PDA

View Full Version : Lakers: Record without MVPau



ambchang
12-22-2013, 08:16 AM
:lol -1

"Jigsaw"
12-22-2013, 09:24 AM
:lol

AchillesHeel
12-22-2013, 02:20 PM
Record since Cancer went out: 1-1(.500 > .333)

Deuce Bigalow
12-22-2013, 03:10 PM
Lakers win when Kobe goes out
They lose when MVPau goes out

Shows you who the real MVP is.

Katherine Robinson
12-22-2013, 03:14 PM
Lakers win when Kobe goes out
They lose when MVPau goes out

Shows you who the real MVP is.

Well, one would assume you lose when your best player is gone...

Jodelo
12-22-2013, 03:28 PM
Lakers win when Kobe goes out
They lose when MVPau goes out

Shows you who the real MVP is.

So, agreeing that Pau is the MVP of the Lakers?

Rogue
12-23-2013, 12:11 AM
mavs record without Dirk: 1-0 :lol

DMC
12-23-2013, 12:13 AM
So, agreeing that Pau is the MVP of the Lakers?

I think he forgot which alt he was logged in to.

ambchang
12-28-2013, 12:06 AM
0-2

spurraider21
12-28-2013, 12:12 AM
Losing to Utah should count as 2 losses

Thread
12-28-2013, 12:16 AM
Losing to Utah should count as 2 losses

Or even 6. tee, hee.

spurraider21
12-28-2013, 12:22 AM
You can dish it... But you can't take it

AchillesHeel
12-28-2013, 12:23 AM
Or even 6. tee, hee.

You lost to the worst team in the West, chickenshit.

Thread
12-28-2013, 12:24 AM
You lost to the worst team in the West, chickenshit.

Still doesn't trump your 6. ha, ha.

Raven
12-28-2013, 12:26 AM
shameful, i was rooting for them too :lol

LkrFan
12-28-2013, 12:46 AM
0-2
Kill yourself.

ambchang
12-28-2013, 02:36 PM
Kill yourself.

On contraire, I am quite content as the lakers record without MVPau is proving what I had been saying for the last few years and the lakers, once the chief rival of the spurs are struggling without their best player for two games.

No need to commit suicide at all.

DMC
12-28-2013, 02:43 PM
shameful, i was rooting for them too :lol

That group does have some redeeming qualities. It's hard to root against them, seeing the obstacles they've had to overcome sitting there on the bench hugging the enemy before a Christmas Day loss like the beta he is.

Raven
12-28-2013, 03:07 PM
That group does have some redeeming qualities. It's hard to root against them, seeing the obstacles they've had to overcome sitting there on the bench hugging the enemy before a Christmas Day loss like the beta he is.

tbh i root for them to take that 9th seed and ruin their draft positioning :lol

DMC
12-28-2013, 03:10 PM
tbh i root for them to take that 9th seed and ruin their draft positioning :lol

I know what you mean (there are only 8 seeds) however I'd like to see them get the 1st overall pick and watch Kobe ruin his outlook on the NBA.

Thread
12-28-2013, 05:29 PM
sitting there on the bench hugging the enemy before a Christmas Day loss like the beta he is.

Kinda reminded one of Pop running around doing likewise after he had to give back 5.

tee, hee.

DMC
12-28-2013, 07:14 PM
Kinda reminded one of Pop running around doing likewise after he had to give back 5.

tee, hee.
It must be painful mustering up a fake laugh to support that overused schtick of yours, especially considering the state of your team.

Thread
12-28-2013, 07:29 PM
It must be painful mustering up a fake laugh to support that overused schtick of yours, especially considering the state of your team.

Like shaved pussy.

Deuce Bigalow
12-28-2013, 08:10 PM
Record since Cancer went out: 1-1(.500 > .333)

What is it now?

Deuce Bigalow
12-28-2013, 08:11 PM
I think he forgot which alt he was logged in to.
Who do you think my alt is?

AchillesHeel
12-29-2013, 04:16 AM
What is it now?

Lakers have been missing MVPau during the losses, so fuck off, fag.

HI-FI
12-29-2013, 04:38 AM
Kill yourself.

:lol
The Salt

LkrFan
12-29-2013, 04:51 AM
:lol
The Salt
N:lolt even. He's being disingenuous with this thread. Not only are we missing Pau, we're also missing Kobe, Nash, and Blake Mamba. Not that I'm worried (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=224936) though. ;)

BanditHiro
12-29-2013, 06:09 AM
Or even 6. tee, hee.

you can try as hard as you want to deflect but 6 hurt you as much as it did spurs fans

Duncan wins 5 and the media would still spin it that Kobe is the better player but a B2B championship run for LeBron killed any chance the media would spin the story that Kobe > LeBron.

irishock
12-29-2013, 06:35 AM
you can try as hard as you want to deflect but 6 hurt you as much as it did spurs fans

Duncan wins 5 and the media would still spin it that Kobe is the better player but a B2B championship run for LeBron killed any chance the media would spin the story that Kobe > LeBron.

Terrible take. Media still doesn't believe LeBron>Kobe but they would've jumped on Duncan>Kobe if the Spurs won.

Thread
12-29-2013, 07:52 AM
you can try as hard as you want to deflect but 6 hurt you as much as it did spurs fans

Duncan wins 5 and the media would still spin it that Kobe is the better player but a B2B championship run for LeBron killed any chance the media would spin the story that Kobe > LeBron.

:rolleyes

ambchang
12-29-2013, 09:43 AM
N:lolt even. He's being disingenuous with this thread. Not only are we missing Pau, we're also missing Kobe, Nash, and Blake Mamba. Not that I'm worried (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=224936) though. ;)

Lakers with Kobe = 2-4 so not having him actual helps.
Lakers didn't play a single game with Nash this season.
:lol lumping Blake with MVPau. I know you guys already acknowledged Blake/farmer > Kobe, but please don't lump MVPau with this turd group.

LkrFan
12-29-2013, 10:51 AM
Lakers with Kobe = 2-4 so not having him actual helps.
Lakers didn't play a single game with Nash this season.
:lol lumping Blake with MVPau. I know you guys already acknowledged Blake/farmer > Kobe, but please don't lump MVPau with this turd group.
I take it back. You're not just being disingenuous, you are flat out lying. SMH

ambchang
12-29-2013, 12:10 PM
I take it back. You're not just being disingenuous, you are flat out lying. SMH

My fault, but Lakers were 3-3 with Nash playing about 20 minutes a game, with a winshare of -0.059 per 48 minutes, or essentially neutral (ie not playing) when he's on the floor. Nash playing or not has minimal to no effects on the Lakers.

To break it down:
Lakers with Kobe: 2-4
Lakers with MVPau but without Kobe: 11-11
Lakers without MVPau: 0-2

Thread
12-29-2013, 12:13 PM
My fault, but Lakers were 3-3 with Nash playing about 20 minutes a game, with a winshare of -0.059 per 48 minutes, or essentially neutral (ie not playing) when he's on the floor. Nash playing or not has minimal to no effects on the Lakers.

To break it down:
Lakers with Kobe: 2-4
Lakers with MVPau but without Kobe: 11-11
Lakers without MVPau: 0-2

You were wrong, motherfucker!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

& you admitted it!

I'll be a son of a bitch!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

WOO HOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LF faced you up and broke your ass to the rim.

LF

ambchang
12-29-2013, 04:39 PM
You were wrong, motherfucker!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

& you admitted it!

I'll be a son of a bitch!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

WOO HOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LF faced you up and broke your ass to the rim.

LF

I do it all the time. What's the problem? You were the one who's wrong everytime and never admitted to it.

Thread
12-29-2013, 04:41 PM
I do it all the time. What's the problem?

Please.

spurraider21
12-30-2013, 12:02 AM
0-3

ambchang
12-30-2013, 01:36 PM
Wow. Even Kobe missing games can't offset the loss of MVPau.

Killakobe81
12-30-2013, 02:53 PM
My fault, but Lakers were 3-3 with Nash playing about 20 minutes a game, with a winshare of -0.059 per 48 minutes, or essentially neutral (ie not playing) when he's on the floor. Nash playing or not has minimal to no effects on the Lakers.

To break it down:
Lakers with Kobe: 2-4
Lakers with MVPau but without Kobe: 11-11
Lakers without MVPau: 0-2

So silly ...especially without factoring Blake who was playing better than any of the above tbh ...including kobe.
LOL 0-2 without Pau also means without Blake, Nash and Kobe ...

spurraider21
12-30-2013, 04:02 PM
this year lakerfans have essentially told us that blake + farmer > Kobe

ambchang
12-31-2013, 06:47 PM
So silly ...especially without factoring Blake who was playing better than any of the above tbh ...including kobe.
LOL 0-2 without Pau also means without Blake, Nash and Kobe ...

Nash is useless.
Kobe is 2-4
Blake is :lol.