PDA

View Full Version : Would the Spurs have more titles if they kept Scola?



tlongII
07-16-2014, 02:24 PM
I think he would have added 1 or 2 more championships.

dabom
07-16-2014, 02:24 PM
????????????

elemento
07-16-2014, 02:38 PM
who ?

manufan10
07-16-2014, 02:39 PM
It's 2014, the Spurs just won their 5th championship, and we're still getting Scola threads. SMH

bobcatfan4life
07-16-2014, 02:39 PM
How many more titles would the Blazers have if they drafted Jordan?

ironman2886
07-16-2014, 02:40 PM
We'd have more with this guy.
http://cdn3.sbnation.com/imported_assets/488340/act_jackie_butler.jpg

FuzzyLumpkins
07-16-2014, 02:42 PM
Aren't you glad that the Spurs stayed together. We can be your 2003-07 Spurs to your Suns. That way after we win a couple of trophies you can finally win in the second round of 2018 and act like its the championship before being trounced by a real contender.

Oh and

9FDboZTyeuA

Do you know where you were?

baseline bum
07-16-2014, 02:46 PM
How many titles if you drafted Durant?

to21
07-16-2014, 02:48 PM
Or Jordan :lmao

Sa_Spursfan20
07-16-2014, 02:51 PM
Scola Thread

Mikeanaro
07-16-2014, 02:53 PM
Maybe 1 more title and thats it, from 2008 to 2011 we had some bad injuries and Scola wont make that much difference by himself with the scrubs we had at that time.
When they had a chance? 2008 playing Oberto minutes.

BadOne
07-16-2014, 02:57 PM
Lol, beat me to it. :toast

Scola Thread

peacemaker885
07-16-2014, 02:57 PM
Maybe. Same argument with Batum.

Brunodf
07-16-2014, 03:05 PM
What about Durant and Jordan

DrunkTXLabrat
07-16-2014, 03:24 PM
My money is on a solid maybe so. I never understood how that situation got botched.

Robz4000
07-16-2014, 03:31 PM
Fuck Yeah, Scola Thread!

murpjf88
07-16-2014, 03:33 PM
My money is on a solid maybe so. I never understood how that situation got botched.

Oberto....

Juggity
07-16-2014, 03:35 PM
One of the worst big man defenders in the league even in his prime. I'll say no.

Dex
07-16-2014, 03:36 PM
It's a legitimate hypothetical, in my opinion.

Spurs drafted Scola in 2002 with high-hopes of bringing him in. His stretch-four style would've complimented prime Duncan's dominance down low perfectly. This is one instance, though, where letting him develop overseas backfired as he tied himself to a huge contract. Spurs tried hard to negotiate him out of his contract with Baskonia but they wanted $3M and the Spurs could only match $500K, leaving Scola on the hook for the remainder.

Instead, the Spurs signed Oberto and traded the rights to Scola for a bag of stale Doritos in order to dump the burden that was Jackie Butler. Somehow, Houston was able to resolve Scola's contract situation in like a week after the Spurs had spent years battling in (Morey opening his checkbook?) and he spent many productive years there torching the Spurs at every opportunity. Scola really should have been a Spur, but it was one of the FO's rare whiffs.

That being said, I think Scola could have put the Spurs over the hump in '04 and '06, particularly the latter's playoff series against the Mavericks. He was a pretty consistent threat up until 2010, and certainly would have been better than the stable of centers we ran through during that period (Nesterovic, Mohammad, Elson, Massenburg, Dice, Bonner, Mahinmi). Then again, if the Spurs pick up Scola prior to 2005, then Robert Horry never comes to town, either.

All things being said, I'd say if the Spurs were able to get Scola when they drafted him, they would have one more title and wouldn't have gone through the Dim Ages of The Centerpiece and HWSNBN.

slick'81
07-16-2014, 03:36 PM
Would the blazers if they didn't draft Bowie or Oden

cd98
07-16-2014, 04:31 PM
Scola never won a title himself and never was an all star caliber player. So doubt it.

Skull-1
07-17-2014, 03:56 PM
I think he would have added 1 or 2 more championships.


Ha, not if they kept Manu.

stnick2261
07-17-2014, 04:10 PM
If Scola would have joined the Spurs it would have been summer 2005... maybe we win in '06... maybe we lose in '07. We wouldn't have drafted Splitter and we wouldn't have brought over Oberto.

Arcadian
07-17-2014, 04:49 PM
:lol Thinking Luis Scola was going to be the difference between a championship and what the 2008-11 Spurs actually accomplished. Those teams weren't winning a title with or without him.

z0sa
07-17-2014, 04:52 PM
How many more titles would the Blazers have if they drafted Jordan and Durant?

SupremeGuy
07-17-2014, 06:17 PM
How many more titles would the Blazers have if they drafted Jordan?:lmao

spursnatic
07-17-2014, 06:26 PM
Maybe?..But we would've definately had more had we brought Bowen back after he was waived by the Bucks

Skull-1
07-17-2014, 08:16 PM
Maybe?..But we would've definately had more had we brought Bowen back after he was waived by the Bucks


This.

DrunkTXLabrat
07-17-2014, 09:10 PM
":lol Thinking Luis Scola was going to be the difference between a championship and what the 2008-11 Spurs actually accomplished. Those teams weren't winning a title with or without him.

If Scola would have joined the Spurs it would have been summer 2005... maybe we win in '06... maybe we lose in '07. We wouldn't have drafted Splitter and we wouldn't have brought over Oberto.

Scola never won a title himself and never was an all star caliber player. So doubt it."

clearly these. I mean winning a championship is difficult, it's only accomplished through a science that might as well be magic to us forum fans. Scola is not an all star caliber guy. Hell, he isn't even the role player that Splitter or Oberto are. Maybe he woulda been a little better as a spur? Maybe the spurs woulda been a little better with him? Maybe not? Ultimately, you have to put the past aside. It is more important to realize that Pop and the FO are master magicians. They makes gold appear from thin air. And Scola isn't gold.

Blizzardwizard
07-17-2014, 09:13 PM
Screw Scola, if only we had kept Paul George :cry

guilhermercf
07-17-2014, 10:08 PM
With the Spurs, Scola would have become a Manu like NBA player.

He is one of the most smart players of his generation. You guys have no idea of how sick it would be if this guy had played together in the NBA with Manu, Duncan and Parker.

Don't forget that Scola also played with Splitter. Back then they were a dominant front court in Spain and reached the EuroLeague semi finals with a team that had only about 50% of the budget of the true contenders. It is like a NBA team reaching the conference finals with a 30 million dollars payroll now days.

DAF86
07-17-2014, 10:08 PM
":lol Thinking Luis Scola was going to be the difference between a championship and what the 2008-11 Spurs actually accomplished. Those teams weren't winning a title with or without him.

If Scola would have joined the Spurs it would have been summer 2005... maybe we win in '06... maybe we lose in '07. We wouldn't have drafted Splitter and we wouldn't have brought over Oberto.

Scola never won a title himself and never was an all star caliber player. So doubt it."

clearly these. I mean winning a championship is difficult, it's only accomplished through a science that might as well be magic to us forum fans. Scola is not an all star caliber guy. Hell, he isn't even the role player that Splitter or Oberto are. Maybe he woulda been a little better as a spur? Maybe the spurs woulda been a little better with him? Maybe not? Ultimately, you have to put the past aside. It is more important to realize that Pop and the FO are master magicians. They makes gold appear from thin air. And Scola isn't gold.

:lol What?

Scola would have been a 15 ppg guy on the Spurs. He might have even stolen an All-star spot one of those years.

purist
07-17-2014, 10:18 PM
Scola = over rated just like the lame ass threads in this forum.

DrunkTXLabrat
07-17-2014, 10:32 PM
:lol What?

Scola would have been a 15 ppg guy on the Spurs. He might have even stolen an All-star spot one of those years.

maybe, i guess he's been pretty good on those pacers. and i remember him being a pretty nightmarish rocket too, especially against the spurs? but it doesn't matter, those teams never won championships. he was never an all star. the spurs did fantastic without him. I mean Blair and McD really challenged Splitter hard, and Splitter and the spurs are better for it. And what was the timeframe of when Scola woulda been a spur anyways? I mean, who can think of the past with that detail. Why play woulda coulda shoulda? Don't be a spoiled spurs fan.

Hemotivo
07-17-2014, 11:06 PM
Si

John B
07-18-2014, 01:12 AM
Drafting Scola could have caused a chain reaction that would unravel the very fabric of the space-time continuum and destroy the entire universe! Or maybe not.

100%duncan
07-18-2014, 01:55 AM
How many more titles would the Blazers have if they drafted Jordan?
:lol

Sean Cagney
07-18-2014, 02:34 AM
Scola = over rated just like the lame ass threads in this forum.

This is the flat out truth, period.

Mel_13
07-18-2014, 05:26 AM
Scrubla.

Spur|n|Austin
07-18-2014, 09:19 AM
:lol tlong with a flashback ScolaThread.

TampaDude
07-18-2014, 12:32 PM
Drafting Scola could have caused a chain reaction that would unravel the very fabric of the space-time continuum and destroy the entire universe!

Granted, that's a worst-case scenario. The destruction might in fact have been very localized, limited to merely our own galaxy.

Leetonidas
07-18-2014, 12:42 PM
Shit worked out in the end. Who gives a fuck