Dead Wrong

[Nbadan]

CNN's searing report on the Intelligence failures that were used by the WH to help justify it's invasion Of Iraq and the overthrow of Saddam Hussein is now online:

The permalink of the blog entry with the links is the same:
http://dissent.blogspot.com/2005_08_21_dissent_archive....

The files have been posted here:

Part 1: http://www.zippyvideos.com/214697335918745.html
Part 2: http://www.zippyvideos.com/151503712918725.html
Part 3: http://www.zippyvideos.com/209078932918705.html
Part 4: http://www.zippyvideos.com/8980302918695.html
Part 5: http://www.zippyvideos.com/12844145918685.html
Part 6: http://www.zippyvideos.com/77239533918665.html
Part 7: http://www.zippyvideos.com/174899236918645.html
Part 8: http://www.zippyvideos.com/67459430918635.html
Part 9: http://www.zippyvideos.com/17400654918625.html
Part 10: http://www.zippyvideos.com/198045425918605.html

For those of you who don't have CNN.

[Nbadan]

Colin Powell's speech before the U.N. continues to be a case study in how the corporate media can buy into war-time propaganda


snip>

It's a depressing case study of journalistic shirking of responsibility. The press essentially acted like a jury that is ready, willing and (in this case) able to deliver a verdict — after the prosecution has spoken and before anyone else is heard or the evidence studied. As media writer Mark Jurkowitz put it at the time in the Boston Globe, Powell's speech may not have convinced France of the need to topple Saddam but "it seemed to work wonders on opinion makers and editorial shakers in the media universe."

The San Francisco Chronicle called the speech "impressive in its breadth and eloquence." The Denver Post likened Powell to "Marshal Dillon facing down a gunslinger in Dodge City," adding that he had presented "not just one 'smoking gun' but a battery of them." The Tampa (Fla.) Tribune called Powell's case "overwhelming," while The Oregonian in Portland found it "devastating." To The Hartford (Ct.) Courant it was "masterful." The Plain Dealer in Cleveland deemed it "credible and persuasive."

One can only laugh, darkly, at the San Jose (Ca.) Mercury News asserting that Powell made his case "without resorting to exaggeration, a rhetorical tool he didn't need." The San Antonio Express-News called the speech "irrefutable," adding, "only those ready to believe Iraq and assume that the United States would manufacture false evidence against Saddam would not be persuaded by Powell's case."

*sic*

Here's the Post's Jim Hoagland: "To continue to say that the Bush administration has not made its case, you must now believe that Colin Powell lied in the most serious statement he will ever make, or was taken in by manufactured evidence. I don't believe that. Today, neither should you."

Editor and Publisher (http://www.mediainfo.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001018727)