PDA

View Full Version : Been thinking



Horse
06-13-2014, 12:13 PM
By definition wouldn't you consider sustained exellence a dynasty more than 3-4 good yrs than a rebuild. The argument that we're not a dynasty cause we didn't repeat is fucking retarded.

Jenks
06-13-2014, 12:15 PM
By definition wouldn't you consider sustained exellence a dynasty more than 3-4 good yrs than a rebuild. The argument that we're not a dynasty cause we didn't repeat is fucking retarded.
No one believes the Spurs aren't a dynasty. Phil Jackson says it but he doesn't believe it, he's just a mediocre troll with a soapbox.

Horse
06-13-2014, 12:16 PM
true fuck phil

xmas1997
06-13-2014, 12:19 PM
It's not an important resultant considering everything.

Mugen
06-13-2014, 12:20 PM
How many times a day do you think, OP?

FromWayDowntown
06-13-2014, 12:21 PM
No one believes the Spurs aren't a dynasty. Phil Jackson says it but he doesn't believe it, he's just a mediocre troll with a soapbox.

Most telling of that was when he acknowledged it, then caught himself and backtracked:

“Tim Duncan making the salary he’s making after being part of a dynasty — not a dynasty, I wouldn’t call San Antonio a dynasty — a force, a great force,”

100%duncan
06-13-2014, 12:23 PM
Fuck Phil Jackson, he hired Fisher as head coach. That's all that is needed to be said :lol

Cry Havoc
06-13-2014, 12:24 PM
This is arguably the most impressive dynasty in the history of professional sports. At least the modern sports Era. Sustained dominance over a full 15 years of play, with salary caps, with teams dumping players for cash, the Spurs have done this all despite being a relatively small market team in the middle of nowhere Texas. 0 super free agent acquisitions, 0 big market trades to being an already-proven all star over (lol Richard Jefferson), basically everything done by draft and passing young players with the eye test.

Astonishing. No one has done this before. It's not even a dynasty. The NBA is living in the Spurs Epoch.

xmas1997
06-13-2014, 12:24 PM
How many times a day do you think, OP?

Not one of his strong suits, obviously.

Horse
06-13-2014, 12:26 PM
Not one of his strong suits, obviously.

No I'm more physical than mental just ask your mom.

Horse
06-13-2014, 12:34 PM
How many times a day do you think, OP?

Right now I'm thinking what a douchebag you are.

Mugen
06-13-2014, 12:37 PM
No I'm more physical than mental just ask your mom.


Right now I'm thinking what a douchebag you are.

:lol

TampaDude
06-13-2014, 12:37 PM
This is arguably the most impressive dynasty in the history of professional sports. At least the modern sports Era. Sustained dominance over a full 15 years of play, with salary caps, with teams dumping players for cash, the Spurs have done this all despite being a relatively small market team in the middle of nowhere Texas. 0 super free agent acquisitions, 0 big market trades to being an already-proven all star over (lol Richard Jefferson), basically everything done by draft and passing young players with the eye test.

Astonishing. No one has done this before. It's not even a dynasty. The NBA is living in the Spurs Epoch.

Not quite yet. Still gotta win one more game. If the Heat come back and win the title this year, they will also have 4 championships, including a 3-peat, with two of those victories coming at the Spurs' expense.

If that happens, then it would be Heat >>>>> Spurs.

Mark in Austin
06-13-2014, 12:38 PM
I have a more exclusive definition of a dynasty: a team that wins 3 title in a row. That narrows it down to:

'52-'54 Lakers
'59-'66 Celtics
'91-'93 Bulls
'95-'98 Bulls
'00-'02 Lakers

Could the post-Jordan era be defined as the Duncan era? Sure. San Antonio the most dominant team of the past 15 years? Arguably. But to me they were never a dynasty. They were two plays away from a 5-peat and being called the second greatest dynasty of all time after the '60's Celtics, but those are the breaks of the game.

TampaDude
06-13-2014, 12:51 PM
http://img28.imageshack.us/img28/9357/spursdynasty2012.jpg

TE
06-13-2014, 12:52 PM
No I'm more physical than mental just ask your mom.
:lmao

Cry Havoc
06-13-2014, 01:01 PM
I have a more exclusive definition of a dynasty: a team that wins 3 title in a row.

That's cool. Personally I would rather win 5 titles over a long period of time and be in contention every year than 3 peat and then suck for several years.

Quiet Strength
06-13-2014, 01:01 PM
http://img28.imageshack.us/img28/9357/spursdynasty2012.jpg

What's up with Splitter's and Leonard's heads?

poop
06-13-2014, 01:10 PM
This is arguably the most impressive dynasty in the history of professional sports. At least the modern sports Era. Sustained dominance over a full 15 years of play, with salary caps, with teams dumping players for cash, the Spurs have done this all despite being a relatively small market team in the middle of nowhere Texas. 0 super free agent acquisitions, 0 big market trades to being an already-proven all star over (lol Richard Jefferson), basically everything done by draft and passing young players with the eye test. Astonishing. No one has done this before. It's not even a dynasty. The NBA is living in the Spurs Epoch.Excellent post

Spurs21Fan4Ever
06-13-2014, 01:14 PM
What about if Spurs manage to win the Finals this year then proceed to repeat next year? I could definitely see that, Duncan's dream is to repeat. Still have my dream scenario where both Kobe and Duncan announce their retirement during next season once it's over, then they meet up in the WCF. Both have 5 rings, both going for #6! Historical WCF between to old legends that the game will miss.

TampaDude
06-13-2014, 01:24 PM
What's up with Splitter's and Leonard's heads?

Somebody photochopped the 2007 cover. KL was Bowen and Splitter was Oberto in the original.

http://images.footballfanatics.com/FFImage/thumb.aspx?i=%2FproductImages%2F_1611000%2Fff_1611 744_xl.jpg&w=800

We were already declared a dynasty back in 2007.

xmas1997
06-13-2014, 01:27 PM
The Spurs Era.

Seventyniner
06-13-2014, 02:11 PM
Somebody photochopped the 2007 cover.

They also decided to change 2007 to 2012, so this was likely done two years ago. I'm guessing it was when the Spurs were up 2-0 in the WCF.

That said, it's a decent job. I couldn't tell at a glance that it was really Bowen and Oberto. The reflection of Kawhi's number is correct, but you can see the reflection of Oberto's #7.

TampaDude
06-13-2014, 02:29 PM
They also decided to change 2007 to 2012, so this was likely done two years ago. I'm guessing it was when the Spurs were up 2-0 in the WCF.

That said, it's a decent job. I couldn't tell at a glance that it was really Bowen and Oberto. The reflection of Kawhi's number is correct, but you can see the reflection of Oberto's #7.

Ah...good catch. I guess if we can find out who did that photochop, we'll know who to blame for the Thunder BDS in 2012. :lol

hsxvvd
06-13-2014, 02:40 PM
An argument could be made that this stretch regardless of victory in this season is The greatest dynasty in NBA history.

Boston had 14 teams to contend with.

hsxvvd
06-13-2014, 02:42 PM
They also decided to change 2007 to 2012, so this was likely done two years ago. I'm guessing it was when the Spurs were up 2-0 in the WCF.

That said, it's a decent job. I couldn't tell at a glance that it was really Bowen and Oberto. The reflection of Kawhi's number is correct, but you can see the reflection of Oberto's #7.

And add about 7 inches to Kwahi's hands.

Mark in Austin
06-13-2014, 04:20 PM
That's cool. Personally I would rather win 5 titles over a long period of time and be in contention every year than 3 peat and then suck for several years.

So would I.

Cry Havoc
06-13-2014, 04:21 PM
This is arguably the most impressive dynasty in the history of professional sports. At least the modern sports Era. Sustained dominance over a full 15 years of play, with salary caps, with teams dumping players for cash, the Spurs have done this all despite being a relatively small market team in the middle of nowhere Texas. 0 super free agent acquisitions, 0 big market trades to being an already-proven all star over (lol Richard Jefferson), basically everything done by draft and passing young players with the eye test.

Astonishing. No one has done this before. It's not even a dynasty. The NBA is living in the Spurs Epoch.


An argument could be made that this stretch regardless of victory in this season is The greatest dynasty in NBA history.

Boston had 14 teams to contend with.

slick'81
06-13-2014, 04:24 PM
Would be 1st championship in 7 years not a dynasty plus spurs never repeated but who cares titles are titles 4 is 4 can't change that

boutons_deux
06-13-2014, 04:27 PM
An argument could be made that this stretch regardless of victory in this season is The greatest dynasty in NBA history.

Boston had 14 teams to contend with.

boston didn't see the player/coaching dilution the over-expanded NBA has.

Horse
06-13-2014, 04:44 PM
Thing is it's not realistic to win every yr but to win some and contend for this long that's a dynasty if you ask me. No real rebuilding no tanking or missing the playoffs.

Gagnrath
06-13-2014, 05:09 PM
I don't really think the NBA is over expanded there is enough basketball talent for 32 competitive teams and I would argue even a few more if we look at high tier foriegn leagues the problem to me is so many horrible ran and managed teams.

MannyIsGod
06-13-2014, 05:15 PM
I don't care if you call it a dynasty. All I know is that being a Spurs fan for the past 15ish years has been amazing.

Aztecfan03
06-13-2014, 06:29 PM
What's up with Splitter's and Leonard's heads?

photo-shopped.

http://cdnl.complex.com/mp/620/400/80/0/bb/1/ffffff/4e1d9adaf30dd370e47898e483e32d6a/images_/assets/CHANNEL_IMAGES/SPORTS/2013/06/nba-dynasties/pzztv_spurs_611359.jpg

Aztecfan03
06-13-2014, 06:32 PM
They also decided to change 2007 to 2012, so this was likely done two years ago. I'm guessing it was when the Spurs were up 2-0 in the WCF.

That said, it's a decent job. I couldn't tell at a glance that it was really Bowen and Oberto. The reflection of Kawhi's number is correct, but you can see the reflection of Oberto's #7.

ANd Manu has way too much hair for 2012.

Aztecfan03
06-13-2014, 06:34 PM
Ah...good catch. I guess if we can find out who did that photochop, we'll know who to blame for the Thunder BDS in 2012. :lol

Whoever T.M.T Spurs is.

Yuixafun
06-13-2014, 06:36 PM
A family of rulers who rule for a long period of time; also : the period of time when a particular dynasty is in power


Spurs are the definition of Dynasty.

Cry Havoc
06-14-2014, 12:25 AM
boston didn't see the player/coaching dilution the over-expanded NBA has.

That's pretty hilarious considering they had 7 Hall of Famers on their team. They had an All-Star starting 5 and the league had virtually no scouting back in those days.

LoneStarState'sPride
06-14-2014, 01:17 AM
I don't care if you call it a dynasty. All I know is that being a Spurs fan for the past 15ish years has been amazing.

This.