Log in

View Full Version : Lakers: Why Didn't Kobe Win a Finals MVP at 22?



ezau
06-15-2014, 11:20 PM
Can you please answer this Laker fans? Kawhi won it at 22, why didn't Kobe?

Thebesteva
06-15-2014, 11:20 PM
Just enjoy the win man, stop picking on us :cry

ezau
06-15-2014, 11:21 PM
Thebesteva: You're one of the better Laker fans here, so you're excused.

Arnold Toht
06-15-2014, 11:22 PM
Fat bastard took all the credit.

Thebesteva
06-15-2014, 11:22 PM
Thebesteva (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=42939): You're one of the better Laker fans here, so you're excused.

I lost an ELE bet, so soon im gone :lol even tho that faggot admitted he was going to welch. Im no welcher

Thread
06-15-2014, 11:24 PM
Only pussies & assholes tote these type of cyphers. There is only two things:::and you did 'em both, ez. There is nothing else.

ezau
06-15-2014, 11:26 PM
I lost an ELE bet, so soon im gone :lol even tho that faggot admitted he was going to welch. Im no welcher

Kool doesn't give a shit about losing bets:lol

ezau
06-15-2014, 11:28 PM
Only pussies & assholes tote these type of cyphers. There is only two things:::and you did 'em both, ez. There is nothing else.

6 and Kobe 5 Duncan 4 no more. It's an end of the Cully dynasty here on ST, tbh. It's been a good run Cully, nothing to be shamed of.

ezau
06-16-2014, 11:49 PM
Still waiting for a Laker fan to answer this, tbh.

RsxPiimp
06-16-2014, 11:52 PM
Shaq was in his prime unlike Jim who is a TOSB. Kobe at 22 would be the best player in this Spurs team tho.

ezau
06-16-2014, 11:54 PM
Shaq was in his prime unlike Jim who is a TOSB. Kobe at 22 would be the best player in this Spurs team tho.

So Kobe wasn't the best player in the Lakers threepeat era?

dg7md
06-16-2014, 11:55 PM
Must mean Kawhi is better than Kobe, right? :lol That's some of the logic Lakerfan/Spurhater throws down on us.

Ashy Larry
06-17-2014, 12:01 AM
One can say the NBA Finals in 2001 was between the two best teams in the Western Conference: Lakers and Spurs. And the best player easily in that series was Bryant. Either squad would have shit stomped the Sixers. So even though Shaquille got it for destroying Deke and an inferior Sixers team, Bryant went apeshit on San Antone with the Spurs having home court.

spurraider21
06-17-2014, 12:07 AM
Shaq was in his prime unlike Jim who is a TOSB. Kobe at 22 would be the best player in this Spurs team tho.
So Kawhi was able to win a championship with less help than Kobe did?

TDMVPDPOY
06-17-2014, 12:55 AM
Only pussies & assholes tote these type of cyphers. There is only two things:::and you did 'em both, ez. There is nothing else.

enjoy the weather faggot, have u not read the weather forecast? premature ejaculation

100%duncan
06-17-2014, 12:57 AM
LA fans raped :lol

ChumpDumper
06-17-2014, 12:58 AM
http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11115/111150904/3802487-9654611931-sakur.gif

scanry
06-17-2014, 02:51 AM
Shaq was in his prime unlike Jim who is a TOSB. Kobe at 22 would be the best player in this Spurs team tho.

The OSB in 2014 still put up better numbers than Kobe did in the 2000 Finals. Now that's just embarrassing. BTW he also shot 57% from the field. Kobe on the other hand, not so much (36.7%).

Should i also bring up the Austin Croshere stat which Clipper Nation publicized all last week?

spurraider21
06-17-2014, 02:57 AM
The OSB in 2014 still put up better numbers than Kobe did in the 2000 Finals. Now that's just embarrassing. BTW he also shot 57% from the field. Kobe on the other hand, not so much (36.7%).

Should i also bring up the Austin Croshere stat which Clipper Nation publicized all last week?
damn, i can't even get credit for the shit i've been posting here...

Kool Bob Love
06-17-2014, 03:02 AM
Can you please answer this Laker fans? Kawhi won it at 22, why didn't Kobe?

Starting off the summer right!!!!

:lol:rollin:lol

ezau
06-17-2014, 03:35 AM
Starting off the summer right!!!!

:lol:rollin:lol

It's gonna be a great summer for us Spurs fans:toast

100%duncan
06-17-2014, 03:38 AM
Starting off the summer right!!!!

:lol:rollin:lol

:lol

ambchang
06-17-2014, 06:41 AM
Off season MVP for ezau.

TDMVPDPOY
06-17-2014, 07:14 AM
at 22? at day1 nba career he had his sights on colorado b4 anything else

Thread
06-17-2014, 08:30 AM
enjoy the weather faggot, have u not read the weather forecast? premature ejaculation

Anytime I can achieve the nut is jake with me.

RsxPiimp
06-17-2014, 11:27 AM
So Kobe wasn't the best player in the Lakers threepeat era?

Of course not you necrophiliac:lol

Mori Chu
06-17-2014, 12:23 PM
We've gone from 6 to 7. Because Laker fans are holding out all of their hopes that their precious #7 pick nets them a star. It's all they have, literally all their franchise has to hope for.

Phenomanul
06-17-2014, 12:49 PM
One can say the NBA Finals in 2001 was between the two best teams in the Western Conference: Lakers and Spurs. And the best player easily in that series was Bryant. Either squad would have shit stomped the Sixers. So even though Shaquille got it for destroying Deke and an inferior Sixers team, Bryant went apeshit on San Antone with the Spurs having home court.

Fisher going 15-20 from deep didnt hurt...

ezau
06-17-2014, 09:41 PM
Off season MVP for ezau (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=15121).

lol

ezau
06-17-2014, 09:42 PM
Of course not you necrophiliac:lol

:lol

Ashy Larry
07-01-2014, 03:25 PM
Fisher going 15-20 from deep didnt hurt...Fish's contribution was key ...... Lakers finally got somewhat of a third scorer but if an MVP was handed out for that series, it would have gone to Bryant.

midnightpulp
07-01-2014, 03:33 PM
One can say the NBA Finals in 2001 was between the two best teams in the Western Conference: Lakers and Spurs. And the best player easily in that series was Bryant. Either squad would have shit stomped the Sixers. So even though Shaquille got it for destroying Deke and an inferior Sixers team, Bryant went apeshit on San Antone with the Spurs having home court.

It wasn't. That Spurs team was highly overrated, fielding Terry Porter, Danny Ferry, and Sean Elliott on the perimeter. It's no wonder Kobe went off. Once Derek Anderson went down, so did the Spurs perimeter threat. That's how weak that team was on the wings. The 6ers put up more of a fight than us, and thus, the NBA Finals were actually the real NBA Finals.

I'm not sure we beat the 6ers. Mutombo would've made Duncan work and the Spurs had no one that could contain A.I.

Ashy Larry
07-01-2014, 03:42 PM
It wasn't. That Spurs team was highly overrated, fielding Terry Porter, Danny Ferry, and Sean Elliott on the perimeter. It's no wonder Kobe went off. Once Derek Anderson went down, so did the Spurs perimeter threat. That's how weak that team was on the wings. The 6ers put up more of a fight than us, and thus, the NBA Finals were actually the real NBA Finals.

I'm not sure we beat the 6ers. Mutombo would've made Duncan work and the Spurs had no one that could contain A.I.Man you know and I know that the Spurs would have destroyed that Sixers squad. The Sixers came into the finals injured while the Spurs had just shitstomped a 47 win 8 seed Twolves and a 53 win 5 seed in Dallas. They would have ran the Sixers. Snow could barely walk. Geiger was hurt. Tyrone Hill was injured. That team was held together by duct tape and spit.

midnightpulp
07-01-2014, 03:50 PM
Man you know and I know that the Spurs would have destroyed that Sixers squad. The Sixers came into the finals injured while the Spurs had just shitstomped a 47 win 8 seed Twolves and a 53 win 5 seed in Dallas. They would have ran the Sixers. Snow could barely walk. Geiger was hurt. Tyrone Hill was injured. That team was held together by duct tape and spit.

With Derek Anderson.

The Spurs and 6ers met in January, and the 6ers won that game by 17 with A.I. dropping 40 on 58%. And that was with Derek Anderson and before Kukoc was traded for Mutombo.

Spurs perimeter defense was beyond shit. It's why they traded for Bowen.

If we had Derek Anderson, I agree it would've been the "real NBA Finals," Spurs probably win game 2 had he played and maybe challenged better in games 3 and 4. Now I'm not saying Derek Anderson is anything special, but losing your second leading scorer is a pretty big deal, even if Derek Anderson isn't that good. That's how thin the Spurs were on the perimeter.

Ashy Larry
07-01-2014, 03:57 PM
With Derek Anderson.

The Spurs and 6ers met in January, and the 6ers won that game by 17 with A.I. dropping 40 on 58%. And that was with Derek Anderson and before Kukoc was traded for Mutombo.

Spurs perimeter defense was beyond shit. It's why they traded for Bowen.

If we had Derek Anderson, I agree it would've been the "real NBA Finals," Spurs probably win game 2 had he played and maybe challenged better in games 3 and 4. Now I'm not saying Derek Anderson is anything special, but losing your second leading scorer is a pretty big deal, even if Derek Anderson isn't that good. That's how thin the Spurs were on the perimeter.Even without D.A., you guys would have rolled. Sixers were also without Geroge Lynch. So even when they got you guys by 17, many of those players were probably healthy then. Also the Sixers shot their wads against the Raptors (7 game series) and the Bucks (another 7 game series). That team was injured and spent.

midnightpulp
07-01-2014, 04:03 PM
Even without D.A., you guys would have rolled. Sixers were also without Geroge Lynch. So even when they got you guys by 17, many of those players were probably healthy then. Also the Sixers shot their wads against the Raptors (7 game series) and the Bucks (another 7 game series). That team was injured and spent.

But at the end of the day, they actually gave you guys the greatest challenge. They won one and 3 games were within one possession late in the 4th. Maybe we beat them, but that's irrelevant. For the Lakers, it was the "Real NBA Finals," since no other Western team had a pulse when they played against them.

Ashy Larry
07-01-2014, 04:15 PM
But at the end of the day, they actually gave you guys the greatest challenge. They won one and 3 games were within one possession late in the 4th. Maybe we beat them, but that's irrelevant. For the Lakers, it was the "Real NBA Finals," since no other Western team had a pulse when they played against them.we'll have to agree to disagree. I just can't see a team that injured and struggling against the Raptors and the Bucks being the second best squad in the league.

baseline bum
07-01-2014, 04:36 PM
It wasn't. That Spurs team was highly overrated, fielding Terry Porter, Danny Ferry, and Sean Elliott on the perimeter. It's no wonder Kobe went off. Once Derek Anderson went down, so did the Spurs perimeter threat. That's how weak that team was on the wings. The 6ers put up more of a fight than us, and thus, the NBA Finals were actually the real NBA Finals.

I'm not sure we beat the 6ers. Mutombo would've made Duncan work and the Spurs had no one that could contain A.I.

Antonio Daniels guarding Iverson. :lol

http://37.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m1ncmfTF4x1rscbxlo1_400.gif

Kool Bob Love
07-17-2014, 06:58 PM
http://youtu.be/lpv4JPPTjhM

Kool Bob Love
07-17-2014, 07:00 PM
:rollinAt Lebron's and the heat fans reaction.


http://youtu.be/grVtIQ7gUtc

POPownsJackson
07-17-2014, 07:05 PM
why didnt duncan?

jimbo
07-17-2014, 08:29 PM
why didnt duncan?

He was too busy ducking Jordan's Bulls by staying in college tbh

ezau
07-17-2014, 09:23 PM
why didnt duncan?

He won at 23 in 99 which isn't too shabby either. Kobe's first FMVP happened at 31:lol