PDA

View Full Version : Rockets: sign Trevor Ariza



djohn2oo8
07-12-2014, 04:31 PM
4 years 32 million per Amick. Guess no more Parsons?

sook
07-12-2014, 04:33 PM
I hate this fucking faggot so much. He shouldn't be making over 5 mil/yr, the dude is notorious for playing it up in contract years and then sucking it up.

benefactor
07-12-2014, 04:33 PM
So Dallas gets Parsons after all. Ariza is a better fit/value anyway.

IrisHockey
07-12-2014, 04:34 PM
:lmao I fucking love Chris Bosh.

djohn2oo8
07-12-2014, 04:34 PM
I hate this fucking faggot so much. He shouldn't be making over 5 mil/yr, the dude is notorious for playing it up in contract years and then sucking it up.
He plays Defense. We clearly need it.

midnightpulp
07-12-2014, 04:34 PM
4 years 32 million per Amick. Guess no more Parsons?

Can't you afford him now that Lin is off the books?

Parsons can play the 4.

djohn2oo8
07-12-2014, 04:35 PM
Can't you afford him now that Lin is off the books?

Parsons can play the 4.

Yeah I just read Parsons might actually still be matched..

sook
07-12-2014, 04:35 PM
He plays Defense. We clearly need it.

We do, but I can't help but remember the cringeworthy season we had when we brought him here. The dude should never dribble more than twice with how bad his handles are.

this off season blows, we still need to match CP.

RsxPiimp
07-12-2014, 04:36 PM
Man, this blows for Houston fans. All they got is Ariza after begging Melo and Bosh twice :lmao

Thats almost Laker failure territory :lol

djohn2oo8
07-12-2014, 04:38 PM
We do, but I can't help but remember the cringeworthy season we had when we brought him here. The dude should never dribble more than twice with how bad his handles are.

this off season blows, we still need to match CP.
That year they forced him to play as the primary option. Not this time.

djohn2oo8
07-12-2014, 04:38 PM
488073350808629248

midnightpulp
07-12-2014, 04:39 PM
We do, but I can't help but remember the cringeworthy season we had when we brought him here. The dude should never dribble more than twice with how bad his handles are.

this off season blows, we still need to match CP.

488073350808629248

C: Howard
PF: Parsons
SF: Ariza
SG: Harden
PG: Bev

That's a nice starting lineup. Parsons + Ariza = Bosh, imo.

hsxvvd
07-12-2014, 04:39 PM
But what about the pretty one? :lol

benefactor
07-12-2014, 04:39 PM
Wow...they might still match?:lol

sook
07-12-2014, 04:40 PM
488073350808629248

C: Howard
PF: Parsons
SF: Ariza
SG: Harden
PG: Bev

That's a nice starting lineup. Parsons + Ariza = Bosh, imo.

The ideal scenario would have been to obtain a true stretch 4 like Spencer Hawes, but you're right that could work. Now need to build a quality bench.

djohn2oo8
07-12-2014, 04:41 PM
488074837223829504

spurraider21
07-12-2014, 04:41 PM
Ariza for 8 is a better value than parsons for 15.3. Interesting if they still match

RsxPiimp
07-12-2014, 04:42 PM
488073350808629248

C: Howard
PF: Parsons
SF: Ariza
SG: Harden
PG: Bev

That's a nice starting lineup. Parsons + Ariza = Bosh, imo.

Aldridge is licking his chops

midnightpulp
07-12-2014, 04:43 PM
488073350808629248

C: Howard
PF: Parsons
SF: Ariza
SG: Harden
PG: Bev

That's a nice starting lineup. Parsons + Ariza = Bosh, imo.

And you also shed Lin.

Morey is looking smart right now, actually.

You have 3 defensive players in Howard, Ariza, and Bev (who can also provide scoring), and 2 all-around offensive weapons that can pass and shoot.

I actually don't like this as a Spurs fan. Rockets got a lot more dangerous and versatile. Parsons is going to have a big year at the 4.

Only caveat is McHale. Lineup like this needs a system.

IrisHockey
07-12-2014, 04:44 PM
488073350808629248

C: Howard
PF: Parsons
SF: Ariza
SG: Harden
PG: Bev

That's a nice starting lineup. Parsons + Ariza = Bosh, imo.

lol no way Mid. Bosh spurning them was the worst possible scenario for the Rox... they needed him

RsxPiimp
07-12-2014, 04:45 PM
lol no way Mid. Bosh spurning them was the worst possible scenario for the Rox... they needed him

+1 :lol Their biggest issue was defense, and Parsons at 4 is suicide.

Asik, Jones couldn't even handle Aldridge. Bosh was their guy and that was a huge blow.

djohn2oo8
07-12-2014, 04:45 PM
Would be funny taking Ariza, and Parsons from Cuban then making him lose Carter.

Clipper Nation
07-12-2014, 04:46 PM
:bang:bang:bang

Looks like it's another season of those fucking faggots Barnes and Dudley at the 3 and another second-round exit for us... fuck!

midnightpulp
07-12-2014, 04:47 PM
lol no way Mid. Bosh spurning them was the worst possible scenario for the Rox... they needed him

I hope I'm wrong. Less threats in the West is better for Spurfan, obviously. But with the way the NBA is going toward small ball, the Rockets have a strong lineup for that.

IrisHockey
07-12-2014, 04:47 PM
With Bosh, they have a guy that can pretty much fortify Dwight on the offensive end, and being the perfect back-up at center at the same time... Houston would have been a 60-win title contending team, now even with Parsons they're back to a 53-55 win 2nd round exit.

Chinook
07-12-2014, 04:47 PM
Parsons at the four won't work in the West. Too many good PFs.

midnightpulp
07-12-2014, 04:47 PM
:bang:bang:bang

Looks like it's another season of those fucking faggots Barnes and Dudley at the 3 and another second-round exit for us... fuck!

Deng?

djohn2oo8
07-12-2014, 04:47 PM
Rockets are still pursuing a PF. No idea if it happens but Iwould like Taj Gibson or Millsap.

spurraider21
07-12-2014, 04:48 PM
:bang:bang:bang

Looks like it's another season of those fucking faggots Barnes and Dudley at the 3 and another second-round exit for us... fuck!
:lol marion/aminu

Thread
07-12-2014, 04:48 PM
Rockets, running in place.

IrisHockey
07-12-2014, 04:48 PM
It makes no sense for them to just sign Ariza and another PF and then match Parsons... why sign Ariza in the first place? :lmao

midnightpulp
07-12-2014, 04:48 PM
Rockets, running in place.

Without Trevor Ariza, you're light one.

Clipper Nation
07-12-2014, 04:49 PM
Deng?

Deng's gonna get paid by Miami, tbh.... plus, the Nyets are going to overpay Pierce, and the Mavs won't let Marion go if the Rox match Parsons....

Clipper Nation
07-12-2014, 04:49 PM
:lol marion/aminu

I'd rather have Marion/Aminu than Scrub 1 and Scrub 2, tbh....

midnightpulp
07-12-2014, 04:50 PM
Rockets are still pursuing a PF. No idea if it happens but Iwould like Taj Gibson or Millsap.

Then where would Parsons/Ariza fit?

Would Ariza be okay with coming off the bench?

Robz4000
07-12-2014, 04:50 PM
Spurs would murder a Houston lineup with Parsons at PF tbh.

djohn2oo8
07-12-2014, 04:51 PM
Then where would Parsons/Ariza fit?

Would Ariza be okay with coming off the bench?

I think he knew he could possibly be coming off the bench. I'm sure they told him.

IrisHockey
07-12-2014, 04:53 PM
Rockets, running in place.

Bosh, dale. Chris muttthaaafuckin Bosh.. you were right when you told me he's a winner/not in the mold of Howard/Harden..

angrydude
07-12-2014, 04:54 PM
Don't think they're done yet. I hope they match Parsons just to screw with Cuban.

Malik Hairston
07-12-2014, 04:56 PM
I don't like signing both Ariza and Parsons, unless you absolutely have to, tbh..

Ariza is a better fit than Parsons, though, he adds a defensive swarming ability that Houston didn't have on their roster, another player to mask Harden..when you add the salaries, it's not even close, 15 mil vs. 8 mil:lol..

McHale's system doesn't allow for peripheral scoring options, too, so Ariza's skills are more likely to translate in the playoffs than Parsons's IMO..

Good move, but it's only notable if they can acquire a good PF..

djohn2oo8
07-12-2014, 04:56 PM
Don't think they're done yet. I hope they match Parsons just to screw with Cuban.

Then have Marion sign for the minimum :lol

Clipper Nation
07-12-2014, 04:59 PM
Then have Marion sign for the minimum :lol

If Marion's signing for the minimum, then it's probably with the Clipps, since he'd be a guaranteed starter here....

Mugen
07-12-2014, 05:00 PM
Matching Parsons would be dumb at this point tbh. They lucked out getting Ariza at much better value, matching would negate that especially when Parsons at the 4 wouldn't work out West and leaves Howard as their only legit big.

baseline bum
07-12-2014, 05:02 PM
Why the fuck does Houston want to match Parsons at $15 million a season? That's an Isiah Thomas era New York Knicks kind of contract. I thought they were morons for paying Lin, but this would be way worse paying practically max money to a slightly above average starter.

sook
07-12-2014, 05:10 PM
Why the fuck does Houston want to match Parsons at $15 million a season? That's an Isiah Thomas era New York Knicks kind of contract. I thought they were morons for paying Lin, but this would be way worse paying practically max money to a slightly above average starter.

Parsons is worth 12 mil at most. 3 extra mil a year can be forgiven when his production/salary value was the highest in the NBA last season...you could say it averages out if they match the contract. They have a small window too, need to win now. If they had actually signed a good stretch 4 like Hawes instead of stargazing they wouldn't be in this position and wouldn't really have to match though.

whitemamba
07-12-2014, 05:13 PM
fucking rockets.

djohn2oo8
07-12-2014, 05:18 PM
So after this signing they have about 8 or 9 million left. Need to find a PF and shore up the bench.

Floyd Pacquiao
07-12-2014, 05:24 PM
Why are people saying parson's at the 4? Boris Diaw would destroy him in the post

mavsfan1000
07-12-2014, 05:25 PM
It makes no sense for them to just sign Ariza and another PF and then match Parsons... why sign Ariza in the first place? :lmao
How about getting a bench. Something that won the Spurs another title. They aren't shit without Mills, Ginobili, and Diaw.

Indazone
07-12-2014, 06:00 PM
Would be stupid to match Parson's now. There are much better value players out there.

baseline bum
07-12-2014, 06:01 PM
Parsons is worth 12 mil at most. 3 extra mil a year can be forgiven when his production/salary value was the highest in the NBA last season...you could say it averages out if they match the contract. They have a small window too, need to win now. If they had actually signed a good stretch 4 like Hawes instead of stargazing they wouldn't be in this position and wouldn't really have to match though.

Hawes would have been awesome there. I disagree on Parsons for $12 million though. I would pay him maybe $9 million, but I guess he has an argument when the market values Frye's scrub ass at $8 million a season and Jordan Hill makes $9 million. You guys should have made a max offer for Bledsoe the second Bosh went to Miami. I know I said some team is going to regret paying him, but fuck, every team but the Spurs and Cavs are going to regret the contracts given out this summer with what players are making.

mavsfan1000
07-12-2014, 06:05 PM
Would be stupid to match Parson's now. There are much better value players out there.
Yes it would be a waste if you plan to play 5 players.

djohn2oo8
07-12-2014, 06:07 PM
Hawes would have been awesome there. I disagree on Parsons for $12 million though. I would pay him maybe $9 million, but I guess he has an argument when the market values Frye's scrub ass at $8 million a season and Jordan Hill makes $9 million. You guys should have made a max offer for Bledsoe the second Bosh went to Miami. I know I said some team is going to regret paying him, but fuck, every team but the Spurs and Cavs are going to regret the contracts given out this summer with what players are making.
I think they did make that offer to Bledsoe.

Thread
07-12-2014, 06:32 PM
Would be stupid to match Parson's now. There are much better value players out there.

You're nuts to put your eggs in Ariza's basket. Match Parsons. Don't fuck around with it.

Jenks
07-12-2014, 06:42 PM
I'd bet Houston makes a move for Boozer when he gets amnestied in a few days.

midnightpulp
07-12-2014, 06:42 PM
You're nuts to put your eggs in Ariza's basket. Match Parsons. Don't fuck around with it.

Without Ariza, you're light one, though.

HemisfairArena
07-12-2014, 06:44 PM
As long as the bricker Harden is on the Rockets,,,they wont win shit.

Thread
07-12-2014, 06:45 PM
Without Ariza, you're light one, though.

More like without Howard we're light one.

Killakobe81
07-12-2014, 06:53 PM
Parsons is not a 4 and I thought Jones wasn't bad last year tbh. But whatever.

Thread
07-12-2014, 06:54 PM
Parsons is not a 4 and I thought Jones wasn't bad last year tbh. But whatever.

Doesn't matter he'll find 40 minutes per nite. Match it!

djohn2oo8
07-12-2014, 07:14 PM
I'm leaning towards matching him. We need wing depth and while not worth 15 mil he is worth more to us than Dallas

MarioSpeedwagon
07-12-2014, 07:16 PM
I'm leaning towards matching him. We need wing depth and while not worth 15 mil he is worth more to us than Dallas
Maybe they can match and then trade him to the mavs for a first. They can get something out of him then at least. Not sure if that's allowable under the CBA though

Franklin
07-12-2014, 07:17 PM
Welcome Paul Pierce to Dallas, tbh :hungry:

DPG21920
07-12-2014, 07:18 PM
Maybe they can match and then trade him to the mavs for a first. They can get something out of him then at least. Not sure if that's allowable under the CBA though

Not immediately. Then if Mavs sign others & lose cap space wouldn't be able to just absorb him for a pick later.

djohn2oo8
07-12-2014, 07:23 PM
Maybe they can match and then trade him to the mavs for a first. They can get something out of him then at least. Not sure if that's allowable under the CBA though

Can't trade him until Dec 15th and not to the mavs for the year I think

Thread
07-12-2014, 07:24 PM
I'm leaning towards matching him. We need wing depth and while not worth 15 mil he is worth more to us than Dallas

You can't afford not to match and it's got nothing to do with dollars and everything to do with "cents."

LkrFan
07-12-2014, 07:31 PM
:bang:bang:bang

Looks like it's another season of those fucking faggots Barnes and Dudley at the 3 and another second-round exit for us... fuck!

Feigning again eh, BNSF? Case in point: there is no such thing as a "Clipper Fan"

:downspin:

Mugen
07-12-2014, 07:33 PM
I'm leaning towards matching him. We need wing depth and while not worth 15 mil he is worth more to us than Dallas

It'd be a dumb move, dj. Paying Parsons 15mil is gonna look really silly when the Rockets are getting hammered on the block against the Clippers or Spurs in the 2nd round next year tbh.

Clipper Nation
07-12-2014, 07:34 PM
Feigning again eh, BNSF? Case in point: there is no such thing as a "Clipper Fan"

:downspin:
N:lol, son, "feigning" is "box-score watching" while hopping on the Bulls bandwagon :lol

Venti Quattro
07-12-2014, 07:35 PM
So he's back with the Rockets...

djohn2oo8
07-12-2014, 07:36 PM
It'd be a dumb move, dj. Paying Parsons 15mil is gonna look really silly when the Rockets are getting hammered on the block against the Clippers or Spurs in the 2nd round next year tbh.

He won't be starting at PF. They are chasing a PF. Ariza likely comes off the bench.

spurraider21
07-12-2014, 07:40 PM
4 years 32 mil off the bench? eh

Mugen
07-12-2014, 07:44 PM
He won't be starting at PF. They are chasing a PF. Ariza likely comes off the bench.


4 years 32 mil off the bench? eh

Your best wing defender off the bench would be retarded tbh. And as spurraider said, not at that price. The money to match Parsons is much better spent at other positions. Ariza for Parsons at half the price is a HUGE upgrade for the Rox tbh.

djohn2oo8
07-12-2014, 07:47 PM
Parsons ties together the offense really well. There is a scenario where the Rox keep their MLE, BLE, and Lin trade exception even if they match Parsons. They would have to modify the Asik trade to make.that happen.

sook
07-12-2014, 08:49 PM
The rockets HAVE to match.

Thread
07-12-2014, 08:52 PM
The rockets HAVE to match.

Just remember it was your old grandpa Dale who said it first. Me.

jag
07-12-2014, 09:23 PM
You're nuts to put your eggs in Ariza's basket. Match Parsons. Don't fuck around with it.

This. They're messing around when they already have the guy they need.

Cowboys_Wear_Spurs
07-12-2014, 09:30 PM
The rockets HAVE to match.

No they don't. Signing Parson would put them out of contention to make a play for Durant in 2016. You don't find it strange they courted SF right after Parson signed with Dallas. Why not Bledsoe at PG. Big upgrade over Beverly and could matchup well against WB, Parker and such.

I wouldn't be surprised if Morey let Parson walk. He wasnt anticipating that ridiculous contract Cuban gave him.

HemisfairArena
07-12-2014, 09:40 PM
Its all semantics,,,,as long as Harden is on the team,,,Rockets wont win shit. Parsons or no Parsons,,,Ariza or no Ariza,,,Bosh or no Bosh,,,.

~O~
07-12-2014, 09:43 PM
The Rockets have no the slightest chance of pulling Durant.

sook
07-12-2014, 09:43 PM
No they don't. Signing Parson would put them out of contention to make a play for Durant in 2016. You don't find it strange they courted SF right after Parson signed with Dallas. Why not Bledsoe at PG. Big upgrade over Beverly and could matchup well against WB, Parker and such.

I wouldn't be surprised if Morey let Parson walk. He wasnt anticipating that ridiculous contract Cuban gave him.

wait for Durant? Do you not see how that was what was wrong with the rocket's mentality this time around? You don't put all your eggs in the basket of "x" player and his decisions. Too many variables I can't even begin to explain. So here is the bottom line, this is why you match. The rockets fail once again, Howard has the option to opt out. He will be gone. You take the best shot you have if you're in a win now mode, meaning the best player available. We know how important Parsons is to the team and letting him walk for nothing would be a giant step backwards. Let Les worry about the $$, god knows how many times he's suckered out of the LT and been cheap.

jag and Thread hit the nail on the head.

sook
07-12-2014, 09:44 PM
The Rockets have no the slightest chance of pulling Durant.

exactly. It would be pure comedy for the rockets go down that route.

spurraider21
07-12-2014, 09:46 PM
exactly. It would be pure comedy for the rockets go down that route.
so morey has been billed as this stat expert but his entire strategy is just to pursue max free agents every offseason :lol

sook
07-12-2014, 09:47 PM
so morey has been billed as this stat expert but his entire strategy is just to pursue max free agents every offseason :lol

he's a slut.

Cowboys_Wear_Spurs
07-12-2014, 09:51 PM
so morey has been billed as this stat expert but his entire strategy is just to pursue max free agents every offseason :lol

Yep, that is why I think he is reluctant to to give Parson the Max right now. He would have no wiggle room for 3 years. I don't think he could stand it, just tied to exceptions for 3 straight years.

mavsfan1000
07-12-2014, 10:01 PM
We fucked if Houston doesn't match.

The Third Man
07-12-2014, 10:22 PM
Wow, I am agreeing with Dale! It's an easy call to match. The Rockets are capped out with, or without Parsons. Parsons is one of the few players outside of Harden than can create off the dribble. Not many 6'9" guys can. Anyway, getting Ariza at this salary is reasonable. Parsons and Harden played too many minutes last year and the Rockets were running out scrubs like Casspi, Garcia and Hamilton to spell them. Ariza immediately solves that issue. He's a pretty good 3 and D wing which was another team need. Not a homerun signing, but a solid single.

Splits
07-12-2014, 10:25 PM
Of course Houston matches, it doesn't handcuff them in any way and it is a tradeable asset. The only reason to not match would be a cheap owner. And while Les Alexander may be a Jew, he's worth northward of $2b and about to follow Jerry to the grave.

diego
07-12-2014, 10:43 PM
Eh, even if you match you are practically forced to start looking for a place to dump him, parsons is nowhere near worth that and its very difficult to visualize him getting there. I understand rocket fan not wanting to hurt the team short term, but on the other hand you have to punish Cuban for fucking with you and you know that long term the rockets won't be able to have a great team because too much money is tied to a player that can't justify his salary. The more I think about it the more id let him walk, fuck Cuban and parsons both, but its probably best to match and trade later.

scanry
07-12-2014, 11:28 PM
You're nuts to put your eggs in Ariza's basket. Match Parsons. Don't fuck around with it.

This. Ariza is a bum who basically played his ass off last year for this contract. Haven't the Rockets learned from last time around?

100%duncan
07-12-2014, 11:31 PM
Parsons is gonna get raped at the 4.

Kerr
07-13-2014, 04:54 AM
the best thing is that rockets didn't have to make CP RFA this year. this is stupidity maxx that's giving them a very hard lesson

djohn2oo8
07-13-2014, 06:23 AM
the best thing is that rockets didn't have to make CP RFA this year. this is stupidity maxx that's giving them a very hard lesson

Then they would have lost him for nothing as an unrestricted FA next year

djohn2oo8
07-13-2014, 06:24 AM
Of course Houston matches, it doesn't handcuff them in any way and it is a tradeable asset. The only reason to not match would be a cheap owner. And while Les Alexander may be a Jew, he's worth northward of $2b and about to follow Jerry to the grave.

This. They will be capped out anyway next year. Gotta keep SOME continuity within the team.

TheCultOfPersonality
07-13-2014, 06:35 AM
:bang:bang:bang

Looks like it's another season of those fucking faggots Barnes and Dudley at the 3 and another second-round exit for us... fuck!
Tayshaun Prince to the Clippers for Matt Barnes and a TPE.


http://i.imgur.com/G9Ra3.png

Jodelo
07-13-2014, 06:47 AM
Parsons can't be traded the first year i believe. There is a trade-kicker in the contract which makes him hard to trade later on...

If they match, Mavs can focus on Stephenson/Marion/Aminu. 2 out of the 3.

Cowboys_Wear_Spurs
07-13-2014, 06:48 AM
Of course Houston matches, it doesn't handcuff them in any way and it is a tradeable asset. The only reason to not match would be a cheap owner. And while Les Alexander may be a Jew, he's worth northward of $2b and about to follow Jerry to the grave.

Parson salary goes north of 17mil if he is traded. Cuban, from what I heard, put quite a few poison pills in the contract. Kinda of like what Morey did with Lin and Asik contracts. It handcuffs them. Parson is a pretty bad defender. Nice offensive game, bad defense.

Cuban fuck Morey w this contract and Morey let him do it by not picking up Parsons this year. And no rockets would not have lost Parson next year. They would have been able to use him in a sign and trade. now he will be tied to an even bigger contract if traded and teams won't want his fat ass contract all the other possible stipulation Cuban put into it just to fuck w Morey. This was payback for Howard and that text Morey sent to Cuban last year.

djohn2oo8
07-13-2014, 06:52 AM
Parsons can't be traded the first year i believe. There is a trade-kicker in the contract which makes him hard to trade later on...

If they match, Mavs can focus on Stephenson/Marion/Aminu. 2 out of the 3.

Parsons can't be traded to Dallas in his first year. He can be traded, just not until December 15th.

Cowboys_Wear_Spurs
07-13-2014, 06:59 AM
Parsons can't be traded to Dallas in his first year. He can be traded, just not until December 15th.

Not if that is what the contract says. Cuban basically put all the shit he wanted to in the contract to make it the least desirable for Houston. That is the danger of restricting a player, you have to play by the offering teams rule at that point.

Morey got blindsided by Cuban. If he had known Cuban would have given him this contract, there is no way he would have not picked up Parsons this year.

Jodelo
07-13-2014, 07:05 AM
Parsons can't be traded to Dallas in his first year. He can be traded, just not until December 15th.

I believe in the contract it says that it's the first year and after that the trade kicker sets in...

djohn2oo8
07-13-2014, 07:17 AM
I believe in the contract it says that it's the first year and after that the trade kicker sets in...

No that's for any player signed to an offer sheet. He can be traded just not to Dallas.

djohn2oo8
07-13-2014, 07:22 AM
Once Parsons signs the offer sheet, he cannot be part of a sign-and-trade to the Mavericks or another team and there can be no other negotiations with him. He would not be eligible to be traded until Dec. 15, and then only with his approval next season. He could not be dealt to Dallas

http://blog.chron.com/ultimaterockets/2014/07/report-mavericks-agree-on-45-million-offer-sheet-with-chandler-parsons/

Jodelo
07-13-2014, 07:23 AM
Yep, i meant he needs to approve a trade. This and the trade kicker are two tough things...

Cowboys_Wear_Spurs
07-13-2014, 07:24 AM
No that's for any player signed to an offer sheet. He can be traded just not to Dallas.

No if the contract says he can't be traded the first year, he cant be traded the first year. Means the Mavs couldn't trade him the first year if they sign him. What you are stating is the CBA general guidelines. Teams can alter these guidelines in contracts like both Duncan and Kobe can't be traded at all unless they want to.

djohn2oo8
07-13-2014, 07:26 AM
I just posted the link. He can be traded.


No if the contract says he can't be traded the first year, he cant be traded the first year. Means the Mavs couldn't trade him the first year of they sign him. What you are stating is the CBA general guidelines. Teams can alter these guidelines in contracts like both Duncan and Kobe can't be traded at all unless they want to.

Cowboys_Wear_Spurs
07-13-2014, 07:27 AM
Once Parsons signs the offer sheet, he cannot be part of a sign-and-trade to the Mavericks or another team and there can be no other negotiations with him. He would not be eligible to be traded until Dec. 15, and then only with his approval next season. He could not be dealt to Dallas

http://blog.chron.com/ultimaterockets/2014/07/report-mavericks-agree-on-45-million-offer-sheet-with-chandler-parsons/

He has a no trade clause the first year. He would have to approve any trade. Players like Duncan and Kobe have it over the life of their contracts.

Cowboys_Wear_Spurs
07-13-2014, 07:31 AM
I just posted the link. He can be traded.

He can't be traded wo put his approval. So if he doesn't want to go to a shitty team like the celtics for rondo, hypothetical, he can veto. Basically makes him an untradeable asset for the ROCKETS, meaning if there is a player they covet, they cant just trade Parson for him. Parson can dictate his future the first year of that contract.

djohn2oo8
07-13-2014, 07:34 AM
He was going to approve a trade to Minnesota. It doesn't matter because he got his money. He isn't untradeable.

Mel_13
07-13-2014, 07:39 AM
He was going to approve a trade to Minnesota. It doesn't matter because he got his money. He isn't untradeable.

He can't be traded until next summer without his approval. That does matter.

Cowboys_Wear_Spurs
07-13-2014, 07:39 AM
He was going to approve a trade to Minnesota. It doesn't matter because he got his money. He isn't untradeable.

Wow, you really want to believe this is a good contract don't you. If it makes you happy, please continue to do so.

djohn2oo8
07-13-2014, 07:42 AM
He can't be traded until next summer without his approval. That does matter.

He apparently was ok with a sign and trade to Minnesota this year but it didn't materialize. It won't be a big obstacle.

djohn2oo8
07-13-2014, 07:43 AM
Wow, you really want to believe this is a good contract don't you. If it makes you happy, please continue to do so.

No but he is worth more to the Rockets chemistry wise. Morey has gotten rid of bad contracts before. So idc really.

Mel_13
07-13-2014, 07:45 AM
He apparently was ok with a sign and trade to Minnesota this year but it didn't materialize. It won't be a big obstacle.

You're being obtuse. He was ok with an S&T to secure the sort of contract he was after.

Now that he has the contract, he can be choosy with where he goes.

A de facto no trade clause matters.

djohn2oo8
07-13-2014, 07:51 AM
You're being obtuse. He was ok with an S&T to secure the sort of contract he was after.

Now that he has the contract, he can be choosy with where he goes.

A de facto no trade clause matters.

Yes he can be choosy. He is chasing fame and will want to be the #1 option wherever he goes. Either way it doesn't make sense to try and trade him the first year. Pay him the 15.for two years, he will exercise his option for the third year where he will become a huge expriring contract and that will be moveable. That will be a nice asset.

Mel_13
07-13-2014, 07:52 AM
Yes he can be choosy. He is chasing fame and will want to be the #1 option wherever he goes. Either way it doesn't make sense to try and trade him the first year. Pay him the 15.for two years, he will exercise his option for the third year where he will become a huge expriring contract and that will be moveable.

Glad to see you come around.

Cowboys_Wear_Spurs
07-13-2014, 07:55 AM
Yes he can be choosy. He is chasing fame and will want to be the #1 option wherever he goes. Either way it doesn't make sense to try and trade him the first year. Pay him the 15.for two years, he will exercise his option for the third year where he will become a huge expriring contract and that will be moveable. That will be a nice asset.

Dude, if this makes you sleep better........

Cowboys_Wear_Spurs
07-13-2014, 04:59 PM
Houston's not matching. I wonder why.

djohn2oo8
07-13-2014, 05:04 PM
488442805987966978

sook
07-13-2014, 05:17 PM
SPLASH

djohn2oo8
04-28-2015, 10:44 PM
Glad they didn't match :lol