News you can use: Views/Posts ratio

[ShoogarBear]

Only the top 25 threads ranked.

#1 V/P ratio is Vanessa Macias, which probably relates to something about not being able to post with only one hand free.

#2 Is the post your picture thread. Ibid.

Real Women is whomping Free Quattro razor in V/P, which lends some support to the four-guys-in-a-circle-jerk theory.

(click the image below to view. The code thingy for the board sucks so this was the only way I could see posting a big chart)


http://img29.imagevenue.com/loc117/th_84f_ViewsPosts.jpg (http://img29.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc117&image=84f_ViewsPosts.jpg)

[thispego]

this simply will not stand

[mouse]

what about Slomo's waaa waaa you stole my picture topic? :lmao

[Suns Fan]

someone needs to make a topic called Yoda yoda yoda.....
and we just reply saying crap like this......oi4tpgjrq0fgh3npfk31mnd0kvojgr0ijeigje0i jgpigjqeppoiejgpegjepgo

just to see if we can get it to page 10.000 :smokin

[Cant_Be_Faded]

Only the top 25 threads ranked.

#1 V/P ratio is Vanessa Macias, which probably relates to something about not being able to post with only one hand free.

#2 Is the post your picture thread. Ibid.

Real Women is whomping Free Quattro razor in V/P, which lends some support to the four-guys-in-a-circle-jerk theory.

(click the image below to view. The code thingy for the board sucks so this was the only way I could see posting a big chart)


http://img29.imagevenue.com/loc117/th_84f_ViewsPosts.jpg (http://img29.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc117&image=84f_ViewsPosts.jpg)



how does a low v/p ratio imply the circle jerk theory is correct?

[ShoogarBear]

how does a low v/p ratio imply the circle jerk theory is correct?
A low V/P ratio might mean that the only people reading it were those posting.

More completely, a better measure of this would be something like Views/Posts*(number of unique posters).

[Cant_Be_Faded]

Those stats are unsubstantiated and misleading. You're acting like Rich Carlisle when he brought bunk stats to the forefront when he was toting around his little Ron for DPOY.

Why don't you post a histogram of posts per user...that would show that more users post in RW. Also, quattro's been around for so long that long time periods went by with some of the posters not viewing. Then today the views jumped up by like 300. It wasn't all me.

[Cant_Be_Faded]

A low V/P ratio might mean that the only people reading it were those posting.

More completely, a better measure of this would be something like Views/Posts*(number of unique posters).


You can't be serious in making me believe people other than the posters kept viewing RW.

[3rdCoast]

We don't want real women.

We want the fake boobies.

[ShoogarBear]

You need a better comprehension of basic English. I never said they proved anything.

And the numbers are what they are. I didn't do any manipulation with them.

A histogram would be one way to show the distirbution of posts per poster, however, iit would tell you nothing about the number of views.

The number of views is related to both the number of unique posters and the number of non-posters who read it. I suggest that all things being equal, a high v/p ratio implies more people are participating in the thread.

[ObiwanGinobili]

We don't want real women.

We want the fake boobies.


uhm.
this is Spurstalk.... not spursreport.

[mouse]

I can prove to you that the number of views can be jacked with, this topic has 70 views at the moment, now look how many it has :lmao

[mouse]

http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=15263&highlight=slomos+pictures

[Sense]

Is that for active threads?

What happened to the Goodbye Tpark one..

:lol

[Sense]

That sucks... it should've been moved here.

[MannyIsGod]

The only thing this stat prooves is that everyone that enters the Quattro thread is drawn in by the Quattro power and is driven to post.