PDA

View Full Version : Just how efficient was Duncan's statline against the Bucks?



bdictjames
12-11-2013, 10:21 PM
21 points on 75% shooting, 16 rebounds, three assists, two blocks, and one turnover in just 24 minutes of playing time.

I'd like to see KG do that. Glad to see Timmy's still got it. :toast

TheGoldStandard
12-11-2013, 10:22 PM
KG is a shell of what he once was but still can't hold a candle to Timmy

DMC
12-11-2013, 10:44 PM
It was the Bucks. We won by almost 40 points. Let's see how Tim fares against competition. Not saying he won't do well, but why use this D league competition as a measuring stick? Not even thread worthy tbh.

spurraider21
12-11-2013, 10:49 PM
:cry this disputes my thread

MeloHype
12-12-2013, 09:27 AM
Duncan = 21 points, Bucks starting lineup = 19
Duncan = 16 rebounds, Bucks starting lineup = 11
Duncan = 2 blocks, Bucks starting lineup = 0

Fireball
12-12-2013, 10:10 AM
Somebody mentioned elsewhere that nobody was this efficient (points, rebounds and FG%) in 24 minutes since 1989. i guess this way even I hold some kind of NBA record :lol

Captivus
12-12-2013, 10:43 AM
Somebody mentioned elsewhere that nobody was this efficient (points, rebounds and FG%) in 24 minutes since 1989. i guess this way even I hold some kind of NBA record :lol

http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/pgl_finder.cgi?request=1&player_id=&match=game&year_min=1986&year_max=2014&age_min=0&age_max=99&team_id=&opp_id=&is_playoffs=&round_is_eds=Y&round_is_edf=Y&round_is_ec1=Y&round_is_ecs=Y&round_is_ecf=Y&round_is_wds=Y&round_is_wdf=Y&round_is_wc1=Y&round_is_wcs=Y&round_is_wcf=Y&round_is_fin=Y&game_num_type=&game_num_min=&game_num_max=&game_month=&game_location=&game_result=&is_starter=&is_active=&is_hof=&pos_is_g=Y&pos_is_gf=Y&pos_is_f=Y&pos_is_fg=Y&pos_is_fc=Y&pos_is_c=Y&pos_is_cf=Y&c1stat=pts&c1comp=gt&c1val=21&c2stat=fg_pct&c2comp=gt&c2val=.75&c3stat=trb&c3comp=gt&c3val=16&c4stat=&c4comp=gt&c4val=&order_by=mp&order_by_asc=Y

SpursRock20
12-12-2013, 11:12 AM
It was the Bucks. We won by almost 40 points. Let's see how Tim fares against competition. Not saying he won't do well, but why use this D league competition as a measuring stick? Not even thread worthy tbh.

He's 37 years old. Games like this are nice to see.

bklynspursfan
12-12-2013, 11:39 AM
Somebody mentioned elsewhere that nobody was this efficient (points, rebounds and FG%) in 24 minutes since 1989. i guess this way even I hold some kind of NBA record :lol

Yea saw that too. First the 20/20 game now this. Continuing to do big things at 37 y/o.

NBA.com/Stats ‏@nbastats (https://twitter.com/nbastats)11h (https://twitter.com/nbastats/status/411011202639462400)
Per Elias, Tim Duncan tonight became the first player since January of ‘89 to have 20+ pts on 75+% FG and 15+ rebs in 25 minutes or less.

Staplepuffs27
12-12-2013, 01:18 PM
It was the Bucks. We won by almost 40 points. Let's see how Tim fares against competition. Not saying he won't do well, but why use this D league competition as a measuring stick? Not even thread worthy tbh.He already proved that against the Rockets and Portland

spurraider21
12-12-2013, 01:51 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8S2oIkJlT1g

TXstbobcat
12-12-2013, 01:56 PM
Last night might be one of the last few chances I will get to see Tim play in person. I'm glad he had such a great game.

DieHardSpursFan1537
12-12-2013, 02:00 PM
It was the Bucks. We won by almost 40 points. Let's see how Tim fares against competition. Not saying he won't do well, but why use this D league competition as a measuring stick? Not even thread worthy tbh.
It's still an incredible performance, especially for a 37 year old. AND in only 24 minutes

DMC
12-12-2013, 06:01 PM
It's still an incredible performance, especially for a 37 year old. AND in only 24 minutes

I don't disagree with that.

aal04
12-12-2013, 08:56 PM
I was hoping he would go 20/20.

Thomas82
12-13-2013, 01:03 AM
I was hoping he would go 20/20.

Me too.....he'll have a few more of those before the season is over.

Kool Bob Love
12-13-2013, 01:23 AM
Last night might be one of the last few chances I will get to see Tim play in person. I'm glad he had such a great game.

I hope you saved the ticket and had a hell of a time. :flag::toast

FireMicoHalili
12-13-2013, 08:07 AM
Fool's gold if we keep losing to playoff teams, end up with a 25+ lottery pick, and sign players like Ayres in the offseason

look_at_g_shred
12-13-2013, 10:09 AM
Fool's gold if we keep losing to playoff teams, end up with a fringe lottery pick, and sign players like Ayres in the offseason
lol

Brazil
12-14-2013, 09:10 AM
It was the Bucks. We won by almost 40 points. Let's see how Tim fares against competition. Not saying he won't do well, but why use this D league competition as a measuring stick? Not even thread worthy tbh.

Thats not the most important here, no matter what was the competition the good news is that Duncan was moving well, he had no hesitation with his jumper, was focused... That's all good signs.

will_spurs
12-14-2013, 01:01 PM
Fool's gold if we keep losing to playoff teams, end up with a 25+ lottery pick, and sign players like Ayres in the offseason

Fool's gold if Spurs fans are still that dumb.

TampaDude
12-14-2013, 02:05 PM
No question about it...yet another :lobt2: awaits the Spurs in June. :hat

FireMicoHalili
12-16-2013, 04:22 AM
Fool's gold if Spurs fans are still that dumb.
Oof sorry did my opinion hurt you in any way? Cause I've been watching them for 10+ years and after 2007, seems like they've always lacked something. WCF is a feat, but...means nothing if we don't get the 'ship, then it's back to drafting late draft picks.

cd021
12-16-2013, 10:09 AM
Fool's gold if we keep losing to playoff teams, end up with a 25+ lottery pick, and sign players like Ayres in the offseason

We lost to Houston (On a BS Harden foul btw) OKC (In OKC were they are 12-0) Portland (11-2 at home) that seems to be knee jerk reaction on par with most of ST. We generally fair extremely well against +500 teams. Last season we were 31-17 (tied for the 3rd best winning percentage with OKC)

I'm assuming that's a typo lotto picks are # 1-14. We've usually done very well despite not picking higher than 20th in the past 17 seasons.

Spur|n|Austin
12-16-2013, 10:44 AM
Oof sorry did my opinion hurt you in any way? Cause I've been watching them for 10+ years and after 2007, seems like they've always lacked something. WCF is a feat, but...means nothing if we don't get the 'ship, then it's back to drafting late draft picks.

10+ years? Whoa lookout for this guy.

FireMicoHalili
12-19-2013, 04:23 AM
Well we'll just see by season's end won't we?