PDA

View Full Version : lol Uruguay



urunobili
05-22-2014, 11:00 AM
Suarez injured in the very last minute of the last game of the EPL: http://www.ovaciondigital.com.uy/mundial/falta-suarez-que-le-lesiono.html

Liverpool didn't realize because he went to rest...

Now in doubt for return...

Uruguay out in the group stage now...

lefty
05-22-2014, 11:08 AM
:cry Son, congrats on our EPL title

urunobili
05-22-2014, 11:18 AM
:cry Son, congrats on our EPL title

EPL? Who cares dude... we're talking about the World Cup old sport! :depressed

lefty
05-22-2014, 11:44 AM
EPL? Who cares dude... we're talking about the World Cup old sport! :depressed
If it makes you feel any better, Algeria at full streegth still sucks :lol

urunobili
05-22-2014, 01:24 PM
If it makes you feel any better, Algeria at full streegth still sucks :lol

Alwhat? :stirpot:

urunobili
05-22-2014, 01:24 PM
http://www.espnfc.com/blog/_/name/worldcupcentral/id/4557?cc=5901

lefty
05-22-2014, 01:49 PM
Alwhat? :stirpot:
The team that beat Uruguay in a friendly before the 2010 WC :D

Relevancy
05-22-2014, 04:43 PM
Na he will play, but an injury specially a few weeks ago from the WC is no good, he qont be 100% probably

Venti Quattro
05-22-2014, 04:54 PM
:lmao Pooruguay

Relevancy
05-22-2014, 05:36 PM
:lmao

urunobili
05-31-2014, 11:24 AM
Suarez Made the 23 man roster...

Muser
06-01-2014, 07:45 AM
Even is he isn't back you should beat England and Costa Rica.

Blizzardwizard
06-01-2014, 07:56 AM
Even is he isn't back you will beat England and Costa Rica.

Fixed.

Muser
06-01-2014, 08:02 AM
No, it's not a certainty that Uruguay will beat England. They're heavy favorites I agree but to say England don't have any chance is incorrect.

urunobili
06-01-2014, 09:19 PM
I'm not sure Uruguay will defeat either England or Italy. If they don't win against Costa Rica their chances are not great...

urunobili
06-14-2014, 04:00 PM
; If they don't win against Costa Rica their chances are not great...

lol Tabarez
lol Forlan
lol Defense
lol Godin
lol 1-3 to Costa Rica
lol Midfield
lol out in the group stage
lol thinking they had chances to win it all



:depressed

in2deep
06-14-2014, 05:10 PM
karma is a bitch. And the racist Suarez is reaping the fruits of the handball and racist stunts :lmao

these niggs shud just go home today and save the embarrasment of the next games :lol

Manu'sMagicalLeftHand
06-15-2014, 01:22 PM
Sorry to kick you when you're down urunobili, but I stumbled across this. Previously unseen footage of the Maracanazo.

http://i.minus.com/ibbcQZer7Ye88H.gif

ElNono
06-15-2014, 03:29 PM
Feel bad for Uruguay, even though they've been overachieving in the last couple of World Cups, IMO...

My grandma on the father side was actually from Uruguay...

ManuLoco
06-15-2014, 03:58 PM
Sorry to kick you when you're down urunobili, but I stumbled across this. Previously unseen footage of the Maracanazo.

http://i.minus.com/ibbcQZer7Ye88H.gif

lol at Uruguay winning their last world cup when there were still dinosaurs on planet earth. Or is that Godzilla?

Venti Quattro
06-15-2014, 04:09 PM
:lol Uruguay

They won their last world Cup before Hitler took over the world

hater
06-15-2014, 04:25 PM
I heard they won the cup when it was used to be played with porkskin balls :lmao

ElNono
06-15-2014, 04:31 PM
^ that's actually accurate, IIRC :lol

Venti Quattro
06-15-2014, 04:31 PM
I heard they won the cup when it was used to be played with porkskin balls :lmao
They won the World Cup before the NBA and the United Nations were formed :lmao

dfens
06-15-2014, 04:40 PM
They won the World Cup before the NBA and the United Nations were formed :lmao

son in 2010 they did make the semis, when was the last time england got that far? Not to mention urgay has like 3 million people.


det dfense tho:lol, too old tbh.

Venti Quattro
06-15-2014, 04:47 PM
son in 2010 they did make the semis, when was the last time england got that far? Not to mention urgay has like 3 million people.

det dfense tho:lol, too old tbh.

England won the cup in '66 breh. That was a long time ago too, but not Uruguay-long time ago. :lmao :lmao

dfens
06-15-2014, 04:59 PM
England won the cup in '66 breh. That was a long time ago too, but not Uruguay-long time ago. :lmao :lmao

as a fellow laker fan I hoped you'd bring the ring argument but getting to the semis or winning a continental title ARE accomplishments. WC semis in 2010 (they gave netherlands a run for their money too) and SA cup in 2011 mean recent success for any team.
England's last WC semi was in 1990 and their last EC is never. Sure a couple of quater finals in between but they got bounced by the first decent team. I won't even talk about the fact that in this period one side played football in the other kicked the ball upfront with no tactics whatsoever.

So both from a historic(rings/titles) and a relevancy (recency) standpoint it is obvious that uruguay is superior to england. Given the national obsession in england and the fact the 80 million people >>>>>>> 3 million ..... you can conclude this one yourself.

Venti Quattro
06-15-2014, 05:02 PM
as a fellow laker fan I hoped you'd bring the ring argument but getting to the semis or winning a continental title ARE accomplishments. WC semis in 2010 (they gave netherlands a run for their money too) and SA cup in 2011 mean recent success for any team.

That fact is not lost in this thread. URU has had more recent success than :lol England

resistanze
06-15-2014, 05:09 PM
Sorry to kick you when you're down urunobili, but I stumbled across this. Previously unseen footage of the Maracanazo.

http://i.minus.com/ibbcQZer7Ye88H.gif
:lol god damn

dfens
06-15-2014, 05:13 PM
That fact is not lost in this thread. URU has had more recent success than :lol England

I don't know why but I had the impression you are an englishman (sorry if by mistake). For the life of me I can't understand why it is so hard for england to put a decent team when all the other countries that regularly obsses about football and that have comparable populations are truly traditional footballing powers (france, italy, germany, brazil, argentina, spain). Even minor population countries such as the netherlands, portugal or uruguay have had more success throughout history.

Do you have an opinion on this. Besides england sucks dick, we all know that. Lol my english coworkers are always saying shit like "it was close". No sons it was not.

Venti Quattro
06-15-2014, 05:18 PM
I don't know why but I had the impression you are an englishman (sorry if by mistake). For the life of me I can't understand why it is so hard for england to put a decent team when all the other countries that regularly obsses about football and that have comparable populations are truly traditional footballing powers (france, italy, germany, brazil, argentina, spain). Even minor population countries such as the netherlands, portugal or uruguay have had more success throughout history.

Do you have an opinion on this. Besides england sucks dick, we all know that. Lol my english coworkers are always saying shit like "it was close". No sons it was not.
It's because the English clubs are too busy with worrying about sugar daddy clubs while other footballing powerhouses pounce on the opportunity by letting their players walk to the EPL. The EPL is the most exciting and competitive league in Europe but it zaps away English potential because of many internationals and that is good for countries like Germany and France. Even Spain which has its backbone of RMA and FCB players has a steady diet of players from the EPL.

Did you see CIV and CAM's lineups? The only faces I could recognize are EPL players.

dfens
06-15-2014, 05:28 PM
It's because the English clubs are too busy with worrying about sugar daddy clubs while other footballing powerhouses pounce on the opportunity by letting their players walk to the EPL. The EPL is the most exciting and competitive league in Europe but it zaps away English potential because of many internationals and that is good for countries like Germany and France. Even Spain which has its backbone of RMA and FCB players has a steady diet of players from the EPL.

Did you see CIV and CAM's lineups? The only faces I could recognize are EPL players.

extremely debatable but agree in rest.

Venti Quattro
06-15-2014, 05:39 PM
extremely debatable but agree in rest.

For me it is imo. Let's take a look at their closest rival leagues

Spain - Atletico were a welcome addition in 2013/14 but they are a selling club, so they'll be back to being a contender who will never win against RMA and FCB.
Germany - Bayern Munich are killing the competition both on and off the pitch
Italy - It's Juventus' league, really
France - :lol
Scotland- :lmao

dfens
06-15-2014, 06:48 PM
For me it is imo. Let's take a look at their closest rival leagues

Spain - Atletico were a welcome addition in 2013/14 but they are a selling club, so they'll be back to being a contender who will never win against RMA and FCB.
Germany - Bayern Munich are killing the competition both on and off the pitch
Italy - It's Juventus' league, really
France - :lol
Scotland- :lmao

You could say that the english league has the least competition if you look at titles in the last 10 years. After the german league, of course with bayern winning almost always.

i'd rather evaluate the strength of a league by results in international competitions (CL, uefa). It is the only way to quantify and compare after all. Also, I find that, in general, the football played in england can only be successfull there whereas the football played in other leagues is more varied and thus is more difficult to counter.

Chelsea manchester liverpool are the only english teams that got to the CL semi finals in the last 10 years or won any europa leagues (from memory).
Look at other leagues:
spain - deportivo, barcelona, valencia, real madrid, atletico madrid, bilbao, celta
italy - juventus, inter, milan, fiorentina, roma, lazio, napoli
germany - bayern, leverkusen, dortmund, schalke
france - lyon, psg, monaco

I also find english teams to be extremely lacking from a tactical standpoint and when they won they won in an extremely ugly fashion (chelsea) or in an extremely lucky fashion(manchester, liverpool). There never were english teams that really won and looked true champions(figo zidane raul real, 2010s barca, old milan, bayern). From a footballing standpoint I was never impressed with the english league, I find that they play too fast, just to get the (imo unknowledgeable)crowd excited ... when other teams have been extraordinary inovators from a tactical standpoint (tiki-taka, milans specific total football 1990s, milans elastic defense 2000s, early 2000 real with the makelele type midfielder which was in the late 2000s copied by everybody, inter's defense that turned into 4-3-3/4-2-1-2-1 that you see today played ad nauseam, juventus' fullback usage, 2000s valencia's usage of the short-long ground passes ... milan also used this alot, 1990s bayern libero/cdm switching).

IMO, I find that the chronic downfall of english football is their inability to really THINK. They just play mechanised strength/pace uninventive football and that is always bound to fail against a decently talented team. Even with all the foreign players playing there they still play by the same principles. It's just an old fashioned mentality and it's obvious it is far inferior tactically. The fact that football is such a small margin sport also defavors the english pov because they think they were close when they really weren't.

resistanze
06-15-2014, 06:55 PM
Chelsea manchester liverpool are the only english teams that got to the CL semi finals in the last 10 years or won any europa leagues (from memory).
Look at other leagues:
spain - deportivo, barcelona, valencia, real madrid, atletico madrid, bilbao, celta
italy - juventus, inter, milan, fiorentina, roma, lazio, napoli
germany - bayern, leverkusen, dortmund, schalke
france - lyon, psg, monaco


Arsenal you bastard!

Everything you said is just highly subjective however; 'true champions' and the like are typically bs qualifiers. If playing like 'true champions' or super tactical is better, then the other teams should've beat Chelsea, or Liverpool or Man U. As I've always said if you go through the whole European tournament and you win, there can be no qualms.

Also I think Venti's point was competitiveness WITHIN the league. Athletico broke a decade stranglehold of Real/Barca and it was lovely. Although personally, I think the skill level of Liga is not different overall from EPL, Seria A, Bundesliga etc.

dfens
06-16-2014, 07:30 AM
Arsenal you bastard!

Everything you said is just highly subjective however; 'true champions' and the like are typically bs qualifiers. If playing like 'true champions' or super tactical is better, then the other teams should've beat Chelsea, or Liverpool or Man U. As I've always said if you go through the whole European tournament and you win, there can be no qualms.

Also I think Venti's point was competitiveness WITHIN the league. Athletico broke a decade stranglehold of Real/Barca and it was lovely. Although personally, I think the skill level of Liga is not different overall from EPL, Seria A, Bundesliga etc.

@arsenal forgot about them tbh.

@being subjective.
true champions means winning without a doubt, leaving little to chance. Football is a one-an-done series so luck plays a heavy role when two teams of close value play each other. It's simple statistics which I consider undebatable given the extremely low sampling rate (goals) by which teams are rated for results.

One can win 1-0 the entire tournament like spain the first euro or the 2010wc and nobody can say they weren't head and shoulders above the rest or one can win like 70s brazil, 2010s barca, 2000s real, 1990s milan or bayern a couple of years ago .. en fanfare. Those were all dominant performances even though they each had a unique style. You could just see those teams controlling games and leaving little to chance.

Or one can win with 2 goals in extra time when the other team hit the post three times (manchester 1999). Or another example is chelsea taking it in the ass big time from bayern just to win by a last minute goal. Or coming back from being down 3-0. That's a choke tbh. The last three prove that the team won by being lucky not by imposing their style of play (= dominating the other teams). So true champions is not a stylistical term nor does it refer to tactics. It refers to the fact that the outcome of the game was in little doubt and that the winners controlled the matches throughout the competition.



Furthermore you seem to have completly failed to understand my post. It is not about the skill or monkeying around with ball, that is almost equally distributed between leagues. It is about HOW those skills are used within a team framework. If you have aguerro/teves/nasri at city, that is a tremendously skilled trio but they still have to be fed. If the same trio would've played for sevilla in spain they would be fed in a very different way. The standard EPL way of feeding/playing the strikers is pretty rudimentary and individualistic, only arsenal had a more creative style of play due to wanger (which has also many flaws btw..).

Now compare that to the creativity, offensive collectivism and ball retention of brazil/argentina/portugal/netherlands/spain/italy/france (zidane's,platini's). This creates the effect of being used to control/keep the ball under pressure. And also the ability to establish and maintain pace with which you can calm down a boiling match or destabilize the rythm like italy did it to england a couple of days ago. These are thing for which english football (NT and EPL) is not exactly renown to put it mildly. Even the germans had played ball retention and match control since the 70s and at the individual level they aren't the most creative.

That's my quarell with english football, it's too damn simplistic and because of that they allways need more space in which to run. That's why you have those wide teams. That's why they have world class complimentary players (defenders, effort midfielders, wingers, strikers) but they NEVER have world class teams because they fail to understand that ball retention&control and a creative, tightly knit midfield are the keys to dominance. And since they never play this brand of football (especially at the early player development state) they'll never develop players like pirlo,xavi, iniesta, zidane, figo, messi, ozil, rui costa, which are the keys behind every big tournament win.

I'd even say that such creative players play differently in the EPL then when they play continental football. Look at fabregas, aguerro, nasri and so on.

dfens
06-16-2014, 07:38 AM
btw even if by (Very) rare luck do such players develop they are almost always misused at a national level in order to fit within the group since the group does not realize it's true weakness because they are all *stars* :lmao. How the fuck can you name terry or beckham or lampard a footballing star. A good footballer turned media star by national obssession would better imo.

Paul scholes is an excellent example. England's best deep creation &game controlling talent squandered on long balls to heskey. :bang

Manu'sMagicalLeftHand
06-19-2014, 05:15 PM
Well done urunobili. For all the rivalry, you had our support for this one. I was working in downtown Buenos Aires and people gathered in front of the TVs celebrated your goals and clapped when the match ended. Some Uruguayans living here, but others were Argies whose disdain for England and sympathy for Uruguay sent them into a frenzy.

urunobili
06-19-2014, 05:17 PM
Well done urunobili. For all the rivalry, you had our support for this one. I was working in downtown Buenos Aires and people gathered in front of the TVs celebrated your goals and clapped when the match ended. Some Uruguayans living here, but others were Argies whose disdain for England and sympathy for Uruguay sent them into a frenzy.

it's understandable with the UY'an Falklands issue you faced in the past tbh. Maradona said Luis would be back strong because he had big balls :wow

Thanks for the props but if we don't beat Italy we may very well be bumping this thread for its original purpose...

Relevancy
06-19-2014, 05:42 PM
Uruguay hasnt been that good. Italy will beat them, or I might be wrong and Uruguay yet again win with the play like shit and still win formula.

Franklin
06-19-2014, 05:48 PM
England ain't out yet though, if Uruguay lose to Italy in game 3 and England beat Costa Rica, each of the three teams (England, Uruguay, Costa Rica) will have 3pts, with goal difference being the tie breaker. England still have the hope to qualify even after losing two games, imho

diego
06-19-2014, 05:57 PM
Re: England, I think that funnily enough they share a flaw with argentina- people are too obsessed. Coaches never last long because press and fans constantly rip them apart, promising players are forced to carry unrealistic expectations, old guys are able to pass expiration on past glory. National teams dont practice every week and alll those distractions take their toll.

On top of that a lot of mental mistakes and poor composure, you could argue too that England have lost their identity.

And everyone likes to talk about argentina 78 but England 66 was pretty bad too as far as robberies go, at least Uruguay has won outside of uruguay (which was after Hitler the un the NBA etc, still a long ass time ago)

Franklin
06-19-2014, 06:07 PM
France hasn't won WC outside of France either, tbh.

Blizzardwizard
06-19-2014, 07:07 PM
IMO, I find that the chronic downfall of english football is their inability to really THINK. They just play mechanised strength/pace uninventive football and that is always bound to fail against a decently talented team. Even with all the foreign players playing there they still play by the same principles. It's just an old fashioned mentality and it's obvious it is far inferior tactically. The fact that football is such a small margin sport also defavors the english pov because they think they were close when they really weren't.

This notion is more a stereotype than anything else I have to say. Just because the national team is seen to play this way doesn't mean it's the entire mentality of the country. I know from my own experience that from the word go nowadays, players here are now taught to play the ball on the ground and to pass more often. If you look deep enough into divisions other than the premier league, you find that most teams have adopted this style of play. It is also a stereotype that playing tiki-taka guarantees you success, which Spain have proven to be wrong.

It is obviously a problem that foreign talent comes in its droves to England, but the real problem lies with the older english managers in the premier league (the vast majority are in their 50s and 60s) knowing no other way than the traditional English way of long ball. Managers like Roberto Martinez and Maurcio Pochettino are now starting to take over the premier league and this will only help the country learn to play the ball on the ground more.

Franklin
06-19-2014, 11:38 PM
Agree, you could hardly imagine so many Spanish players flourishing in the premier league back in 90s and early 00s, while now each premier league teams has 2-3 Spanish players on their squad playing pivotal roles.

ManuLoco
06-20-2014, 09:17 AM
I saw yesterday that Uruguay has 4 stars... did they win two more world cups that anyone of us are aware of because those records were lost in the Library of Alexandria fire?

urunobili
06-20-2014, 10:47 AM
I saw yesterday that Uruguay has 4 stars... did they win two more world cups that anyone of us are aware of because those records were lost in the Library of Alexandria fire?

FIFA organized the Olympic tournaments of 1924 and 1928 which were the world championship then. When they did their own tourney (1930) it was negotiated that the two previous ones were recognized as WCs. So technically we've rang 4 times...

Relevancy
06-20-2014, 10:55 AM
How many teams were in the tournament though

it's me
06-20-2014, 10:56 AM
FIFA organized the Olympic tournaments of 1924 and 1928 which were the world championship then. When they did their own tourney (1930) it was negotiated that the two previous ones were recognized as WCs. So technically we've rang 4 times...

:lmao

dfens
06-20-2014, 11:04 AM
FIFA organized the Olympic tournaments of 1924 and 1928 which were the world championship then. When they did their own tourney (1930) it was negotiated that the two previous ones were recognized as WCs. So technically we've rang 4 times...

taking a play from culburns "16 time world champion reporting. saw mikan live" repertoire aren't we? :lol

Venti Quattro
06-20-2014, 11:12 AM
taking a play from culburns "16 time world champion reporting. saw mikan live" repertoire aren't we? :lol

The Lakers didn't win any of their 16 titles as a franchise in NBA-sponsored tournaments in the Olympics.

urunobili
06-20-2014, 11:51 AM
taking a play from culburns "16 time world champion reporting. saw mikan live" repertoire aren't we? :lol

:lmao
4 rings faggots!!!

:lol

There's a reason FIFA allows the 4 stars and it's not only pity... :lol

Manu'sMagicalLeftHand
06-20-2014, 11:59 AM
We had this argument before. Please refrain using the 4 WC argument, anywhere but in Uruguay, because it's the only country counting them. If you are eating choto with your friends in Maldonado, then sure, Uruguay is 4 times World Champions. But as soon as you leave the country, or speak to someone who isn't Uruguayan, that shit becomes hilarious.

urunobili
06-20-2014, 12:00 PM
We had this argument before. Please refrain using the 4 WC argument, anywhere but in Uruguay, because it's the only country counting them. If you are eating choto with your friends in Maldonado, then sure, Uruguay is 4 times World Champions. But as soon as you leave the country, or speak to someone who isn't Uruguayan, that shit becomes hilarious.

lol Less tournaments than little brother

Manu'sMagicalLeftHand
06-20-2014, 12:24 PM
lol Less tournaments than province

Nope.
2 WC = 2WC
2 Olympics = 2 Olympics
15 > 14 Copa America
0 < 1 Confederations Cup
0 < 6 U-20 WC
8 < 22 Libertadores
0 < 13 Supercopa/Mercosur/Sudamericana
1 < 6 Recopa
0 < 3 Conmebol
6 < 9 Intercontinental/FIFA World Club

And tbh I'm cutting you some slack, because all your tournaments were carved with stone age tools.

urunobili
06-20-2014, 12:26 PM
Nope.
2 WC = 2WC
2 Olympics = 2 Olympics
15 > 14 Copa America
0 < 1 Confederations Cup
0 < 6 U-20 WC
8 < 22 Libertadores
0 < 13 Supercopa/Mercosur/Sudamericana
1 < 6 Recopa
0 < 3 Conmebol
6 < 9 Intercontinental/FIFA World Club

And tbh I'm cutting you some slack, because all your tournaments were carved with stone age tools.
Sorry, can you explain to me other than the Choto in Maldonado why FIFA allows the 4 stars?

also, lol youth championships then Mexico is a world powerhouse so is Nigeria :lmao

Manu'sMagicalLeftHand
06-20-2014, 12:45 PM
Sorry, can you explain to me other than the Choto in Maldonado why FIFA allows the 4 stars?

also, lol youth championships then Mexico is a world powerhouse so is Nigeria :lmao

Nope, they are good teams who failed to translate that into the senior side. Powerhouses are Brazil or Argentina who won at both levels. Uruguay is in the middle, World Cup glory in the past, but their club football sucks.

I've already explained to you. Uruguay BEGGED on its knees to put 4 stars in their badge. But the only country who considers Uruguay 4 times World Champs out of the 209 affiliated to FIFA? Uruguay :lol

urunobili
06-20-2014, 12:50 PM
But the only country who considers Uruguay 4 times World Champs out of the 209 affiliated to FIFA? Uruguay :lol

Can you prove this please? Sounds like an argie drunken wish vs. a fact...

Manu'sMagicalLeftHand
06-20-2014, 01:06 PM
Can you prove this please? Sounds like an argie drunken wish vs. a fact...

Name at least 10 countries out of the 209 affiliated to FIFA, who are not named Uruguay and who have a list with Uruguay as 4 times World Champs :lmao

urunobili
06-20-2014, 01:19 PM
Name at least 10 countries out of the 209 affiliated to FIFA, who are not named Uruguay and who have a list with Uruguay as 4 times World Champs :lmao

so 209 countries opinion overrules something signed and approved by FIFA? share some of that whatever it is you're taking please!

ManuLoco
06-20-2014, 01:22 PM
Urunobili, if your group of scrubs/picapiedras somehow miraculously manage to win the world cup and thus get the "fifth star", do you think the world would put Uruguay next to Brazil???? Like you said, 1924 and 1928 were olympic games, not world cups. I bet FIFA were like "ok, whatever, you can put as many little stars on your shirt as you like but the world will always know you only have two world cups".

Manu'sMagicalLeftHand
06-20-2014, 01:23 PM
so 209 countries opinion overrules something signed and approved by FIFA? share some of that whatever it is you're taking please!

http://www.fifa.com/worldcup/teams/team=43930/profile.html

11 Apperances
2 Titles

:cry b-b-but FIFA you promised us... :cry

urunobili
06-20-2014, 01:53 PM
Como la tienen adentro uds porteños que a nivel selecciones mayores ganaron menos que una supuesta provincia!!!

No worries, Argentina will surely ring again and that will shut us up for good, congrats :tu

Manu'sMagicalLeftHand
06-20-2014, 02:01 PM
Como la tienen adentro uds provincianos que a nivel selecciones mayores ganaron menos que una papá Argentina!!!

No worries, Maracanazo 2014 is coming!

FIFY

urunobili
06-20-2014, 02:02 PM
FIFY

How so? Make your count again...

15>14
2=2

a llorar al cuartito!!!

:cry

Manu'sMagicalLeftHand
06-20-2014, 02:07 PM
Played: 180
Argentina won: 82
Uruguay won: 54 :cry
Draws: 44

Hijos nuestros :lol

urunobili
06-20-2014, 02:09 PM
Played: 180
Argentina won: 82
Uruguay won: 54 :cry
Draws: 44

Hijos nuestros :lol

yet less tournaments at NT level than a 3 mill provincia :cry

Manu'sMagicalLeftHand
06-20-2014, 02:12 PM
yet less tournaments at NT level than a 3 mill provincia :cry

:cry Plz, FIFA count only tournaments we won! :cry
:cry I know the archives are in hieroglyphics, but we need something to count on since we suck in any other sport :cry

urunobili
06-20-2014, 02:24 PM
:cry Plz, FIFA count only tournaments we won! :cry
:cry I know the archives are in hieroglyphics, but we need something to count on since we suck in any other sport :cry
Yet we rock at the most popular in Argentina and the rest of the world :cry

Franklin
06-20-2014, 05:43 PM
Nigeria debe poner un estrellar encima de la emblema tambien porque tenemous un oro olympico.

Relevancy
06-20-2014, 07:08 PM
Nigeria debe poner un estrellar encima de la emblema tambien porque tenemous un oro olympico.
Lol

ManuLoco
06-21-2014, 09:09 AM
Urunobili, si ponen la estrella del mundialito pueden alcanzar a Brasil! Vayan a reclamar!

hater
06-25-2014, 01:05 AM
:lmao U-R-Gay

:lol Suarez Banned :lmao :lol :lol

ElNono
06-25-2014, 01:45 AM
FIFA opens disciplinary proceedings against Uruguay's Suarez after bite (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/soccer/chi-world-cup-bite-20140624,0,5175126.story)

ElNono
06-25-2014, 01:47 AM
A tweet from former Liverpool striker Michael Owen was typical of a wave of reaction from former players and pundits: "Tell me I'm seeing things. Surely Suarez didn't bite someone again?," he wrote.

"I'm genuinely gutted. I love watching him play more than any other player but he obviously can't control himself."

:lol

Pelicans78
06-25-2014, 07:49 AM
To be fair, Suarez's cheap actions have helped Uruguay in the last two World Cups. They wouldn't have gotten past Ghana in 2010 and definitely wouldn't have scored yesterday. Props to him for ruining his reputation for his country.

urunobili
06-25-2014, 07:59 AM
To be fair, Suarez's cheap actions have helped Uruguay in the last two World Cups. They wouldn't have gotten past Ghana in 2010 and definitely wouldn't have scored yesterday. Props to him for ruining his reputation for his country.

Nothing cheap with the Ghana hand. Cheap was the offside on that play and the foul given in the first place when the UY'an defender was 2 meters from the guy fell and they gave them the foul. Look at it again.

We will see after forensic evidence is conducted on Chiellini to check if those marks weren't older. Go back to NFL

Pelicans78
06-25-2014, 10:42 PM
Nothing cheap with the Ghana hand. Cheap was the offside on that play and the foul given in the first place when the UY'an defender was 2 meters from the guy fell and they gave them the foul. Look at it again.

We will see after forensic evidence is conducted on Chiellini to check if those marks weren't older. Go back to NFL

You're really denying the biting?

urunobili
06-25-2014, 10:47 PM
You're really denying the biting?

I am no one to judge right or wrong. Praise the lord!

Venti Quattro
06-25-2014, 10:55 PM
I am no one to judge right or wrong. Praise the lord!

:lmao :lmao wow

dfens
06-26-2014, 06:58 AM
I am no one to judge right or wrong. Praise the lord!

Most important: Bite thee toungue for taking the Lord's name in vain :cry

So sad that suarez bit more than he can chew with all those urgay hating cameras out there :cry
They'll still beat colombia by the skin of their teeth :cry
And urugayans are too classy to chew their team in public :cry
They also cut their eyeteeth on team unity.. one player won't affect them much :cry
They'll play eye for an eye and tooth for tooth :cry
tooth and nail for every possession :cry
beating uruguay is like pulling teeth :cry
even if they are a bit long in the tooth at this wc :cry
and even if you put some serious teeth into attacking them :cry
urugay play so nice, that such problems are as scarce as hen's teeth :cry
so any team that gets uruguay should gnash and grit their teeth :cry


In conclusion, those are all teething problems, with the knock out stage coming :cry

urunobili
06-26-2014, 07:54 AM
Most important: Bite thee toungue for taking the Lord's name in vain :cry

So sad that suarez bit more than he can chew with all those urgay hating cameras out there :cry
They'll still beat colombia by the skin of their teeth :cry
And urugayans are too classy to chew their team in public :cry
They also cut their eyeteeth on team unity.. one player won't affect them much :cry
They'll play eye for an eye and tooth for tooth :cry
tooth and nail for every possession :cry
beating uruguay is like pulling teeth :cry
even if they are a bit long in the tooth at this wc :cry
and even if you put some serious teeth into attacking them :cry
urugay play so nice, that such problems are as scarce as hen's teeth :cry
so any team that gets uruguay should gnash and grit their teeth :cry


In conclusion, those are all teething problems, with the knock out stage coming :cry
Congrats on the sure celebration of another WC for Germany :tu

You guys represent all what's right in football :tu

hater
07-01-2014, 12:04 AM
:lol Uruguayan president:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/players/luis-suarez/10936942/Luis-Suarez-bite-Uruguay-President-Jose-Mujica-brands-Fifa-sons-of-bitches-over-ban.html

is this for real the UY president? nigga looks and talks like figuretti of Videomatch :lmao