behold, you shall lie in ambush against the city, behind the city. Do not go very far from the city, but all of you be ready. 5 Then I and all the people who are with me will approach the city; and it will come about, when they come out against us as at the first, that we shall flee before them. 6 For they will come out after us till we have drawn them from the city, for they will say, ‘They are fleeing before us as at the first.’ Therefore we will flee before them. 7 Then you shall rise from the ambush and seize the city, for the Lord your God will deliver it into your hand. 8 And it will be, when you have taken the city, that you shall set the city on fire. According to the commandment of the Lord you shall do. See, I have commanded you.”

...

24 And it came to pass when Israel had made an end of slaying all the inhabitants of Ai in the field, in the wilderness where they pursued them, and when they all had fallen by the edge of the sword until they were consumed, that all the Israelites returned to Ai and struck it with the edge of the sword. 25 So it was that all who fell that day, both men and women, were twelve thousand—all the people of Ai. 26 For Joshua did not draw back his hand, with which he stretched out the spear, until he had utterly destroyed all the inhabitants of Ai. 27 Only the livestock and the spoil of that city Israel took as booty for themselves, according to the word of the Lord which He had commanded Joshua

Kind of hard to reconcile a kind loving God with one so obviously bent on slaughter.

I don't see much "parable" here that is open to interpretation. This is a pretty straightforward account of mass murder.

You also dodged the question.

While I commend you for having the nuts to call evil, evil, the question I posed remains.

What does it say about a belief system when people who profess to hold it can't tell you that murdering children is immoral?
(edit)
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=223023&page=4&p=6873199&viewfull=1#post6873199

[xmas1997]

Tldr

You choose not to accept rational reasoning.
So apparently your motive is drawn into question.
I think you only wish to mock and ridicule.
If so, you will only make a bigger fool of yourself than you already have.
And how far has that gotten you? :lol

[RandomGuy]

Your reasoning is faulty and quite limited if that is what you think IMHO.
You should read some other great books, use science, and if all that fails you, then fall back on your conscience and some good common sense.
Then maybe, just maybe some of those veils that are self imposed by your own lack of understanding and faulty reading comprehension might be lifted.
I can not help you, nor do I presume that it is my job to do so. It is your job to figure this stuff out.
I've done my due diligence, and come to my own personal conclusions.
You do yours, it isn't my job to do it for you, sorry.
But I feel sorry for you if you think it is ok to believe that God, universal consciousness, the great sky daddy, Yahweh, or whatever you choose to call Him would say it was ok, or command, to do the things you say.
And furthermore, IMHO it is very naive to believe such a literal translation as that in the first place.

I don't think the bible is worth more than any other book of poetry or philosphy. I do not hold it literally, or even figuratively.

Some of the historical accounts of happenings were almost certainly accurate to some degree.

I would agree that is it naive.

[RD2191]

The Canaanites were full of shit so that's why they died.

[mouse]

Nobody is telling you what to believe either.

Except for the teachers and the Text books.

http://www.hps.cam.ac.uk/visibleembryos/s6/6_4_2_BSCS_cover-sml.jpg

[Blake]

You choose not to accept rational reasoning.

wut


So apparently your motive is drawn into question.
I think you only wish to mock and ridicule.
If so, you will only make a bigger fool of yourself than you already have.
And how far has that gotten you? :lol

If you think I'm only wanting to mock and ridicule you, why are you still talking to me?

Either discuss what's on the table or don't. How far has questioning why it's on the table got you?

[Blake]

Except for the teachers and the Text books.

http://www.hps.cam.ac.uk/visibleembryos/s6/6_4_2_BSCS_cover-sml.jpg

you haven't read what's in that book, have you.

But I'm sure xmas will still give you a high five any way.

[mouse]

you haven't read what's in that book, have you.



Your going to pull out the "you haven't read that book " card this early in the conversation? your already in trouble



But I'm sure xmas will still give you a high five any way.

If Darwin was still alive you would get yours also.


http://www.scientificamerican.com/media/inline/5ED33A08-A5BA-C11A-8191492647888775_reports.jpg

[xmas1997]

Um, I didn't really make an analogy.

And, if you read closely, I didn't really say it was *you* specifically that said these things, or could not answer a question. I was simply referring to coolaidman and whatshisbutt evading that question.



Kind of hard to reconcile a kind loving God with one so obviously bent on slaughter.

I don't see much "parable" here that is open to interpretation. This is a pretty straightforward account of mass murder.

You also dodged the question.

While I commend you for having the nuts to call evil, evil, the question I posed remains.

What does it say about a belief system when people who profess to hold it can't tell you that murdering children is immoral?

You may be surprised to find that I actually agree with you.
My studies of many great books are some, but not all, of the reasons that have led me to my conclusions.
There are too many inconsistencies in the bible to take someone's word that it is All of Gods' words. And to lump it all into being the result of it being parables IMHO is the epitome of naivety. The OT is the worst at this and no thinking person can accept it as being literal.
The NT is only slightly better, and thus has a greater probability of being literal, except of course Revelations which is an apocalyptic form of writing.
I wasn't aware that I dodged any question, but I do my best to answer.
Remember, I do not expect you to believe what I believe, and these are opinions we are discussing.
Your last question presupposes things, that some people believe it, and that other people do not. I am in the "do not" category. Some on here say because of this I am cherry picking. I disagree with that notion.
But back to your question, to my way of thinking, the parts of the bible you are getting this from is doing nothing more than telling a story, giving an example, expressing a stern harsh imaginary reality. Thus anyone believing it in a literal sense might be led to think that things like murder is ok as long as it done in the name of God.
Obviously that is not true, no true God loving individual with a decent moral conscience would think that, not even close.
So from what I have studied, those parts are not real, they are fictional accounts designed to give examples of what one should not do.

This is why I discount much of what is in the bible, yet I know from my own experiences and studies that there is also much in there that contain Truth. Just because parts are obviously skewed, does not mean the whole text is.
Nothing in life is absolute except IMHO God. Science has shown us that every time we think there is an absolute, we can also find an exception to that rule.
My feeling is that the reason for the flaws and inconsistencies in the bible and other great books is one common denominator, man.
Hope I didn't skirt the question this time.
If I did, then please state the question again using different words so that Incan understand what you are asking better.

[mouse]

Checkout how ignorant Darwin supporters look when they always try to bring religion into the debate about evolution.

You can see they have no other choice even when someone is using Science not religion to argue Evolution.

This video is another example why Blake and others are a waste of time debating they have limited thought patterns in the brain.


L83V3QUhU1k

[Blake]

Why do you never acknowledge the gray areas? Things are rarely if ever purely black or white, as your questions presuppose, i.e. "all" your thoughts rational, or "all" your thoughts irrational.

I'm not the one that went with "all" thoughts. Justagirl did and you high fived her with a "truer words were never spoken"

it's clear now you are just wanting a win here instead of a discussion.

smh lol.

[Blake]

Your going to pull out the "you haven't read that book " card this early in the conversation? your already in trouble

Except that you haven't read the book.

[xmas1997]

wut



If you think I'm only wanting to mock and ridicule you, why are you still talking to me?

Either discuss what's on the table or don't. How far has questioning why it's on the table got you?

That was merely my suspicion since we were discussing opinions of a subject that is rather controversial at best.
I grant you that my beliefs and opinions are somewhat controversial too, or better yet, unorthodox, but that does not make me any less of a Christian IMHO.

I was replying to your "tldr" comment. That seemed to me to be a form of ridicule.
I am still talking to you because I am graciously giving you the benefit of the doubt.
However, I did also warn you that ridicule on your part would not come without consequences.
We can be civil, or you can argue with yourself. And arguing with yourself will only backfire upon yourself.
That was my point.
The better you are able to refrain from mockery and ridicule i. e. tldr, if that indeed was an attempt at ridicule, then the more conducive you will find me and others willing to discuss this with you.
Do you understand where I am coming from, and also why my reply was as such?

[mouse]

Except that you haven't read the book.

I don't have to read a playboy to know there are tits inside.

Typical Blake brings no evidence or knowledge to any conversations.

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/MIT-on-Evolution/th_Evolutionisdead-001.jpg (http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/MIT-on-Evolution/Evolutionisdead-001.mp4)

[galvanizedspur9]

I don't know how anybody can engage themselves in a discussion with Blake. He's a terrible father, cuck and human being IMO. Bad things happen to bad people. Go figure.

[xmas1997]

why do all your thoughts have to be rational. leads to a boring life.


I'm not the one that went with "all" thoughts. Justagirl did and you high fived her with a "truer words were never spoken"

it's clear now you are just wanting a win here instead of a discussion.

smh lol.

Ok, I pulled her post out. You don!t see the profound nature of her post? I certainly do and applauded her for it.
It was no slight to you. Did you take it that way? She used the word "your", but I sincerely doubt she meant you in the singular sense, rather I thought she meant it in the plural sense, which would be more rational IMHO.
Thus she deserved a high five. You should have high fived her too!

I assure you I have no motivation to enter into pissing contests here with you or anyone else.
Why? It makes me look foolish. Those are the consequences of me resorting to ridicule.
But we've been over this.

Are you trying to bait me into getting into one with you?
If so, you won't succeed. All you will accomplish is debating with yourself, and of making a fool of yourself.

I will however be amused at the attempts, but I'll also cease discussing these things with you.
It is your choice. I will proceed under the proverb of "do unto others as you would have them do unto you".

[Blake]

That was merely my suspicion since we were discussing opinions of a subject that is rather controversial at best.
I grant you that my beliefs and opinions are somewhat controversial too, or better yet, unorthodox, but that does not make me any less of a Christian IMHO.

I was replying to your "tldr" comment. That seemed to me to be a form of ridicule.
I am still talking to you because I am graciously giving you the benefit of the doubt.
However, I did also warn you that ridicule on your part would not come without consequences.
We can be civil, or you can argue with yourself. And arguing with yourself will only backfire upon yourself.
That was my point.
The better you are able to refrain from mockery and ridicule i. e. tldr, if that indeed was an attempt at ridicule, then the more conducive you will find me and others willing to discuss this with you.
Do you understand where I am coming from, and also why my reply was as such?

Neh. I don't have much patience for so many wordy replies with a bunch of different points to address in each post.

[xmas1997]

Blake, do you have anything of a positive nature to say in this discussion?
So far, you mostly just question, and when you do commit yourself to a statement, it appears negative in nature.
No offense meant, but you give the impression of being a rather contentious, unhappy, and lost individual.
So if I am off base here, then by all means add something positive to this discussion.
Surely you have some decent opinions to share. You do not have to agree, but that is different than being disagreeable.
Do you catch my drift? :lol

[ChumpDumper]

I wouldn't hold my breath - it is pretty hard to see when you are convinced you "know"That's hilarious.

[Blake]

why do all your thoughts have to be rational. leads to a boring life.


Truer words were never spoken!


are all your thoughts irrational then?


Why do you never acknowledge the gray areas? Things are rarely if ever purely black or white, as your questions presuppose, i.e. "all" your thoughts rational, or "all" your thoughts irrational.

I'm not here just to ridicule, but if you leave yourself open for it, that's on you.

smh "never"

[Blake]

Blake, do you have anything of a positive nature to say in this discussion?
So far, you mostly just question, and when you do commit yourself to a statement, it appears negative in nature.
No offense meant, but you give the impression of being a rather contentious, unhappy, and lost individual.
So if I am off base here, then by all means add something positive to this discussion.
Surely you have some decent opinions to share. You do not have to agree, but that is different than being disagreeable.
Do you catch my drift? :lol

smh "anything"

When did you ask for my opinion?

[xmas1997]

I'm not here just to ridicule, but if you leave yourself open for it, that's on you.

smh "never"

And............
I fail to see the correlation.

[xmas1997]

smh "anything"

When did you ask for my opinion?

Do I need to ask you for it?
Geeez, I'm sorry.
I thought this was a discussion.
Well, that is what I get for thinking, right? :lol

Yes, of course, Blake, this whole discussion is based on opinions.
Yours are just as valid as anyone else's here, so, yes, give some opinions, and if you have any of the positive ones, that would be appreciated even more.

[Blake]

And............
I fail to see the correlation.

that's a shame.

[Blake]

Do I need to ask you for it?
Geeez, I'm sorry.
I thought this was a discussion.
Well, that is what I get for thinking, right? :lol

Yes, of course, Blake, this whole discussion is based on opinions.
Yours are just as valid as anyone else's here, so, yes, give some opinions, and if you have any of the positive ones, that would be appreciated even more.

my opinion is that a belief in right and wrong does not therefore automatically mean a belief in God.

you'll have to define what a "positive opinion" means.

I'll try to give you some POs, but I'm not sure I have any for you and I'm not sure why any real truth seeker would want them.

[xmas1997]

my opinion is that a belief in right and wrong does not therefore automatically mean a belief in God.

you'll have to define what a "positive opinion" means.

I'll try to give you some POs, but I'm not sure I have any for you and I'm not sure why any real truth seeker would want them.

Actually, I agree with you that a belief in right or wrong does not therefore automatically mean a belief in God.
That, sir, is the first positive statement I have read from you in this thread! :lol

But I also suspect you have other gems to add. That is the real reason why I continue to discuss all the side ramifications orbiting this subject and how we got sidetracked on all the other related subjects.
I have patiently addressed as many questions as I could even though I do not have all the answers. I do have many educated opinions. But I do think that we eventually have to begin "subtracting" what we think we know in order to get to the root of truth, rather than adding more superfluous substance. That is my suspicion and my theory up to this point.

[Blake]

Not sure how that's a positive statement.

[xmas1997]

Not sure how that's a positive statement.

It is positive because you leave open for the possibility however remote it might be in your opinion that such a being could actually exist.
You did not state emphatically that He did not.
Rather, you only stated that just because one believes in right or wrong, does not necessarily mean that it must come from a Supreme Deity, or even from believing in such a One.
In other words, the jury is still out.
And that is a healthy skepticism if you ask me.
That same skepticism is what has guided me to what I presently believe now, that God does indeed exist, has always existed, and will always exist. :lol

[silverblk mystix]

Blake getting schooled and embarrassed from someone that isn't even trying/

I suspect this will really fuck up Blake since he emulates Chump -"I never really say anything" - dumpster!



:lmao


Nice work xmas!

[xmas1997]

Not sure what I did, to be perfectly honest.
I was not trying "to school" anyone, least of all Blake.
I hope he knows that.
I was just trying to understand him.
He has some true gems to share, if we can only get him to do it.
He has a strong enough background to venture forth some great opinions.
He does not have to believe in God to do that.

[silverblk mystix]

Not sure what I did, to be perfectly honest.
I was not trying "to school" anyone, least of all Blake.
I hope he knows that.
I was just trying to understand him.
He has some true gems to share, if we can only get him to do it.
He has a strong enough background to venture forth some great opinions.
He does not have to believe in God to do that.


Except - he is full of fear and this will always be the opposite of truth and god/love/reality.


You schooled him by not being affected by his little hate/fear parade.

[johnsmith]

Debating religion on this site seems even less productive than the shit that is usually talked about on this site.

[silverblk mystix]

Debating religion on this site seems even less productive than the shit that is usually talked about on this site.


Start an interesting thread.

[johnsmith]

Start an interesting thread.

Meh, I'm not very interesting.

[xmas1997]

Debating religion on this site seems even less productive than the shit that is usually talked about on this site.

It is not "religion" that is being debated here. That is just an interesting sideshow.
What is actually being debated is the existence of a Supreme Being.

[silverblk mystix]

Meh, I'm not very interesting.

I can PM you an interesting topic - this way it goes for pages and pages.

[xmas1997]

I think a great thread would be:

If God does indeed exist, does He have a sense of humor?

[johnsmith]

I can PM you an interesting topic - this way it goes for pages and pages.

You know I don't check those enough....:lol

[silverblk mystix]

You know I don't check those enough....:lol


:lol


It might also go to the wrong account..

[johnsmith]

:lol


It might also go to the wrong account..

That's one thing, I swear to you, I only have two accounts, and one of them has like 30 posts or some shit that I never really used.

[TE]

If God does indeed exist, does He have a sense of humor?
Yeah, our creation and the overwhelming urge to hold the superficial thought that spirituality is all bullshit.

[silverblk mystix]

That's one thing, I swear to you, I only have two accounts, and one of them has like 30 posts or some shit that I never really used.


uh...ok


:corn:

[xmas1997]

Yeah, our creation and the overwhelming urge to hold the superficial thought that spirituality is all bullshit.

:lmao

[Blake]

It is positive because you leave open for the possibility however remote it might be in your opinion that such a being could actually exist.
You did not state emphatically that He did not.
Rather, you only stated that just because one believes in right or wrong, does not necessarily mean that it must come from a Supreme Deity, or even from believing in such a One.
In other words, the jury is still out.
And that is a healthy skepticism if you ask me.
That same skepticism is what has guided me to what I presently believe now, that God does indeed exist, has always existed, and will always exist. :lol

That's a fascinating definition of positive opining

What's your definition for a negative opinion?

[Blake]

Except - he is full of fear and this will always be the opposite of truth and god/love/reality.


You schooled him by not being affected by his little hate/fear parade.

So you're having to school xmas by explaining how he schooled me.

You're not schooling anyone.

[silverblk mystix]

fear and hate hate and fear more fear and fear and more fear

[xmas1997]

That's a fascinating definition of positive opining

What's your definition for a negative opinion?

Definition?
Not sure.
Maybe an example would be better.
How about, "we should not believe in an all powerful OT sky father because he wants us to kill children", that would be a pretty negative opinion.

[Blake]

I think a great thread would be:

If God does indeed exist, does He have a sense of humor?

"Abraham.....I the Lord your God command you to sacrifice your son.















































j/k lololololololololololooollllooollolol

[Blake]

Definition?
Not sure.
Maybe an example would be better.
How about, "we should not believe in an all powerful OT sky father because he wants us to kill children", that would be a pretty negative opinion.

That's not a negative opinion. Change all powerful to all loving and that's a philosophical paradox...........which is a very solid reason to discredit OT God.

[Blake]

Oh look! Sbm changed my quote! That schooled me.

just call me cuck and post some emoticons and you've completed your daily routine.

[silverblk mystix]

Oh look! Sbm changed my quote! That schooled me.

just call me cuck and post some emoticons and you've completed your daily routine.


Actually, xmas is the one schooling you pretty thoroughly today -

I am just clowning you.

Try to keep up.

[mouse]

just call me cuck and post some emoticons and you've completed your daily routine.

Quote of the day! :lmao

[silverblk mystix]

Truth of the day! :lmao


fify

[xmas1997]

That's not a negative opinion. Change all powerful to all loving and that's a philosophical paradox...........which is a very solid reason to discredit OT God.


Ok, I like yours better.
Obviously you've had more practice at it than I have.
But I prefer your positive opinions, frankly.
Do you have any more! Seriously?

[Blake]

Actually, xmas is the one schooling you pretty thoroughly today -

I am just clowning you.

Neither is happening.


Try to keep up.

I'm not behind. I've already lapped you.

[Blake]

fify

Yes, it was also a truth of this day.

You're god awful at cut downs.

[mouse]

fify

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/MIT-on-Evolution/th_Anthony-Flew.jpg (http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p55/RackTheMouse/MIT-on-Evolution/Anthony-Flew.mp4)

[Blake]

Ok, I like yours better.
Obviously you've had more practice at it than I have.
But I prefer your positive opinions, frankly.
Do you have any more! Seriously?

Opinions about God? My only opinion would be that if there is indeed a God, he looks at us as nothing more than a fish tank.

I'd imagine when Jesus comes home drunk from all the wine he makes at parties, he pisses in our tank. That's where acid rain comes from.

[xmas1997]

Opinions about God? My only opinion would be that if there is indeed a God, he looks at us as nothing more than a fish tank.

I'd imagine when Jesus comes home drunk from all the wine he makes at parties, he pisses in our tank. That's where acid rain comes from.

:lmao

More great negative opinions.
You are pretty good at this, Blake. Must have had lots of practice!
Now for a challenge for you, give me a positive one, if you can.

[Blake]

:lmao

More great negative opinions.
You are pretty good at this, Blake. Must have had lots of practice!
Now for a challenge for you, give me a positive one, if you can.

sorry, you'll have to ask someone else for some feelgood crutches.

I bet sbm can give you another fortune cookie opinion if you promise to high five him.

[xmas1997]

sorry, you'll have to ask someone else for some feelgood crutches.

I bet sbm can give you another fortune cookie opinion if you promise to high five him.

Ok, I was just asking is all.
Can't hurt to ask.

SBM, is it true what mouse said, that Blake is actually more than one person using his name but in different cubicles?
If so, it would be nice to know if I am answering Blake #3s questions versus Blake #19s.

[silverblk mystix]

Ok, I was just asking is all.
Can't hurt to ask.

SBM, is it true what mouse said, that Blake is actually more than one person using his name but in different cubicles?
If so, it would be nice to know if I am answering Blake #3s questions versus Blake #19s.


Blake is a troll account of many troll accounts by the same person.
Chump is one of many troll accounts by the same person.

DMC was asking you personal stuff regarding your education so that he can twist whatever you answered into future insults.
Trolls never give out personal info because they don't care about debating/discussing/learning/teaching/sharing - they care about fishing for personal info so they can twist it into future insults.

Trolls in hiding - in here - think it is 1999 and that trolling on the internet is a fab new thing!

[xmas1997]

Blake is a troll account of many troll accounts by the same person.
Chump is one of many troll accounts by the same person.

DMC was asking you personal stuff regarding your education so that he can twist whatever you answered into future insults.
Trolls never give out personal info because they don't care about debating/discussing/learning/teaching/sharing - they care about fishing for personal info so they can twist it into future insults.

Trolls in hiding - in here - think it is 1999 and that trolling on the internet is a fab new thing!

Thanks.
What is the best way to handle them?
Because I've had lots of stupid arguments upstairs with some like TGY and kobyz and skull and it gets no where fast. I'm not sure if those guys are trolls or what but they sure do act like it because they post the same redundancies over and over again.
I've even seen chump up there too and usually his posts are pretty humorous for the most part especially when he gets on kobyz.
I'm surprised to see him down here hassling you.
I can see how it can get frustrating trying to discuss with some of these people because it seems their whole agenda is to get under people's skin and then engage in ridiculing each other for some odd reason.
I used to come here often but rarely if ever posted, more interested in info. I still post at SR on occasion.

Back on SR you could always tell who the trolls were because they had other teams other than the Spurs as their faves. Here though there seem to be no rules or protocols.

[Blake]

Blake is a troll account of many troll accounts by the same person.
Chump is one of many troll accounts by the same person.

DMC was asking you personal stuff regarding your education so that he can twist whatever you answered into future insults.
Trolls never give out personal info because they don't care about debating/discussing/learning/teaching/sharing - they care about fishing for personal info so they can twist it into future insults.

Trolls in hiding - in here - think it is 1999 and that trolling on the internet is a fab new thing!

Let's wager on it. $1000. We'll get the site administrator or unbiased moderator of your choice to verify accounts that it is just me posting almost exclusively now from my samsung.

Put up or shut up, pussy.

[xmas1997]

Let's wager on it. $1000. We'll get the site administrator or unbiased moderator of your choice to verify accounts that it is just me posting almost exclusively now from my samsung.

Put up or shut up, pussy.

That is good, I would have not liked to waste my time if you were actually a bunch of people, I'll take your word for it.

[Wild Cobra]

There are no other manuscripts (valiadted by dead sea scrolls) that spell out right from wrong or good from bad except the 10 Commandments as given to us by the prophet Noah...if you believe it's wrong to sleep with another man's wife then you believe in the Bible. If you believe it' wrong to steal, cheat, kill, etc...you're a believer in the Christ....Face it....you have no other basis for believing in morality except on the basis of what was handed down to you from Christianity throughout the ages...I dare anyone to logically dispute this...one cannot practice things of the law without first having being given the law... everything you do in life whether you publicly acknowledge it or not is rooted in the morality of Christianity....
Are you really that stupid?

[xmas1997]

I think he meant Moses who was not a prophet either, but at least he gave it a good stab.
Noah had the ark and also was not a prophet. :lol

[Blake]

That is good, I would have not liked to waste my time if you were actually a bunch of people, I'll take your word for it.

Honestly, I don't care what you believe about me. it's just fun to watch sbm slink away with tail between legs after needlessly talking shit.

[ChumpDumper]

Chump is one of many troll accounts by the same person.Really?

Which other names do you claim I use?

Are you willing to bet several thousand dollars on your claim?

[spurraider21]

There are no other manuscripts (valiadted by dead sea scrolls) that spell out right from wrong or good from bad except the 10 Commandments as given to us by the prophet Noah...if you believe it's wrong to sleep with another man's wife then you believe in the Bible. If you believe it' wrong to steal, cheat, kill, etc...you're a believer in the Christ....Face it....you have no other basis for believing in morality except on the basis of what was handed down to you from Christianity throughout the ages...I dare anyone to logically dispute this...one cannot practice things of the law without first having being given the law... everything you do in life whether you publicly acknowledge it or not is rooted in the morality of Christianity....
Morals existed before the bible, tbh

[silverblk mystix]

Let's wager on it. $1000. We'll get the site administrator or unbiased moderator of your choice to verify accounts that it is just me posting almost exclusively now from my samsung.

Put up or shut up, pussy.


Lol - tough guy.

The site admin or unbiased mod here is a troll himself and has troll accounts also and are also your buddies. Like chumpie the mod.

No thanks.

[silverblk mystix]

Really?

Which other names do you claim I use?

Are you willing to bet several thousand dollars on your claim?


Not gonna do any legwork for you dumbshit troll.

78000 posts by this troll account by itself speaks for itself.

[Blake]

Lol - tough guy.

The site admin or unbiased mod here is a troll himself and has troll accounts also and are also your buddies. Like chumpie the mod.

No thanks.

Lol - weak minded pussy.

Lol - desperate slandering.

[silverblk mystix]

Lol - weak minded pussy.

Lol - desperate slandering.

Yes, nothing makes you tougher than talking shit anonymously.

What a bad ass!

[Blake]

Yes, nothing makes you tougher than talking shit anonymously.

What a bad ass!

You're the one talking shit here, and when told to back it up with cash, you turned pussy.

Post after post, day after day, same hypocritical bullshit.

[silverblk mystix]

You're the one talking shit here, and when told to back it up with cash, you turned pussy.

Post after post, day after day, same hypocritical bullshit.



pot. Kettle Lol

[Blake]

pot. Kettle Lol

damn you're unintelligent.

And that's not me trying to cut you down. It's more of an exclamation of amazement on my part.

[ChumpDumper]

Not gonna do any legwork for you dumbshit troll.If you think I have multiple names, you have already done your own legwork.

If I have multiple names, I need to do no legwork.

So be a man and put your money where your mouth is.

[silverblk mystix]

If you think I have multiple names, you have already done your own legwork.

If I have multiple names, I need to do no legwork.

So be a man and put your money where your mouth is.


Be a man and get a fuckin life- idiot.

[ChumpDumper]

Be a man and get a fuckin life- idiot.You backed down even quicker than I thought you would.

[silverblk mystix]

You backed down even quicker than I thought you would.


Nothing screams tough guy more than anonymous trash talking.

Another bad ass in here.

Skeeery!

[ChumpDumper]

Nothing screams tough guy more than anonymous trash talking.

Another bad ass in here.

Skeeery!You made a claim.

I called you on it.

You backed down.

Now you're tap dancing for me.

[silverblk mystix]

You made a claim.

I called you on it.

You backed down.

Now you're tap dancing for me.


:sleep


Now I am sleeping. Your trolling has gotten pretty boring now - not that you ever had a "heydey"

:lol


But it sure was /is important to you.

[ChumpDumper]

:sleep


Now I am sleeping. Your trolling has gotten pretty boring now - not that you ever had a "heydey"

:lol


But it sure was /is important to you.You're still tap dancing.

You got called out on your bullshit and folded like bitch. Now you are whining about it.

[silverblk mystix]

You're still tap dancing.

You got called out on your bullshit and folded like bitch. Now you are whining about it.

You lost your touch - nothing is happening except you are revealing yourself as an angry name caller again.

Are you and Blake related? He seems to suffer from the same affliction/syndrome.

The angry name calling anonymous bad asses!

[ChumpDumper]

You lost your touch - nothing is happening except you are revealing yourself as an angry name caller again.

Are you and Blake related? He seems to suffer from the same affliction/syndrome.

The angry name calling anonymous bad asses!As long as you are still submitting like the omega you are, you can do whatever you like.

Which in this case is backing down and whining.

[silverblk mystix]

I'm angry -i'm angry - I can't ever be happy - hate hate hate i am angry feel my words i am angry!!!!!

[ChumpDumper]

I am so angry that I backed down so quickly, I have to try to turn this around somehow!

[xmas1997]

You guys are cracking me up!
Whatever causes such animosity between you two in the first place?
It must have been something really terrible!
Unless you are kidding with each other!

[silverblk mystix]

You guys are cracking me up!
Whatever causes such animosity between you two in the first place?
It must have been something really terrible!
Unless you are kidding with each other!


I showed them love in the love thread but their butthurt would not allow them to be cool. They really are unhappy and eternally butthurt.

It makes me laugh to work them so easily - especially - when this is their entire life - in here!


:rollin:rollin


Before I got here all they did was find a newbie and gang up and destroy them - but I came in to throw a wrench in their hate party and they can't stand it.

Priceless.

[RD2191]

How can anyone with almost 80,000 posts be taken seriously?

[silverblk mystix]

How can anyone with almost 80,000 posts be taken seriously?

That is just ONE of his accounts.

To answer your question.

No one can.


:lmao

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Blake is a troll account of many troll accounts by the same person.
Chump is one of many troll accounts by the same person.


Really?

Which other names do you claim I use?

Are you willing to bet several thousand dollars on your claim?


Not gonna do any legwork for you dumbshit troll.


If you think I have multiple names, you have already done your own legwork.

If I have multiple names, I need to do no legwork.

So be a man and put your money where your mouth is.


Be a man and get a fuckin life- idiot.


You backed down even quicker than I thought you would.


Nothing screams tough guy more than anonymous trash talking.

Another bad ass in here.

Skeeery!

I really want to believe that SBM is just trolling. If that is the case then he is just your typical maladjusted schadenfreude type. OTOH if he is earnest in his takes it speaks to something much more pitiful.

[silverblk mystix]

I really want to believe that SBM is just trolling. If that is the case then he is just your typical maladjusted schadenfreude type. OTOH if he is earnest in his takes it speaks to something much more pitiful.


Yeah, but you say that -as if it were a bad thing.



:rollin:rollin

[ChumpDumper]

SBM gets extremely salty when he backs down.

[Blake]

People that are just trolling don't send out PMs asking others to please stop trolling

[Blake]

Yeah, but you say that -as if it were a bad thing.



:rollin:rollin

You think being called pitiful is ok?

Damn you're incredibly unintelligent.

[silverblk mystix]

You think being called pitiful is ok?

Damn you're incredibly unintelligent.


Oh, you missed the joke - how shocking!

[Blake]

You're unfunny, unhappy, uneducated and unintelligent. Srsly, no joke.

[silverblk mystix]

You're uneducated and unintelligent. Srsly, no joke.


Angry name caller -

I can reduce you anytime!

[Blake]

Angry name caller -

I can reduce you anytime!

unintelligent hypocrite

You're not reducing or fooling anyone except xmas1997.

[xmas1997]

unintelligent hypocrite

You're not reducing or fooling anyone except xmas1997.

Wow, now you're bringing me into this too?
:lol
What's up with that?

[RD2191]

He's a piece of shit xmas. Don't try to be respectable or kind to him. He is mad at the world because his wife was banging another dude. Which I don't blame her since he does lead a miserable existence.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Wow, now you're bringing me into this too?
:lol
What's up with that?

You've inserted yourself. The innocent schtick is lame as hell.

[xmas1997]

You've inserted yourself. The innocent schtick is lame as hell.

Wow, such animosity, fuzzy.
What's up with that? :lol
Or were you kidding? Hard to tell.

[silverblk mystix]

He's a piece of shit xmas. Don't try to be respectable or kind to him. He is mad at the world because his wife was banging another dude. Which I don't blame her since he does lead a miserable existence.


Troof bomb!!!!!!!!

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Wow, such animosity, fuzzy.
What's up with that? :lol
Or were you kidding? Hard to tell.

You see how I talk to other people. Don't act all hurt cause I am being relatively civil. You should thank me, tbh.

You are acting like you aren't putting yourself square in the middle of this shit by your own devices.

[xmas1997]

Troof bomb!!!!!!!!

Yeah, but fuzzy seems to have some issues too for some reason, even though his monkeys are damn funny.
I just try to stay clear of the mud slinging if possible.

[silverblk mystix]

You see how I talk to other people. Don't act all hurt cause I am being relatively civil. You should thank me, tbh.

You are acting like you aren't putting yourself square in the middle of this shit by your own devices.


Translation: Even though xmas has been a gentleman - my life is so shitty and I am so angry - that I must bait him into a fight before I go nutz!

[RD2191]

Ight fuzzy, who's banging your wife? Because I refuse to believe that someone can be that big of an asshole for no reason at all. Respect your elders you piece of shit.

[RD2191]

I swear I would beat you to a fucking pulp you sack of shit.

[silverblk mystix]

I swear I would beat you to a fucking pulp you sack of shit.


:lmao

[xmas1997]

Fuzzy, with all those crazy monkeys around, did you ever see any flying ones? I did once, in the Wizard of Oz, and they were not funny at all, they were down right nasty!

[xmas1997]

.