Log in

View Full Version : Wendy Davis joins Greg Abbott in supporting ‘open carry’ gun law



elbamba
02-07-2014, 10:27 AM
http://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/state-politics/20140206-wendy-davis-joins-greg-abbott-in-supporting-open-carry-gun-law.ece

AUSTIN — The Wild West tradition of openly carrying your six-shooter on the street has long been banned in Texas under state law. But the next governor could change that.

Rising Democratic star and gubernatorial candidate Wendy Davis has joined her top Republican rival in supporting a proposed “open carry” law. It would allow people with concealed handgun licenses to wear a pistol on their hip, in full view, while in public.

Davis has said she supports expanding gun rights in Texas. In a statement to The Associated Press, she said that includes open-carry — a position that puts her at odds with her own party but could keep her from alienating gun rights advocates in a deeply conservative state where the Second Amendment is sacrosanct.

Davis’ position now aligns her with her Republican gubernatorial rival, Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott, marking her latest effort to eliminate it as a wedge issue in the campaign.

The state senator from Fort Worth said such a law should allow private property owners to determine whether weapons could be openly carried on their property. She also said background checks and training requirements would “help ensure that only mentally stable, law-abiding citizens may carry, whether concealed or open.”

But her party and influential Democratic colleagues, including a fellow state senator running for lieutenant governor, disagree.

“There is little or no public safety justification for open carry,” said Emmanuel Garcia, spokesman for the Texas Democratic Party.

Kellye Burke, who leads the Texas Chapter of Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, also opposes Davis’ position. She said the open carry of firearms, whether rifles or pistols, “is meant to be a sign of intimidation. It’s not about protection.”

“I don’t think people are aware of it. They just haven’t seen it yet. People are completely shocked how strange and lawless it looks to have that kind of firepower in our daily life,” Burke said.

History suggests that Davis’ position is a pragmatic one. Former Gov. Ann Richards, a Democrat, vetoed a concealed handgun measure, but Republican George W. Bush made it a major campaign issue when he defeated Richards for governor in 1994. Texas passed its concealed handgun law the next year.

Davis, who said she keeps a gun at her home for protection, supported legislation last year to allow college students with concealed handgun licenses to keep their weapons in their cars. She also voted for reduced training requirements to get such a license.

Still, gun rights advocates were skeptical. Texas State Rifle Association spokeswoman Alice Tripp noted Davis’ previous calls for more restrictions on gun show sales and past votes against allowing concealed license holders to carry their guns in classrooms and buildings on college campuses.

“Wendy Davis has a very bad record as far as gun owners go,” Tripp said, calling Davis an “opportunist.”

Abbott spokesman Adviel Huerta expressed a similar sentiment.

“Sen. Wendy Davis’ new pro-gun stance may help improve her low grade with the NRA, but it won’t help her (be) a straight shooter when it comes to the facts of her anti-gun record,” Huerta said, noting that Abbott supported an open-carry bill in the 2013 legislative session.

But veteran Democratic consultant Harold Cook said Abbott supporters have already tried to portray Davis as anti-gun.

“If the issue isn’t important to you, then it would be smart to take it off the table by saying, ‘Me, too; now let’s go back to talking about education and how we fund road building and the stuff the mainstream of Texas is really concerned with,“’ he said.

Open carry is specifically allowed in 17 states, according to the National Conference on State Legislatures. Many others leave it up to cities and counties to impose restrictions.

But laws in five states — including Texas — and Washington, D.C. specifically prohibit open carry of handguns, according to the gun rights advocacy group OpenCarry.org.

Texas does allow open carry of long firearms, such as rifles and shotguns, with virtually no restrictions. In recent months, rifle-toting Second Amendment advocates have held public demonstrations at the Alamo in San Antonio and near the Capitol in Austin.

Texas has about 600,000 concealed handgun license holders, who must be at least 21, pass criminal background checks and go through a training course. In 2013, state lawmakers relaxed the training requirements, reducing the minimum time required for classroom and shooting range instruction from 10 to 15 hours to four to six hours.

Trainwreck2100
02-07-2014, 01:37 PM
no surprise abortion barbie supports ways to kill your child however


Rising Democratic star and gubernatorial candidate Wendy Davis has joined her top Republican rival in supporting a proposed “open carry” law. It would allow people with concealed handgun licenses to wear a pistol on their hip, in full view, while in public.




The state senator from Fort Worth said such a law should allow private property owners to determine whether weapons could be openly carried on their property.

one part of the article says public and one says she supports on private property

TSA
02-07-2014, 02:46 PM
one part of the article says public and one says she supports on private property

I read it as she supports it in public/public property and supports giving business owners/private property the choice of whether or not they want to allow it.

Winehole23
02-08-2014, 02:12 AM
is that substantially different than what Mr. Abbott is for?

Winehole23
02-08-2014, 02:13 AM
(honest question. don't know.)

elbamba
02-10-2014, 03:54 PM
(honest question. don't know.)

No. Not really. I think the only difference when it comes to guns is that Davis wants stronger restrictions and regulations to gun show sales. Someone who pays attention might be able to chime in with more detail.

SnakeBoy
02-10-2014, 04:41 PM
is that substantially different than what Mr. Abbott is for?

You mean other than Mr. Abbot actually being for it and not just taking the position for campaign purposes?

baseline bum
02-10-2014, 05:13 PM
You mean other than Mr. Abbot actually being for it and not just taking the position for campaign purposes?

Abbott, the principled politician?

boutons_deux
02-10-2014, 05:17 PM
Abbott, the principled politician?

Doesn Abbot STAND for anything?

baseline bum
02-10-2014, 05:19 PM
Doesn Abbot STAND for anything?

Haha, nigga's paralyzed son!!

boutons_deux
02-10-2014, 05:41 PM
Haha, nigga's paralyzed son!!

sorry to hear that. I wouldn't want to walk a mile in his shoes

Winehole23
02-11-2014, 03:12 PM
You mean other than Mr. Abbot actually being for it and not just taking the position for campaign purposes?you know the intent of the candidates how? just curious.

elbamba
02-11-2014, 03:50 PM
you know the intent of the candidates how? just curious.

I confess that my general skepticism of politicians makes me inclined to believe that it is nothing more than a political promise that will be broken once she is in office. I would imagine that her understanding would "evolve" on the issue.

baseline bum
02-11-2014, 05:05 PM
I confess that my general skepticism of politicians makes me inclined to believe that it is nothing more than a political promise that will be broken once she is in office. I would imagine that her understanding would "evolve" on the issue.

Why? You don't think she'd want to get reelected?

Nbadan
02-11-2014, 09:57 PM
Wendy Davis says she supports medical marijuana
Source: ASSOCIATED PRESS


DALLAS (AP) — Democratic candidate for Texas governor Wendy Davis says she supports the use of medical marijuana and would consider decriminalizing possession of small amounts of the substance.

She explained her position Tuesday to the Dallas Morning News editorial board (http://dallasne.ws/1ju8T0p).

Davis told editors that Texas should learn from the experiences of other states when considering revamping drug laws. According to a transcript of the interview, Davis said she’s not sure how she would vote if Texas had a referendum on legalizing marijuana like the ones held in Washington and Colorado.

Gov. Rick Perry has said he supports decriminalizing possession of small amounts of marijuana, partially because the state is trying to keep non-violent offenders out of prisons. He opposes legalizing the drug and would continue to make selling it illegal.

###

Read more: http://www.salon.com/2014/02/12/wendy_davis_says_she_supports_medical_marijuana/

Nbadan
02-12-2014, 10:31 PM
Meeting Wendy Davis tomorrow..any advice forum-bots?

spursncowboys
02-13-2014, 09:03 AM
Meeting Wendy Davis tomorrow..any advice forum-bots?
Ask her about NFL in San Antonio.

Nbadan
02-13-2014, 08:53 PM
the NFL in SA....Lol....it was nice..gotta tell ya...her, Mayor Castro and his bro are the pathway to a blue Texas...time is running out......

Winehole23
08-13-2014, 02:41 AM
Abbott spokeswoman Lauren Bean said the state has already appealed the court decision awarding Wendy Davis’ lawyers more than $260,0oo in fees.

“We are pleased that Plaintiff Davis’ original request for $616,000 in attorneys’ fees has now been reduced to $267,000, and that multiple inappropriate fee requests have been denied,” Bean said in a statement. “We are also pleased that LULAC’s request for $99,000 has been reduced to $93,000. However, we do not believe the plaintiffs are eligible for attorney fees at all and have therefore filed a notice of appeal.”

http://blog.mysanantonio.com/texas-politics/2014/01/court-awards-davis-lawyers-more-than-260k-in-redistricting-fight-with-abbott/

boutons_deux
08-13-2014, 05:26 AM
http://blog.mysanantonio.com/texas-politics/2014/01/court-awards-davis-lawyers-more-than-260k-in-redistricting-fight-with-abbott/

voter suppression, insane gerrymandering! What's not to love about Repugs' Love For Democracy and their hellish, low-wage, low-education, debt-default red states?

Could voter ID law tilt North Carolina Senate race? Foes decry judge's ruling

Lawyers seeking to block a voter identification law in North Carolina (http://www.csmonitor.com/tags/topic/North+Carolina) expressed disappointment Monday at the recent ruling by a federal judge in Winston-Salem that upheld the ID law and other restrictions for the November election.

The North Carolina election is being closely watched in part because of the tight race between incumbent US (http://www.csmonitor.com/tags/topic/United+States) Sen. Kay Hagan and her Republican challenger, Thom Tillis.

The outcome could tip the balance of power in the US Senate in favor of one party or the other. Thus, any factor that might influence voting is under intense scrutiny.

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2014/0811/Could-voter-ID-law-tilt-North-Carolina-Senate-race-Foes-decry-judge-s-ruling-video

97 Year-Old Woman Denied The Right To Vote Because Of Voter ID

Last Tuesday, Beth Hiller, a 97 year-old nursing home resident from Topeka, Kansas, boarded a shuttle along with several other residents of the nursing home’s health care unit. It was a difficult process for many of the residents, who had limited mobility and depended on wheelchairs or walkers in order to move around. Yet Hiller and her fellow residents also boarded that shuttle intending to exercise one of their most important rights as citizens — the shuttle was there to take them to a nearby polling place so that they could vote in a primary election.

When Hiller arrived at the polls, however, she was told that she could not exercise her right to vote after all (http://m.cjonline.com/news/2014-08-08/topeka-seniors-shut-out-primary-id-law-poll-worker#gsc.tab=0). Hiller was turned away because she did not have a photo ID, and Kansas has a strict voter ID law that disenfranchises voters without identification.

Indeed, Kansas’ voter ID law is so strict that it even prohibits voters from casting an absentee ballot unless they have ID (http://www.brennancenter.org/analysis/voter-id-laws-passed-2011).

To add insult to injury, Hiller was also denied the opportunity to cast a provisional ballot, something she is entitled to do even under the state’s voter ID law, although it is doubtful that it would have made much of a difference if she had cast a provisional vote.

Under Kansas’ voter ID law, a voter who casts a provisional ballot because they lack photo ID must still show up at the local election office with identification before their ballot can be counted (http://watchdog.org/37047/ks-kris-kobach-discusses-voter-photo-id-in-kansas/).

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2014/08/11/3469626/97-year-old-woman-denied-the-right-to-vote-because-of-voter-id/