PDA

View Full Version : Usian Bolt.....



Avante
08-19-2014, 04:40 PM
......is the fastest human that has ever walked the face of the earth. His 100m and 200m world records won't be lowered in our life time, he is that far superior to everyone else.

He did it in a very unique way unlike what other 100/200m guys do, a totally different approach. At 6-5 he'd be too tall for the 100m it would take him too long to unwind so he started off as a 400/200 guy. He was running a 45.2 as a teenager but the 400 was just too much work, so the hell with that. He then became a 200m guy. He'd spend years just running the 200m with an occasional 400/4x4 relay.

The big $$$$$ however is in the 100m. So he ...finally...decided to give it a shot, in his very first 100m (in New York) he beats the great Tyson Gay which stunned all us track geeks. We all were saying....he's just too tall.

Ok, here's where this is heading...

There ain't no way in hell science would see a guy like Usian Bolt coming. So if they tried to use all the info/stats available to try to predict scientifically just how fast us humans can run they would have been way off. Totally in another time zone because Bolt is a freak of nature. Nobody that tall can run the first 40m like he does and nobody has ever had the..."speed endurance"...he possesses. Those years of 400/200 training the reason why.

This is unlike anything the sprint world has ever seen, he's on a whole other level, a level no scientist would know about.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3nbjhpcZ9_g

ChumpDumper
08-19-2014, 04:49 PM
Wrong forum.

Clipper Nation
08-19-2014, 04:57 PM
Wow, Old Faggot welching on yet another promise to stop spamming threads and track/field shit, what a surprise :lol

Avante
08-19-2014, 05:00 PM
Wow, Old Faggot welching on yet another promise to stop spamming threads and track/field shit, what a surprise :lol

Not about track and field little fella, it was about how science can only deal with things from the past. When something original and unique like Usian Bolt show up they spoil everything for scientists.

ZOOOOMMM....right over that pin head of yours as always.

Avante
08-19-2014, 05:03 PM
Notice how the ones who never do a fucking thing themselves complain the most about others, hahahaha!!!!!!!!!

Koolaid_Man
08-19-2014, 05:04 PM
all I can contribute to this thread is run nigga run

Clipper Nation
08-19-2014, 05:05 PM
Not about track and field little fella, it was about how science can only deal with things from the past. When something original and unique like Usian Bolt they spoil everything spoils for scientists.

ZOOOOMMM....right over that pin head of yours as always.
:lol Old Faggot
:lol Thinking Bolt runs fast because a magical invisible sky man made him that way

Avante
08-19-2014, 05:06 PM
all I can contribute to this thread is run nigga run

Just think there was a time when science couldn't explain why those with roots to western Africa were faster than everyone else.

Avante
08-19-2014, 05:10 PM
:lol Old Faggot
:lol Thinking Bolt runs fast because a magical invisible sky man made him that way

Is this not the dumbest fuck we've ever seen on these boards? The fucker is beyond plain stupid, like Bolt, he's on a whole other level.

Anyway...

This thread isn't about...is there a God....it's about the inability of science to know it all.

Koolaid_Man
08-19-2014, 05:14 PM
:lol Old Faggot
:lol Thinking Bolt runs fast because a magical invisible sky man made him that way

listen you moron...God is real no matter how much you don't understand about his presence....


Sperm is cum.....a woman's egg mixed with her sex juices is basically cum....those to ingredients fused together are the blue prints of life....not just in humans but in every species in existence....there is no way genetic code and DNA material in the form of this sticky substance was just floating in space made contact with each other and started to form life and replicate that in many different species....with balance and form with eyes, nose, mouth..organs that all function in support of one another...and most importantly...all containing blood that makes the body alive....you cannot convince me that the maker of complex software programming code such as dreamweaver actually created the software program..whereas the complexity of the universe is by chance and luck....

get the fuck off this board with that nonsense...ok jackass...

Avante
08-19-2014, 05:22 PM
Let's say......

A scientist in Africa studies the pgymies, they are to his knowledge the only tribe in Africa (work with me). He spends 3 years studying them. He is pretty confident he understands the black man in Africa. On his way back to England he accidently comes across ......the Watusi.

ChumpDumper
08-19-2014, 05:39 PM
Which scientists said he couldn't run that fast?

Name them.

mrsmaalox
08-19-2014, 05:59 PM
"Usain"

Avante
08-19-2014, 06:54 PM
Thank you, really curious how that happened .....numerous times.....whoa!!!!!!!

Avante
08-19-2014, 07:00 PM
Ok, it's 1936 (Olympics) and Ohio States Jesse Owens has just shit all over Berlin and Hitler. He won the 100, 200, long jump, 4x1. And......we had a guy back home in Alabama who had owned Jesse in the 100 and had also beaten him in the long jump.....Eulace Peacock....who had to miss the trials because of injury.

If after those 36 Olympics, scientists had had the task of trying to figure out what us humans could run a 100m, what criteria did they have to go with.............

There are high school kids today that could give Jesse and Eulace a head start.

ChumpDumper
08-19-2014, 07:04 PM
I think you don't know what scientists actually do.

The Reckoning
08-20-2014, 02:16 AM
Let's say......

A scientist in Africa studies the pgymies, they are to his knowledge the only tribe in Africa (work with me). He spends 3 years studying them. He is pretty confident he understands the black man in Africa. On his way back to England he accidently comes across ......the Watusi.


"i'll be damned. they look just like longhorns."

Avante
08-20-2014, 02:22 AM
"i'll be damned. they look just like longhorns."

I wonder if Wilt, Shaq,Jabbar and all those7 foot black cats......hmmmmm?

Avante
08-20-2014, 03:57 AM
My point....

Is how science needs normally, obviously Usain Bolt isn't that.

ChumpDumper
08-20-2014, 08:54 AM
My point....

Is how science needs normally, obviously Usain Bolt isn't that.
How does one need an adverb?

What the he'll are you saying?

Oh, Gee!!
08-20-2014, 03:14 PM
I think you don't know what scientists actually do.

they make gatorade

Avante
08-20-2014, 03:23 PM
Who thinks if asked in 1936 just how fast us humans can run a 100m in the science world is saying....9.58?

gnsf0946
08-20-2014, 03:29 PM
Who thinks if asked in 1936 just how fast us humans can run a 100m in the science world is saying....9.58?

Since science is responsible for internet it would be best if you logged out and never came back.

Avante
08-20-2014, 03:41 PM
Since science is responsible for internet it would be best if you logged out and never came back.

Nay, I think I'll just leech off everyone else like you do asshole.

ChumpDumper
08-20-2014, 03:56 PM
Who thinks if asked in 1936 just how fast us humans can run a 100m in the science world is saying....9.58?I think no one in "science world" ever said anything about that

Avante
08-20-2014, 04:29 PM
http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2013-05/fyi-there-limit-how-fast-human-can-run

ChumpDumper
08-20-2014, 04:39 PM
http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2013-05/fyi-there-limit-how-fast-human-can-run

Not 1936.

Avante
08-20-2014, 04:46 PM
Who thinks............... if ..................asked in 1936 just how fast us humans can run a 100m in the science world is saying....9.58?

Avante
08-20-2014, 04:50 PM
What we had above was a 9.48 as a prediction, why? It's because we've seen a 9.58. In 1936 science would have said...10.1 maybe 10.0 because the then world record was 10.2. If asked in 1964 they say 9.96 because the then WR was 10.06.

Science totally unable to work outside limits already established.

cantthinkofanything
08-20-2014, 04:52 PM
What we had above was a 9.48 as a prediction, why? It's because we've seen a 9.58. In 1936 science would have said...10.1 maybe 10.0 because the then world record was 10.2. If asked in 1964 they say 9.96 because the then WR was 10.06.

Science totally unable to work outside limits already established.

this wouldn't be a stretch knowing that we'd land on the moon

Avante
08-20-2014, 05:00 PM
this wouldn't be a stretch knowing that we'd land on the moon

Human limits a lot different than landing on the moon.

If science would have been told that someday someone will run a 9.58 after watching Owens run a 10.2 (which is a 10.44 electric) they'd laugh at you.

Then....if told..."high school kids will be running faster than Jesse"....they'd had you committed.

Medvedenko
08-20-2014, 05:05 PM
Isn't it EVOLUTION especially when you are comparing 1936 to the present with records such as these.......Oh, and the OP is a nerd.

cantthinkofanything
08-20-2014, 05:09 PM
Human limits a lot different than landing on the moon.

If science would have been told that someday someone will run a 9.58 after watching Owens run a 10.2 (which is a 10.44 electric) they'd laugh at you.

Then....if told..."high school kids will be running faster than Jesse"....they'd had you committed.

nah. I'd probably have plotted the times on a chart and compared Jesse's times to those of runners in the 1800's. If anything, I'd be like...9.58...that all?

Avante
08-20-2014, 05:13 PM
Isn't it EVOLUTION especially when you are comparing 1936 to the present with records such as these.......Oh, and the OP is a nerd.

I can see why you're here little guy.
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=94413

You could have taken Jesse Owens put him in 2014 and he'd be running with these guys today. It wasn't about him it was about the tracks back then, the training methods and nutrition.

Usain Bolt being the exception to alll the rules.

ChumpDumper
08-20-2014, 05:22 PM
I can see why you're here little guy.
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=94413

You could have taken Jesse Owens put him in 2014 and he'd be running with these guys today. It wasn't about him it was about the tracks back then, the training methods and nutrition.

Usain Bolt being the exception to alll the rules.The advantage of science is science doesn't get butthurt when it's wrong.

It doesn't make up stories and say its son did it.

It adjusts and moves on.

Avante
08-20-2014, 05:22 PM
nah. I'd probably have plotted the times on a chart and compared Jesse's times to those of runners in the 1800's. If anything, I'd be like...9.58...that all?

The first 100m WR was a 10.8 in 1891, or...11.04 electric.

In 36.....10.44 electric

In 68...9.95 electric

In 96...9.84 electric