PDA

View Full Version : The Pundits Manufactured Outrage Over Cancelled Insurance Policies



Nbadan
11-02-2013, 12:41 AM
They were wrong about Bengazi and IRS gate, so why are so many 'well-informed' Americans buying this crap?

Great article by Sally Kohn on CNN Opinion website...


(CNN) -- Conservatives are expressing shock and outrage that the Obama administration knew that many people in the individual insurance market would not be able to keep their plans once the Affordable Care Act took effect. Such shock is not surprising; overblown outrage is the stock and trade of conservative politics these days.

But here's what conservatives won't tell you, lest it undermine their theatrics: Many insurance plans are shutting down because they don't meet the higher bar of quality benefits required under Obamacare, and of those people who lose access to their plans, many will pay less and all will have better and more comprehensive options.

Also, with a few exceptions, no one is really noting that this point isn't quite news. In 2010, the fact that certain insurance plans would not be grandfathered into Obamacare because of their inadequate coverage was widely covered by the press. It was a given, after all that, if standards for health insurance were going to be raised in America -- a good thing -- then some plans that don't meet the bar would no longer be available. One could blame this on the Affordable Care Act, or alternatively, one could blame this on insurance companies for providing such substandard care in the first place.

Here's what this boils down to:

Will some people lose their current insurance? Yes.

Will these same folks lose health insurance coverage? No.

They will all have access to better plans and in many cases pay less because of expanded options and tax credits.

This whole kerfuffle ignores that insurance plans were changing all the time and premiums were skyrocketing pre-Obamacare. Suddenly, a whole range of bad behavior on the part of insurance companies is blamed on the Affordable Care Act. It's just like employers trying to shaft their workers by cutting hours and benefits and blaming it on the Affordable Care Act, even though employer mandate provisions don't take effect for another year.

Trying to blame Obamacare for every problem in the private insurance market is paradoxical: The whole reason for passing the Affordable Care Act was to fix what's broken with private insurance

If we as a nation object to the inherent and deeper flaws within the private health insurance system in America, then we should embrace a single-payer system. But instead, because conservatives were so wed to propping up the private insurance market, we got Obamacare. It's disingenuous to turn around and point fingers at Obamacare for faults that have always been -- and will always be -- pervasive in private health insurance.

The Affordable Care Act prevents some of the worst abuses of the private insurance market and makes coverage overall more inclusive and affordable. It doesn't fundamentally alter the private market equation -- and incentives to cut corners and care.

I know Republicans love their manufactured outrage, as much as they loved it back in September 2010, when Republican Sen. Mike Enzi cited the same 40% to 67% numbers for those expected to lose plans that NBC now reports as "new news." But the fact remains that about 80% of Americans get their health insurance either from their employers or from a program like Medicare, and that won't change at all under the Affordable Care Act.

Millions more are uninsured and will be thrilled to have access to affordable insurance at subsidized rates. This saves us all money, because the cost of their emergency room care isn't offloaded onto the rest of us in rising premiums. What we're focused on now is the small sliver of Americans who, like myself, get insurance through the individual market. Some of us will see our current plans disappear, but all of us will see our plans upgraded -- with many becoming more affordable.

When it comes to President Obama and his policies, conservatives have a steady supply of manufactured shock. But improving the quality and affordability of health insurance for all Americans and providing real facts along the way, that's an important accomplishment.

http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/29/opinion/kohn-affordable-care-act/index.html

boobie4three
11-02-2013, 03:04 AM
Only a hard core leftist would continue to support Obamacare....Yes, that would be you.

Nbadan
11-02-2013, 03:12 AM
Or a realists..and there are plenty like me who don't live in Pundit-land... millions more

boutons_deux
11-02-2013, 08:10 AM
Repugs and tea baggers are doing a Benghazi on ACA, but going further by sabotaging ACA for purely political reasons, having NOTHING to offer as an alternative. Propaganda, slander, LIES is how the Repugs and tea baggers roll.

A question is whether the uninsured in red states being refused Medicaid by their Repug assholes THEY elected will punish the Repugs by voting Dem, or at least by abstaining.

AntiChrist
11-02-2013, 08:46 AM
If you don't think Benghazi was a clusterfuck, especially after the recent segment on 60 Minutes, then you just don't want to see it that way.

boutons_deux
11-02-2013, 09:18 AM
If you don't think Benghazi was a clusterfuck, especially after the recent segment on 60 Minutes, then you just don't want to see it that way.

Benghazi was a disaster, AND there was no coverup, or other fabricated non-sticking bullshit Issa is futilely throwing at the WH.

There have been and will be more Repug witch hunts on Benghazi with dozens of testimonies, and Issa has, and will continue, to come up flaccid, nothing to hold on to except his limp dick.

Nbadan
12-30-2013, 01:16 AM
If you don't think Benghazi was a clusterfuck, especially after the recent segment on 60 Minutes, then you just don't want to see it that way.

Because 60 minutes retracted their story and now this....

Darrell Issa Hid The Truth About Benghazi For a Year While Attacking President Obama
By: Rmuse at Politicus USA

http://www.politicususa.com/2013/12/29/darrell-issa-hid-truth-benghazi-year-attacking-president-obama.html


"SNIP........................................


It is an unfortunate human trait to look for some kind of moral wrong or legal malfeasance in specific events to incite general public outrage either to benefit someone or to cast aspersion on someone else. Shortly after Republicans won a House majority in the 2010 midterm elections a corrupt Republican, Darrell Issa, promised his only job as chairman of the House Oversight Committee was to have “seven hearings a week, times 40 weeks” investigating the Obama Administration when the 112th Congress began. Issa was desperate to find a scandal to take down President Obama and has investigated everything from the 2009 federal stimulus program to fabricating President Obama’s part in the scandalous Republican government shutdown two months ago.

Issa has wasted taxpayer time and money for three years looking for Obama Administration scandals he subsequently never found, including the tragic deaths of 4 American diplomats in Benghazi Libya on September 11 2012. Issa’s scandalous investigations aside, it was revealed yesterday that an extensive investigation into the attack on the diplomatic outpost that claimed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three diplomats’ lives found no involvement of al-Qaeda or other international terrorists groups whatsoever like Republicans have claimed for over a year. Instead, the attack was precipitated by, as first reported, extremist Christians in the United States.

A lengthy and comprehensive New York Times investigation informed what Republicans are desperate to keep under wraps because it revealed the Benghazi attack was “accelerated in part by anger at a U.S.-made video denigrating Islam.” The report parroted what any American with half-a-mind has known since Republicans began their relentless propaganda campaign that the Obama administration attempted to cover up al-Qaeda’s alleged role in the attack. According to the chairman of the House Intelligent Committee, Republican Mike Rogers, who kept the al-Qaeda meme alive last month on Fox News, “It was very clear to the individuals on the ground that this was an al-Qaeda-led event.”

However, according to the Times, “The only intelligence connecting Al Qaeda to the attack was an intercepted phone call that night from a participant in the first wave of the attack to a friend in another African country who had ties to members of Al Qaeda. But when the friend heard the attacker’s boasts, he sounded astonished and had no prior knowledge of the assault.” The report said militants surveyed the U.S. compound at least 12 hours before the assault started, but “the violence also had spontaneous elements fueled in large part by anger at the (anti-Islam) video that motivated the initial attack.” It is important to note that the video, titled “Innocence of Muslims,” was made by an American and “had also prompted protests for hours the day before at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo.”




........................................SNIP"

boutons_deux
12-30-2013, 09:11 AM
The Repugs, naturally and automatically, armed with their myths and Issa's empty-hands, AND totally exposed AGAIN as All-Politics-All-The-Time (means NO ACTUAL GOVERNING) LIARS, deny totally the NY times story.

Thanks, Repug asshole voters!