Nbadan
06-17-2014, 02:22 PM
The real problem: we never prosecuted the Bush crime syndicate for their Iraq war crimes so we have absolutely ZERO credibility or morality to base any foreign policy on.....
UN Could Prosecute Bush for War Crimes, Says Ex-U.S. Terror Czar
Former U.S. terror czar Richard Clarke (shown), who resigned in 2003, dropped two bombshell statements about the Bush administration he served during a recent TV interview. First, he said, former President George W. Bush and then-Vice President Dick Cheney probably perpetrated what amounts to “war crimes” surrounding the unconstitutional attack on Iraq. While plenty of Americans on all sides of the political spectrum might be inclined to agree, Clarke went even further. He suggested the duo could be prosecuted by the dictator-dominated United Nations at the global body’s self-styled “International Criminal Court” (ICC) in The Hague.
Clarke was fairly blunt when asked whether he thought war-crimes charges should be brought against Bush, Cheney, and then-Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. “I think things that they authorized probably fall within the area of war crimes,” the former U.S. terrorism czar for Bill Clinton and George W. Bush said in an interview with Amy Goodman of the “progressive” Democracy Now TV program."
http://independentfilmnewsandmedia.com/un-could-prosecute-bush-for-war-crimes-says-ex-u-s-terror-czar/
So the question becomes, why is the U.S. protecting war criminals and human rights abusers? If the former Bush Administration, and that includes more than just Dubya, Cheney and Rummy, thinks that their justification for the invasion and occupation of Iraq and the rendition, torture, rape, sodomy and murder of Iraqi citizens will stand up in court then they shouldn't fear being charged as war criminals. They should welcome the opportunity to prove to the world that they weren't....
UN Could Prosecute Bush for War Crimes, Says Ex-U.S. Terror Czar
Former U.S. terror czar Richard Clarke (shown), who resigned in 2003, dropped two bombshell statements about the Bush administration he served during a recent TV interview. First, he said, former President George W. Bush and then-Vice President Dick Cheney probably perpetrated what amounts to “war crimes” surrounding the unconstitutional attack on Iraq. While plenty of Americans on all sides of the political spectrum might be inclined to agree, Clarke went even further. He suggested the duo could be prosecuted by the dictator-dominated United Nations at the global body’s self-styled “International Criminal Court” (ICC) in The Hague.
Clarke was fairly blunt when asked whether he thought war-crimes charges should be brought against Bush, Cheney, and then-Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. “I think things that they authorized probably fall within the area of war crimes,” the former U.S. terrorism czar for Bill Clinton and George W. Bush said in an interview with Amy Goodman of the “progressive” Democracy Now TV program."
http://independentfilmnewsandmedia.com/un-could-prosecute-bush-for-war-crimes-says-ex-u-s-terror-czar/
So the question becomes, why is the U.S. protecting war criminals and human rights abusers? If the former Bush Administration, and that includes more than just Dubya, Cheney and Rummy, thinks that their justification for the invasion and occupation of Iraq and the rendition, torture, rape, sodomy and murder of Iraqi citizens will stand up in court then they shouldn't fear being charged as war criminals. They should welcome the opportunity to prove to the world that they weren't....