Spurs meeting w/ Kent Bazemore in the tomorrow

[Jwash_1986]

I don't know much about this cat. But I just seen that info on Facebook.

[tholdren]

awful

[Malik Hairston]

I don't understand the hype around Bazemore, tbh..

Pretty decent defender and "heat check scorer", but not worth the hype I've been hearing..

[Ice009]

I don't understand the hype around Bazemore, tbh..

Pretty decent "heat check scorer", but not worth the hype I've been hearing..

How much do you think he's worth? or would you not want him at all?

[DJR210]

Oh hell no. I don't want this dude just cause he's fucking ugly as shit and I don't wanna see his ugly mug for 82+ games.

[Splits]

:cry Nando pls

:cry we need you

:cry PlayNando

[SpursFan86]

I wouldn't want Bazemore for any more than $2-3 million a year personally. He'd be WAY better defensively than Marco, but he's not near as good of a shooter or overall offensive player as Belinelli.

[BatManu20]

He's not coming here regardless, tbh.

[Ice009]

Would anyone dip into the MLE for him? or BAE only? I don't think I'd be interested for anything more than the BAE.

[Ron Swanson]

I wouldn't dip into the MLE for him. If he wants more than the BAE, let another team pay it.

[Spursfanfromafar]

More of a pesky defender than anything else. Pass.

[timtonymanu]

Yeah, what is the fascination with Bazemore? His biggest highlights are his reactions on the bench.

[VBM]

Yeah, what is the fascination with Bazemore? His biggest highlights are his reactions on the bench.

Used to be the same thing with Mills http://www.thecoli.com/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/manny.png

[Aggie Hoopsfan]

Ginobili, hurt. Mills, hurt. Yeah, why would we want a career 41.4% SG to fill some time for this squad? No one's saying to give the guy the full MLE. But we should get LeBron for the MLE instead, right?

[spurraider21]

he has decent size/athleticism. surprisingly, i think teams like him as a defensive prospect, as somebody who can cover 1-3 while not being an offensive liability

[Malik Hairston]

Ginobili, hurt. Mills, hurt. Yeah, why would we want a career 41.4% SG to fill some time for this squad? No one's saying to give the guy the full MLE. But we should get LeBron for the MLE instead, right?

Bazemore isn't going to sign with the Spurs to be a temporary filler for Ginobili and Mills, though..he has other suitors, so if the Spurs do sign him, it would have to be assumed that he would receive a permanent spot in the rotation IMO..

He's only 25 IIRC, he's gonna try to land somewhere where he can display his game for his next pay day..

[spurs1990]

Is my math off or what?

(1) Parker, (2) Mills, (3) Joseph
(4) Green, (5) Ginobili, (6) Cotton
(7) Leonard, (8) Belinelli, (9) Anderson
(10) Duncan, (11) Splitter, (12) Daye
(13) Diaw, (14) Baynes, (15) Ayres

I mean is Daye or Ayres contracts still expendable at this point?

[Ice009]

I think you've got to be willing to cut Ayres if you need an extra roster spot and can't work out a trade to clear the roster spot instead.

Daye, I think you can just cut outright if you need his spot.

[Steve-O-Matic]

Bazemore was the national college defensive player of the year as a junior at ODU. He's a plus athlete, has long arms (and is 6-4 w/o shoes), can get to the rim with both hands (is nearly ambidextrous), and is an emerging outside shooter. The guy can play.

[ducks]

Do not use any of mle

[FireMicoHalili]

Do not use any of mle
Can be had for BAE, keeping MLE intact during buyout market.

[FireMicoHalili]

Bazemore was the national college defensive player of the year as a junior at ODU. He's a plus athlete, has long arms (and is 6-4 w/o shoes), can get to the rim with both hands (is nearly ambidextrous), and is an emerging outside shooter. The guy can play.
:toast

[Floyd Pacquiao]

Is he good? Can the spurs get him?

[Chinook]

I'll be disappointed in a Bazemore signing. He's just not what the team needs.

[Biernutz]

I would bet that the spurs team car will be busy taking players to Austin for floor time. Daye,
Anderson for sure will make this trip.......

[Baam]

I'll be disappointed in a Bazemore signing. He's just not what the team needs.

What do they need ? A stretch 4 would be nice but it's gonna be Bonner...

The disappointing part to me was the Mills signing... If you do the Mills signing then you have to get another guard there's no way around it...

[FireMicoHalili]

Aww look at the people saying "Pass" or "He's not what the team needs" like they have an actual say in the matter

[SpursFan86]

Aww look at the people saying "Pass" or "He's not what the team needs" like they have an actual say in the matter

...you do realize that goes both ways right?

"Aww look at the people saying 'Bazemore would be a good fit'...like they have an actual say in the matter"

[spurraider21]

...you do realize that goes both ways right?

"Aww look at the people saying 'Bazemore would be a good fit'...like they have an actual say in the matter"
well, if the spurs are meeting with him, it says they're interested... so those saying "not interested, pass" (including myself :lol) are the ones out of the loop

but it's just people expressing opinions.... that's the purpose of sports forums :lol. doesn't mean we actually believe our comments will sway their decisions

[FlAVaK]

Is my math off or what?

(1) Parker, (2) Mills, (3) Joseph
(4) Green, (5) Ginobili, (6) Cotton
(7) Leonard, (8) Belinelli, (9) Anderson
(10) Duncan, (11) Splitter, (12) Daye
(13) Diaw, (14) Baynes, (15) Ayres

I mean is Daye or Ayres contracts still expendable at this point?

I`ll give you a hint: 20>15

[SpursFan86]

but it's just people expressing opinions.... that's the purpose of sports forums :lol. doesn't mean we actually believe our comments will sway their decisions

Exactly...it just seems to dumb to call out people for giving their opinions on an internet forum. Are we not on here to talk about the Spurs? :rolleyes

[FireMicoHalili]

...you do realize that goes both ways right?

"Aww look at the people saying 'Bazemore would be a good fit'...like they have an actual say in the matter"
Didn't say it wouldn't cut the same way had another person said he was a good fit, but saying "Pass" or "he's not what the team needs" ignores the rhyme or reason behind the Spurs' interest. Not even a rumor as confirmed but a report on an actual "face-to-face meeting". Has anyone even identified the team's needs as of late? Afaik, Bazemore can play at least three spots, and if Cotton doesn't stick, he may fill in for Mills while the latter recovers. Besides, no one has said he'd be a good fit, and if he were a bad fit, no viable reason why can be seen above. Guy can defend, guy can shoot.

[SpursFan86]

Didn't say it wouldn't cut the same way had another person said he was a good fit, but saying "Pass" or "he's not what the team needs" ignores the rhyme or reason behind the Spurs' interest. Not even a rumor as confirmed but a report on an actual "face-to-face meeting". Has anyone even identified the team's needs as of late? Afaik, Bazemore can play at least three spots, and if Cotton doesn't stick, he may fill in for Mills while the latter recovers. Besides, no one has said he'd be a good fit, and if he were a bad fit, no viable reason why can be seen above. Guy can defend, guy can shoot.

I already said I wouldn't mind getting Bazemore as long as the price is right. I just think it's a bit childish to to say things like "Aww look at people acting like they have a say in the matter". As far as I can tell, no one here has acted like they have a say in what the Spurs do. People are just giving their opinions because...well, we're on a Spurs forum and that's typically what you do on sports forums.

[FireMicoHalili]

Exactly...it just seems to dumb to call out people for giving their opinions on an internet forum. Are we not on here to talk about the Spurs? :rolleyes
Seems dumb to post an emotionally-fueled opinion with cherry-picked evidence, or worse, no reasoning behind it. Opinion different from pointless blabber.

[Chinook]

What do they need ? A stretch 4 would be nice but it's gonna be Bonner...

The disappointing part to me was the Mills signing... If you do the Mills signing then you have to get another guard there's no way around it...

They need a young guard on a long-term cheap deal. One with upside but to whom the team is not strongly committed financially. Cotton and Denmon or some other summer-league guard.

[Chinook]

Didn't say it wouldn't cut the same way had another person said he was a good fit, but saying "Pass" or "he's not what the team needs" ignores the rhyme or reason behind the Spurs' interest. Not even a rumor as confirmed but a report on an actual "face-to-face meeting". Has anyone even identified the team's needs as of late? Afaik, Bazemore can play at least three spots, and if Cotton doesn't stick, he may fill in for Mills while the latter recovers. Besides, no one has said he'd be a good fit, and if he were a bad fit, no viable reason why can be seen above. Guy can defend, guy can shoot.

The Spurs wanted Granger, to the point they supposedly told him he'd be the next Robert Horry. Look how that turned out. We're allowed to criticize or support the FO's decisions however we want. Sometimes we're right, and sometimes we're wrong.

[FireMicoHalili]

The Spurs wanted Granger, to the point they supposedly told him he'd be the next Robert Horry. Look how that turned out. We're allowed to criticize or support the FO's decisions however we want. Sometimes we're right, and sometimes we're wrong.
I don't see how Granger affects the discussion. Sorry if I didn't get my point across but I wanted to hear more of why one would simply dismiss one of the FO's moves without any logic or reasoning behind it. I savor some if the discussion here and it wouldn't hurt to up the ante a bit, so to speak. Merely dismissing one of the FO's moves without any justification just reeks of personal conviction. I could say this is just an Internet forum after all, but I've seen posts which I actually learned from, despite discussions being tainted sometimes by egos and personal jabs.

[Chinook]

I don't see how Granger affects the discussion. Sorry if I didn't get my point across but I wanted to hear more of why one would simply dismiss one of the FO's moves without any logic or reasoning behind it. I savor some if the discussion here and it wouldn't hurt to up the ante a bit, so to speak. Merely dismissing one of the FO's moves without any justification just reeks of personal conviction. I could say this is just an Internet forum after all, but I've seen posts which I actually learned from, despite discussions being tainted sometimes by egos and personal jabs.

Supposedly, Atlanta is offering $6M/2. Do you really think that deal makes sense for the Spurs to offer for a fourth-string PG?

[FireMicoHalili]

Supposedly, Atlanta is offering $6M/2. Do you really think that deal makes sense for the Spurs to offer for a fourth-string PG?
Again, I fail to see how this affects the discussion, seeing that (a) Bazemore has not accepted any offers; (b) the Spurs have yet to tender an offer. I'll take your bait and say no, the deal fails to make sense, but at least there's a good reason to dismiss the notion of him coming to San Antonio: he's out of the perceived price range of a player his caliber. I've seen players take less to be part of the squad though, e.g. Belinelli, so I would stick to the facts until the dust settles.

[Baam]

Bringing up Belinelli is interesting as he single-handedly requires to have a plus defender at the 1 given how shitty he is on that end of the floor... Which is why Bazemore would be a decent choice...

[spurspokesman]

Has the feel of him being Greens replacement when he bolts for the big dollars in free agency if the spurs can't match. If bazemore emerges as a shooter any where near greens level I see him being a swell replacement for cheaper. Greens the better player at the moment though.

[exstatic]

Is my math off or what?

(1) Parker, (2) Mills, (3) Joseph
(4) Green, (5) Ginobili, (6) Cotton
(7) Leonard, (8) Belinelli, (9) Anderson
(10) Duncan, (11) Splitter, (12) Daye
(13) Diaw, (14) Baynes, (15) Ayres

I mean is Daye or Ayres contracts still expendable at this point?

Baynes only has a QO on the table, which can be withdrawn at any time. Bonner is yet unsigned. Cotton will be cut in camp and sent to Austin on a d-league contract.

[Andthentherewas21]

I wouldn't be in favor of the signing as he isn't really what the Spurs need. He may have the physical ability to play positions 1-3, but he has a higher turnover percentage than assist percentage, and per 36 minutes CoJo has similar/better stats in all major categories except points (Cojo also has a much better ORtg and DRtg). Between Manu, Green, and Marco they don't need a another 2 guard unless the FO plans to move one of them to the backup 3 spot full time. And at 6'4-6'5, Bazemore is a bit undersized to be the backup 3 full-time. Other worrisome traits include his 60% ft percentage that hasn't improved since entering the NBA. As far as the Spurs system, he isn't a great 3pt shooter, 33% career, and has a relatively low FG% at 41% (although it should be noted both did improve from his first to second year).

There is some potential there, but given the limited roster space, the fact he doesn't really address a current need, and the presence of other offers on the table that are likely to drive up his salary, I think the Spurs should pass on him. That being said, if he signed something cheap this year and spent most of the year with the Toros, I could see him moving into the lineup post-Manu

[Ice009]

Bazemore was the national college defensive player of the year as a junior at ODU. He's a plus athlete, has long arms (and is 6-4 w/o shoes), can get to the rim with both hands (is nearly ambidextrous), and is an emerging outside shooter. The guy can play.

I had no idea that he was a good defender (I don't follow college basketball), so thanks for pointing that out. That changes my interest level quite a lot, as I do like athletic defensive players. If his offense is somewhat decent and can fit in with the Spurs, then I am very interested. I still probably wouldn't want to give him more than the BAE though.

What positions can he guard on the NBA level? I assume 1s and 2s, but can he also check 3s?

[exstatic]

Two or three years ago, we would have gotten him for the minimum. Now, with our former guys running things in ATL, they want the same players we want, and can spend for them.

[Ice009]

How many years has he been in the league? Would this be his third season?

[Andthentherewas21]

How many years has he been in the league? Would this be his third season?

Yes

[ceperez]

Is my math off or what?

(1) Parker, (2) Mills, (3) Joseph
(4) Green, (5) Ginobili, (6) Cotton
(7) Leonard, (8) Belinelli, (9) Anderson
(10) Duncan, (11) Splitter, (12) Daye
(13) Diaw, (14) Baynes, (15) Ayres

I mean is Daye or Ayres contracts still expendable at this point?

Baynes and Bonner have yet to be signed. Cotton is unguaranteed.

Yes, it is very crowded, 12 players have guaranteed contracts. Anderson will likely be signed.

[Ice009]

Yes

Thanks.

I'm interested to know what positions Bazemore can check. Is it 1-3 or only 1s and 2s? Either way, it'd be good to have someone that can check 1s at an elite level. Danny Green is pretty much the only guy on the team that can play very good defense against the best PGs in the NBA. The rest of the team really struggles defending a lot of the most explosive PGs in the NBA.

Edit : forgot to mention Cory. His defense isn't too bad at the PG spot. Would Bazemore be a better overall defender than Joseph?

[cjw]

I think you've got to be willing to cut Ayres if you need an extra roster spot and can't work out a trade to clear the roster spot instead.

Always slips my mind that this option exists for over the cap teams - doesn't affect ability to use MLE or BAE and only things to bear in mind are (1) need to stay under the tax, which won't be a problem and (2) it's a small hit to Holt's wallet, plus he may have to take something back / dump a draft pick (read: cheaper contract than a vet) just to offload Ayers.

Also, there's a chance Cotton doesn't even make the roster. I doubt they'd have him AND Bazemore. Still holding out hope that they're willing to spend at least some of the MLE and that Bazemore is a contingency plan if one of the guys they've earmarked doesn't pan out.

[DesignatedT]

I think Bazemore would be good here. He'd instantly be our third best perimeter defender behind Kawhi and Green and he isn't a liability offensively. This would likely push Cotton out and I would much rather have Bazemore than Cotton. People will be upset because they actually think we can land Gasol, but that isn't happening. If Bazemore is willing to come here and earn his minutes on a stacked roster I am all for it. This also shows that RC and Pop realize the liability Belinelli is defensively.

Sure, I'd rather have another big and unload Ayres but I'm not sure how realistic that is and I don't see many bigs out there remaining that would be a good fit.

[Andthentherewas21]

I'm interested to know what positions Bazemore can check. Is it 1-3 or only 1s and 2s? Either way, it'd be good to have someone that can check 1s at an elite level. Danny Green is pretty much the only guy on the team that can play very good defense against the best PGs in the NBA. The rest of the team really struggles defending a lot of the most explosive PGs in the NBA.

Edit : forgot to mention Cory. His defense isn't too bad at the PG spot. Would Bazemore be a better overall defender than Joseph?

Well take what I say with a grain of salt. I've seen a little bit of the guy and done a good amount of research, but other than his time with the Lakers he hasn't played much in the NBA. That being said, if we are talking 2nd unit/bench guys Bazemore should be able to defend positions 1-3. As far as defending the explosive PGs of the league, I doubt Bazemore would be better then CoJo, at least this year. While Bazemore's 6"11 wingspan helps him disrupt passing lanes, the biggest knock on his defense in both college and the NBA has been his tendency to let up in ISO situations and get blown past by quicker players. He is also undersized at the 3, but could probably play spot minutes at the 3 similar to what Beli played last season.

Bazemore is intriguing but its difficult to plot a course for the guy. He has played in 2 drastically different systems (GSW where they had a defensive system but no system on offense, and the exact opposite in LAL). He definitely has potential on D due to his length and versatility, but his offense still has a ways to go (has a slow release on his shot, FT troubles, not really a play-maker). I think he is a guy that makes sense next year when they could potentially lose Manu, Green, and/or Beli, but wouldn't be utilized much this year.

[Ice009]

I think Bazemore would be good here. He'd instantly be our third best perimeter defender behind Kawhi and Green and he isn't a liability offensively. This would likely push Cotton out and I would much rather have Bazemore than Cotton. People will be upset because they actually think we can land Gasol, but that isn't happening. If Bazemore is willing to come here and earn his minutes on a stacked roster I am all for it. This also shows that RC and Pop realize the liability Belinelli is defensively.

Sure, I'd rather have another big and unload Ayres but I'm not sure how realistic that is and I don't see many bigs out there remaining that would be a good fit.

Good point. If the FO realizes how much of a liability Belinelli was on the defense end and they are trying to address that by looking at guys like Bazemore, then I am all for that.

Do you guys think Vince Carter was that good in round 1 because he played great, or do you think Belinelli's defense made him look great? Probably a little bit of both, but I will say, there were times in that series where I was thinking that Beli's D is making Carter look like prime VC again.

[phxspurfan]

http://www.tu-pc.com/fondos/media/3576.jpg

[eDizzle20]

I personally like Bazemore. If the Spurs can get them with their Bi-annual Exception he is well worth it. However, the Spurs are at a disadvantage considering the Hawks are willing to give him 2 years/$6 million and most likely much more playing time. Getting a guy like Bazemore would allow Ginobili to get more rest during the regular season and as many of you have mentioned, a much better defender than Belinelli.

[Dverde]

I'm fine with Bazemore. I believe the Spurs can make him a decent player. Someone is going to overpay Danny Green next summer. I doubt the Spurs will match. Spurs need to find a cheap replacement. This year will give FO time to decide between Marco and Bazemore.

[jag]

His advanced numbers aren't impressive. Some are terrible.

Small sample size though.

I don't really think he's what the Spurs need right now.

[ChumpDumper]

Wrong thread.

Tough to see any PG or SG who could get minutes elsewhere competing for scraps here.

[Chinook]

I would rather the team develop players rather than using their deep-bench slots on mid-salary players. The team could lose A LOT of talent after the season, and I am hoping there are some players in the pipeline to replace them. Anderson should be one, and LJC/Bertans could be another. But I really don't like Bazemore as one, especially if he's going to make part of the MLE.

[Spurs9]

Grade A chunker tbh

[kobyz]

I dreamed that spurs sign bazemore and he's getting bellinelli minuets, that was delight... I really want bazemore, i think he has close to all star potential...

[cd021]

I dreamed that spurs sign bazemore and he's getting bellinelli minuets, that was delight... I really want bazemore, i think he has close to all star potential...

Da Fuck?

[DJR210]

Per my sources..

The meeting with Kent Bazemore didn't go so well. He was looking for a multi-year deal somewhere in the range of 10-11 mil per year.

[Kindergarten Cop]

Per my sources..

The meeting with Kent Bazemore didn't go so well. He was looking for a multi-year deal somewhere in the range of 10-11 mil per year.


Da Fuck?

[jhfenton]

Per my sources..

The meeting with Kent Bazemore didn't go so well. He was looking for a multi-year deal somewhere in the range of 10-11 mil per year.

Per year? Or total? Either way, no thanks.

[Spurs9]

Per my sources..

The meeting with Kent Bazemore didn't go so well. He was looking for a multi-year deal somewhere in the range of 10-11 mil per year.
:lol

[DJR210]

Hopefully I don't have to go back and make that shit blue..

[xmas1997]

Hopefully I don't have to go back and make that shit blue..

Doubt you will have to unless kobyz reads it.

[KL2]

Just read he is looking primarily for minutes since he never gets any, doubt he gets them here.

[DJR210]

Just read he is looking primarily for minutes since he never gets any, doubt he gets them here.

What kind of minutes does he want? He doesn't mean playing time, right?

[Biggems]

Was Bazemore with the Lakers

[Ron Swanson]

Yes. He was with the Lakers last season.

[Kindergarten Cop]

Was Bazemore with the Lakers

Yeah, they acquired him from GS as part of the Steve Blake trade.

[Darkwaters]

Per my sources..

The meeting with Kent Bazemore didn't go so well. He was looking for a multi-year deal somewhere in the range of 10-11 mil per year.

I'd give him 10M. But I'd structure it as a 10-year contract at 1M per season with a team option after every year. :lol


Ok, I know you can't even get close to doing that. But it's be such an amazing contract!

[Mel_13]

Per my sources..

The meeting with Kent Bazemore didn't go so well. He was looking for a multi-year deal somewhere in the range of 10-11 mil per year.

:lol

Funnier than the stuff being tweeted by the rumormongers that we react to as if their information has any factual basis.

[Darkwaters]

Kent Bazemore, Hawks Reach Two-Year, $4M Guaranteed Deal
Jul 11, 2014 10:37 PM EDT

Kent Bazemore has reached agreement on a $4 million contract with the Atlanta Hawks, fully guaranteed over two seasons, a league source told RealGM.

Bazemore had fielded interest from several team and held meetings this week, and he traveled to Atlanta for a visit to the Hawks. The Los Angeles Lakers and Charlotte Hornets made late pushes for Bazemore, a source said.

An athletic, 6-foot-5 combo guard, Bazemore had been part of the Golden State Warriors’ developing core of players before his trade to the Los Angeles Lakers last season. In 23 games and 15 starts for the Lakers, Bazemore averaged 13.1 points, 3.3 rebounds and 3.1 assists.

Out of Old Dominion, Bazemore, 25, has played three NBA seasons. The Hawks have replenished their backcourt with lengthy guards in Bazemore and Thabo Sefolosha.

ESPN first reported Bazemore's deal with the Hawks.

http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/234244/Kent-Bazemore-Hawks-Reach-Two-Year-$4M-Guaranteed-Deal

[Darkwaters]

Thank goodness this joker is off the market! I didn't want him to be certain!

Even in this inflated market he only drew the BAE. Thats pretty telling.

[SpurPadre]

Thank goodness this joker is off the market! I didn't want him to be certain!

Even in this inflated market he only drew the BAE. Thats pretty telling.

Well, good luck to Bud to see if he can make him into a player because I don't see it.

[kobyz]

Darvin Ham from the Hawks organization who also coach Hawks summer league team said that Hawks see Bazmore as the most underrated move of the off season and he compare him as a player to a young Manu Ginobili... How we missed out on him?

[TheWriter]

Well, if Darvin Ham says that... oh, it's Kobyz.

[kobyz]

Well, if Darvin Ham says that... oh, it's Kobyz.

Now you also have a problem with Darvin Ham, Danny Ferry and Mike Budenholzer?

[Cowboys_Wear_Spurs]

Darvin Ham from the Hawks organization who also coach Hawks summer league team said that Hawks see Bazmore as the most underrated move of the off season and he compare him as a player to a young Manu Ginobili... How we missed out on him?

When he was 11 yo.

[TheGreatYacht]

22pts, 7/8fg, 4/4 from three, 4/4 FT, 2 assists off the bench.. Spurs could use a SG like that, Bud should lend us another favor tbh

[Kawhitstorm]

22pts, 7/8fg, 4/4 from three, 4/4 FT, 2 assists off the bench.. Spurs could use a SG like that, Bud should lend us another favor tbh

They are thin at the wing position as it is after they lost Carroll. If they are going to trade anyone it's Schroder.

In any case, Bazemore didn't sign w/ the Spurs b/c he wanted to play Marco type minutes. Also, last time the Spurs played the Hawks he was an absolute disaster on defense.:lol

[lmbebo]

Would love to have Schroder.

[Kawhitstorm]

Would love to have Schroder.

They might trade Jeff Teague rather than Schroder since he's 5 years older. Otherwise, it might be like the Reggie Jackson situation.

[kobyz]

Once again Great prediction by me that RC missed out on a future stud...

[kobyz]

I don't understand the hype around Bazemore, tbh..

Pretty decent defender and "heat check scorer", but not worth the hype I've been hearing..

Once again "mister know it all" don't know shit...

[HarlemHeat37]

Once again "mister know it all" don't know shit...

:lol what was I wrong about? He's not very good..he was slightly above average during the RS and horrible in the playoffs..

[kobyz]

:lol what was I wrong about? He's not very good..he was slightly above average during the RS and horrible in the playoffs..

You didn't want the spurs to sign him... Are you gonna steak with braving about how much danny green is a great player this year also?!?!

[HarlemHeat37]

You didn't want the spurs to sign him... Are you gonna steak with braving about how much danny green is a great player this year also?!?!

I still don't want the Spurs to sign him, he's not that good:lol

[kobyz]

I still don't want the Spurs to sign him, he's not that good:lol

lol not wanting him 2 millions a year!!! Keep jerking off on danny green and tell us how underrated him!!