PDA

View Full Version : Lakers: 111-111



Michael Jordan.
12-14-2013, 11:57 AM
Record between the Shaq and Gasol era. Now can't win a single game without a dominant frontline. SMH.

Thread
12-14-2013, 11:58 AM
Kobe: 5

Daddy: 4

the tired old shit bag Duncan: 4

Michael Jordan.
12-14-2013, 12:00 PM
Kobe: 5

Daddy: 4

the tired old shit bag Duncan: 4
.500

Bill_Brasky
12-14-2013, 12:00 PM
I do believe MJ likes the rockets tbh. that's why he retired and let them win a couple.

Clipper Nation
12-14-2013, 12:01 PM
Kobe: 5

Daddy: 4

the tired old shit bag Duncan: 4
You can have that, but I'm stickin' with 0-3...

Thread
12-14-2013, 12:01 PM
.500

Kobe: 5

the tired old shit bag Duncan: 4

Leetonidas
12-14-2013, 12:03 PM
Out of curiosity Cubster, since Duncan returned to All-NBA status and is once again rounding into form (2 assists shy of a triple double last night tbh) while the Spurs have one of the top 4 records in the league, when he is no longer going to be considered the TOSB when it is clearly Achilles-torn Kobe who is now the TOSB? Or are you just going to stay in the past?

Leetonidas
12-14-2013, 12:04 PM
Surely you can admit Kobe is TOSB status now?

Thread
12-14-2013, 12:20 PM
Out of curiosity Cubster, since Duncan returned to All-NBA status and is once again rounding into form (2 assists shy of a triple double last night tbh) while the Spurs have one of the top 4 records in the league, when he is no longer going to be considered the TOSB when it is clearly Achilles-torn Kobe who is now the TOSB? Or are you just going to stay in the past?

When the Lakers have 6 in the cabinet and Kobe makes them take 1 out and have to give it back then he'll be TOSB.

Duncan must wear that shame, his shame. He could not make a layup over a shrimp. Then couldn't make a tap in of the miss over the same shrimp. Don't fret though,,,it not like he' been made to pay for it (cept here). It's like it never happened. James got his back-to-back, Media got what they wanted and it was (hands off Duncan and the Spurs).

Michael Jordan.
12-14-2013, 12:22 PM
When the Lakers have 6 in the cabinet and Kobe makes them take 1 out and have to give it back then he'll be TOSB.

Duncan must wear that shame, his shame. He could not make a layup over a shrimp. Then couldn't make a tap in of the miss over the same shrimp. Don't fret though,,,it like he' been made to pay for it (cept here). It's like it never happened. James got his back-to-back, Media got what they wanted and it was (hands off Duncan and the Spurs).
Kolby can't even make it back to get a chance at 6, tee hee.

Thread
12-14-2013, 12:24 PM
Kolby can't even make it back to get a chance at 6, tee hee.

Ipso facto:::Duncan is the tired old shit bag.

I ain't Media. I ain't lettin' you offin' the hook.

Leetonidas
12-14-2013, 12:25 PM
When the Lakers have 6 in the cabinet and Kobe makes them take 1 out and have to give it back then he'll be TOSB.

Duncan must wear that shame, his shame. He could not make a layup over a shrimp. Then couldn't make a tap in of the miss over the same shrimp. Don't fret though,,,it not like he' been made to pay for it (cept here). It's like it never happened. James got his back-to-back, Media got what they wanted and it was (hands off Duncan and the Spurs).

Well yeah he definitely choked but it has nothing to do with being a TOSB. imo mental state was damaged after Manu/Pop robbed him after game 6

Thread
12-14-2013, 12:28 PM
Well yeah he definitely choked but it has nothing to do with being a TOSB. imo mental state was damaged after Manu/Pop robbed him after game 6

Of course it does. Had he not been a TOSB he would have made either the layup, or the tap in. He didn't. Duncan is resisdent TOSB now, Lee. And it fits him. He's got that hang dog look, it's like natural. But, now there is a good reason for it.

Koolaid_Man
12-14-2013, 12:30 PM
Of course it does. Had he not been a TOSB he would have made either the layup, or the tap in. He didn't. Duncan is resisdent TOSB now, Lee. And it fits him. He's got that hang dog look, it's like natural. But, now there is a good reason for it.

^ fine you can have that...I've got

Tired old shit fag = TOSF

midnightpulp
12-14-2013, 12:30 PM
When the Lakers have 6 in the cabinet and Kobe makes them take 1 out and have to give it back then he'll be TOSB.

Duncan must wear that shame, his shame. He could not make a layup over a shrimp. Then couldn't make a tap in of the miss over the same shrimp. Don't fret though,,,it not like he' been made to pay for it (cept here). It's like it never happened. James got his back-to-back, Media got what they wanted and it was (hands off Duncan and the Spurs).

As it should be.

He averaged 27 and 14 in the last two games of the Finals, on the road. Parker went 3-13 and Manu was doing his best Earnest Byner impressions. But you don't talk about that, do you?

I know you love distilling things down to singular moments for whatever reason (this is you being manipulated by media, who thrives on presenting "moments" removed from context). But the game wasn't lost on that missed Duncan layup.

And you know that. But to admit otherwise would deprive you of ammunition when we get in Kobe's ass.

Michael Jordan.
12-14-2013, 12:30 PM
^ fine you can have that...I've got

Tired old shit fag = TOSF
http://4.kicksonfire.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/tumblr_mocxnm9yW91r2b4iuo1_500.gif

Thread
12-14-2013, 12:35 PM
As it should be.

He averaged 27 and 14 in the last two games of the Finals, on the road. Parker went 3-13 and Manu was doing his best Earnest Byner impressions. But you don't talk about that, do you?

I know you love distilling things down to singular moments for whatever reason (this is you being manipulated by media, who thrives on presenting "moments" removed from context). But the game wasn't lost on that missed Duncan layup.

And you know that. But to admit otherwise would deprive you of ammunition when we get in Kobe's ass.

Of course I enjoy those moments. I was raised on those moments, tortured by them. Then all the sudden the worm turned, I got straightened out ('85) and then "you" and Media didn't want to do the MOMENTS anymore. Uh, uh. We doin' the MOMENTS.

Koolaid_Man
12-14-2013, 12:38 PM
Record between the Shaq and Gasol era. Now can't win a single game without a dominant frontline. SMH.


http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a68/Koolbreezey/mioxes_zps5932c273.png

Michael Jordan.
12-14-2013, 12:39 PM
http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a68/Koolbreezey/mioxes_zps5932c273.png
http://4.kicksonfire.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/tumblr_mocxnm9yW91r2b4iuo1_500.gif

Koolaid_Man
12-14-2013, 12:41 PM
http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a68/Koolbreezey/mioxes_zps5932c273.png

Leetonidas
12-14-2013, 12:44 PM
http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a68/Koolbreezey/mioxes_zps5932c273.png

Salty ass nigga :lmao

0-3

midnightpulp
12-14-2013, 12:45 PM
Of course I enjoy those moments. I was raised on those moments, tortured by them. Then all the sudden the worm turned, I got straightened out ('85) and then "you" and Media didn't want to do the MOMENTS anymore. Uh, uh. We doin' the MOMENTS.

:lol When has Media never wanted to do "moments?"

ESPN built a billion dollar empire on "moments."

Media crucified Buckner, when it was Schilraldi who should've been hanging. Etc, etc. You know the drill.

Michael Jordan.
12-14-2013, 12:46 PM
http://4.kicksonfire.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/tumblr_mocxnm9yW91r2b4iuo1_500.gif

Thread
12-14-2013, 12:48 PM
:lol When has Media never wanted to do "moments?"

ESPN built a billion dollar empire on "moments."

Media crucified Buckner, when it was Schilraldi who should've been hanging. Etc, etc. You know the drill.

They won't do Webber turning his back on Horry.
They won't do Wallace turning his back on Horry.
They won't do Duncan missing that layup.

Thread
12-14-2013, 12:49 PM
They won't do Barkley fucking up on Pippen leaing to the Paxson 3. The video is right there. It's never been cited. And never will.

Koolaid_Man
12-14-2013, 12:53 PM
To Hit or Not To Hit...That Is The Question

http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a68/Koolbreezey/d88f0f4d-574d-4f41-8538-5744708cdcf9_zpsea53de3c.jpg
:lmao
http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a68/Koolbreezey/mioxes_zps5932c273.png

Michael Jordan.
12-14-2013, 12:55 PM
I went into a little detail with these three rosters simply because the story over time has been that Kobe carried 4 carcasses around the court with him for three years, but it’s just not true; he had more to work with and a better coaching situation than Jason Kidd ever experienced in his prime. Overall, Kobe’s influence on LA’s W-L records wasn't very noticeable (111-111 with him, 9-14 without --- I know fans will want to jump on this as proof of his influence, so I'll point out that 14 of those contests were against teams at or above .500, meaning the expected W-L record for a .500 club against that lineup is 9-14), and he certainly wasn’t able to keep the team afloat when Lamar Odom was injured. In fact, a much stronger case can be made that Odom was the one carrying the franchise during this time based on the Lakers’ W-L records with and without him. The numbers indicate that Kobe’s impact was minimal.

Koolaid_Man
12-14-2013, 12:56 PM
To Hit or Not To Hit...That Is The Question..

http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a68/Koolbreezey/d88f0f4d-574d-4f41-8538-5744708cdcf9_zpsea53de3c.jpg
:lmao
http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a68/Koolbreezey/mioxes_zps5932c273.png

Michael Jordan.
12-14-2013, 12:56 PM
0-3

midnightpulp
12-14-2013, 12:57 PM
They won't do Webber turning his back on Horry.
They won't do Wallace turning his back on Horry.
They won't do Duncan missing that layup.

You blow the Webber play out of proportion. If anybody should be crucified for that play, it's Vlade for that idiotic back tap in lieu of corralling the board.

And they sure as hell do Webber against North Carolina.

Seriously, how much do "coverage" of Webber's defensive lapse on Horry do you expect? That's not exactly a play the media routinely "crucifies" a player over.

They don't do Duncan because to admit a choke there (or in 6) would take the shine away from James' repeat. It's not about the Spurs being bulletproof. It's about protecting James. It'd be about how the Spurs lost it and not how James won it.

You know this. But you're eternally getting us back for 4>3, so I understand your fervor. And you're also getting us "back" for '84 by proxy, since every thing for you always comes back to '84.

Thread
12-14-2013, 01:06 PM
You blow the Webber play out of proportion. If anybody should be crucified for that play, it's Vlade for that idiotic back tap in lieu of corralling the board.

And they sure as hell do Webber against North Carolina.

Seriously, how much do "coverage" of Webber's defensive lapse on Horry do you expect? That's not exactly a play the media routinely "crucifies" a player over.

They don't do Duncan because to admit a choke there (or in 6) would take the shine away from James' repeat. It's not about the Spurs being bulletproof. It's about protecting James. It'd be about how the Spurs lost it and not how James won it.

You know this. But you're eternally getting us back for 4>3, so I understand your fervor. And you're also getting us "back" for '84 by proxy, since every thing for you always comes back to '84.

It (Webber) was never even cited. Never even parsed and examined that day, or, since by Media. Just happened in a vacuum like last June. We don't examine that tme frame. We just get a steady diet of James with his 2. Because there is money in the protocol that took place last June. There is no money in tearing down Pop and the Spurs, no money tearing down the Maloofs then and Webber. No money tearing down Barkley and the Suns when Media and America got what they wanted:::MJ with another. No money tearing down Wallace, he was being feted on speculation, a Media gold mine if it were handled correctly and NYC made sure it was handled by the numbers.

But, by God they'll take off after an Incognito, or an A-Rod, because they've been given the go ahead, the chocker chain released.

You're a fool Midst.

DMC
12-14-2013, 01:14 PM
When the Lakers have 6 in the cabinet and Kobe makes them take 1 out and have to give it back then he'll be TOSB.

Duncan must wear that shame, his shame. He could not make a layup over a shrimp. Then couldn't make a tap in of the miss over the same shrimp. Don't fret though,,,it not like he' been made to pay for it (cept here). It's like it never happened. James got his back-to-back, Media got what they wanted and it was (hands off Duncan and the Spurs).

More dishonesty from the resident liar. Kobe had 4 HOFers around him, made it to the Finals, got beat by a team with zero HOFers (maybe Billups). If that's not giving it back, nothing is.

DMC
12-14-2013, 01:19 PM
They won't do Webber turning his back on Horry.
They won't do Wallace turning his back on Horry.
They won't do Duncan missing that layup.

They won't do Kobe flying in and out of a rape trial, taking too many shots and throwing his team and coach under the bus. You seem to ignore that as well you quitter. That was Kobe's 6th. I allow that the Celtics pushed his shit in beyond reproach, but he should have won that series against the Pistons.

Because of one white girl in Colorado who already have 5 different genetic samples of semen in her crotch, the trophy went to a deserted crime ridden city instead.

midnightpulp
12-14-2013, 01:21 PM
It (Webber) was never even cited. Never even parsed and examined that day, or, since by Media. Just happened in a vacuum like last June. We don't examine that tme frame. We just get a steady diet of James with his 2. Because there is money in the protocol that took place last June. There is no money in tearing down Pop and the Spurs, no money tearing down the Maloofs then and Webber. No money tearing down Barkley and the Suns when Media and America got what they wanted:::MJ with another. No money tearing down Wallace, he was being feted on speculation, a Media gold mine if it were handled correctly and NYC made sure it was handled by the numbers.

But, by God they'll take off after an Incognito, or an A-Rod, because they've been given the go ahead, the chocker chain released.

You're a fool Midst.

Because there is no money in the truth. There is only money in hype and half-truths.

Also, you can't tear someone down while you build up the Golden Boys (Jordan, James, etc). No money in tearing down the Spurs, because, again, it would suggest the Spurs lost it more than James won it.

What angers you about the Media not going after the Spurs? Why you expect they would when the price is indicting James's title?

Koolaid_Man
12-14-2013, 01:21 PM
They won't do Kobe flying in and out of a rape trial, taking too many shots and throwing his team and coach under the bus. You seem to ignore that as well you quitter. That was Kobe's 6th. I allow that the Celtics pushed his shit in beyond reproach, but he should have won that series against the Pistons.

Because of one white girl in Colorado who already have 5 different genetic samples of semen in her crotch, the trophy went to a deserted crime ridden city instead.

that's what I say...fuck a good basketball conversation...the reality is it's Kobe 5 TOSF 6..till that changes nothing else matters....

Thread
12-14-2013, 01:29 PM
Because there is no money in the truth. There is only money in hype and half-truths.

Also, you can't tear someone down while you build up the Golden Boys (Jordan, James, etc). No money in tearing down the Spurs, because, again, it would suggest the Spurs lost it more than James won it.

What angers you about the Media not going after the Spurs? Why you expect they would when the price is indicting James's title?

But, by God they strung up Worthy in '84. Then years later, a few years ago during one of their fucking half times they did a retrospective on that sequence with Worthy. You know the kind:::everybody talking in hushed tones, dressed to the 9's, ever so respectful takin it frame by frame like that Zapruder 8MM showing JFK's head getting blitz. And Worthy sitting there discussing it with these fucking animals. Fuck them. I'd a told them, "do everybody else first, Barkley, Webber, Wallace, McHale, everybody. After you've done all those guys and retropectives then go and fuck your mother some more then come and I'll sit down with ya."

DMC
12-14-2013, 01:46 PM
^ Your non-Dale is showing.

lefty
12-14-2013, 01:51 PM
MJ shtting on Thread as usual

jeebus
12-14-2013, 02:17 PM
Has there been a day in the entire history of spurstalk where lakerfan wasn't shit on by the entire forum?

Trainwreck2100
12-14-2013, 02:20 PM
Has there been a day in the entire history of spurstalk where lakerfan wasn't shit on by the entire forum?

pregasol trade tbqh, they just weren't here to be shit on

unforeseen
12-14-2013, 03:52 PM
http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b398/heat_fusion/mbrown_zps6b6ebd39.jpg

HI-FI
12-14-2013, 04:16 PM
MJ shtting on Thread as usual

DMC as well. if there is one thing I like about THread returning, DMC becomes like a resurgent Duncan, just unleashing double barrel blast on the old fart.

Thread
12-14-2013, 04:23 PM
DMC as well. if there is one thing I like about THread returning, DMC becomes like a resurgent Duncan, just unleashing double barrel blast on the old fart.

At least he disobeyed himself and is talking to me. After 6 he wrote War & Peace and swore he woudn't talk to me again as long as lived.

"You guys know me and I am not kidding here. I have never been so mad. It's not Duncan missing a bunny, or, Pop hugging everybody in arms length after it was over, or, Kiwi missing that FT, or, everybody sinking into the paint instead of marching to the arc. No, it's not those things. What is it then? Oh, yeah, it that Dale guy. He left and then the moment we're undressed on national television he comes back and laughs at us. I demand Kori kick him off, or appear naked in front of us."

Signed,

- DMC

LkrFan
12-14-2013, 05:53 PM
Record between the Shaq and Gasol era. Now can't win a single game without a dominant frontline. SMH.
Just an example of his supporting cast (http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/LAL/2006.html)s to put things into context. Carry on with your unbiased agenda. ;)

Michael Jordan.
12-14-2013, 05:57 PM
Just an example of his supporting cast (http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/LAL/2006.html)s to put things into context. Carry on with your unbiased agenda. ;)
He had no top 5 big men during that time period. Carry on.

UZER
12-14-2013, 05:58 PM
They won't do Webber turning his back on Horry.
They won't do Wallace turning his back on Horry.
They won't do Duncan missing that layup.

They won't do Dale chickenshitting then reappearing after the dust settled.

You have no credibility talking shit. But its a free country, so parrot away my friend.

HI-FI
12-14-2013, 06:04 PM
Just an example of his supporting cast (http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/LAL/2006.html)s to put things into context. Carry on with your unbiased agenda. ;)
I'm surprised you aren't pulling out the tanking excuse.

:cry"Mitch was spending $100 million plus to tank, that's just Greenspan level economics. Do it Mitch :hungry::cry"

LA supposedly being the greatest free agent location yet still needing to tank. Sad thing is they aren't tanking now nor were they then, just KbFan not wanting to realize how overrated their idol is. Let us proceed.....

LkrFan
12-14-2013, 06:04 PM
He had no top 5 big men during that time period. Carry on.
His 35.4ppg was reminiscent of your 37.1ppg avg in '86: fruitless without a good supporting cast. Bad example. We know you don't do '80s titles. :lol

Michael Jordan.
12-14-2013, 06:07 PM
His 35.4ppg was reminiscent of your 37.1ppg avg in '86: fruitless without a good supporting cast. Bad example. We know you don't do '80s titles. :lol
Four top 5 big men all in their prime is just a good supporting cast? Got it.

spurraider21
12-14-2013, 06:07 PM
Four top 5 big men all in their prime is just a good supporting cast? Got it.
I think he meant to say that Kobe was in the supporting cast, in which case he's spot on.

Michael Jordan.
12-14-2013, 06:09 PM
I think he meant to say that Kobe was in the supporting cast, in which case he's spot on.
:lol

LkrFan
12-14-2013, 06:13 PM
I'm surprised you aren't pulling out the tanking excuse.

:cry"Mitch was spending $100 million plus to tank, that's just Greenspan level economics. Do it Mitch :hungry::cry"

LA supposedly being the greatest free agent location yet still needing to tank. Sad thing is they aren't tanking now nor were they then, just KbFan not wanting to realize how overrated their idol is. Let us proceed.....
They were not tanking (intentionally). There were no big time FAs available to poach. They always sign players to deals that expire around the same time that a coveted FA's deal expires. They had plans for players like LBJ and Yao during the same time frame (you recall, they could have been FAs around that time). When it didn't happen, they ended up with players like Kwame* and Smushcalade.

*Kwame's expiring deal led to The Gift!, three straight Finals appearances, 2 rangs, and 8. :lol

LkrFan
12-14-2013, 06:14 PM
Four top 5 big men all in their prime is just a good supporting cast? Got it.
Cherry picking again I see, eh? Michael "0 for the '80's" Jordan. ;)

HI-FI
12-14-2013, 06:15 PM
They were not tanking (intentionally). There were no big time FAs available to poach. They always sign players to deals that expire around the same time that a coveted FA's deal expires. They had plans for players like LBJ and Yao during the same time frame (you recall, they could have been FAs around that time). When it didn't happen, they ended up with players like Kwame* and Smushcalade.

*Kwame's expiring deal led to The Gift!, three straight Finals appearances, 2 rangs, and 8. :lol
least you weren't spinning about tanking with this one. +10 for BnrFan

Thread
12-14-2013, 06:15 PM
8

Seems like a lifetime ago.

Michael Jordan.
12-14-2013, 06:16 PM
Cherry picking again I see, eh? Michael "0 for the '80's" Jordan. ;)
Can't cherry pick det stat. Four top 5 bigs.

LkrFan
12-14-2013, 06:26 PM
Can't cherry pick det stat. Four top 5 bigs.
I quoted the 2005-2006 Lakers roster. There was no top anything on it other than Kobe... But then again, you knew that. SMH

Michael Jordan.
12-14-2013, 06:29 PM
I quoted the 2005-2006 Lakers roster. There was no top anything on it other than Kobe... But then again, you knew that. SMH
Look at you cherry picking. I quoted the time from Shaq's departure to Gasol's arrival.

LkrFan
12-14-2013, 06:49 PM
least you weren't spinning about tanking with this one. +10 for BnrFan
:lol

LkrFan
12-14-2013, 06:51 PM
Look at you cherry picking. I quoted the time from Shaq's departure to Gasol's arrival.
Are you stupid? That roster was smack dab in the middle of The Eviction! and The Gift! -200 point s:loln