PDA

View Full Version : Pete Rose in the hall?



samikeyp
07-29-2005, 03:01 PM
With the Baseball Hall of Fame inductions coming up...do you believe Pete Rose deserves to be in the Hall of Fame and why or why not?

samikeyp
07-29-2005, 03:03 PM
I think his playing career stats warrant his admission but I think that there should be notation on his plaque that he was banned from baseball for gambling. He finally admitted to it but he needs to apologize IMO. I think if he made a public and formal apology, a lot of people would forgive. That being said....I don't see him making it until after he dies.

N.Y. Johnny
07-29-2005, 03:08 PM
I believe he should be in the Hall Of Fame but I also believe that he played a bunch of people as saps when he denied again and again about gambling on baseball then did that complete reversal and then admitted to it but never apologized.

I don't think that he will ever get in, he'll be left out like Shoeless Joe Jackson is.
Gambling on the game was the worst thing that could be done according to some.

shelshor
07-29-2005, 03:22 PM
The precedent has already been set with Shoeless Joe Jackson's ban
If Rose wants in, then let Jackson in first

samikeyp
07-29-2005, 03:33 PM
The precedent has already been set with Shoeless Joe Jackson's ban
If Rose wants in, then let Jackson in first

agreed

pooh
07-29-2005, 04:09 PM
I agree, if they let Rose in then Jackson and the other "black sox" players should be allowed in also, but with notations that they were banned for gambling on baseball while as a player and or manager.

King
07-29-2005, 04:39 PM
He should be let in, because the hall is based on what is accomplished as a player. On the field, he's one of the best ever, and keeping his bust out of Cooperstown doesn't change that. But, there should be a notation of his ban/gambling, because that's part of his legacy.

Don't give him a job in baseball, but don't act like he wasn't one of the best players ever.

FromWayDowntown
07-29-2005, 04:59 PM
I've never understood the argument that has Pete Rose among the top 10 or so players to ever play the game. He had one exceptional year (MVP in 1973) and a number of very good years.

At bottom, Rose was a great singles hitter (3215 of his 4256 hits (75.6%) were singles; most in MLB history) who scored a lot of runs, had a nice OBP (.375 for career), and stole some bases (around 200); but he never hit for power (160 HR for career; 7 per year on average) and didn't drive in an exorbitent number of runs (1314 for career; 60 per year with a high of 82). He doesn't rank in the top 10 all-time in any major categories other than games, hits, and runs (he has a couple of other top-10's but those derive from the number of games and hits). He also wasn't a particularly good fielder.

I will give him this: he played in a bunch of post-seasons and played pretty well when he got there.

His numbers stand out, IMO, more because of his longevity than his greatness. I would never put Rose anywhere near my all-time starting 9 and wouldn't have him backing up at any position that he played in his career. Jimmy Foxx, Stan Musial, and Hank Greenberg are better choices at 1B; Joe Morgan and Rogers Hornsby are better choices at 2B; Mike Schmidt and George Brett are better choices at 3B; and there are far more than 6 OF who were better than Rose: Ruth, Mays, Mantle, Williams, DiMaggio, Aaron, Frank Robinson, Cobb, Al Simmons, Clemente, Mel Ott, Stan Musial (if not at 1B), and Rickey Henderson (among retired players) immediately come to mind as better players.

People liked Pete Rose because he hustled and because he was controversial. I prefer other players because they were simply better.

Rose's numbers warrant enshrinement. But Rose knew the Golden Rule and he broke it. He broke it repeatedly and by gambling on his own team. He knew that the consequence for gambling was a Jackson-esque ban and he did it anyway. I have no sympathy whatsoever for Pete Rose and firmly believe that he should never, under any circumstances be admitted to the Baseball Hall of Fame. I don't care if he apologizes or ever fully comes clean. If you let Rose in, you essentially say to others that the rules can be broken so long as you take your punishment and appear apologetic at some point in the future. That should never be the rule. If you want to maintain the integrity of the game and ensure proper respect for its rules, you have to make sure that the penalty for violating the most sacred rule is also the harshest penalty. Rose broke the sacred rule and the precedent is a ban from baseball -- forever.

And frankly, I don't care if Pete Rose ever apologizes. I'm absolutely sure that any apology he offers will not be sincere.

samikeyp
07-29-2005, 05:01 PM
His numbers stand out, IMO, more because of his longevity than his greatness.

I would agree with that but IMO, its his greatness that enabled him to play so well for so long. But you are right....he did break the most sacred rule of baseball that is why if he does make it in....I think it will be posthumously.

FromWayDowntown
07-29-2005, 05:26 PM
I would agree with that but IMO, its his greatness that enabled him to play so well for so long.

I think you have to take longevity-based numbers with a grain of salt. Phil Niekro and Don Sutton both won 300 games, but not because either was ever a dominant pitcher. But, both were good enough to stay on staffs and win games for a number of years.

Certainly, you must be a great player to play for a long time; but that you amass numbers because you play for a long time does not make you automatically among the 9 or 18 best to ever play.

In my personal rankings, Rose wouldn't be in the Top 30.

He was Ichiro in the 60's and 70's, but without the speed and defense. I don't think Ichiro will ever be considered a top-30 player, but I think Ichiro is better than Rose ever was.

samikeyp
07-29-2005, 05:56 PM
In my personal rankings, he would be top 30...but that's just my .02.

FromWayDowntown
07-29-2005, 06:13 PM
In my personal rankings, he would be top 30...but that's just my .02.

I understand. For the reasons stated above, I disagree, but I understand.

FWIW, my top 30 since 1900 (in no particular order, save for #s 1-3)[including current players]:

1. Willie Mays
2. Mickey Mantle
3. Babe Ruth
4. Lou Gehrig
5. Rogers Hornsby
6. Henry Aaron
7. Christy Mathewson
8. Ted Williams
9. Joe Dimaggio
10. Stan Musial
11. Jimmie Foxx
12. Hank Greenberg
13. Ty Cobb
14. Tris Speaker
15. Frank Robinson
16. Sandy Koufax
17. Al Simmons
18. Rickey Henderson
19. Pete Alexander
20. Bob Gibson
21. Cy Young
22. Roger Clemens
23. Barry Bonds
24. Steve Carlton
25. Nolan Ryan
26. Warren Spahn
27. Mike Schmidt
28. Roberto Clemente
29. Eddie Collins
30. Honus Wagner

Spurminator
07-31-2005, 04:29 PM
Shoeless Joe wouldn't be a lock for the Hall of Fame even if he hadn't been involved in the Black Sox scandal. That might have been the best thing that could have possibly happened for his legacy. If not, he'd be completely forgotten.

N.Y. Johnny
07-31-2005, 09:11 PM
I've love Baseball.
I've loved baseball ever since Arnold Rothstein fixed the World Series in 1919

Guru of Nothing
07-31-2005, 09:52 PM
I understand. For the reasons stated above, I disagree, but I understand.

FWIW, my top 30 since 1900 (in no particular order, save for #s 1-3)[including current players]:

1. Willie Mays
2. Mickey Mantle
3. Babe Ruth
4. Lou Gehrig
5. Rogers Hornsby
6. Henry Aaron
7. Christy Mathewson
8. Ted Williams
9. Joe Dimaggio
10. Stan Musial
11. Jimmie Foxx
12. Hank Greenberg
13. Ty Cobb
14. Tris Speaker
15. Frank Robinson
16. Sandy Koufax
17. Al Simmons
18. Rickey Henderson
19. Pete Alexander
20. Bob Gibson
21. Cy Young
22. Roger Clemens
23. Barry Bonds
24. Steve Carlton
25. Nolan Ryan
26. Warren Spahn
27. Mike Schmidt
28. Roberto Clemente
29. Eddie Collins
30. Honus Wagner

Is Walter Johnson #31?

Das Texan
07-31-2005, 11:24 PM
shoeless joe did his gambling misdeed as a player.


pete rose as a manager.

not entirely the same, both extremly wrong, but not the same thing.

ObiwanGinobili
08-01-2005, 12:25 PM
I'm sorry, but no.

KEDA
08-01-2005, 01:55 PM
he bet on baseball



enough said

FromWayDowntown
08-01-2005, 02:04 PM
Is Walter Johnson #31?

I had Johnson in the top 10, because he is the first pitcher who came to my mind, but in editing the list, I must have deleted his name and then assumed it was on the list.

There is no doubt that the Big Train is among the 10 greatest ever.

tlongII
08-01-2005, 06:44 PM
So he bet baseball, BIG FUCKING DEAL! Pete should be in the Hall without question. He played the game the way it was meant to be played...all out. I get sick of the hypocrites that say he shouldn't be in the Hall while having no problem with scumbags like Ty Cobb being in it. Pete Rose is one of the greatest players to ever play the game!

Jimcs50
08-02-2005, 02:38 PM
So he bet baseball, BIG FUCKING DEAL! Pete should be in the Hall without question. He played the game the way it was meant to be played...all out. I get sick of the hypocrites that say he shouldn't be in the Hall while having no problem with scumbags like Ty Cobb being in it. Pete Rose is one of the greatest players to ever play the game!

Bullshit!!

I bet on his team when he used the bullpen a certain way, knowing that they had a better chance to win those games, and when he did now bet on his team, it was after he had over used his bullpen the previous days, thus he knew when they would lose.

He was the most horrible offender in the history of baseball, not even close to people who used steroids. At least those people who were on the juice wanted to win, even if they cheated to dod it. Pete Rose was making his own team lose, because of his betting on them and adjusting his roster on the days he did bet on them.

Pete Rose almost ruined baseball....he will NEVER get in the HOF.

tlongII
08-02-2005, 04:59 PM
Bullshit!!

I bet on his team when he used the bullpen a certain way, knowing that they had a better chance to win those games, and when he did now bet on his team, it was after he had over used his bullpen the previous days, thus he knew when they would lose.

He was the most horrible offender in the history of baseball, not even close to people who used steroids. At least those people who were on the juice wanted to win, even if they cheated to dod it. Pete Rose was making his own team lose, because of his betting on them and adjusting his roster on the days he did bet on them.

Pete Rose almost ruined baseball....he will NEVER get in the HOF.

That is CRAP! Pete never bet against his own team. Besides, the Hall should be for his playing accomplishments anyway, not what he did as a manager. I find it amazing that you can be so critical of him when you are an admitted gambler yourself.

Jimcs50
08-02-2005, 05:17 PM
That is CRAP! Pete never bet against his own team. Besides, the Hall should be for his playing accomplishments anyway, not what he did as a manager. I find it amazing that you can be so critical of him when you are an admitted gambler yourself.

tlong, do you read lips????

I said he bet ON his team. He did it only on games when his bullpen was fresh, and when he knew he would not be having to use a tired bullpen.

He did what would be the equivalent of Pop playing Tim Duncan 48 mins on one night on a game he bet on the Spurs and on the next night, not betting on the Spurs, because he knows that TD would be all worn out.

This is all well documented, the people he was betting with all had records of what games he bet and what games he would not bet. When the bullpen was tired because he over used them on his betting games, he would not call the bookies on those nights.

He deserves to be in prison for 30 yrs.

Jimcs50
08-02-2005, 05:18 PM
That is CRAP! Pete never bet against his own team. Besides, the Hall should be for his playing accomplishments anyway, not what he did as a manager. I find it amazing that you can be so critical of him when you are an admitted gambler yourself.

I also do not bet on my dentisty...huge difference, pal.

tlongII
08-02-2005, 06:25 PM
I also do not bet on my dentisty...huge difference, pal.


Your argument is WEAK! Again, he did not bet against his own team so WHO GIVES A SHIT! I suggest you change your opinion of his eligibility for the HOF or I will be extremely angry.

Guru of Nothing
08-02-2005, 09:00 PM
I had Johnson in the top 10, because he is the first pitcher who came to my mind, but in editing the list, I must have deleted his name and then assumed it was on the list.

There is no doubt that the Big Train is among the 10 greatest ever.

I was scratching my head trying to figure out why Walter Johnson was not in your top 30.

I'm with you on the Pete Rose issue. He just was not that great. I was a baseball fanatic in everyway imaginable in the 1970's, and during that time, my adolescent mind never could grasp onto the hullaballoo over Pete Rose.

He's merely a notch, maybe two and half notches, above Don Sutton in my book.

Jimcs50
08-02-2005, 09:02 PM
Your argument is WEAK! Again, he did not bet against his own team so WHO GIVES A SHIT! I suggest you change your opinion of his eligibility for the HOF or I will be extremely angry.

He just made it impossible for his team to win the game after he bet on his team because he blew out his bullpen on that game.

He knew what he was doing was hurting his team's chance to win the next game, but he did not give a shit...he fuckedf his own team just for the purpose of winning a bet on the previous game....he is the lowest of low...he is scum...and every one of his players hate his guts for what he did.

TheTruth
08-02-2005, 09:52 PM
hell f*ing yes. Hit King Baby...Hit King...

tlongII
08-03-2005, 02:48 PM
He just made it impossible for his team to win the game after he bet on his team because he blew out his bullpen on that game.

He knew what he was doing was hurting his team's chance to win the next game, but he did not give a shit...he fuckedf his own team just for the purpose of winning a bet on the previous game....he is the lowest of low...he is scum...and every one of his players hate his guts for what he did.


You obviously don't know what you're talking about.

Jimcs50
08-03-2005, 03:18 PM
You obviously don't know what you're talking about.


I know all the facts of the case.

Why do you think that he has been banned for so long?????


Rose should have gone to prison for 30 yrs.

tlongII
08-03-2005, 03:42 PM
I know all the facts of the case.

Why do you think that he has been banned for so long?????


Rose should have gone to prison for 30 yrs.


He's been banned for so long because Bart Giamatti hated his guts, that's why. Your bullpen theories are bullshit. There is no way you can prove he was sacrificing games. Regardless, any of those actions are beside the point. He was a Hall of Fame player and the gambling took place after his playing career was over. Pete Rose is the epitome of what every baseball player should strive to be.

Jimcs50
08-03-2005, 04:35 PM
Pete Rose is the epitome of what every baseball player should strive to be.


I devious lying cheat????

He lied about his gambling for 15 yrs, calling everyone else a liar instead. Then he finally admits his lying only after they had the goods on him and were going to go public with them.

The guys should actually have gotten the death penalty instead of 30 yrs.

tlongII
08-03-2005, 04:56 PM
I devious lying cheat????

He lied about his gambling for 15 yrs, calling everyone else a liar instead. Then he finally admits his lying only after they had the goods on him and were going to go public with them.

The guys should actually have gotten the death penalty instead of 30 yrs.

All professional athletes lie.

Jimcs50
08-03-2005, 04:59 PM
All professional athletes lie.

Not David Robinson

tlongII
08-03-2005, 05:02 PM
Not David Robinson


Okay, most professional athletes lie.

HotAssComic
08-05-2005, 02:29 PM
Pete Rose deserves to be in... Hell if we're letting in all these steroid using stars in... why not Charlie Hustle... all their stats & legacies are tainted. Don't see the big deal anymore.