PDA

View Full Version : NBA: Kobe/Duncan 4th quarter stats in Lakers/Spurs playoff series



Deuce Bigalow
03-21-2014, 02:59 PM
4TH QUARTER STATS

1999 Lakers/Spurs series

Kobe: 6.5 ppg on 41/43/63
Duncan: 4.0 ppg on 63/0/60

2001 Lakers/Spurs series

Kobe: 9.8 ppg on 47/33/100 (tel:47/33/100)
Duncan: 4.5 ppg on 39/100/78 (tel:39/100/78)

2002 Spurs/Lakers series

Kobe: 9.2 ppg on 60/40/67
Duncan: 6.2 ppg on 38/50/57

2003 Lakers/Spurs series

Kobe: 9.0 ppg on 40/35/88
Duncan: 5.6 ppg on 30/0/78

2004 Lakers/Spurs series

Kobe: 7.3 ppg on 44/20/72
Duncan: 5.5 ppg on 55/0/75

2008 Lakers/Spurs series

Kobe: 10.2 ppg on 54/56/86
Duncan: 5.8 ppg on 39/0/75

Source: http://stats.nba.com/leaguePlayerGeneral.html?pageNo=1&rowsPerPage=25&SeasonType=Playoffs&Season=2007-08&columnOrder=&MeasureType=Base&PerMode=PerGame&sortField=PTS&sortOrder=DES&filters=&Period=4&OpponentTeamID=1610612759

Arcadian
03-21-2014, 03:18 PM
:lol 22-45

Deuce Bigalow
03-21-2014, 03:31 PM
:lol 22-45
No championships this decade :lol

6 :lol

Joseph Kony
03-21-2014, 03:34 PM
:lol "this decade"
:lol arbitrary starting point
:lol irrelevant team

Clipper Nation
03-21-2014, 03:35 PM
Speaking of Kirby in the 4th:

http://i.imgur.com/zmtLyQj.png
:lol 23%

http://swishnba.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/photo.jpg?w=300&h=300
:lol Supposed top-6 player bailed out by MVPau two straight years

Deuce Bigalow
03-21-2014, 03:37 PM
:lol "this decade"
:lol arbitrary starting point
:lol irrelevant team
:lol 0 championships this decade
:lol no back to back championships in any decade
:lol no back to back finals either
:lol 6 6 6
:lol 5>4
:lol everything is arbitrary or cherrypicking that doesn't fit your agenda

Deuce Bigalow
03-21-2014, 03:40 PM
Speaking of Kirby in the 4th:

http://i.imgur.com/zmtLyQj.png
:lol 23%

http://swishnba.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/photo.jpg?w=300&h=300
:lol Supposed top-6 player bailed out by MVPau two straight years
Kobe was still the leading scoring in the 4th quarters :lol

Clipper Nation
03-21-2014, 03:41 PM
Kobe was still the leading scoring in the 4th quarters :lol

When he's chucking that many shots, he'd better be the leading scorer :lol

30% and 29% :lol

Arcadian
03-21-2014, 03:48 PM
No championships this decade :lol

6 :lol

:lol Laker fans having nothing left to talk about except the past because they're fucked in the present

Deuce Bigalow
03-21-2014, 03:50 PM
:lol Laker fans having nothing left to talk about except the past because they're fucked in the present
Congratulations on your regular season dominance. Spurs are regular season champs :lol

Kool Bob Love
03-21-2014, 03:52 PM
Congratulations on your regular season dominance. Spurs are regular season champs :lol

How's kobe gonna do tonight?

Joseph Kony
03-21-2014, 03:54 PM
:lol 0 championships this decade
:lol no back to back championships in any decade
:lol no back to back finals either
:lol 6 6 6
:lol 5>4
:lol everything is arbitrary or cherrypicking that doesn't fit your agenda

Example A that Lakerfan is terrified of Duncan ringing this season

Deuce Bigalow
03-21-2014, 03:58 PM
How's kobe gonna do tonight?
How's Duncan? Putting up mediocre numbers his entire career.

Deuce Bigalow
03-21-2014, 03:59 PM
Example A that Lakerfan is terrified of Duncan ringing this season
#1 seed 3 years in a row and.....0 titles :lol

Deuce Bigalow
03-21-2014, 03:59 PM
"I think about game 6 every day" :lol

Bruce Wayne
03-21-2014, 04:04 PM
:lol 0 championships this decade
:lol no back to back championships in any decade
:lol no back to back finals either
:lol 6 6 6
:lol 5>4
:lol everything is arbitrary or cherrypicking that doesn't fit your agenda
You know the Lakers lack a championship this decade too right?

Kool Bob Love
03-21-2014, 04:05 PM
How's Duncan? Putting up mediocre numbers his entire career.

Yeah Duncan playing tonight. Is kobe?

Deuce Bigalow
03-21-2014, 04:10 PM
You know the Lakers lack a championship this decade too right?
2010 championship was won on June 17, 2010. The one that broke the camels back.

http://cdn.necolebitchie.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/kobe-crying1.jpg

Deuce Bigalow
03-21-2014, 04:13 PM
Yeah Duncan playing tonight. Is kobe?
Pau's playing and averaging 18/10/3, basically a Duncan like year.

Bruce Wayne
03-21-2014, 04:23 PM
2010 championship was won on June 17, 2010. The one that broke the camels back.

http://cdn.necolebitchie.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/kobe-crying1.jpg
:lol you realize that's not part of THIS decade? Or do you not know what a decade is?

Clipper Nation
03-21-2014, 04:25 PM
2010 championship was won on June 17, 2010. The one that broke the camels back.

http://cdn.necolebitchie.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/kobe-crying1.jpg
There was no year zero, so the decade started in 2011, dumbass :lol

Arcadian
03-21-2014, 04:26 PM
Congratulations on your regular season dominance. Spurs are regular season champs:lol

Thank you. Was this supposed to be an underhanded compliment? :lol It's a lot better than not being dominant in the regular season.


How's Duncan? Putting up mediocre numbers his entire career.

Duncan was a superstar the moment he stepped onto NBA hardwood. He was an MVP candidate his first two seasons. What was Kobe doing his first two seasons?

Deuce Bigalow
03-21-2014, 04:31 PM
you realize that's not part of THIS decade? Or do you not know what a decade is?

There was no year zero, so the decade started in 2011, dumbass :lol
http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/4ce_1.gif

FromWayDowntown
03-21-2014, 04:32 PM
Check out how insecure I am about the historical legacy of my favorite player!

Clipper Nation
03-21-2014, 04:34 PM
http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/4ce_1.gif

You accuse others of cherrypicking to fit an agenda, yet you misinterpret the calendar on purpose to fit your agenda :lol

Deuce Bigalow
03-21-2014, 04:36 PM
The 2000s, usually pronounced "two thousands",[citation needed] was a decade that began on January 1, 2000, and ended on December 31, 2009.

The decade generally continued the technological and socioeconomic changes that started in the 1980s and accelerated in the 1990s. These changes had ended during the Great Recession. Globalization had accelerated in the 1990s after the fall of Communism and continued to be a force in the 2000s. Geopolitically, the century opened with the United States enjoying an economic peak that bestowed hegemonic political and military preeminence.


The growth of the Internet was one of the prime contributors to globalization during the decade, making it possible for people to interact with other people, express ideas, introduce others to different cultures and backgrounds, use goods and services, sell and buy online, and research and learn.[1][2][3][4][5]


The economic growth of the 2000s had considerable environmental consequences, raised demand for diminishing energy resources,[6][7] and was still shown to be vulnerable as demonstrated during the Global Financial Crisis of the late 2000s.[8]
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000s_(decade)


The 2010s, pronounced "twenty-tens"[1] or "two thousand (and) tens",[2][3][4][5] is the current decade, which began on January 1, 2010, and will end on December 31, 2019.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010s

Clipper Nation
03-21-2014, 04:38 PM
There Was No Year Zero
Simple logic and the ability to count will tell you when a new decade or millennium begins and end. A decade is ten years. Since there was no year zero, ten years is year 1 to 10 and a new decade starts at year 11. In other words, the last decade was 2001 to 2010. We are heading into the end of the decade, not the start of new one.

whitemamba
03-21-2014, 04:39 PM
Deuce bitch slapping 0 Per par :lol

Sybok
03-21-2014, 04:47 PM
Those are only offensive stats.

Bruce Wayne
03-21-2014, 04:47 PM
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000s_(decade)


http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010s
Because the common calendar starts with year 1, its first full decade is the years 1 to 10, the second decade from 11 to 20, and so on.[5] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decade#cite_note-5) So while the "2000s" comprises the years 2000 to 2009, the "201st decade" spans 2001 to 2010.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decade

Clipper Nation
03-21-2014, 04:49 PM
Those are only offensive stats.

Much like his idol Kirby, all Statfag cares about is scoring, that's well-established :lol

Deuce Bigalow
03-21-2014, 04:51 PM
:lol Spurs haven't won a championship in the 2010s

Sybok
03-21-2014, 04:55 PM
There Was No Year Zero
Simple logic and the ability to count will tell you when a new decade or millennium begins and end. A decade is ten years. Since there was no year zero, ten years is year 1 to 10 and a new decade starts at year 11. In other words, the last decade was 2001 to 2010. We are heading into the end of the decade, not the start of new one.

There's a problem in using different terminology; saying "in the 2000s" is saying 2000 - 2009, but saying "that decade" is saying 2001 - 2010. So, if you consider a "player of the decade" in Jordan's heyday comment, technically you're referring to the years of 1991 - 2001, however if you say "best player of the 90's" you're talking about 1990 to 1999.

Sybok
03-21-2014, 04:58 PM
:lol Spurs haven't won a championship in the 2010s

We're less than 4 years in, douche nigalow.

Bruce Wayne
03-21-2014, 04:58 PM
:lol Spurs haven't won a championship in the 2010s
The Current decade started in 2011, dipshit.

Deuce Bigalow
03-21-2014, 04:58 PM
Those are only offensive stats.
Dat Duncan defense doe

qv_wKwanldc

Deuce Bigalow
03-21-2014, 04:59 PM
The Current decade started in 2011, dipshit.
2010s started in 2010

Bruce Wayne
03-21-2014, 05:00 PM
2010s started in 2010
There is no 2010s, there is ONE 2010.. :lol

Sybok
03-21-2014, 05:00 PM
Dat Duncan defense doe

qv_wKwanldc

It must really hurt to know you're not only going to miss the playoffs again, but that the reward for doing so will be insufficient to change your path for next season as well. You need to bring your A game here, son, you don't have any room for error.

Deuce Bigalow
03-21-2014, 05:01 PM
There is no 2010s, there is ONE 2010 :lol
:lol Spurs 0 championships in the '10s

Happy now Batman? :lol

Deuce Bigalow
03-21-2014, 05:05 PM
It must really hurt to know you're not only going to miss the playoffs again, but that the reward for doing so will be insufficient to change your path for next season as well. You need to bring your A game here, son, you don't have any room for error.
I've lost interest in the Lakers right now so its like do I care? Once next year comes and Kobe's back then I'll care again.

Clipper Nation
03-21-2014, 05:08 PM
I've lost interest in the Lakers right now so its like do I care? Once next year comes and Kobe's back then I'll care again.
http://i.imgur.com/Km7PVyV.png

Deuce Bigalow
03-21-2014, 05:12 PM
http://i.imgur.com/Km7PVyV.png
Im a Kobe fan 0

Deuce Bigalow
03-21-2014, 06:53 PM
So no spurfan is gonna address this? All I see is deflection :lol

They can dish it but they cant take it.

Sybok
03-22-2014, 12:35 AM
I've lost interest in the Lakers right now so its like do I care? Once next year comes and Kobe's back then I'll care again.

It still says "Lakers" under your user name, and you still push "Kobe" like you're one of his mistresses. You're still liable.

spurraider21
03-22-2014, 01:17 AM
Kobe is one of the greatest volume scorers in nba history nobody ever denied that. Not sure why OP is so defensive about it

ambchang
03-22-2014, 06:59 AM
4TH QUARTER STATS

1999 Lakers/Spurs series

Kobe: 6.5 ppg on 41/43/63
Duncan: 4.0 ppg on 63/0/60

2001 Lakers/Spurs series

Kobe: 9.8 ppg on 47/33/100 (tel:47/33/100)
Duncan: 4.5 ppg on 39/100/78 (tel:39/100/78)

2002 Spurs/Lakers series

Kobe: 9.2 ppg on 60/40/67
Duncan: 6.2 ppg on 38/50/57

2003 Lakers/Spurs series

Kobe: 9.0 ppg on 40/35/88
Duncan: 5.6 ppg on 30/0/78

2004 Lakers/Spurs series

Kobe: 7.3 ppg on 44/20/72
Duncan: 5.5 ppg on 55/0/75

2008 Lakers/Spurs series

Kobe: 10.2 ppg on 54/56/86
Duncan: 5.8 ppg on 39/0/75

A) source please. Not like you've never posted wrong stats
B) so Kobe scored more than Duncan. Is that some kind of surprise? It's like Duncan has more 4th quarter rebounds than Kobe. It's retarded.
C) Duncan was always the focus of the defense, especially the 4th. Kobe's but a receipient of shaq double teams.

Michael Jordan.
03-22-2014, 08:10 AM
^Shaq was triple teamed too. Making things that much easier for Kobe.

Deuce Bigalow
03-22-2014, 12:29 PM
A) source please. Not like you've never posted wrong stats
B) so Kobe scored more than Duncan. Is that some kind of surprise? It's like Duncan has more 4th quarter rebounds than Kobe. It's retarded.
C) Duncan was always the focus of the defense, especially the 4th. Kobe's but a receipient of shaq double teams.
http://stats.nba.com/leaguePlayerGeneral.html?pageNo=1&rowsPerPage=25

Choose the fillers.

Kobe outscored Duncan by a lot though and was more efficient. It wasn't even close for most. Don't act like it doesn't matter.

Kobe wasn't just a recipient of Shaq double teams but its funny that you say that because the biggest difference between the two was the 2008 series with no Shaq.

01Snake
03-22-2014, 12:32 PM
The Kobe dick sucking by the OP is amusing

Deuce Bigalow
03-22-2014, 12:33 PM
Here's the '08 series

http://stats.nba.com/leaguePlayerGeneral.html?pageNo=1&rowsPerPage=25&SeasonType=Playoffs&Season=2007-08&columnOrder=&MeasureType=Base&PerMode=PerGame&sortField=PTS&sortOrder=DES&filters=&Period=4&OpponentTeamID=1610612759 (http://stats.nba.com/leaguePlayerGeneral.html?pageNo=1&rowsPerPage=25&SeasonType=Playoffs&Season=2007-08&columnOrder=&MeasureType=Base&PerMode=PerGame&sortField=PTS&sortOrder=DES&filters=&Period=4&OpponentTeamID=1610612759)

http://stats.nba.com/leaguePlayerGeneral.html?pageNo=1&rowsPerPage=25&SeasonType=Playoffs&Season=2007-08&columnOrder=&MeasureType=Base&PerMode=PerGame&sortField=PTS&sortOrder=DES&filters=&Period=4&OpponentTeamID=1610612747

Wiz
03-22-2014, 12:36 PM
What about rebounds, assists, blocks, steals, points in the final 2 minute, etc.

Deuce Bigalow
03-22-2014, 12:46 PM
What about rebounds, assists, blocks, steals, points in the final 2 minute, etc.
You can find those stats with the link I gave. Player clutch section has stats under 30 sec - under 5 minute within 0-5 points.

Wiz
03-22-2014, 12:49 PM
You can find those stats with the link I gave. Player clutch section has stats under 30 sec - under 5 minute within 0-5 points.bean is shooting under 30% in the final 10 seconds

Deuce Bigalow
03-22-2014, 12:52 PM
bean is shooting under 30% in the final 10 seconds
Tim seems to shoot close to that in entire 4th quarters vs the Lakers in the playoffs tbh. 39% in 01, 38% in 02, 30% in 03, and 39% in 08. And he's a big man lol

Clipper Nation
03-22-2014, 12:53 PM
bean is shooting under 30% in the final 10 seconds
:cry But, but, look at his points! Points are all that matters! :cry

Wiz
03-22-2014, 12:54 PM
Tim seems to shoot close to that in entire 4th quarters vs the Lakers in the playoffs tbhKobe is shooting that in every playoff game, so what's your point?

Wiz
03-22-2014, 12:55 PM
:cry But, but, look at his points! Points are all that matters! :crypoints don't mean shit if you cant make the last shot

Deuce Bigalow
03-22-2014, 12:58 PM
points don't mean shit if you cant make the last shot
Kobe hit 2 gamewinners vs San antonio in the playoffs. Duncan has none.

Wiz
03-22-2014, 01:00 PM
Kobe hit 2 gamewinners vs San antonio in the playoffs. Duncan has none.
Fisher has hit 1 game winner vs San Antonio, Fisher > Duncan

Deuce Bigalow
03-22-2014, 01:12 PM
Fisher has hit 1 game winner vs San Antonio, Fisher > Duncan
You just said points dont matter if you dont hit the last shot...

Goddamn spurfan is retarded :lol

ambchang
03-22-2014, 06:35 PM
http://stats.nba.com/leaguePlayerGeneral.html?pageNo=1&rowsPerPage=25

Choose the fillers.

Kobe outscored Duncan by a lot though and was more efficient. It wasn't even close for most. Don't act like it doesn't matter.

Kobe wasn't just a recipient of Shaq double teams but its funny that you say that because the biggest difference between the two was the 2008 series with no Shaq.

Good tool.

Duncan out rebounded and blocked Kobe a lot too, whats your point?

And :lol Kobe's assists average
0.8 in 99
1.3 in 01
1.6 in 02 (great actually. more than 6 a game)
0.8 in 03 (actually decent)
0.5 in 04
0.2 in 08

Now look at Duncan's:
1 in 99
0.5 in 01
1.8 in 02
1.8 in 03
0.7 in 04
1.3 in 08

:lol Getting out assisted by a PF 5 out of 6 years.
:lol more evidence Kobe was left opened/singled and Duncan was doubled/tripled.

The Third Man
03-22-2014, 10:42 PM
Deuce: it's over. You may as well post George Mikan stats.