36,000 Criminals released...

[Red Hawk #21]

http://americanandproud.net/36k-criminals-released/
http://www.wnd.com/2014/05/release-of-36000-criminal-illegals-impeachable-offense/
dWITafmqkPc

Thoughts?

[cantthinkofanything]

http://cdn.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/2013/02/06/082843/83074105/thankbama.jpg

[m>s]

fucking n1gg3r still isn't impeached?

[Franklin]

Release the criminals and let them cause more harm to civilians so more people will buy obamacare.

[Red Hawk #21]

Further, “the 36,007 convicted criminal aliens freed from ICE custody in many instances had multiple convictions. Among them, the 36,007 had nearly 88,000 convictions,” according to the Center for Immigration Studies.

Here’s a breakdown of some of the 88,000 convictions:

193 homicide convictions (including one willful killing of a public official with gun)
426 sexual assault convictions
303 kidnapping convictions
1,075 aggravated assault convictions
1,160 stolen vehicle convictions
9,187 dangerous drug convictions
16,070 drunk or drugged driving convictions
303 flight escape convictions

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/05/14/report-says-obama-admin-released-36k-criminal-illegal-aliens-in-2013/

Obama should be impeached for treason.

[ChumpDumper]

How many of the releases were court ordered?

[Red Hawk #21]

How many of the releases were court ordered?

ICE said 75 percent of the convicted murderers released in 2013 were considered “mandatory releases” in compliance with court decisions.
http://www.ijreview.com/2014/05/138124-feds-released-36000-illegal-alien-murderers-drunk-drivers-sex-crime-convicts-think-cool/

[ChumpDumper]

Hm, so Obama didn't release a large percentage of those numbers cited?

OK.

[Red Hawk #21]

Hm, so Obama didn't release a large percentage of those numbers cited?

OK.

That makes it all better, tbh :toast

[ChumpDumper]

That makes it all better, tbh :toastThat makes the linked articles completely inaccurate tbh :toast

[Red Hawk #21]

That makes the linked articles completely inaccurate tbh :toast

I honestly don't understand your argument here. Are you saying that somehow the Obama administration shouldn't be blamed for this release of criminal illegal aliens?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

I honestly don't understand your argument here. Are you saying that somehow the Obama administration shouldn't be blamed for this release of criminal illegal aliens?

I am going to assume that you at least went to high school. That you think this speaks very poorly of you and the school that you went to.

The executive branch is required to _________ court orders handed down by the judicial branch.

[ChumpDumper]

I honestly don't understand your argument here. Are you saying that somehow the Obama administration shouldn't be blamed for this release of criminal illegal aliens?You honestly don't understand a lot of things.


What do you honestly think "75 percent of the convicted murderers released in 2013 were considered “mandatory releases” in compliance with court decisions" means?

[Red Hawk #21]

You honestly don't understand a lot of things.


What do you honestly think "75 percent of the convicted murderers released in 2013 were considered “mandatory releases” in compliance with court decisions" means?

It means that the other 25% were released based on "discretion". It also means that somehow individuals who have committed serious offenses (Homicide, Rape, Grand Larceny) are being let go scot-free, even though as an American I would have served a lengthy prison sentence for any of those offenses. Yes, I understand that these criminals cannot be held indefinitely (Zadvydas v. Davis) but I don't understand why I would have to explain how it is problematic for these individuals to be allowed to roam the streets once again.

[ChumpDumper]

It means that the other 25% were released based on "discretion". It also means that somehow individuals who have committed serious offenses (Homicide, Rape, Grand Larceny) are being let go scot-free, even though as an American I would have served a lengthy prison sentence for any of those offenses. Yes, I understand that these criminals cannot be held indefinitely (Zadvydas v. Davis) but I don't understand why I would have to explain how it is problematic for these individuals to be allowed to roam the streets once again.So you agree the linked articles were completely inaccurate.

:tu

[Red Hawk #21]

So you agree the linked articles were completely inaccurate.

:tu

Perhaps you could copy and paste what was inaccurate about them?

[ChumpDumper]

Perhaps you could copy and paste what was inaccurate about them?The characterization that all the releases were the result of a conscious policy decision by Obama is grossly inaccurate.

Thanks for proving that with a quote. :tu

[Red Hawk #21]

The characterization that all the releases were the result of a conscious policy decision by Obama is grossly inaccurate.

Thanks for proving that with a quote. :tu

None of the articles I posted said anything about Obama making "A conscious policy decision". The articles I posted blamed the Obama administration for allowing a staggering amount of criminals to be released back into the public. :toast

[ChumpDumper]

None of the articles I posted said anything about Obama making "A conscious policy decision". The articles I posted blamed the Obama administration for allowing a staggering amount of criminals to be released back into the public. :toastIt's much less staggering when you take away the majority of those released, isn't it?

Do some comparison for me. How many similar releases happened under the Bush administration?

Show me just how outraged I should be and why I shuold not have been outraged for any reason before January 2009. :toast

[Red Hawk #21]

It's much less staggering when you take away the majority of those released, isn't it?

Do some comparison for me. How many similar releases happened under the Bush administration?

Show me just how outraged I should be and why I shuold not have been outraged for any reason before January 2009. :toast

You make great points tbh. There's no problem with these releases. Thank you for clarifying this. :toast

[ChumpDumper]

You make great points tbh. There's no problem with these releases. Thank you for clarifying this. :toastI accept your evasion as a surrender. :toast

[Red Hawk #21]

I accept your evasion as a surrender. :toast

Thanks for proving how those articles were "completely inaccurate", tbh. :)

[ChumpDumper]

Thanks for proving how those articles were "completely inaccurate", tbh. :)You did that for me tbh. :)

Thanks again!

[Red Hawk #21]

You did that for me tbh. :)

Thanks again!

But none of the articles I posted said anything about a "conscious policy decision" made by Obama. :toast

[ChumpDumper]

But none of the articles I posted said anything about a "conscious policy decision" made by Obama. :toastSo you also don't understand the word "characterization" either. :toast

How many criminals were similarly released by ICE during the Bush administration?

[Red Hawk #21]

So you also don't understand the word "characterization" either. :toast



So you agree the linked articles were completely inaccurate.

:tu

You're backtracking.

[ChumpDumper]

Well, a partial answer can be found here.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/07/us/more-deportations-follow-minor-crimes-data-shows.html?_r=0

Obama has deported more criminals than Bush. Should you have been outraged back then at Bush? Do you think he should have been impeached for that?

[ChumpDumper]

I'm just trying to get a baseline of outrage here.

I think all the felons should be deported when possible.

[Biernutz]

So you also don't understand the word "characterization" either. :toast

How many criminals were similarly released by ICE during the Bush administration?

I'll bite,,,,How many did Bush let go in 8 years?

[ChumpDumper]

I'll bite,,,,How many did Bush let go in 8 years?That's what I want to know.

I want to distribute my outrage fairly.

The Center for Immigration Studies doesn't seem to have studied it.

[TDMVPDPOY]

crims released into the wild...

just decreasing the states taxes looking after these clowns nothing to see here, they just allocate those funds to another wasteful project

[cantthinkofanything]

That's what I want to know.

I want to distribute my outrage fairly.

The Center for Immigration Studies doesn't seem to have studied it.

7. Bush released 7. But of those 7, only one went on to commit another crime. And it was jaywalking.

[RandomGuy]

Classic Chumpness.

It is always interesting to get at the sheer silliness of the hysterical anti-Obama crowd.

Not that I am any huge fan, but sheesh.

[The Reckoning]

they need to release the pot offenders first