Michael Savage: Obama Practicing 'Ethnic Replacement' in America

[Infinite_limit]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOs7LwMrkMw#t=247

[pgardn]

Latinos and African Americans were having more kids than Whites before Obama.

Populations change in ethnic makeup and average age.
Does this frighten groups that already have a record of oppression.
Thinkin a bit of revenge? That scares the Nazi?

[Infinite_limit]

Latinos and African Americans were having more kids than Whites before Obama.

Populations change in ethnic makeup and average age.
Does this frighten groups that already have a record of oppression.
Thinkin a bit of revenge? That scares the Nazi?
You foresee the USA being (the only) a well off Brown nation?

[cantthinkofanything]

You foresee the USA being (the only) a well off Brown nation?

good luck getting a heartfelt answer on this one and/or any acknowledgement that there is any physiological/psychological differences between races. Other than in athletics.

[pgardn]

You foresee the USA being (the only) a well off Brown nation?

So you imply there are no brown nations that do well...

What reason is behind this?

And Why (implied by you), are white nations so well off?
Do tell...

[FuzzyLumpkins]

good luck getting a heartfelt answer on this one and/or any acknowledgement that there is any physiological/psychological differences between races. Other than in athletics.

The US didn't become an economic powerhouse until after abolition. The Arabs and Africans also dominated the know world for about as much time over the last 2000 years as anyone else. The Ottoman's fell a century or so ago and the last Caliphate was no more so most people don't recognize that truth but it is what it is.

I imagine when Constantinople fell 500 years ago, there were equivalent dipshit phrenologists who made the same stupid comments.

Its typical hubris to think that because one group is on top that they will remain on top forever.


Last time i pointed that out, dipshit on his troll tried to say Arabs were 'aryan.'

Then there is the entire premise of your post.

[Infinite_limit]

So you imply there are no brown nations that do well...

What reason is behind this?

And Why (implied by you), are white nations so well off?
Do tell...
I don't see any Brown nations thriving. There is potential but the running joke is USA turning into Brazil

Many reasons but the ones I'd attribute most are rights for women and decline of religion

[Infinite_limit]

The US didn't become an economic powerhouse until after abolition. The Arabs and Africans also dominated the know world for about as much time over the last 2000 years as anyone else. The Ottoman's fell a century or so ago and the last Caliphate was no more so most people don't recognize that truth but it is what it is.

I imagine when Constantinople fell 500 years ago, there were equivalent dipshit phrenologists who made the same stupid comments.

Its typical hubris to think that because one group is on top that they will remain on top forever.


Last time i pointed that out, dipshit on his troll tried to say Arabs were 'aryan.'

Then there is the entire premise of your post.
Asians have all but closed the gap. South Americans are making baby steps.

Ottomans are as much European as Egyptians are African.

[cantthinkofanything]

The US didn't become an economic powerhouse until after abolition. The Arabs and Africans also dominated the know world for about as much time over the last 2000 years as anyone else. The Ottoman's fell a century or so ago and the last Caliphate was no more so most people don't recognize that truth but it is what it is.

I imagine when Constantinople fell 500 years ago, there were equivalent dipshit phrenologists who made the same stupid comments.

Its typical hubris to think that because one group is on top that they will remain on top forever.


Last time i pointed that out, dipshit on his troll tried to say Arabs were 'aryan.'

Then there is the entire premise of your post.

world domination doesn't always equate to progress...in particular, technological progress. which hopefully will result in cultural progress as well. but until people are willing to acknowledge that there are differences in races, then we're just spinning our wheels at best.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

world domination doesn't always equate to progress...in particular, technological progress. which hopefully will result in cultural progress as well. but until people are willing to acknowledge that there are differences in races, then we're just spinning our wheels at best.

As long as the races want to consider themselves different then there will always be cultural differences. It is still phrenology. White people really like to line breed nonetheless. Conflating people in skandinavia to those in alabama because of skin color is frankly, stupid.

The Ottomans and Moors were dramatically ahead of us in math and engineering too btw. It's why we use arabic numerals. While we were living in mud huts and fighting over the scraps of the Romans who had abandoned Rome, they were at their zenith. The Gauls, Celts Angles, and Saxons that most of us descended from were living in mud huts and eating dirt when the Romans conquered them in the first place.

[cantthinkofanything]

As long as the races want to consider themselves different then there will always be cultural differences. It is still phrenology. White people really like to line breed nonetheless. Conflating people in skandinavia to those in alabama because of skin color is frankly, stupid.

The Ottomans and Moors were dramatically ahead of us in math and engineering too btw. It's why we use arabic numerals. While we were living in mud huts and fighting over the scraps of the Romans who had abandoned Rome, they were at their zenith. The Gauls, Celts Angles, and Saxons that most of us descended from were living in mud huts and eating dirt when the Romans conquered them in the first place.

Do you not think there are differences between the races? There are well documented differences between breeds of dogs. Why is it not OK to say the same about humans? It doesn't make any of them less important. But it does allow us to move past this bullshit about trying to shoehorn people into jobs and situations that they just weren't made for.

Not to say that there aren't smart bulldogs that can do different things but if I want a smart herding dog, I'm best off picking from collies and shepherds. Does that make me dog racist?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Do you not think there are differences between the races? There are well documented differences between breeds of dogs. Why is it not OK to say the same about humans? It doesn't make any of them less important. But it does allow us to move past this bullshit about trying to shoehorn people into jobs and situations that they just weren't made for.

Not to say that there aren't smart bulldogs that can do different things but if I want a smart herding dog, I'm best off picking from collies and shepherds. Does that make me dog racist?

When humans start systematically selective breeding for traits then sure. Do I think that slavers killing and breeding for several hundred years shaped the local population? Sure. What i don't think is that skin color as genetic marker is universally applicable.

I think it should be viewed like geneticists do in terms of isolated populations and not phrenology.

[cantthinkofanything]

When humans start systematically selective breeding for traits then sure. Do I think that slavers killing and breeding for several hundred years shaped the local population? Sure. What i don't think is that skin color as genetic marker is universally applicable.

I think it should be viewed like geneticists do in terms of isolated populations and not phrenology.

Fair enough.

[m>s]

When humans start systematically selective breeding for traits then sure. Do I think that slavers killing and breeding for several hundred years shaped the local population? Sure. What i don't think is that skin color as genetic marker is universally applicable.

I think it should be viewed like geneticists do in terms of isolated populations and not phrenology.
Not skin color, then how about skull sizes, bone density, etc?

Fake ass scientist

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Not skin color, then how about skull sizes, bone density, etc?

Fake ass scientist

Like skull shape and earlobe length? Do you know what phrenology is?

I mentioned populations for a reason. You should be happy as I am admitting that white line breeding in the US has created genetically unique populations.

Please, in your own words explain the biomechanics of how 'skull size' or 'bone density' is genetically expressed.

It's hard to tell if you are trolling or really just that dumb. This is WC levels of ignorance, Adolph.

[pgardn]

I don't see any Brown nations thriving. There is potential but the running joke is USA turning into Brazil

Many reasons but the ones I'd attribute most are rights for women and decline of religion

So white nations that give equal rights to women thrive. Like the US after WW II where women's rights were... Still missing? Back to the kitchen, we got the men back for the factories?

Good, real good.

[Infinite_limit]

So white nations that give equal rights to women thrive. Like the US after WW II where women's rights were... Still missing? Back to the kitchen, we got the men back for the factories?

Good, real good.
More along the lines of allowing women in schools

[pgardn]

The Egyptians, who were very dark, gave us some of the most important advances in math.

But they are not Africans because they lacked really broad noses and full lips.
So people with full lips and broad noses don't make much progress either...
I'm learning, keep going.

[pgardn]

More along the lines of allowing women in schools

Uhh the big increase of women in our universities is a fairly recent phenomena.

[cantthinkofanything]

The Egyptians, who were very dark, gave us some of the most important advances in math.

But they are not Africans because they lacked really broad noses and full lips.
So people with full lips and broad noses don't make much progress either...
I'm learning, keep going.

who let you out all of a sudden? anyway...since you are trying to make a counter point to your own post, what big lipped, broad nosed nation are you going to suggest is a world leader? The NBA?

[cantthinkofanything]

Uganda?

euXQbZDwV0w

[cantthinkofanything]

maybe it's Kenya...

rMCQk-TBHPA

[pgardn]

who let you out all of a sudden? anyway...since you are trying to make a counter point to your own post, what big lipped, broad nosed nation are you going to suggest is a world leader? The NBA?

Progress is not linked with skin color. Read Very_Limited. Egyptians are not really Africans.

Maybe you should read and follow the person I am responding to?

[Infinite_limit]

Uhh the big increase of women in our universities is a fairly recent phenomena.
I know Poland was the first European nation to allow women in Universities in the 15th Century

No coincidence it coincides with White emergence

[pgardn]

I know Poland was the first European nation to allow women in Universities in the 15th Century

No coincidence it coincides with White emergence

And not all people of color treat their women as second class.
And not all pale skins treat their women as equals.

[pgardn]

who let you out all of a sudden? anyway...since you are trying to make a counter point to your own post, what big lipped, broad nosed nation are you going to suggest is a world leader? The NBA?

So go ahead and like Very_Limited, link progress with skin color.
And watch out for the sarcasm biting your butt from others.

Whoops work calls.
The adults might be disagreeing yet again after finishing.
I'm out.